JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 7


Fig. 7. Comparison of 2,4-D adsorption ability among metal-humate complexes. (A) humic acid (HA) was complexed in the presence of 0.01 M CaCl2 (•), 0.1 M CaCl2 ({circ}), 0.01 M FeCl3 ({blacktriangleup}), and 0.01 M AlCl3 ({blacksquare}). (B) Comparison between Al-humate complex (humic acid was complexed in the presence of 0.01 M AlCl3, {blacksquare}) and Al hydroxides (0.01 M AlCl3 was precipitated by adding NaOH in the absence of HA, {square}). Reaction time, 4 h; initial 2,4-D concentration, 22.6 µM (5.0 mg L–1); humic acid added, 2.0 mg; COOH added, 8.14 µmol; Al or Fe added, 50 µmol; Ca added, 50 or 500 µmol.





Right arrow Return to article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome