HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (14) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Noble, R. Articles by Mead, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Noble, R. Articles by Mead, A. Agricola Articles by Noble, R. Articles by Mead, A. Related Collections Air Pollution Animal Waste Other Waste Management

TECHNICAL REPORT
Atmospheric Pollutants and Trace Gases

Olfactory Response to Mushroom Composting Emissions as a Function of Chemical Concentration

^a Biometrics Dep., Horticulture Research International, Wellesbourne, Warwick, CV35 9EF, UK
^b Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, North Wyke, Okehampton, Devon, EX20 2SB, UK

Corresponding author (ralph.noble{at}hri.ac.uk)

Received for publication March 31, 2000. Odor pollution is a major problem facing mushroom [Agaricus bisporus (Lange) Imbach] compost production. Techniques for quantifying mushroom composting odors are needed to assess the effectiveness of odor control measures. Odor samples were obtained in nalophane bags from 11 mushroom composting sites. Samples were collected 0.2 m downwind from the pre-wetting heaps (aerated or unaerated) of raw composting ingredients (wheat straw, poultry and horse manures, and gypsum) and subsequent Phase I composting windrows or aerated tunnels. The odor concentrations (OCs) of the samples were assessed using serial dilution olfactometry and the chemical composition of the samples was determined using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS), both 24 h after sampling. Gas detector tubes were used for on-site measurement of gaseous compounds. Odorants that exceeded their published olfactory detection thresholds by the greatest order of magnitude, in decreasing order, were: H₂S, dimethyl sulfide (DMS), butanoic acid, methanethiol, and trimethylamine. Concentrations of NH₃ were not significantly correlated with OC, and they were not significantly affected by the use of aeration. Aeration reduced the OC and the combined H₂S + DMS concentrations by 87 and 92%, respectively. There was a very close correlation (r = 0.948, P < 0.001) between the OC of bag samples and the combined H₂S + DMS concentrations, measured on-site with detector tubes. This relationship was unaffected by the NH₃ concentration or the type of compost: aerated or unaerated, pre-wet or Phase I, poultry manure–based or horse and poultry manure–based compost. Prediction of the OC will enable rapid and low-cost identification of odor sources on mushroom composting sites.

Abbreviations: DMS, dimethyl sulfide • GC–MS, gas chromatography–mass spectrometry • OC, odor concentration • OU, odor unit • VFA, volatile fatty acid

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Noble, A. Dobrovin-Pennington, C. Wright, P. J. Hobbs, and J. Williams Aerating Recycled Water on Mushroom Composting Sites Affects Its Chemical Analysis and the Characteristics of Odor Emissions J. Environ. Qual., May 20, 2009; 38(4): 1493 - 1500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]