JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 2


Fig. 2. (a) Soil NO3 concentration in till and no-till treatments between 1989 and 2002. Letters indicate the crop harvested in that year: c, corn; s, soybean; w, wheat. * Indicates statistically different responses within a year (P < 0.05) determined by slicing of the treatment by year interaction. (b) Difference between conventional till (Ct) and no-till (Nt) normalized by the overall mean NO3 concentration for that year. Points greater than zero indicate a till response greater than a no-till response. Year means were significantly different (P < 0.05) and separated using Tukey's test. Linear regression analysis showed no trend in NO3 concentration (P < 0.05) over across all crops and years; NO3 concentrations in wheat significantly increased in till relative to no-till over time [normalized NO3 difference = –15 650 + 7.84 (year); r2 = 0.44; n = 3 yr]. Mean ± SE.





Right arrow Return to article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome