|
|
||||||||
Environmental Monitoring and Research Division, Research and Development Department, Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago, Lue-Hing R&D Complex, 6001 West Pershing Road, Cicero, IL 60804
* Corresponding author (guanglong.tian{at}mwrdgc.dst.il.us)
Received for publication September 15, 2004.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Abbreviations: MDL, method detection level
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Biosolids from wastewater treatment plants have been recognized as beneficial nutrient sources for plant growth and crop production (Lue-Hing et al., 1974). Application of biosolids could also improve the microbial community (Denis and Fresquez, 1989) and soil physical properties (Metzger and Yaron, 1987; Gschwind and Pietz, 1992). The application of biosolids to degraded soils has long been considered an economical alternative to inorganic fertilizer (Fresquez et al., 1990). Meyer et al. (2001) reported that biosolids application on a severely burned and previously forested site near Denver increased plant cover. In Canada, agro-industrial wastewater and municipal sewage were used to restore Frank Lake, a 1246-ha northern prairie marsh in southern Alberta, Canada (White and Bayley, 2001). In a review, Sopper (1992) emphasized that stabilized municipal sludge, if applied properly, could be a better alternative to conventional techniques in reclamation of mined land. Like any other nutrient source, biosolids contain N, P, and trace elements. In reclamation settings, biosolids are often applied at greater than agronomic rates to build up soil organic matter and improve soil tilth. Nutrients, which may thereby be applied in excess, cannot be fully absorbed by plants, and may tend to move from reclaimed land in either snowmelt, rainfall, or irrigation to lakes and streams (Nicholaichuk and Read, 1978), resulting in water pollution. Hence, it is necessary to evaluate the impacts on water quality from the land application of biosolids for soil reclamation as with other nutrient recycling practices.
It is reasonable to assume the application of biosolids to strip-mined land can have both positive and negative impacts on surface water chemistry. A fraction of the biosolids chemical constituents can move to surface water along with the runoff and through ground water, resulting in an elevation of NO3, NH4+, phosphorus, and trace element concentrations. This is particularly true for P, as the current N-based approach to biosolids management does result in increase of soil P to values well above those needed for optimum crop yields and leading to an increased risk of P loss to water sources (Shober and Sims, 2003). On the other hand, the buildup of soil organic matter and inorganic constituents of biosolids may chelate and bind the metals and reduce their mobility. Although it has become commonly accepted that nutrient addition to ecosystems leads to pollution of the water, Cessna et al. (2001) did not believe that the increase in N and P, due to fertilizer application, was always substantial because of the possibly insignificant movement of these nutrients to water sources and the dilution of drainage water in rivers. Aluminum and Fe salts in biosolids may mitigate the environmental risk to water quality associated with land application of P in biosolids (Shober and Sims, 2003).
We hypothesize that proper application of biosolids will not cause a significant adverse impact on surface water quality. While the impacts of application of nutrients from animal wastes and chemical fertilizer on chemistry of surface water are well studied, less information is available on the watershed scale for biosolids, an aged stabilized nutrient source from municipal wastewater treatment, that meets the federal criteria for land application. Because of the time-dependent transformations of nutrients from biosolids application (Keller et al., 2002), there is clearly a need to conduct such large-scale studies for a long-term duration. The objective of the study was to assess the impact of biosolids applications to strip-mined land on surface water NO3, NH4+, and total P, Cd, Cu, and Hg at the time scale of decades.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Treatments and Operations
In the 6000 ha of land comprising calcareous strip-mined soil, nonmined land, acidic coal refuse material, mine lakes (reservoirs), and wooded areas, approximately 1790 ha of calcareous strip-mined soil and nonmined land were developed into approximately 80 fields for biosolids application and crop production. Most of the fields in the north, central, and east quadrants (Fig. 1
) of the study site received biosolids at cumulative rates of 388 to 1816 dry Mg ha1 for 5 to 22 yr in rotation from 1972 to 2002. The mean loading rate based on the total area of the fields (1120 ha) in these three quadrants (4500 ha) was 875 dry Mg ha1 cumulatively or 28.2 dry Mg ha1 annually during the past 31 yr. However, most of the fields in the west quadrant received only supernatant from 1977 to 1979, and occasionally in the 1980s, with cumulative biosolids application rates of 2.5 to 46.5 dry Mg ha1. The mean loading rate based on the total area of the fields (670 ha) in this quadrant (1500 ha) was 4.3 dry Mg ha1 cumulatively and 0.13 dry Mg ha1 annually. Subsequently, we considered the north, central, and east quadrants as the biosolids-amended watershed, and the west quadrant as the control watershed (Fig. 1).
|
Each agricultural field receiving biosolids, in the biosolids-amended watershed, was bermed so that the runoff could be contained and directed to a field retention basin through a pipe. Each basin was designed to capture the runoff from a 100-yr, 24-h storm event for the Fulton County region. Runoff water was released to reservoirs and creeks through a pipe only after it met the applicable State of Illinois effluent standards, which are
99 mg L1 for total suspended solids,
33 mg L1 for biochemical oxygen demand, pH in the range of 6.0 to 10.0, and
500 counts/100 mL for fecal coliform. Time period of release after a rainfall event could vary from 1 d to a month, depending on the amount of water in the basin vs. its holding capacity. Solids that accumulated from sediments in retention basins were distributed back onto the protected fields once every 5 yr; however, this practice continued only until 1980. No field retention basin was constructed for fields in the control watershed, though some of these fields have berms.
Over the 31 yr, fields in the biosolids-amended watershed were, on average, cropped for 19 yr. Cropping patterns are various rotations of corn, wheat, sorghum, soybean, grass, and fallow. Soybean was planted mainly during the most recent decade. Some fertilizer application on biosolids-amended fields occurred during periods of leasing by the farmers. Fields in the control watershed were used mainly for hay, but half of these fields were cropped with corn or soybean during the most recent decade. Fields in the control watershed that were cropped during the most recent decade received agronomic rates of N, P, and K fertilizer for the cropped years. The amount of fertilizers applied by the farmers on the leased fields was never determined. The fertilizer application time was either spring or fall. For the most recent three years, corn yields ranged from 5.2 to 13.2 Mg ha1 in the biosolids-amended fields and 3.7 to 8.7 Mg ha1 in the control fields.
Sampling and Analysis
Sampling of surface water was performed monthly from 1972 to 1981, and at intervals of three times per year from 1982 to 2002. From 1982 through 2002, two of these three samples were collected following significant rainfall events between the months of April and November, and the third annual sample was taken during a drier period in summer. The wet weather samples were invariably taken during the spring or fall, while the dry weather samples were taken during the summer. As biosolids were applied from June to September, the spring samples were taken before the biosolids application and fall sample at the end of biosolids application. Sampling was not done in winter. The sampling period was determined by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA). Fifteen sampling sites (12 reservoirs and 3 creeks) are located in the control watershed (Fig. 1); however, one creek was excluded from the data set, as the creek receives effluent from the Canton water treatment plant. Fourteen sites (8 reservoirs and 6 creeks) are located in the biosolids-amended watershed; however, two creeks are excluded from the data set as they passed by a landfill site. There are over 480 ha of reservoirs and creeks in the 6000-ha site. Most of the reservoirs were man-made through the strip-mining process. The width of reservoirs was up to 30 m, and that of creeks up to 3 m. Some creeks were seasonal, depending on runoff.
Water samples were shipped in coolers packed with ice to the District's laboratory in Chicago for next-day chemical analysis. Samples were not filtered before analysis. The NO3N plus NO2N and NH4+N were analyzed by colorimetry in an autoanalyzer (Technicon [Tarrytown, NY] from 1971 to 1999 and Lachat [Milwaukee, WI] from 2000 to 2002). For the determination of total P, water samples were digested in the presence of sulfuric acid, K2SO4, and HgSO4 (USEPA, 1983), and P was determined by colorimetry using an autoanalyzer (Technicon from 1971 to 1999 and Lachat from 2000 to 2002). For the determination of total Cd and Cu, the water samples were digested in the presence of nitric acid (Greenberg et al., 1992), and the metals were determined using atomic absorption spectrophotometry from 1971 to 1998 and inductively coupled plasma spectroscopy (ICPAES) from 1999 to 2002. For the determination of total Hg, the water samples acidified with H2SO4 and HNO3 were digested in the presence of KMnO4 and K2S2O8 (Greenberg et al., 1992), and the Hg in the digestion was analyzed by atomic emission spectrophotometry from 1971 to 1997 and by atomic absorption spectrophotometry from 1998 to 2002. The selection of the above metals for monitoring in the surface water was based on the requirements of the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency who issued the permit for the land application of biosolids at Fulton County.
The annual samples of biosolids were analyzed for pH, total nitrogen, ammonia, and total P, Cd, Cu, and Hg. The pH was measured in 1:2 water. The total N was determined using Kjeldahl digestion, followed by colorimetry. The total P was determined in the above Kjeldahl digestion using the molybdate blue method. For the determination of total Cd and Cu, the biosolids samples were digested in the presence of nitric acid. For the determination of total Hg, the biosolids samples were liquidized in water and digested in the same way as for water samples. Then, the Cd, Cu, and Hg in the digestion were measured using the same approaches as for those in the digestion of water samples.
The 31-yr data were sorted by four factors: treatment (two levels: control and biosolids), water body (two levels: reservoir and creek), sampling season (three levels: wet-spring, dry-summer, and wet-fall), and years (31 levels: 19722002). The analysis of data from this study can be achieved by traditional ANOVA under the assumption of normality of population distribution and the assumption of equal variance across each level of a factor. When analysis involves multiple factors, the normality and equal variance assumptions must be met for all possible levels due to interactions (Walpole and Myers, 1989). The normality assumption was verified by Kolmogorov and Smirnov method, and found to be met in this study. We then applied the F test on the equality of variance when a factor had two levels and Bartlett's test on equality of variance when a factor had more than two levels. These tests indicated equal variance assumptions were not met for all factors (levels of some factors did not have equal variance). If the error distributions across all levels satisfy normality, but the variances are heterogeneous, the traditional ANOVA approach might lead to an erroneous conclusion, and the analysis of these data must be performed by either ANOVA under unequal error variance known as exact ANOVA or multiple comparison which involves only two levels at a time (Weerahandi, 1995). Significance of treatment, water body, and season effects were therefore computed using the Multiple Comparison Procedure (MCP). Due to a preponderance of data below the method detection levels, the standard error of trace metals, especially Cd and Cu, was zero for many years and therefore it was not possible to analyze the effect of year. The data of various years were therefore pooled in conducting multiple comparison for the other three factors (treatment, water body, and sampling season).
The 31-yr data sets were plotted to show monthly dynamics (mean of all sampling sites) of surface water chemistry parameters. A linear trendline that describes a long-term trend was inserted if the correlation coefficient of the regression of constituent concentration against time (year) was significant (P < 0.05). Yearly mean values for NO3N, NH4+N, and total P, Cd, Cu, and Hg were calculated and tested for the significance of difference between the biosolids-amended and control watersheds. We compared the means of water chemistry of three major periods (19721984, 19851993, and 19942002). During the first major period, nearly all fields in the biosolids watershed received biosolids. From 1985 through 1993, biosolids application was almost ceased in two-thirds of fields (mainly located in the north and the east quadrants of the reclamation site). A federal regulation (40 CFR Part 503) was promulgated in 1993, and from 1994 onward exceptional quality biosolids (metal levels meet pollutant concentration limits of Table 3 of Section 503.13) was applied. Simple correlation analysis was conducted to test if there were correlations between each of the water chemistry parameters and the annual biosolids/element loading rate. All statistical tests were performed using the SAS fixed model (Littell et al., 1996).
|
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The monthly mean concentration of total phosphorus in surface water across water bodies was nearly unchanged in both the control and biosolids-amended watersheds (Fig. 3). For three of the first thirteen years of the project, annual mean total P concentrations in surface water were significantly higher in the biosolids-amended watershed than in the control watershed (Table 3). From 1985 to 1993, there were five years in which yearly mean total P concentrations in surface water was higher in the biosolids-amended than the control water-shed, and one year it was significantly lower in the biosolids-amended than control watershed. For the most recent nine years, we observed five years (1994, 1995, 1998, 2001, and 2002) in which annual mean total P concentrations in surface water were significantly higher in the biosolids watershed than in the control watershed (Table 3). The mean total P concentration over 31 yr in the biosolids-amended watershed was greater than that in the control watershed (Table 3). For the entire study period across water bodies and treatments, the total P concentration was higher in the dry-summer and wet-fall than the wet-spring (Table 4). Total P tended to be more concentrated in creeks than reservoirs, and this occurred for the biosolids-amended watershed in wet-fall and the control watershed in wet-spring (Table 5).
Statistical tests did not indicate a significant correlation between concentrations of nitrate, ammonium, and total P in surface water and annual biosolids loading rate in the biosolids-amended watershed or between each nutrient and its annual loading rate.
Trace Elements
Concentrations of total Cd in surface water over the 31-yr study period were mostly below the method detection levels (MDLs) (Table 3), which were close to the Illinois limit of 0.01 mg L1 for public supply and food processing water (Illinois Pollution Control Board, 2003).
The monthly mean copper concentrations in surface water across water bodies declined with time in both control and biosolids-amended watersheds (Fig. 4 ). Annual mean Cu concentrations in surface water in the first year were very high relative to the rest of the study period in both the biosolids-amended watershed and the control watershed (Table 3). For the first nine years, during which Cu concentration was above the MDL, the mean surface water Cu concentration in the biosolids-amended watershed was significantly greater than that in the control watershed in 1976, 1977, 1978, and 1980 (Table 3). The effect of sampling season on Cu concentration in surface water was not significant for all water bodies and treatments (Table 4). There is almost no effect of water body on the Cu concentration in surface water (Table 5).
|
Statistical tests also did not indicate a significant correlation between concentrations of trace metals in surface water and annual biosolids loading rate in the bio-solids-amended watershed or between each metal and its annual loading rate.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
With the mean annual N input to the biosolids watershed as high as 735 kg ha1 on the 1120 ha of application fields, the elevation of the surface water NO3 and NH4+ seems to be unavoidable, as N sources can move to surface water through runoff. A study using 15N showed that nitrate, generated from commercial land application of swine waste within a North Carolina Coastal Plain catchment, could move to surface water by ground water passing beneath the spray fields and adjacent riparian buffers (Karr et al., 2001). The soil compaction brought about by strip-mining in our study area may have promoted the runoff and movement of NO3N to stream water as observed by others (Coupe and Macy, 1993; Croke et al., 2000). Nitrate may cause human and animal health problems when concentrations exceed 10 mg L1 as N. In no months did the NO3N concentration in surface water in the biosolids-amended watershed exceed \10 mg L1, implying that at this site the application of biosolids for land reclamation will not have any significant effect on human health or the environment with respect to NO3N.
The NH4+N in surface water in the biosolids-amended watershed was also far below a concentration that could adversely affect aquatic organisms.
The elevation of total P concentration in surface water associated with the biosolids applications for 13 of 31 yr of the project is modest considering that the mean annual P input from biosolids was as high as 530 kg ha1 on the 1120 ha of application fields in the biosolids-amended watershed, and that mean surface soil total P (0.7%) in the fields within the biosolids-amended watershed was already 13 times higher than that in the fields within the control watershed in 2001. This elevation in surface water P concentrations might not have occurred if the annual loading of biosolids had not exceeded the agronomic rate at the early stage of the project. Furthermore, the 31-yr mean surface water total P concentration of 0.16 mg L1 for the biosolids-amended watersheds at Fulton County was even close to the low end of the range of 0.06 to 0.4 mg L1 for drainage from agricultural sites in the Western Lake Michigan watershed in Wisconsin and upper Michigan from 19921995 (http://water.usgs.gov/pubs/circ/circ1156/circ1156. 4B.html; verified 23 Aug. 2005).
Two years after the project began, the Cd concentration went below the MDL until 2002 in both the biosol-ids-amended and control watersheds, suggesting biosolids application did not increase the Cd concentration in surface water. Although results showed higher Cu in surface water in the biosolids-amended watershed, this mainly occurred within the first 10 yr of the project, when the land-applied sludge carried a substantially high amount of Cu. From 1981, most measurements of Cu concentration were below the MDL, suggesting no discernable impact on Cu concentration in surface water could be expected in the use of biosolids.
Mercury concentrations in surface water were significantly higher for only one year, but significantly lower for two years in the biosolids-amended watershed than in the control. The low mobility of mercury to water bodies has been confirmed by results of Granato et al. (1995).
The Cd, Cu, and Hg concentrations in surface water of both the control and biosolids-amended watersheds became higher during the middle of the 31-yr land reclamation project. This trend occurred from 1980 to 1990 for Cd and Cu, and from 1991 to 1995 for Hg. Such elevations might be due to the greater value of the MDL, which is probably the result of changes in instrument sensitivity. These areas are downwind of coal-fired power plants. Aerial plumes from these plants could also contribute to these increases. For the trace metals we monitored, their concentrations were either below the MDL or not significantly different in two watersheds, while the application of biosolids during the 31 yr increased the concentrations of these trace elements in soil in the biosolids-amended watershed (data not shown). Granato et al. (1995, 2004) indicated that at the same Fulton County site, from 80 to 100% of the Cd, Cu, and Hg applied to soils in sewage sludge/biosolids since 1972 still resided in the plow layer or top 15 to 23 cm of soil. Sloan et al. (2001) also observed the accumulation of biosolids mercury in soil in a Minnesota agricultural watershed amended with biosolids for two decades.
Normally, at this site, spring and fall are relatively wet seasons, and summer a relatively dry season due to the difference in temperature that affects the evaporation. High P concentrations in wet-fall could be due to high runoff in the fall, which transported the particulate form of P into water bodies. Since water was not filtered before analysis, some of the P should be in the particulate form. Summer is the season for biosolids application, and this may explain why the high P concentration in surface water also occurred in summer in the biosolids watershed. Nitrate concentrations in water did not follow this pattern, implying the movement of NO3 may be controlled by other factors. Biosolids were typically applied either in summer or early fall and only an annual cover crop was planted. For fall applications the cover crop did not establish as well as crops following summer applications and did not produce as much biomass, possibly making it less effective in reducing NO3 concentrations in soil and/or mitigating erosion. The soil soluble N can move to water bodies along with water from rains at the onset of spring. Farmers apply nitrogen fertilizer in spring, generally before the first water sampling of a year. In summer and fall, less NO3 in soil is available for moving to water bodies because of use by crops in fields. This is probably why the NO3 concentration in surface waters in the biosolids-amended watershed was always higher in spring than summer and fall. We could not determine a plausible reason for higher mercury concentration in surface water in the dry-summer and wet-fall than in the wet-spring in the control watershed.
Relatively greater concentrations of NO3, NH4+, and total P were observed in creeks than in reservoirs, irrespective of watershed and sampling season. In the Fulton County reclamation site, reservoirs are far larger than the creeks, and hence there is a smaller volume of water generally present in the creek than the reservoir. The difference in concentration of nutrients between the two water bodies could therefore be explained by the different dilution in the reservoir as compared with the creek. Concentrations of Cd, Cu, and Hg were apparently not affected by water body, further confirming the insignificant amount of these metals moving into water bodies from the application fields.
The statistical analysis revealed no correlation between each water chemistry parameter and annual bio-solids/element loading rate. Since the biosolids are applied starting in June and the summer is usually a dry period, the first two surface water samplings, spring and mid-summer, would not seem to be of any value in correlation determinations. However, there were also no correlations between wet-fall water chemistry parameters and annual biosolids loading rate. Furthermore, wet-spring water chemistry parameters were not correlated to biosolids loading rate of the previous year either. Our finding therefore indicates the movement of biosolids nutrients and trace metals into surface water would not depend on biosolids loading rate if proper soil conservation measures take place.
| CONCLUSIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Brown, A. Svendsen, and C. Henry Restoration of High Zinc and Lead Tailings with Municipal Biosolids and Lime: A Field Study J. Environ. Qual., October 29, 2009; 38(6): 2189 - 2197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Tian, T. C. Granato, A. E. Cox, R. I. Pietz, C. R. Carlson Jr., and Z. Abedin Soil Carbon Sequestration Resulting from Long-Term Application of Biosolids for Land Reclamation J. Environ. Qual., January 13, 2009; 38(1): 61 - 74. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. L. Pepper, H. Zerzghi, J. P. Brooks, and C. P. Gerba Sustainability of Land Application of Class B Biosolids J. Environ. Qual., September 2, 2008; 37(5_Supplement): S-58 - S-67. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Svendson, C. Henry, and S. Brown Revegetation of High Zinc and Lead Tailings with Municipal Biosolids and Lime: Greenhouse Study J. Environ. Qual., November 1, 2007; 36(6): 1609 - 1617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Crop Science | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Vadose Zone Journal | ||||
| Soil Science Society of America Journal | Journal of Plant Registrations | The Plant Genome | |||