JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 6 July 2006
Published in J Environ Qual 35:1470-1477 (2006)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2005.0163
© 2006 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prior, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Prior, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, R. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Prior, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, R. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Agroclimatology
Right arrow Soybean
Right arrow Carbon Sequestration
Right arrow Global Change
Right arrow Plant and Environment Interactions

Free-Air Carbon Dioxide Enrichment of Soybean

Influence of Crop Variety on Residue Decomposition

S. A. Priora,*, H. A. Torberta, G. B. Runiona, H. H. Rogersa, D. R. Ortb and R. L. Nelsonc

a USDA-ARS National Soil Dynamics Laboratory, 411 South Donahue Drive, Auburn, AL 36832
b USDA-ARS Photosynthesis Research Unit, 1201 West Gregory Drive, Urbana, IL 61801
c USDA-ARS, 232 National Soybean Research Center, 1101 West Peabody Drive, Urbana, IL 61801

* Corresponding author (sprior{at}acesag.auburn.edu)

Received for publication April 30, 2005.

    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Elevated atmospheric CO2 can result in larger plants returning greater amounts of residue to the soil. However, the effects of elevated CO2 on carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) cycling for different soybean varieties have not been examined. Aboveground residue of eight soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] varieties was collected from a field study where crops had been grown under two different atmospheric CO2 levels [370 µmol mol–1 (ambient) and 550 µmol mol–1 (free-air carbon dioxide enrichment, FACE)]. Senesced residue material was used in a 60-d laboratory incubation study to evaluate potential C and N mineralization. In addition to assessing the overall effects of CO2 level and variety, a few specific variety comparisons were also made. Across varieties, overall residue N concentration was increased by FACE, but residue C concentration was only slightly increased. Overall residue C to N ratio was lower under FACE and total mineralized N was increased by FACE, suggesting that increased N2 fixation impacted residue decomposition; total mineralized C was also slightly increased by FACE. Across CO2 levels, varietal differences were also observed with the oldest variety having the lowest residue N concentration and highest residue C to N ratio; mineralized N was lowest in the oldest variety, illustrating the influence of high residue C to N ratio. It appears (based on our few specific varietal comparisons) that the breeding selection process may have resulted in some varietal differences in residue quality which can result in increased N or C mineralization under elevated CO2 conditions. This limited number of varietal comparisons indicated that more work investigating varietal influences on soil C and N cycling under elevated CO2 conditions is required.

Abbreviations: FACE, free-air carbon dioxide enrichment


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
THE WELL DOCUMENTED anthropogenic-driven increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration (Keeling and Whorf, 1994) has raised questions related to the ability of highly managed agricultural systems to store soil carbon (Rogers et al., 1994). Biomass production represents the primary means of carbon input to the soil system. However, the decomposition rate of these residue inputs is influenced by tissue chemistry and exogenous nutrient sources. An important topic related to the ability of soil systems to store carbon (C) is nitrogen (N) availability, since this element can limit the amount of C that can be fixed in terrestrial ecosystems. Although the availability of N could limit plant response to elevated CO2 (Strain and Cure, 1985), it is well established that elevated CO2 can often enhance biomass production under ideal nutrient conditions (Rogers and Dahlman, 1993; Amthor, 1995; Kimball et al., 2002). In addition to these CO2–induced increases in productivity, shifts in tissue quality or nutrient content have been observed in plants grown under elevated CO2 (Conroy, 1992; Cotrufo et al., 1998; Prior et al., 1997a) which could influence soil C and nutrient cycling in cropping systems (Torbert et al., 2000; Prior et al., 2003).

Whether changes in the composition of plant residue in a CO2–rich environment may limit decomposition rates and nutrient cycling is not entirely known (Van Veen et al., 1991; Norby and Cotrufo, 1998; Rogers et al., 1999; Torbert et al., 2000). In an incubation study using soil collected after a 3-yr FACE (free-air carbon dioxide enrichment) cotton experiment, alterations in soil C and N cycling patterns were observed for FACE under different irrigation regimes (Wood et al., 1994). In this study, increased soil C turnover corresponded weakly with soil organic C concentrations or biomass production, suggesting that changes in residue quality may have been a factor influencing C cycling. In a wheat FACE study (Prior et al., 1997b), different results were noted between the interaction of FACE and the soil water conditions compared to the FACE cotton system study. For cotton, decreased C turnover occurred when soil moisture was not limiting, whereas potential C turnover in the wheat system was similar regardless of soil moisture conditions. Others have examined residue decomposition as affected by elevated CO2 independent of the cumulative impact to the soil (Torbert et al., 1995, 1998; Henning et al., 1996). For example, mature cotton residues (leaf, stem, and root) produced under FACE were examined separately using differing soil series (sandy loam, silt loam, and clay loam) having no elevated CO2 exposure history (Torbert et al., 1995). Differences in soil series were found to exert an important control on decomposition of residues produced under elevated CO2. Further, increased levels of easily decomposable components compensated for higher C to N ratios, resulting in similar decomposition rates among residues from different CO2 treatments. While soil C mineralization showed little effect, the N mineralization rates of amended soils were impacted. The release of inorganic N into soil solution was slower with FACE, resulting in decreased N mineralization similar to findings reported in the aforementioned FACE studies (Wood et al., 1994; Prior et al., 1997b). The impacts of CO2 treatment on mineralization patterns were also reported by Henning et al. (1996), examining individual plant parts of sorghum and soybean material taken at physiological maturity, and by Torbert et al. (1998), evaluating senesced residues of these species collected at maturity, indicating some differences between crop species which were attributed to differences in residue quality. For example, Torbert et al. (1998) reported that low soil N availability limited microbial decomposition in both grain sorghum and soybean, with net N immobilization conditions persisting throughout most of the incubation period. Also, as was observed with the cotton plant decomposition, the release of inorganic N into the soil solution with soybean was slower under elevated CO2 conditions. Collectively, these laboratory incubation studies indicate that the limitations on N availability were imposing an important controlling effect on the residue decomposition processes in soil, but some differences occurred among crop species examined.

More work is needed to accurately determine whether differences in crop residue, due to elevated CO2, could alter soil N cycling and the ability of highly managed agricultural systems to store soil C. One aspect which has not been investigated is whether elevated CO2 will alter decomposition patterns of residues from different varieties within a given crop species. Our objective was to investigate the effects of elevated CO2 on C and N cycling for residues of eight soybean varieties in a 60-d laboratory incubation study.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Plant material for this incubation study was collected from an elevated atmospheric CO2 study conducted using FACE exposure technology. The details of the FACE exposure system used in this study have been previously described in detail by Miglietta et al. (2001). The CO2 regimes were ambient (370 µmol mol–1) and FACE (550 µmol mol–1), and eight soybean varieties were evaluated (Table 1); the experiment was conducted using a randomized complete block design with four replications. The FACE rings were 20 m in diameter (octagonal shape plots) and within these the variety plots were 1.9 m2 in size. Carbon dioxide exposure of the crop was from emergence to harvest, during daylight hours, and concurrent weather information was collected. An on-site weather station (MetData 1-type; Campbell Scientific, Logan, UT) measured air temperature and relative humidity at a height of 3 m. A quantum sensor (Model QSO; Apogee Instruments, Logan, UT) measured incident photosynthetic photon irradiance at a height of 3 m. Data were averaged and logged at 10 min intervals throughout the growing season. Tipping bucket rain gauges (Model 52202; R.M. Young, Traverse City, MI) were distributed throughout the field and recorded rainfall (0.0001-m increments) throughout the season. Weather data is posted on the SoyFACE website (http://www.soyface.uiuc.edu/weather. htm, verified 23 Jan. 2006); the Illinois State Water Survey weather station (http://www.sws.uiuc.edu/data/climatedb/, verified 23 Jan. 2006) in Urbana, IL (40°05' N, 88°14' W) is situated 3 km north of the SoyFACE site and at the same altitude.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Characteristics of the eight soybean varieties evaluated in the incubation study.

 
The soil series at the soybean FACE facility, located on 32 ha of farmland within the Crop Sciences Research and Education Center of the University of Illinois at Urbana, IL (40°2' N, 88°13' W, 228 m above sea level; http://www.soyface. uiuc.edu, verified 23 Jan. 2006), is a Flanagan–Drummer silty clay loam (fine-silty, mixed, mesic Typic Endoaquolls). The soil is a deep, organically rich "prairie soil" typical of northern and central Illinois. The field is tile-drained and has a history of continuous crop cultivation to arable crops for over 100 yr. Agronomic practices in use at the site are typical for this region of Illinois. No applications of additional phosphorus or potassium were required and, according to standard regional practices for soybean production, no nitrogen was added to the field. Basic information on the properties of the soil is shown in Table 2. The field was sown using a mechanical seed planter to a density of about 200 000 plants ha–1 on row spacings of 0.38 m. The experimental plots were over-sown by hand on the day of planting and thinned after emergence to ensure uniform plant density. The soybean crop was grown under rainfed and conventional tillage conditions.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Characteristics of the Flanagan–Drummer silty clay loam soil used in the incubation study.

 
Final harvest was performed in October 2001 and seeds were separated from residue material (pod hulls, leaves, and stems) which would normally remain in the field at harvest. Residue material was dried at 65°C (until weight loss was complete) and ground in a Wiley mill to pass a 0.44-mm screen. A subsample of this ground residue material was collected for each variety for analysis in the incubation procedures. Total C and N contents of residue materials were determined using a Fisons NA1500 CN Analyzer (Fisons Instruments, Beverly, MA).

The Flanagan–Drummer silty clay loam soil used in this study was collected from the plow layer (0–15 cm) by taking multiple shovel samples from locations where a crop had not been planted; these were combined into a composite sample which was thoroughly mixed and screened (2-mm mesh size); any remaining organic debris was removed from the sample using tweezers. This processed composite sample was used as the source of soil for evaluation of potential soil C and N cycling using methods of Torbert et al. (2000). Soil water content of the composite sample was measured after drying soil subsamples at 105°C for 72 h. Sieved soil samples were weighed (25 g dry weight basis) and placed in plastic 118.3-mL specimen cup containers (Fisher Scientific, Hampton, NH); these cups were sealed to ensure uniform soil water content until all soil and residue samples could be weighed. All pre-weighed samples were stored at 4°C before initiation of the incubation study. Pre-weighed residue samples were then incorporated with the pre-weighed soil samples at a rate of 0.1 g. Residue was incorporated with the soil since the major field experiment was managed under conventional tillage conditions and the long-term cultivation history of this area was conventional tillage. After residue had been mixed into the soil, the specimen cup containers were tamped to a uniform height to achieve a bulk density of 1.3 Mg m–3 (the typical range of bulk density for this soil type is 1.0 to 1.3 Mg m–3). Deionized water was then carefully added to adjust soil water content (soil water content equivalent to –20 kPa). Specimen cup containers were then placed in sealed 946-mL glass Ball Mason Jars (Alltrista Consumer Products Co., Muncie, IN) with 10 mL of water (placed into the bottom of the jar for humidity control) and a 10-mL vial of 1 M NaOH (CO2 trap). Jars were incubated in the dark at 25°C and removed after 30 and 60 d. Carbon dioxide in NaOH traps was determined by titrating excess base with 1 M HCl in the presence of BaCl2. Potential C mineralization was the difference between CO2–C captured in sample traps and in blanks. Soil inorganic N (NO3–N and NH4–N) was extracted with 2 M KCl and measured by standard colorimetric procedures using a Autoanalyzer III (Bran Luebbe, Buffalo Grove, IL). Potential N mineralization was the difference between inorganic N contents of samples compared to blanks (soil with no plant residue additions).

Data were analyzed as an ANOVA using the Proc Mixed procedure of the Statistical Analysis System (Littell et al., 1996) of SAS. A significance level of P < 0.10 was established a priori. As previously stated, the study was a randomized complete block design with four replications. Main effects of CO2 treatment and soybean variety were often significant while their interactions were rarely significant; all data are presented with appropriate Pr > F values (Tables 3GoGo6). However, pre-planned comparison among varieties were conducted using contrast statements (Tables 7 and 8); these specific varietal comparisons included the following: (i) Flyer vs. Spencer; (ii) Williams vs. LG00-15593; (iii) HS93-4118 vs. Lincoln; and (iv) NN5 vs. nodulating soybeans.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Initial residue N concentration, C concentration, and C to N ratio of eight soybean varieties as affected by CO2 level (N = 4).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Nitrogen mineralization and C mineralization of incorporated residues for eight soybean varieties as affected by CO2 level during the 0- to 30-d incubation period (N = 4).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Nitrogen mineralization and C mineralization of incorporated residues for eight soybean varieties as affected by CO2 level during the 30- to 60-d incubation period (N = 4).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6. Nitrogen mineralization and C mineralization of incorporated residues for eight soybean varieties as affected by CO2 level during the 0- to 60-d incubation period (N = 4).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 7. Pre-planned varietal comparisons for residue C concentration, N concentration, and C to N ratio.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 8. Pre-planned varietal comparison for N and C mineralization.

 

    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
The initial residue characteristics in terms of C concentration, N concentration, and C to N ratio for the eight soybean varieties as affected by CO2 level were evaluated (Table 3). For initial residue C concentration, the main effect of CO2 was significant and FACE increased this measure slightly (0.36%). The main effect of variety was also significant for residue C; the HS93-4118 variety had the lowest value while the two highest values were associated with the LG00-15593 and Lincoln varieties. There was no significant interaction for residue C; the same was true for initial residue N and residue C to N ratio. The main effect of CO2 was significant for residue N; FACE increased the overall residue N by approximately 15%. The main effect of variety was also significant for residue N. In this case, the Lincoln variety had the lowest residue N while the highest value was noted with the Williams variety. The main effect of CO2 was found to be significant for the initial residue C to N ratio; this measure was lowered by FACE (14%) compared to ambient CO2. The main effect of variety was significant for residue C to N ratio, with the highest observed being Lincoln with 51.3 and the lowest being Williams at 31.9.

During the 0- to 30-d incubation period, N of incorporated residues for the eight soybean varieties was clearly immobilized as reflected by the negative N mineralization values shown in Table 4. The main effect of CO2 and variety was significant, as well as the interaction. In this case, the Pana and Spencer varieties had significantly less N immobilized under conditions of FACE compared to ambient CO2. Carbon mineralization of incorporated residues for this period was fairly consistent for the eight soybean varieties across CO2 levels. The main effect of CO2 was not significant. Main effect of variety was significant; however, these differences were small. There was no significant interaction for C mineralization during the 0- to 30-d incubation interval.

During the 30- to 60-d incubation period, potential N mineralization of incorporated residues of the eight soybean varieties under the different CO2 levels was clearly observed (Table 5) relative to the 0- to 30-d incubation interval (Table 4). However, there were no significant effects for CO2, variety, or their interaction. For corresponding measures of C mineralization during this incubation period, the main effect of CO2 was significant; FACE increased overall C mineralization by approximately 9%. Main effect of variety was not significant and no significant interaction was noted for C mineralization covering the 30- to 60-d incubation period.

Potential N mineralization of incorporated residues for eight soybean varieties as affected by CO2 level for the total incubation period (i.e., 0–60 d) is shown in Table 6. The main effect of CO2 was significant and total N mineralization was increased by FACE. The overall N mineralization mean was 4.64 for ambient CO2 compared to 7.12 mg kg–1 for FACE, which represented an increase of 53%. The main effect of variety was significant, with the Lincoln and Flyer varieties exhibiting the lowest N mineralization values. No significant interaction was noted for total N mineralization. For corresponding total C mineralization, the main effect of CO2 was significant. The overall C mineralization mean was 878.7 mg kg–1 for ambient compared to 912.3 mg kg–1 for FACE, which represented an increase of only 3.8%. The main effect of variety was significant with the Williams variety exhibiting the highest C mineralization value; overall, differences between varieties were not great. No significant interaction was noted for C mineralization for the total incubation period (0–60 d).

Pre-planned varietal comparisons were also performed based on some specific varietal characteristics listed in Table 1. Flyer and Spencer were compared due to their differential response to CO2 enrichment. Williams and LG00-15593 were compared due to their differences in seed protein content. The best publicly released cultivars that are separated by >50 yr (HS93-4118 and Lincoln) were compared. A comparison between the only non-nodulating variety (NN5) and the mean of all other nodulating varieties was also done. The results of these comparisons for initial residue characteristics and mineralization patterns are exhibited in Tables 7 and 8, respectively. Significant differences were observed between some of these variety comparisons, which differed between ambient and/or FACE conditions. The implications of these differences are discussed in detail below.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Differences in residue N were noted among varieties, with the oldest variety (Lincoln) having the lowest value (Table 3). Lincoln also had one of the highest residue C values. Likewise, these differences were reflected in the residue C to N ratio of the Lincoln variety, which was higher than the other varieties evaluated. It is possible that differences between the newer varieties and this old variety may be reflective of the breeding process impacting the selection of factors influencing residue quality characteristics.

Overall differences in these residue characteristics could also be attributable to changes in atmospheric CO2 level (Table 3). Although FACE led to an increase in residue C, this change was relatively small. More importantly, residue N was increased by FACE and residue C to N ratio was lower under FACE (Table 3), which was likely due to increased symbiotic N2 fixation capabilities involving Bradyrhizobium. Others have reported that CO2 enrichment increases nodulation and biological N2 fixation in leguminous crops (Zanetti et al., 1996; Kimball et al., 2002). Using isotope dilution methods, Torbert et al. (2004) reported that N2 fixation in soybean was significantly higher under elevated CO2 compared to ambient CO2 in a 3-yr field study. This increase in the level of biologically fixed N2 in soybean would account for the increased N levels observed in the FACE treatment compared to ambient CO2 treatments in this study.

Some specific comparisons between varieties were made to determine if certain criteria or varietal characteristics (Table 1) influenced residue quality under different levels of atmospheric CO2 (Table 7). For example, the Flyer and Spencer varieties were directly compared since Flyer is thought to represent a non-responder to CO2 while Spencer represents a CO2 responder (Ort and Nelson, personal communication). In this comparison, both varieties showed an increase in residue N under both ambient and elevated CO2 conditions. Further, Flyer was found to exhibit a high C to N ratio compared to Spencer under ambient CO2 conditions, with a similar trend being noted between these varieties under elevated CO2 conditions.

Another comparison was made between varieties that exhibited specific differences in seed protein content; Williams with 42% seed protein and LG00-15593 with 48% seed protein (Table 7). It was thought that shifts in seed protein content may also be accompanied by shifts in N allocation to non-yield residue components of the soybean crop. There was some indication that the variety with the highest seed protein (LG00-15593) had the lowest residue N (due to more N allocation to the seed). However, in this comparison, both varieties exhibited similar C to N ratios under ambient and elevated CO2 conditions; this finding could be attributable in part to corresponding increases in residue C.

The Lincoln and HS93-4118 varieties were compared since they represent the best publicly released cultivars that are separated by >50 yr (Table 7); Lincoln was released in 1943 and HS93-4118 in 2000. In this case, both varieties showed a reduction in residue C under both CO2 levels. Further, residue N was higher for HS93-4118 under ambient CO2 conditions, with a similar trend being noted between these varieties under elevated CO2 conditions. These shifts resulted in the old release (Lincoln) having a higher C to N ratio under both ambient CO2 and FACE conditions compared to the respective HS93-4118 counterparts. This suggests that breeding selection (often done for yield improvement) resulted in the HS93-4118 variety having a higher residue quality in terms of higher residue N, resulting in a lower residue C to N ratio.

The non-nodulating variety (NN5) was also compared to the average of the nodulating soybeans (Table 7). In this comparison, both showed no difference in residue C. Although no difference was observed for residue N in the ambient comparison, a significant difference in residue N occurred in the elevated CO2 comparison. While this may reflect a stimulation of N2 fixation for nodulated soybeans under elevated CO2, it did not alter residue C to N ratio under high CO2 conditions. In fact, NN5 was found to exhibit a higher C to N ratio only under ambient CO2 conditions.

Differences in potential N mineralization were found to occur over time based on the length of the incubation period and the soybean varieties evaluated (Tables 4Go6). Immobilization of residue N clearly occurred during the first 30 d for all varieties (Table 4); however, over the next interval (30–60 d; Table 5), the opposite occurred as more N was released into soil solution thereby reflecting an overall increase in potential N mineralization. Although it has been reported that the C to N ratio of soybean residue is generally lower than that of non-nodulating crop species (Parr and Papendick, 1978) resulting in comparatively faster N mineralization, microbial decomposition processes in our case were sufficient to cause immobilization of residue N during the first 30 d. Even though N immobilization occurred, the inherent N fertility of the soil resulted in no negative impact on residue decomposition as relatively high C mineralization occurred during this period (Table 4). However, during the following incubation period (30–60 d), continuing microbial decomposition processes resulted in a release of N from the soybean residue, with the overall impact for the entire incubation period being net N mineralization (Table 5). Likewise, the cumulative assessment of potential N mineralization (0–60 d) reflected that overall mineralization of residue N was increased by FACE (Table 6).

As in our earlier specific comparisons, we also examined specific mineralization patterns (Table 8). For the non-nodulating variety (NN5) vs. that of the nodulating soybeans comparison, overall N mineralization patterns were similar in the elevated CO2 comparison except for the 0- to 30-d period when NN5 exhibited greater N immobilization. On the other hand, more N was mineralized for NN5 in the ambient CO2 comparison for the 30- to 60- and 0- to 60-d periods. These mineralization patterns generally follow the shifts noted with residue C to N ratio.

Differences in N mineralization patterns between the non-responder to CO2 (Flyer) and the CO2 responder (Spencer) were also examined. While the CO2 responder clearly had higher total N mineralization (all incubation periods) compared to the non-responder, no significant increase in net N mineralization due to CO2 enrichment was observed for the CO2 responder (Table 8). A comparison of corresponding C mineralization patterns showed no significant differences. This indicates that yield response to CO2 treatment may not always impact our ability to predict N and C mineralization patterns. Likewise, this was true for soybean varieties having different seed protein values (i.e., Williams with seed protein of 42% vs. LG00-15593 with seed protein of 48%) in terms of N mineralization comparisons (Table 8). However, this was not the case for C mineralization in the Williams vs. LG00-15593 comparison. In this case, there was a consistent pattern of lower C mineralization for the LG00-15593 variety (higher seed protein) for the comparison made under FACE conditions. This difference ranged from a reduction of approximately 19% (30–60 d) to 13% (0–60 d).

For the Lincoln vs. HS93-4118 comparison (i.e., best public release varieties separated by >50 yr), there was a clear response to elevated CO2, with the newer variety (HS93-4118) having a greater cumulative N mineralization response (0–60 d; Table 8). As suggested earlier, the breeding selection process may have unknowingly impacted residue quality (e.g., lower residue C to N ratio), resulting in higher N mineralization for the HS93-4118 variety which was most exaggerated under elevated CO2 conditions (Table 8).


    CONCLUSIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
During the last 50 yr, there has been a substantial release of CO2 to the atmosphere and numerous studies have shown positive growth responses to CO2 enrichment. In addition, although changing CO2 level can also alter residue quality and decomposition patterns, these responses have been shown to be influenced by such factors as crop species and soil type (Torbert et al., 2000). However, it is not known whether variety breeding efforts for yield response (or other desired factors) were also selecting for differential CO2 growth responses. This work clearly shows that elevated CO2 can impact overall residue quality and that CO2 had greater effect on increasing overall N mineralization more than C mineralization. Based on our few varietal comparison, it appears that in some cases, the breeding selection process may have resulted in varietal differences in residue quality which can result in increased N or C mineralization under elevated CO2 conditions.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors thank B.G. Dorman, J.W. Carrington, and T.K. Dorman for technical assistance. This research was supported by the Biological and Environmental Research Program (BER), U.S. Department of Energy, Interagency Agreement no. DE-AI02-95ER62088.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
A. D. B. Leakey, E. A. Ainsworth, C. J. Bernacchi, A. Rogers, S. P. Long, and D. R. Ort
Elevated CO2 effects on plant carbon, nitrogen, and water relations: six important lessons from FACE
J. Exp. Bot., April 28, 2009; (2009) erp096v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prior, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Prior, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, R. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Prior, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, R. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Agroclimatology
Right arrow Soybean
Right arrow Carbon Sequestration
Right arrow Global Change
Right arrow Plant and Environment Interactions


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome