JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kremer, R.J.
Right arrow Articles by Motavalli, P.P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kremer, R.J.
Right arrow Articles by Motavalli, P.P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kremer, R.J.
Right arrow Articles by Motavalli, P.P.
Published in J. Environ. Qual. 33:805 (2004).
© ASA, CSSA, SSSA
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA

Introduction

R.J. Kremera and P.P. Motavallib

a USDA-ARS, University of Missouri
b Department of Soil, Environmental and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Missouri


THE PAPERS in this section were presented at the symposium, "The Environmental Impact of Transgenic Crops on Soil Biological Processes and Functions," held during the 2002 ASA–CSSA–SSSA annual meetings. Among the objectives of the symposium were to review and discuss the effects of genetically modified (GM) crops on soil biological processes and functions in agroecosystems and stimulate discussion of research priorities.

A primary reason that the symposium was organized is that public concerns over the environmental effects of GM crops are widespread (Priest, 2000). The agricultural land area planted to GM crops has expanded rapidly since the first commercial introduction of these crops in the 1990s and, therefore, the potential risk of large-scale environmental impacts also may be increasing. In 2003, the global land area planted to GM crops was estimated at 68 million hectares (CropBiotech Net, 2004). The majority (99%) of these GM crops were grown in six countries (United States, Argentina, Canada, Brazil, China, and South Africa). The possible overall environmental hazards associated with the release of GM crops include the dispersal and invasiveness of GM plants into ecosystems; movement of transgenes in the environment through pollen dispersal to other non-transgenic plants or gene transfer to microorganisms; reductions in the biodiversity and activity of nontarget organisms, including both flora and fauna; and development of resistance in target organisms (National Research Council, 2002).

The potential of nontarget effects of GM plants on soil organisms, including microbial processes, nutrient cycling, and microbial diversity, is a cause of considerable concern in environmental risk assessment of these crops. Although a limited number of previous studies demonstrated that GM plants can affect soil and microbial communities, results must be interpreted with caution because the environmental impact of these plants may be subject to several factors, including variations in climate, soil chemical and physical properties, and plant growth rate, that occur under field conditions (Dunfield and Germida, 2003).

As the number and variety of GM crops increase and as land area devoted to production of GM crops continues to expand, it is important that a defined system is in place to screen for potential unwanted nontarget effects. Agricultural scientists will be challenged by producers and stakeholders to provide information for improving current environmental assessments of GM crops.

Most environmental assessment studies for GM crops have focused on potential aboveground effects. However, the belowground component may also be significantly affected by GM crops because soil-borne microbial communities are largely responsible for ecosystem functions such as nutrient cycling and decomposition. The complexity of the soil system and the inability to culture most soil microorganisms has contributed to the difficulty in studying soil microbial communities and often resulted in their omission in environmental assessments of GM crops. Recent methodological advances, including new molecular biological techniques, are aiding to better describe and understand soil microbial communities (Kowalchuk et al., 2003). Such advances in soil ecosystem research will improve the information available to determine environmental impacts of GM crop production.

The symposium highlighted concepts and state-of-the-art knowledge of the effects of crops genetically modified for insect and herbicide resistance on soil and rhizosphere microbial communities and processes. Also of interest were the impacts of genetic traits for improved nutrient uptake and the indirect effects of management practices associated with GM crops on soil microbial communities. Several gaps in our knowledge that impede our full understanding of GM-crop-induced effects were highlighted. In an attempt to overcome these knowledge gaps, several papers described technological advances that couple microbial identity and function and new techniques in microbial community analysis that should provide tools for more complete assessments of GM-induced effects on plant–soil systems.

We hope that the symposium articles presented in this issue serve as valuable information sources for those interested in improving assessment of the effects of GM crops on the soil ecosystem and that this information will be used to develop more effective environmental assessment strategies.

As organizers of the symposium, we wish to acknowledge the sponsorship of the S-3 (Soil Biology and Biochemistry) and S-11 (Soils and Environmental Quality) divisions of the Soil Science Society of America and the co-sponsorship of the North Central Regional Technical Committee on Soil Organic Matter (NCR-59). We also wish to express our appreciation to Richard Dick (Oregon State University) for his encouragement and assistance in organizing the symposium, Guenther Stotzky (New York University) for his participation in the symposium, and Michael Mullen (University of Kentucky) for serving as guest associate editor for these papers.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 REFERENCES
 




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
J. Poerschmann, A. Gathmann, J. Augustin, U. Langer, and T. Gorecki
Molecular Composition of Leaves and Stems of Genetically Modified Bt and Near-Isogenic Non-Bt Maize--Characterization of Lignin Patterns
J. Environ. Qual., August 9, 2005; 34(5): 1508 - 1518.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kremer, R.J.
Right arrow Articles by Motavalli, P.P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kremer, R.J.
Right arrow Articles by Motavalli, P.P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kremer, R.J.
Right arrow Articles by Motavalli, P.P.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome