JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 4


Fig. 4. (a) Soil N2O emissions in till and no-till treatments between 1991 and 2002 (no data available for 1995). Letters indicate the crop harvested in that year: c, corn; s, soybean; w, wheat. * Indicates statistically different responses within a year (P < 0.05) determined by slicing of the treatment by year interaction. (b) Difference between conventional till (Ct) and no-till (Nt) normalized by the overall mean N2O emissions for that year. Points greater than zero indicate a till response greater than a no-till response. There was no detectable difference between years based on a Tukey's test. Linear regression analysis showed no trend in N2O emissions (P < 0.05) across all crops and years; emissions from soybean significantly increased in till relative to no-till over time [normalized N2O difference = 31 210 – 15.7 (year); r2 = 0.48; n = 4 yr]. Mean ± SE.





Right arrow Return to article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome