JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 8 September 2005
Published in J Environ Qual 34:1811-1819 (2005)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2004.0329
© 2005 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Evanylo, G. K.
Right arrow Articles by Rockett, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Evanylo, G. K.
Right arrow Articles by Rockett, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Evanylo, G. K.
Right arrow Articles by Rockett, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ecosystem Restoration
Right arrow Plant and Soil Interactions
Right arrow Toxic Trace Metals
Right arrow Nutrient Cycling
Right arrow Municipal Waste

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Ecosystem Restoration

Herbaceous Vegetation Productivity, Persistence, and Metals Uptake on a Biosolids-Amended Mine Soil

G. K. Evanyloa,*, A. O. Abayea, C. Dundasb, C. E. Zippera, R. Lemusc, B. Sukkariyaha and J. Rockettd

a Department of Crop and Soil Environmental Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24060
b Conservation Specialist Peaks of Otter Soil and Water Conservation District, Bedford, VA 24523
c Department of Agronomy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210
d Virginia Cooperative Extension, Powell River Project, Wise, VA 24293

* Corresponding author (gevanylo{at}vt.edu)

Received for publication August 25, 2004.

    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
The selection of plant species is critical for the successful establishment and long-term maintenance of vegetation on reclaimed surface mined soils. A study was conducted to assess the capability of 16 forage grass and legume species in monocultures and mixes to establish and thrive on a reclaimed Appalachian surface mine amended with biosolids. The 0.15-ha coarse-textured, rocky, non-acid forming mined site was prepared for planting by grading to a 2% slope and amending sandstone overburden materials with a mixture of composted and dewatered, anaerobically digested biosolids at a rate of 368 Mg ha–1 (dry weight). Tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.), orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.), switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.), caucasian bluestem (Bothriochloa caucasia L.), reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.), ladino clover (Trifolium repens L.), birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.), crownvetch (Coronilla varia L.), alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), common sericea lespedeza and AULotan sericea lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata L.), tall fescue–ladino clover, tall fescue–alfalfa, orchardgrass–birdsfoot trefoil, switchgrass–AULotan, and an herbaceous species mix intended for planting on reforested sites consisting of foxtail millet [Setaria italica (L.) Beauv.], perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.), redtop (Agrostis alba L.), kobe lespedeza (Kummerowia striata L.), appalow lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata L.), and birdsfoot trefoil were established between spring 1990 and 1991. Vegetative biomass and/or persistence were assessed in 1996, 1997, 1998, 2000, 2001, and 2002. The high rate of biosolids applied provided favorable soil chemical properties but could not overcome physical property limitations due to shallow undeveloped soil perched atop a compacted soil layer at 25 cm depth. The plant species whose persistence and biomass production were the greatest after a decade or more of establishment (i.e., switchgrass, sericea lespedeza, reed canarygrass, tall fescue, and crownvetch) shared the physiological and reproductive characteristics of low fertility requirements, drought and moisture tolerance, and propagation by rhizome and/or stolons. Of these five species, two (tall fescue and sericea lespedeza) are or have been seeded commonly on Appalachian coal surface mines, and often dominate abandoned pasture sites. Despite the high rates of heavy metal–bearing biosolids applied to the soil, plant uptake of Cd, Cu, Ni, and Zn were well within critical concentrations more than a decade after establishment of the vegetation.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
THE SELECTION of plant species is critical for the successful establishment and long-term productivity of high quality vegetation on reclaimed surface mined soils. Establishment of self-sustaining herbaceous vegetative cover on such sites is vital for controlling erosion and is required by U.S. law (Public Law 95-87, Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act). Climatic conditions and the physical and chemical properties of the reconstructed growth medium will influence the establishment success and survival of reclamation species. The overburden and mine soils in much of southwestern Virginia, whose geology is typical of much of the central Appalachian coal mining region, are often coarse-textured, rocky, and non-acid forming (Haering et al., 2000). The establishment and maintenance of vegetation on surface-mined coal lands in Appalachia is limited by the properties of unweathered rock materials that are commonly used as topsoil substitutes. These limitations include the lack of organic matter that enhances soil physical properties (e.g., water-holding capacity, aggregation, porosity, bulk density), buffers pH, and contributes to the supplying of nutrients such as nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) and soil compaction caused by land-shaping equipment. Successful revegetation of such sites can be achieved by the implementation of practices that modify the plant rooting medium to reduce compaction, improve water-holding capacity and drainage, and increase nutrient (especially N and P) availability and/or by using plant species that are tolerant of the stressful conditions encountered in such soils.

Monocultures or mixtures of perennial grasses and legumes can provide cover required for control of erosion, soil development, wildlife habitat, hay and pasture production, and biomass energy sources (Ditsch and Collins, 2000). Herbaceous species that are employed in pasture or hayland can be appropriate for restoration of Appalachian surface mined soils that are not reforested because livestock production is the major nonforestry agricultural enterprise in this region.

Cool season grasses usually establish quickly and develop extensive root systems that improve soil aggregation and reduce erosion and runoff potential. Heat and drought tolerance of cool season grasses range from excellent for endophyte-infected tall fescue to good for orchardgrass and reed canarygrass (Ditsch and Collins, 2000). The adaptation to wet soil conditions that often occur in reconstructed mine soils due to compaction-induced drainage limitations (Haering et al., 2004) is excellent for reed canarygrass, good for tall fescue, and poor for orchardgrass. All are adapted to a wide pH range (i.e., 5.0–8.0) and have excellent winter hardiness. Warm season grasses, such as switchgrass and caucasian bluestem, establish slower, and can exploit greater rooting depths and volumes than cool season grasses, which can be an advantage during periods of drought and under the low nutrient (especially P) availability common on surface mined soils (Jung, 1986). Both species also exhibit excellent winter hardiness.

The capability of legumes to fix nitrogen provides an establishment and productivity advantage of these species over grasses on nitrogen-limited soils. Furthermore, the potentially deep (>3 m in the absence of physical obstructions or unfavorable chemical conditions) taproot of many legumes (e.g., alfalfa, crown vetch, birdsfoot trefoil) enable these species to survive drought if the subsoil is sufficiently loose to allow root penetration. Legumes vary greatly in their tolerance of wet soil conditions (e.g., good for birdsfoot trefoil and sericea lespedeza, poor for alfalfa and crownvetch) and winter hardiness (excellent for alfalfa, good for birdsfoot trefoil, fair for crown vetch, and poor for sericea lespedeza) (Ditsch and Collins, 2000).

The addition of a legume to a grass will provide a mixture whose need for external N will be reduced, but all legumes are not equally proficient in supplying N to a companion grass. Powell et al. (1982) produced greater biomass yields with grass–legume mixtures than monocultures of the same species. Jefferies et al. (1981) determined that alfalfa was less effective as an N source for an associated grass than white clover. Unfortunately, legumes have high demand for P (Mengel and Kirkby, 1979), which is often limiting in surface mined soils constructed from overburden rock materials.

Soil organic matter is one of the most important attributes of soil quality, which has been defined as "...the capacity of a soil to promote the growth of plants, protect watersheds by regulating the infiltration and partitioning of precipitation, and prevent water and air pollution by buffering potential pollutants such as agricultural chemicals, organic wastes, and industrial chemicals" (National Research Council, 1993). The amount of organic carbon present in a soil affects soil attributes such as cation exchange capacity (CEC), pH buffering capacity, nutrient availability, leaching potential, water retention characteristics, compaction, porosity, and aggregate stability (Doran and Parkin, 1996). Revegetation of surface-mined coal land in Appalachia is most efficiently accomplished by the application of amendments that provide a steady supply of nutrients and the restoration of soil organic matter to levels that promote sound chemical, physical, and biological functions (Haering et al., 2000).

The chemical, physical, and biological properties of surface mined soils derived from overburden rock materials may be restored with high application rates of organic residuals, such as composted and uncomposted biosolids, manures, and other municipal and industrial by-products (Haering et al., 2000; Daniels et al., 2001, 2002). Biosolids meet the criteria for successful mined land amendments because they contain relatively high concentrations of N, P, and organic matter. The typical concentrations of potentially toxic heavy metals (e.g., Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn) that occur in currently generated biosolids have been deemed low enough as to pose negligible risk to the environment and to the crops produced on soils amended with such biosolids (USEPA, 1993). The metal uptake rate by plants grown in biosolids-amended soils typically declines as the biosolids application rate increases. This occurs despite the increase in the metal content of soil, because the sorption capacity of biosolids-amended soil exceeds that of unamended soil (Corey et al., 1987; Chaney and Ryan, 1993). Chaney and Ryan (1992) concluded that the specific metal adsorption capacity added with biosolids will persist as long as trace metals of concern persist in the soil.

Despite the demonstrated benefits of biosolids in ameliorating metal-contaminated soils, critics of land application warn of potential degradation of soil quality and plant productivity where biosolids are applied according to current Federal and state regulations (McBride, 1995). McBride (1995) has proposed that the availability of potentially toxic trace elements may increase and result in phytotoxicity or excess accumulation of metals as the metal-binding attributes of biosolids organic matter decline years after application ceases. Reclaimed mine land that receives a single large application of biosolids offers an opportunity to study the change in metal availability with time.

The primary objective of this experiment was to assess the survivability and biomass productivity of individual plant species and mixes of species as long as 12 yr after establishment on a biosolids-amended Appalachian coal mine soil. A secondary objective was to assess the effects of the various revegetation treatments on long-term soil properties and phyto-accumulation of heavy metals from the biosolids-amended soil.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Study Site Description and Treatment Design
The revegetation study was established on a reclaimed coal mine at the Powell River Project Research and Education Center in Wise County, Virginia, in spring 1990. The overburden and mine soils are coarse-textured, rocky, and non-acid forming (Haering et al., 2000). A 0.15-ha disturbed site was prepared for planting by placing on the surface and grading to approximately 2% a moderately alkaline sandstone overburden.

A 50:50 mixture (by volume) of composted biosolids + woodchips and dewatered, anaerobically digested biosolids (termed "mine mix") produced by the Philadelphia Wastewater Treatment Authority's Biosolids Recycling Center was surface-applied to the entire experimental site and incorporated with a chisel plow. Before application, the blend was stacked in windrows and, while not actively aerated, partially composted as evidenced by the release of steam when the piles were disturbed. The mine mix was prepared during winter and early spring and allowed to "cure" for several months before delivery and application to the site in summer 1989. The mine mix was applied at a rate of 368 Mg ha–1 (dry weight) (Haering et al., 2000). The composition of the mix and the loading rate of the mix constituents are presented in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Composition of composted biosolids and wood chips and loading rates of selected constituents applied to experimental site in 1989.

 
Plant Establishment, Maintenance, and Sampling
In July 1990, 16 treatments (Table 2) consisting of a variety of monocultures and species mixtures were established on the reclaimed site. The species were seeded at rates recommended for forage crops (Virginia Cooperative Extension, 2000) or for reclamation of mined land (Skousen and Zipper, 1997; Torbert and Burger, 2000). Herbicides were applied as recommended by Virginia Cooperative Extension (1992) guidelines to reduce weed competition with the planted species. The treatments were each replicated four times in a randomized complete block design. Individual plots measured 3.9 x 3.9 m and were separated by 0.9-m-wide alleys planted with tall fescue. A second seeding was performed in April 1991 due to poor initial establishment of some treatments associated with drought conditions in summer 1990. The plants were allowed to grow to maturity and then mowed to a height of 10 cm each October to remove dead tissue and promote vigorous growth in the spring.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Plant species and species mix treatments established in 1990 and 1991.

 
Plant samples were collected in September 1996, 1997, 1998, 2001, and 2002 by cutting all plant material contained in randomly placed 1-m2 quadrats (one per plot) to a height of 5 cm above the soil surface. Vegetation in only 10 of the treatments (Treatments 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 10, 11, 15, and 16) was sampled in 2001 and 2002 because the ladino clover, birdsfoot trefoil, and alfalfa had disappeared entirely in the monoculture (Treatments 6, 7, and 9) and the species mix treatments (Treatments 12, 13, and 14). Samples were separated in the field into target species (i.e., the species originally planted) and nontarget grasses, forbs, and legumes. Each sample was dried at 65°C until constant mass was achieved and weighed to calculate dry matter production. A bioefficiency index was calculated for each treatment by dividing the dry matter of the target species by the total dry matter of all plant materials from each sampling.

Plant Tissue Processing and Analysis
Plant tissue sampled and dried for biomass determination in 2002 was further processed for chemical analysis by grinding in a stainless steel Wiley mill to pass a 0.5-mm sieve and stored in paper bags, which were placed in an oven at 65°C until constant mass was achieved to remove moisture added during grinding and handling of the samples.

Plant tissue was digested in an Ethos Plus 800 Microwave Labstation (Milestone Microwave Lab Systems, Bergamo, Italy) using a nitric acid microwave method (USEPA, 1996b). Reagent blanks and NIST standard samples (1573a) were routinely included in the analysis. Samples were analyzed for Cd, Cu, Ni, and Zn using a Thermo (Fitchburg, MA) Jarrell Ash ICAP (inductively coupled argon plasma–atomic emission simultaneous spectrometer; ICP–AES).

Soil Sampling, Processing, and Analysis
The reconstructed, biosolids-amended soil was sampled as described below during the study duration to assess the effects of time and vegetation type on soil properties. Twenty cores (2.5 cm in diameter each) were collected to a depth of 15 cm from each of the four replications before planting in June 1990 for establishing baseline chemical properties. Ten soil cores (2.5 cm in diameter x 15 cm in depth) were collected from each treatment plot in fall 1996, 1997, and 2002 for analysis. Soil samples were air-dried and passed through a 2-mm sieve in preparation for chemical extraction or digestion.

Routine soil test laboratory analyses of pH and Mehlich I (0.05 M HCl and 0.0125 H2SO4)-extractable P, K, Ca, Mg, Mn, and Zn as determined by the Virginia Cooperative Extension Soil Test Laboratory procedures (Donohue, 1992) were performed on all samples at each of the four sampling times. Other analyses conducted in 1996 included total C by dry combustion and organic matter by Walkley–Black wet oxidation (Nelson and Sommers, 1982), total Kjeldahl N (TKN) by the method of Bremner and Mulvaney (1982), total P following digestion in perchloric acid (Olsen and Sommers, 1982), cation exchange capacity by saturation and replacement of unbuffered 1 M BaCl2 with 1 M KCl as described by Rhoades (1982), and available water at 33 kPa using a pressure plate (Klute, 1986).

The EPA-3050B (USEPA, 1996a) method, a strong acid digestion procedure recommended for the extraction of total metals (except those bound within crystalline structure), was employed to determine the total concentration of soil metals in the 2002 samples. Metal concentrations were determined using ICP–AES.

Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were performed on plant biomass, percent groundcover, and tissue metal concentration using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and least significant differences (LSD, 0.05 level of probability) to separate means with SAS (SAS Institute, 1990).


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Soil Properties
The application of the biosolids provided a uniform research site whose soil test values (pH and Mehlich I–extractable P, K, Ca, and Mg) were adequate for plant growth for the duration of the study (Table 3; Donohue and Heckendorn, 1994). The vegetative treatments did not affect soil test variables in 1996 or 1997, but the soils where the legume treatments predominated were higher in soil test Ca and Mg in 2002 (Table 4). Calcium (Loneragan and Snowball, 1969) and Mg (Eakin, 1972) are accumulated at higher concentrations in the top growth of dicotyledons (especially legumes) than monocotyledons (i.e., grasses); thus, the higher topsoil concentrations of Ca and Mg may have been due to greater assimilation into and release from aboveground tissue of legumes than other species during the 12 yr of vegetative production. There were some differences among treatments in Mehlich I–extractable Zn, Cu, Fe, and B, but no rationale could be offered to explain the patterns among vegetation types.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Mean values of soil pH and Mehlich I–extractable P, K, Ca, Mg, Mn, Zn, and Cu for the treatments sampled before amendment application and at various times during the duration of the study.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Soil fertility status under various forage species grown on partially reclaimed surface-mined soils in 2002.{dagger}

 
No differences in EPA-3050B Cu (mean = 346 mg kg–1), Ni (mean = 23 mg kg–1), and Zn (mean = 338 mg kg–1) occurred due to treatment. Cadmium concentrations were below detection limits (i.e., <0.1 mg kg–1) in all treatments. Suggested threshold values for total soil metal concentrations have been reported by Kabata-Pendias and Pendias (1984) for Cd (3–8 mg kg–1), Cu (60–126 mg kg–1), Ni (100 mg kg–1), and Zn (70–400 mg kg–1). Only Cu was present at concentrations that might cause some concern. The USEPA (1993) set higher standards for Cu (750 mg kg–1), Ni (210 mg kg–1), and Zn (3750 mg kg–1) in biosolids-amended soil because of the reduced bioavailability observed for these metals when applied in a biosolids matrix.

After 5 yr of revegetation, treatments had no effect on soil TKN (mean = 5.0 mg kg–1), total C (mean = 86 mg kg–1), organic matter (mean = 117 mg kg–1), cation exchange capacity (mean = 25.9 cmolc kg–1), and water holding capacity (mean = 195 g kg–1). The chemical properties that resulted from the application of the biosolids were greatly improved compared to adjacent reconstructed soils that had not received the biosolids' amendment.

The main soil limitation to plant establishment and growth appeared to be the physical constraints posed by a shallow (<25 cm) reconstructed topsoil underlain by a compacted zone of large impervious boulders and newly developing soil. We did not excavate soil pits to determine soil development, but penetration with a hand-operated soil corer to a depth greater than 25 cm was not possible. Previous investigations conducted on adjacent reconstructed mined lands, including both operational reclamation and experimental sites, revealed that horizons form within a few years after mining and reclamation. Weak A horizons can form within 2 yr of soil construction (Roberts et al., 1988), and well-developed A horizons can form within 4 yr (Roberts et al., 1988). The time required for formation of B horizons has been quite variable, ranging in time of development from as recent as 4 yr to greater than 20 yr (Haering et al., 2004). Examination of soil pits in adjacent mined lands reclaimed by similar methods during the same time period revealed that subsurface compaction similar to that present on our site limited any significant plant rooting to above the compacted zone (Haering et al., 2004).

Vegetation
Biomass
Within 1 yr of planting, ground coverage of the reclamation species ranged from less than 20% for reed canarygrass, switchgrass, and Caucasian bluestem to between 80 and 100% for ladino clover, birdsfoot trefoil, and alfalfa (Evanylo and Wolf, 1991). Five years after the establishment of vegetation (1996), alfalfa, ladino clover, and birdsfoot trefoil had nearly disappeared, and both the target biomass (i.e., the yield of the planted species; Table 5) and the bioefficiency (i.e., the yield of the target biomass divided by the total biomass, or the sum yield of all plant species; Fig. 1) of these species were much lower than for all other species. The slowly establishing species (reed canarygrass, switchgrass, Caucasian bluestem, and crown vetch) performed better than the early adaptors (i.e., ladino clover, birdsfoot trefoil, alfalfa) by 1996. The order of biomass production among the monocultures after 5 yr was: switchgrass > sericea lespedeza > AULotan > reed canarygrass > tall fescue > Caucasian bluestem > crownvetch > orchardgrass. The order of biomass production among the mixed species at the same time was: switchgrass + AULotan > tall fescue + alfalfa > orchardgrass + birdsfoot trefoil > tall fescue + ladino clover > reforestation mix.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Biomass production of target (i.e., planted) and total species and species mixes at the reclaimed mine site during 1996, 1997, 1998, and 2002.{dagger}

 


View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Bioefficiency (target biomass/total biomass) for the 16 treatments during 1996, 1997, 1998, and 2002. Missing data is a result of disappearance of the target species. Key: AF (alfalfa), AL (AULotan), BT (birdsfoot trefoil), CB (Caucasian bluestem), SL (common sericea lespedeza), CV (crown vetch), LC (ladino clover), OG (orchardgrass), OG + BT (orchardgrass + birdsfoot trefoil), RC (reed canarygrass), RM (reforestation mix), SG (switchgrass), SG + AL (switchgrass + AULotan), TF (tall fescue), TF + AF (tall fescue + alfalfa), TF + LC (tall fescue + ladino clover).

 
The addition of a legume (i.e., AULotan, alfalfa, birdsfoot trefoil, ladino clover) to a grass (i.e., switchgrass, orchardgrass, tall fescue) increased the target biomass and the total biomass of the treatment species above that of the solitary species only for the switchgrass + AULotan treatment mix in 1996 (Table 5). The biomass in the tall fescue and orchardgrass mixes was not significantly different from the biomass in the monoculture grass treatments when biomass of all target vegetation was summed. The bioefficiency (Fig. 1) was higher in the treatments that produced the greatest target biomass, as the more competitive species produced higher values of both measures.

Overall biomass production was lower in 1997 than in 1996 due likely to less favorable climatic conditions in 1997. Alfalfa, ladino clover, and birdsfoot trefoil disappeared from all plots (Table 5). Among the legume species, common sericea lespedeza was the dominant vegetation, while switchgrass was the dominant grass. Switchgrass continued to produce high biomass even under the poorer growing conditions in 1997 that reduced the yields of other reclamation species. Unlike 1996, no significant difference in 1997 target biomass production occurred between the pure stand of switchgrass and switchgrass in combination with AULotan (Table 5).

The biomass produced by species planted both in monoculture and in mixes was not affected by treatment combination in 1996 or 1997 (Table 6). Tall fescue, birdsfoot trefoil, alfalfa, orchardgrass, and switchgrass produced statistically identical yields whether grown alone or in combination with other species. AULotan biomass was greater in the AULotan treatment than in the switchgrass–AULotan treatment in 1996, but the differences disappeared by 1997. Combining several species in a mix can be a valuable reclamation practice if the species are compatible (i.e., if one species does not dominate).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6. Biomass production of tall fescue, alfalfa, AULotan, birdsfoot trefoil, orchardgrass, and switchgrass in pure and mixed species treatments in 1996 and 1997.

 
The production of the forage species, except for crown vetch, orchardgrass, orchardgrass + birdsfoot trefoil, reed canarygrass, switchgrass, and tall fescue, continued to decline by 1998 (Table 5). Switchgrass continued to be the dominant vegetation, which produced the same amount of biomass when grown alone or in combination with AULotan. Although alfalfa, ladino clover, and birdsfoot trefoil had completely disappeared from the pure stand treatments by 1997, these species were present in their orchardgrass and tall fescue mixtures in 1998. The bioefficiency of most species was also lower in 1998 than in 1996 and 1997 (Fig. 1). The decision not to mow the plots at the end of the 1997 season may have provided competitive advantages for some nontarget species. Mowing had been performed each fall from 1991 to 1996 to remove dead tissue and promote tillering.

By 2002, nearly all of the surviving species had become well-established and were the dominant vegetation in the treatment (Table 5). Switchgrass, followed by reed canarygrass and tall fescue, produced the most biomass of the grasses. Orchardgrass was the only surviving grass species that continued to decline. Caucasian bluestem had largely disappeared. Among the legumes, the lespedezas (common sericea lespedeza and AULotan lespedeza), followed by crownvetch, continued to yield well.

Persistence
Long-term persistence and production of a plant species on mined land soils is a function of soil physical and chemical properties as well as the individual plant morphological and physiological characteristics that help the plant to withstand biotic and abiotic stresses. In addition to soil properties and environmental conditions, grazing and/or cutting management can be either detrimental or beneficial, depending on cutting frequencies and heights. Among the cool season grasses planted over 10 yr ago, tall fescue and reed canarygrass persisted better than orchardgrass (Table 5). The persistence of the two cool season grasses can be attributed to their low fertility requirements and their morphological characteristics. Both tall fescue and reed canarygrass spread by short rhizomes (underground stems), whose multiple growth initiation sites permit more rapid plant spreading. By contrast, orchardgrass is a bunch grass without rhizomes. Individual orchardgrass plants do not attain the density of those grasses that propagate by rhizomes and vigorous tillering; thus, orchardgrass stands typically thin and disappear 3 to 5 yr after establishment regardless of management.

Among the two perennial warm-season grasses, switchgrass was more persistent and out-yielded Caucasian bluestem years after establishment. Switchgrass, a native bunch grass that produces a short rhizome, can survive over 20 yr while tolerating annual cutting unlike many grasses that require frequent defoliation for tiller production. In addition, switchgrass is drought tolerant and grows well with minimal fertilization. Caucasian bluestem, also a bunch grass, is well adapted to most soil types and tolerant of acidic, infertile soils. The lack of persistence of caucasian bluestem on the reclaimed mined site may be attributed to management. Caucasian bluestem is often managed by burning old growth from the previous year or mowing the dead residue as short as possible in February or March. These practices increase tiller production and control disease and weed pressures (D. Wolf, personal communication). Our annual fall mowing provided less than optimal regrowth conditions for caucasian bluestem.

Tall fescue, a cool season perennial grass, was also persistent on the reclaimed soil. Tall fescue can survive on soil whose pH ranges from 4.7 to 9.5, but production on soils with native pH of 5.3 to 5.5 is typical (Burns and Chamblee, 1979). The grass' extensive root system allows it to sustain on droughty and poorly drained soils. The adaptability of tall fescue to a wide range of climatic and soil conditions has resulted in its cultivation on nearly 1 million ha in Virginia and 14 million ha throughout the United States (Ball et al., 2003).

Among the legumes, sericea lespedeza (both common and AULotan) and crown vetch were the most persistent, while alfalfa, birdsfoot trefoil, and ladino clover disappeared from the site. The persistence of sericea lespedeza can be attributed to its ability to grow well on marginal soils that are not suitable for many forage species. Sericea has a long taproot, which is capable of penetrating deep into the overburden to extract soil water that is inaccessible to more shallow-rooted species (Dove et al., 1991). The lack of close and frequent cutting allowed the sericea lespedezas to thrive throughout the study duration. The other persistent legume, crownvetch, is a low growing, long-lived perennial, that spreads via creeping underground roots. The species can withstand dry and infertile soils but is best adapted to well drained, fertile soils with a pH 6 or above (Barnes et al., 1995, p. 273–275).

Fertility and cutting management is very important for the maintenance and persistence of alfalfa. The disappearance of alfalfa from the experimental site soon after establishment can be attributed to the poor soil conditions (i.e., alternating drought and wetness) and less than optimum management (e.g., harvesting time and frequency). Maximum alfalfa persistence (for at least the first 6 yr of production) requires enough time after the final fall cutting to allow 30 to 45 cm of regrowth before the first killing frost (Chamblee et al., 1995). In most years, alfalfa was cut just before the first frost date. Birdsfoot trefoil can grow successfully on marginal lands; however, its persistence is highly dependent on its capability to reseeding. Trefoil must be allowed to reseed itself every 2 or 3 yr by accumulating growth during the spring until seed set to ensure a persistent stand. In general, the herbaceous species that survive environmental stress and less than optimal management are those with specialized organs such as stolons, rhizomes, or crowns that store large quantities of sugars for regrowth and possess sites for initiation of new growth.

Of the five most persistent species, sericea lespedeza and tall fescue dominate many abandoned hayland–pasture lands on coal surface mines. Sericea lespedeza is a dominant species, despite no longer being planted on such sites, because of the morphological attributes that contribute to its persistence and the manner in which its seeds are spread (i.e., by birds and other natural agents).

Weed Encroachment
Weed encroachment was insignificant for the duration of the study in the treatments where the originally planted species remained dominant. Tall fescue, common sericea lespedeza, switchgrass, crown vetch and, to a lesser extent, reed canarygrass were dominant to abundant, and weed species were rare. Less aggressive species (e.g., Caucasian bluestem) were invaded by weedy species such as devils beggarticks (Bidens frondosa L.), goldenrod (Solidago spp.), wild raspberries (Rubus idaeus L.), dewberries (Rubus caesius L.), blackberries (Rubus spp.), and other annual and perennial forbs.

Metal Concentration
The forage species exhibited differential uptake of the heavy metals that could affect the recommended use of forages planted on biosolids-remediated land (Table 7). Crown vetch accumulated the highest concentrations of Cd and Zn, AULotan sericea lespedeza accumulated the highest concentration of Ni, and switchgrass accumulated the highest concentration of Cu. While other differences existed, there were no obvious uptake patterns for the four metals among the various species.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 7. Heavy metal concentrations in above ground plant tissue of selected treatments.

 
Plant tissue metal concentrations were not affected by species mixes. For example, metal concentrations were the same in the tall fescue–alfalfa treatment (largely, tall fescue) as in the tall fescue treatment and in the switchgrass–AULotan treatment (largely, switchgrass) as in the switchgrass treatment.

The metals Cu, Ni, and Zn are readily taken up by plants but pose phytotoxicity risks before food chain risks. This has been termed the "soil–plant barrier" by Chaney (1980). Although the plants accumulated trace elements differentially, the concentrations in the forages did not exceed thresholds for concern (i.e., >40 mg Cu kg–1, >50 mg Ni kg–1, and >400 mg Zn kg–1 as documented by Chaney, 1994).

Cadmium poses human or animal health risks at plant concentrations that are not generally phytotoxic; thus, Cd could be a concern due to bioaccumulation through the soil–plant–animal food chain. Even the highest concentration of Cd in this study (1.0 mg Cd kg–1 in crown vetch) was lower than established conservative levels of concern (Kabata-Pendias and Pendias, 1984).


    CONCLUSIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
This research evaluated the productivity, persistence, and metal uptake by herbaceous forage species and species mixes grown on biosolids-amended coal mine land. Five to six years after establishment, alfalfa, ladino clover, and birdsfoot trefoil largely disappeared from the site. The lack of long-term persistence of these legumes may be attributed to limiting physical properties of the soil at this site, which are typical of reclaimed surface mined coal soils, and to the infrequent cuttings imposed by the management regime. The limiting site properties include a shallow and undeveloped topsoil horizon underlain with a compacted rock layer that alternately ponds water during periods of plentiful rainfall and prevents roots of some species from exploring deeper horizons for water during drought conditions. Alfalfa, ladino clover, and birdsfoot trefoil were more sensitive to excessive moisture and/or drought stress than the other legumes and grasses initially established. Crown vetch and sericea lespedeza (common and AULotan), both in pure stand and in mixes with grasses, persisted 11 yr after establishment. The successful establishment and persistence of these legumes in pure stand and in mixtures with grasses can be attributed to their tolerance of extremes in moisture and drought as well as their 10- to 20-yr life expectancy. Sericea lespedeza, whose persistence has been shown to be reduced by heavy grazing (Dove, 1985), likely benefited from infrequent (once annually) mowings.

Among the grasses initially established, switchgrass grown in pure stand as well as in mixture with legumes outperformed the other grasses and grass mixtures for most of the experimental years. Switchgrass is well adapted to the moisture stress conditions that predominate shallow mineland soils. Reed canarygrass, likely due to its tolerance to both excessive moisture and drought, and tall fescue also produced well.

The establishment of a pool of nutrients and organic matter through the application of a higher than agronomic loading rate provided a root environment whose chemical properties were favorable for establishment and maintenance of most forages grown in the Appalachian Plateau region; however, long-term survival and productivity of the forages were dependent on the ability of the plants to root effectively in the physically limited medium and to compete with other species until the soil profile became better developed and on the type of management practice (i.e., mowing frequency) employed. The use of a high rate of biosolids containing considerably greater concentrations of heavy metals than the background soil did not reduce plant vigor nor increase metal uptake by the forages to concentrations of concern. Tall fescue and sericea lespedeza often emerge as dominant species in abandoned hayland–pasture areas on Appalachian coal surface mines today, even when initial seeding includes multiple grass and legume species. Our results indicate that these species retain their persistent attributes on Appalachian mine soils under the higher-nutrient conditions created by a heavy biosolids application.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors are grateful to the Powell River Project for funding of this research and to Dan Early for field support. Furthermore, the authors would like to thank the countless undergraduate students whose collection and identification of vegetation as part of a course in the Department of Crop and Soil Environmental Sciences contributed to the data presented in this manuscript.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
R. K. Shrestha and R. Lal
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen in 28-Year-Old Land Uses in Reclaimed Coal Mine Soils of Ohio
J. Environ. Qual., October 24, 2007; 36(6): 1775 - 1783.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Evanylo, G. K.
Right arrow Articles by Rockett, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Evanylo, G. K.
Right arrow Articles by Rockett, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Evanylo, G. K.
Right arrow Articles by Rockett, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ecosystem Restoration
Right arrow Plant and Soil Interactions
Right arrow Toxic Trace Metals
Right arrow Nutrient Cycling
Right arrow Municipal Waste


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome