JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in JEQ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bruland, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bruland, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, C. J.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bruland, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, C. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Wetland Soils
Right arrow Geostatistics
Right arrow Spatial Variability
Right arrow Sorption/Exchange
Right arrow Phosphorus
Published in J. Environ. Qual. 33:785-794 (2004).
© ASA, CSSA, SSSA
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA

TECHNICAL REPORT

Wetlands and Aquatic Processes

A Spatially Explicit Investigation of Phosphorus Sorption and Related Soil Properties in Two Riparian Wetlands

Gregory L. Bruland* and Curtis J. Richardson

Duke University Wetland Center, Nicholas School of the Environment and Earth Sciences, Box 90333, Durham, NC 27708-0333

* Corresponding author (glb5{at}duke.edu).

Received for publication May 20, 2003.

    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Soils of riparian wetlands are highly effective at phosphorus (P) sorption. However, these soils exhibit extreme spatial variability across riparian zones. We used a spatially explicit sampling design in two riparian wetlands in North Carolina to better understand the relationships among P sorption, soil properties, and spatial variability. Our objectives were to quantify patterns of spatial variability of P sorption and related soil properties, and to determine which soil properties best explained the variability in P sorption after accounting for the effects of spatial autocorrelation. We measured bulk density, moisture, pH, soil organic matter (SOM), texture (percent clay, silt, and sand), oxalate-extractable aluminum (Alox), iron (Feox), and the phosphorus sorption index (PSI). Due to differences in texture, Alox, and Feox, the two sites had substantially different mean PSIs. At each site, we found considerable differences in the spatial variability of soil properties. For example, semivariance analysis and kriging illustrated that soil properties at Site 1 varied at smaller scales than those at Site 2. At both sites, after accounting for the effects of spatial autocorrelation and all other soil properties, we determined that Alox had the highest Mantel correlation with PSI. We believe this geostatistic and Mantel approach is robust and could serve as a model for research on other biogeochemical processes such as denitrification.

Abbreviations: Alox, oxalate-extractable aluminum • Feox, oxalate-extractable iron • GrCr, Grindle Creek • PSI, phosphorus sorption index • RoBr, Rowel Branch • SOM, soil organic matter


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
AS A RESULT of their location in the landscape, forested riparian wetlands interact with both upstream and upslope sources of nonpoint-source runoff and have the ability to reduce nonpoint-source inputs of P to surface waters (Brinson, 1993; Walbridge, 1993; Lockaby and Walbridge, 1998). Soils of these forested riparian wetlands have been shown to have higher P sorption capacities than adjacent uplands or streambanks (Axt and Walbridge, 1999; Darke and Walbridge, 2000). Thus, forested riparian wetlands may be sinks for P at the landscape scale and if so, play a central role in maintaining regional water quality (Darke and Walbridge, 2000). Because development trends in the southeastern United States suggest increasing losses of natural riparian wetlands, the understanding of the P retention functions of these wetlands is increasingly critical (Axt and Walbridge, 1999). A better understanding of the controls on P sorption in forested riparian wetlands can help us to develop more accurate P-loading models and identify areas within riparian zones with high P sorption capacities for preservation or restoration (Lyons et al., 1998).

In forested riparian wetlands in the southeastern United States, long-term P retention is generally believed to be controlled by two main processes: (i) deposition of sediment and particulate organic P (a physical process) and (ii) sorption of dissolved phosphate (a geochemical process) (Axt and Walbridge, 1999). While significant amounts of P can be stored by sedimentation (Johnston, 1991), these sediments may be resuspended in future hydrologic events. Consequently, sorption is believed to represent the most important long-term P retention pathway in wetland soils (Richardson, 1985; Richardson et al., 1988; Walbridge and Struthers, 1993; Lockaby and Walbridge, 1998; Axt and Walbridge, 1999).

In the acid wetland soils of the southeastern Coastal Plain, P sorption has been shown to be significantly correlated with amorphous Al and Fe content (Richardson, 1985; Lockaby and Walbridge, 1998), and to a lesser degree soil organic matter (SOM) (Axt and Walbridge, 1999), and particle size (Axt and Walbridge, 1999). While iron phosphates are solubilized when Fe(III) is reduced to Fe(II) under anaerobic conditions, aluminum phosphates are unaffected by changes in redox potential (Ponnamperuma, 1972). Thus, soluble iron and phosphate may be lost from wetland soils in reducing conditions while aluminum phosphates appear to persist in acid wetland soils of the southeast (Darke and Walbridge, 2000).

Another layer of complexity is added when we consider that amorphous Al and Fe, SOM, and texture exhibit significant spatial and temporal variability in riparian wetlands (Lyons et al., 1998; Darke and Walbridge, 2000; Johnston et al., 2001). Beyond a locally random aspect, this spatial variability may be related to the combined action of physical, chemical, or biological processes that operate at different spatial scales (Goovaerts, 1998). In natural riparian forested wetlands, these processes might include overbank flooding, sediment deposition, surface runoff, erosion, ground water inputs, fire, tree-throw, root activity, litter production, and activity of macro and micro soil fauna. Each of these processes may influence particular locations of the riparian zone with varying degrees of intensity. Thus it has been recommended that any study of patchily distributed wetland soils should attempt to quantify not only the soil properties or processes under investigation but also their spatial variability (Johnston et al., 2001; Stolt et al., 2000). Improving our understanding of the spatial variability of soil properties in wetlands is important because such variability influences both the structure and function of soil ecosystems (May, 1974; Legendre and Fortin, 1989; Reynolds and Houle, 2002). Unfortunately, due to the combined difficulties of establishing spatially explicit sampling designs at remote, wet, and densely vegetated sites, and processing the large number of samples needed for adequate spatial coverage, sampling designs that quantify spatial variability are seldom used in studies of wetland soils (Bridgham et al., 2001).

Thus, the complex relationships among soil properties and their associated spatial variabilities render attempts to establish causality between individual soil properties and P sorption highly difficult. These intertwined factors have confounded traditional parametric analyses of the relationships between soil properties and P sorption, and, in some cases, they may have even lead to identification of spurious correlations between dependent and independent variables. In response to these complexities, we established a spatially explicit sampling design that enabled us to use Mantel tests (Mantel, 1967) to ascertain the importance of edaphic and spatial variables in controlling the P sorption capacity of soil cores taken from two natural forested riparian wetlands in the North Carolina Coastal Plain. The objectives of this study were to (i) quantify patterns of spatial variability of P sorption and related soil properties in the wetlands and (ii) determine which soil properties best explained the variability in P sorption after accounting for the effects of spatial autocorrelation.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Study Sites
The data for this study were collected from two forested riparian wetlands in the Coastal Plain of North Carolina (see Fig. 1) . The first site is located in Brunswick County near the city of Wilmington. This site has an intact floodplain that receives floodwaters from a second-order creek, Rowel Branch (RoBr), during wet periods. A few kilometers southeast of the site, RoBr flows into the Brunswick River, a tributary of the Cape Fear River. In the headwaters, where the RoBr sample plot is located, the floodplain is narrow and flat, abruptly giving way to a steep slope into upland habitat. The floodplain has not developed levee or terrace features common to floodplains associated with larger streams in this region. Our sampling plot was located adjacent to RoBr on the south side of the creek. Vegetation in the plot includes the following: an overstory of black-gum (Nyssa sylvatica Marshall) and [Taxodium distichum (L.) Rich.]; an understory of black gum, green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica Marshall), and red maple (Acer rubrum L.); a shrub layer of giant cane [Arundinaria gigantea (Walter) Muhl.], fetterbush [Lyonia lucida (Lam.) K. Koch], and greenbriar (Smilax spp.); and a herbaceous layer dominated by dog-hobble [Leucothoe axillaris (Lam.) D. Don]. Soil series in and around the site include Norfolk (fine-loamy, kaolinitic, thermic Typic Kandiudults), Pantego (fine-loamy, siliceous, semiactive, thermic Umbric Paleaquults), and Rains (fine-loamy, siliceous, semiactive, thermic Typic Paleaquults). Of these three soil series, Rains was the only hydric soil.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Map of the two forested riparian wetland study sites in the Coastal Plain of North Carolina.

 
The second site is located in Pitt County near the city of Greenville, NC (Fig. 1). This site also has an intact floodplain that receives floodwaters from a third-order stream, Grindle Creek (GrCr), during wet periods. A few kilometers southeast of the site, GrCr flows into the Tar River. Our sampling plot was located adjacent to GrCr on the south side of the creek. Similar to RoBr, the GrCr floodplain is relatively flat and has not developed levees or terraces. Vegetation in the plot includes the following: a canopy of swamp tupelo (Nyssa biflora Walter) and bald cypress; an understory of red maple, sweet bay (Magnolia virginiana L.), and swamp tupelo; a shrub layer of giant cane, fetterbush, and green briar; and a herbaceous layer of false nettle [Boehmeria cylindrica (L.) Sw.] and arrow arum [Peltandra virginica (L.) Schott]. The hydric soil series present at the site include Olustee (sandy, siliceous, thermic Ultic Alaquods) and Portsmouth (fine-loamy over sandy or sandy-skeletal, mixed, semiactive, thermic Typic Umbraquults). Nonhydric soils present include Altavista (fine-loamy, mixed, semiactive, thermic Aquic Hapludults), Lakeland (thermic, coated Typic Quartzipsamments), and Tuckerman (fine-loamy, mixed, active, thermic Typic Endoaqualfs).

Sampling Design
At each site, we identified a relatively flat section of the floodplain with no major elevation gradients in directions perpendicular or parallel to the flow of water. Microtopography in these areas was generally within ±0.5 m from the mean elevation of the plot. As close to the stream as possible, we established a 32 by 32 m plot (0.1 ha). We chose this plot size for two reasons: (i) soil properties such as amorphous aluminum and iron have been shown to be spatially autocorreated at scales captured by our plots (Lyons et al., 1998), and (ii) it was the largest plot that could be fit onto the floodplain of each site. To allow for a robust Mantel analysis of the data we established sampling designs at both RoBr and GrCr with four transects, separated by 8 m, which ran perpendicular to the direction of water flow (see Fig. 2) . Each transect consisted of four centroids, allowing us to establish clusters of samples separated by a wide range of distances. This was advantageous because both uniform and random sampling designs fail to provide adequate sample points separated by short distances, which in turn, does not permit analysis of fine-scale spatial variability. Furthermore, random sampling is often very difficult to carry out in the field and uniform designs may have inadequate lag distances or may be out of phase with the existing spatial structure (Fortin et al., 1989). Three of the four centroids on each transect were selected at random for sampling, while the fourth was skipped to keep the sample size from becoming too large. Also, to limit the sample size, we took three cores at two of the centroids, while we took only two cores at the other centroid. Cores were collected at random directions and distances from the centroids (all <4 m) (see Fig. 2). We generated unique random directions and distances for each plot. The location of each of the cores was determined in reference to a datum with a tape measure and compass.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Spatial sampling design used for this study.

 
The cores were collected, after scraping off the O horizon, by pounding a piston corer into the upper 20 cm of the soil horizon. Cores were retained inside individual plastic sleeves of 5 cm diameter. The volume of soil collected was approximately 87 cm3. In total we sampled eight cores per transect, 32 cores per plot, and 64 total cores. The cores were collected at RoBr on 9 July 2002 and at GrCr on 13 July 2002. Cores were stored in a cooler with ice until being transported back to the Duke Wetland Center Laboratory.

Laboratory Analyses of Soil Properties
Upon arrival at the laboratory, the cores were extruded from the plastic sleeves and split in half vertically with a sharp knife. Half of the core was oven-dried at 105°C for 24 h to determine the moisture content and bulk density. The dried soils were then ground and passed through a 2-mm sieve to remove pebbles and macroorganic matter. The sieved soil was then used to determine the percent SOM by loss on ignition (Campbell et al., 2002) and the percent clay, silt, and sand by the pipette method (Sheldrick and Wang, 1993).

The other half of the core was kept at field moisture and passed through a 2-mm sieve. The sieved field-moist soil was analyzed for pH (Hendershot et al., 1993) and oxalate-extractable aluminum (Alox) and iron (Feox) (Richardson, 1985). We used the phosphorus sorption index (PSI) to quantify the P sorption capacity of the soils in this study (Richardson, 1985). Previous studies have established that the PSI (i) serves as a reliable gauge of a wetland soil's P sorption potential, (ii) is less time-consuming to measure than multiple-point P sorption isotherms, and (iii) facilitates comparison with related soil properties (Richardson, 1985; Axt and Walbridge, 1999; Bridgham et al., 2001). The PSI was determined by shaking a sterilized soil sample with a solution of 130 mg P L–1 for 24 h. The difference in concentration of inorganic P between the initial (130) and final concentration represents the amount of P sorbed. The index is then calculated as X(log C)–1, where X is the amount of P sorbed (mg P 100 g soil–1) and C is the final inorganic P concentration in solution (mg P L–1).

Statistical Analyses
Means and standard errors for each soil property (n = 32) were calculated for both RoBr and GrCr. These values were based on the actual soil cores we collected, not on the additional values generated from the geostatistical analyses. Due to the nonindependent nature of the data, we did not compare mean values of the two sites with t tests or analysis of variance. Pearson correlations were also calculated to determine collinearities among soil properties so that redundant variables would not be included in the Mantel analysis.

Geostatistical Analyses
Semivariance analysis (GS+ Version 5.0; Gamma Design Software, 2000) was used to quantify the degree of spatial autocorrelation that exists among soil cores taken from each plot and to facilitate subsequent mapping of soil properties (Boerner et al., 1998). This analysis calculates an index of autocorrelation (the semivariance) among groups of paired samples separated by increasing distances. We calculated empirical semivariance values for eight equal (2 m) distance classes from 0 to 16 m. For both sites, the average number of sample pairs per distance class was 28. The empirical semivariance data were then fit with the spherical semivariogram model (Webster, 1985). A number of parameters were extracted from the fitted spherical model including the following: the nugget (Co, the semivariance at distance zero); the sill (Co + C, the y value at which the semivariance reaches an asymptote); and the range (Ao, the distance [x value] at which this leveling occurs). Finally, we determined Q, which is the ratio of the sill to the sum of the sill and nugget variance (Lyons et al., 1998). This Q parameter represents the proportion of the sample variance explained by the fitted model. In a plot with strong spatial structure, the Q value will approach 1.0; whereas in a plot without spatial structure, the Q value will approach 0.0 (Morris, 1999). We also used a system proposed by Cambardella et al. (1994) to define different classes of spatial dependence (S, strong spatial dependence; M, moderate spatial dependence; W, weak of spatial dependence) for the soil properties measured in this study that are based on the ratio of the nugget to the sill. If the nugget to sill ratio was ≤25%, the soil property was considered to be strongly spatially dependent, or distributed in patches; if the ratio was between 26 and 75%, the soil property was considered to be moderately spatially dependent; and if the ratio was >75% the soil property was considered to be weakly spatially dependent (Cambardella et al., 1994).

As the sample plots at each site were chosen for their relatively homogeneous topography and lack of major elevation gradients, we expected that isotropic semivariograms would be acceptable for modeling spatial variability of soil properties and P sorption. Furthermore, it appeared that isotropic semivariogram models fit the empirical semivariogram data better than did anisotropic semivariograms for most soil properties. The best-fit isotropic semivariogram model was then used to map the distribution of soil properties across the study plots by ordinary point kriging (with GS+), a form of nonlinear interpolation that provides optimal, unbiased estimates of points not sampled (Boerner et al., 1998; Ettema and Wardle, 2002).

Nonparametric Statistical Analyses: Simple and Partial Mantel Tests
Moisture, bulk density, and SOM were significantly collinear at both sites as were percent clay and percent silt with percent sand. Thus, we chose to omit moisture, bulk density, and percent sand from the Mantel analysis. While collinearities were found in some of the other soil properties, each was considered sufficiently unique to be included in the Mantel tests. Simple and partial Mantel tests were calculated for each site to analyze the effects of soil properties and spatial variability on P sorption. Mantel tests are a form of partial regression that measures the correlation between two distance or dissimilarity matrices (Mantel, 1967; Sanderson et al., 1995). By using distance matrices, the Mantel approach allowed us to extract variation in soil properties and P sorption that were due to spatial autocorrelation (King et al., 2004). As the elements of these matrices are not independent, standard parametric methods for determining significance of the correlation coefficient are not appropriate. Thus, the significance of the Mantel correlation was assessed by permutation (Manly, 1997). As Mantel correlation coefficients do not behave like product–moment correlation coefficients, they do not have to be large in absolute value to be statistically significant (Legendre and Fortin, 1989).

Partial Mantel tests were also used to calculate the partial correlation ({rho}) between individual soil properties and P sorption, controlling for the effects of spatial autocorrelation (Sanderson et al., 1995). Finally, pure-partial Mantel correlations were estimated. Here, the strength of correlation between a soil property and P sorption was assessed after variation attributed to all other soil properties and spatial autocorrelation had been removed (King et al., 2004). The pure-partial relationship of space and P sorption was also estimated, which would indicate a residual spatial pattern in P sorption that could only be explained by spatial factors (King et al., 2004).

For this study, as the soil properties were in different measurement units, they were standardized into z scores. This standardized data was then converted to a Euclidean distance matrix. Mantel tests were then conducted to examine the relationships of soil properties and space on P sorption capacity. The Mantel test procedure was performed in S+ (Version 6.1) using code developed by Goslee (Urban et al., 2002). Significance of the Mantel coefficients was estimated by bootstrapping with 10000 random permutations. As a visual framework for examining the correlations among P sorption, soil properties, and space, path diagrams were created to depict significant relationships among variables (Leduc et al., 1992).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Site Means
Both RoBr and GrCr had very similar mean soil moisture, bulk density, and pH values (see Table 1). Rowel Branch had mean SOM values that were almost double those of GrCr. Mean percent clay was slightly higher in RoBr than GrCr, while mean percent silt was more than 2.5 times higher in RoBr than GrCr. Conversely, mean percent sand content of RoBr was less than half that of GrCr. Mean Alox, Feox, and PSI values were approximately twice as high in RoBr than in GrCr.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Comparison of soil properties at each site.

 
Geostatistical Analyses of Soil Properties and Phosphorus Sorption
Semivariance analysis indicated that the majority of soil properties at RoBr and GrCr exhibited moderate to strong spatial structure. At RoBr, nugget values (scaled to sample variance for comparison purposes) ranged from 0.00 to 0.35 (see Table 2). Both pH and Feox had nugget values of 0.00, indicating there was little or no spatial variability in these soil properties at scales finer than that captured by our sampling design. At GrCr, by comparison, nugget values ranged from 0.16 to 0.65. Unlike RoBr, no soil properties at GrCr had nugget values of 0.00. Sill values at RoBr ranged from a low of 0.75 for Feox to a high of 1.06 for the PSI. Sill values at GrCr, by comparison, ranged from a low of 1.32 for the PSI to high of 2.44 for Feox.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Semivariogram characteristics for selected soil properties from Rowel Branch and Grindle Creek.

 
At RoBr and GrCr, relative spatial structure (Q) values, or the proportion of the variance explained by the fitted semivariogram models, ranged from 0.67 to 1.00. The Q values for pH and Feox and RoBr were each 1.00, indicating that the semivariogram models explained virtually all variance in these soil properties. At GrCr, by comparison, Feox had the highest Q value (0.93) followed by Alox (0.92). Unlike RoBr, pH at GrCr did not exhibit spatial structure. According to the classification developed by Cambardella et al. (1994), at RoBr, pH, Alox, and Feox exhibited strong spatial dependencies, while percent clay and PSI exhibited moderate spatial dependencies. In contrast, at GrCr, according Cambardella et al. (1994), Alox, Feox, and PSI exhibited strong spatial dependencies while percent clay exhibited moderate spatial dependence. At RoBr, the distances at which soil properties were autocorrelated, or range values, spanned from 6.7 m for pH to 32.5 m for the PSI. At GrCr, on the other hand, range values spanned from 26.1 m for the PSI to 41.0 m for percent clay and Feox. In general, range values at GrCr were either larger or similar to those at RoBr. At RoBr, the r2 values for the fit between actual and modeled semivariogram data varied from 0.00 for SOM to 0.73 for Alox. Spatial variability of SOM and percent silt at RoBr was not fit effectively by isotropic or anisotropic spherical semivariogram models. The r2 values for GrCr ranged from 0.04 for SOM to 0.88 for the PSI. As at RoBr, the spatial variability of SOM and percent silt at GrCr, as well as pH, were not fit effectively by isotropic or anisotropic spherical models.

As shown in the kriged map (Fig. 3a) , percent clay at RoBr exhibited a patchy distribution. Patches were generally 4 to 8 m in diameter and dispersed across the plot. Grindle Creek followed a different pattern, with the plot capturing only part of what appeared to be a single large patch with the high values near the lower left corner (Fig. 3b). The distribution of Alox at RoBr was similar to that of percent clay, except for the fact that patches of Alox were slightly larger than patches of clay (Fig. 3c). Compared with RoBr, there was much less variability in Alox content across the GrCr plot. The downstream areas (left side) of the GrCr plot had slightly higher Alox values than upstream areas (Fig. 3d). In terms of PSI, the RoBr plot had not only a higher but also a more heterogeneous distribution of values across the plot (Fig. 3e). At GrCr, on the other hand, PSI had a much more homogeneous distribution and increased slightly from the upstream to the downstream areas of the plot (Fig. 3f).



View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Spatial distribution of (a) percent clay, (c) oxalate-extractable aluminum (Alox), and (e) the phosphorus sorption index (PSI) at Rowel Branch (RoBr), and (b) percent clay, (d) Alox, and (f) PSI at Grindle Creek (GrCr). Contour maps were made by ordinary point kriging using spherical semivariogram models for each individual soil property.

 
Nonparametric Statistical Analyses: Simple and Partial Mantel Tests
Pearson correlation analysis indicated that all soil properties except for Feox at RoBr and percent silt at GrCr were significantly correlated with P sorption (see Table 3). By comparison, at RoBr, simple Mantel tests indicated that only SOM, percent silt, and Alox were significantly correlated with P sorption (Table 3). At GrCr, simple Mantel tests agreed with Pearson correlation analysis in revealing that SOM, pH, percent clay, Alox, and Feox were all significantly correlated with P sorption. For RoBr, simple Mantel tests also indicated that SOM, pH, percent silt, Alox, Feox, and PSI had significant Mantel correlations with space. For GrCr, percent silt, Alox, Feox, and PSI had significant Mantel correlations with space (Table 3, Fig. 4) . Partial Mantel tests revealed that at both sites, all of the soil properties that were significantly correlated to P sorption in the simple Mantel test continued to be significantly related to P sorption after removing the effects of space (Table 3, Fig. 4). However, pure-partial Mantel tests at RoBr indicated that after removing the effects of space and all other soil properties, only percent clay, percent silt, and Alox were significantly related to P sorption (Table 3, Fig. 4). Percent clay, which did not exhibit a significant correlation with P sorption in the simple Mantel test or partial Mantel test accounting for space, was significant as a pure-partial. Pure-partial tests at GrCr indicated that SOM, pH, percent clay, Alox, and Feox were all significantly related to P sorption (Table 3, Fig. 4). Finally, while significant in the simple Mantel tests, the pure-partial effect of space was not significant at either site, indicating that space did not account for a unique portion of the variability in the PSI that could not be accounted for by any of the soil properties.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Results of Pearson, simple, partial, and pure-partial Mantel correlations among individual soil properties (X), space (S), and P sorption (Y) at the two sites. Pearson coefficients are correlations of soil properties (X) with P sorption (Y). Mantel coefficients (r) are simple correlations of soil properties (X) with P sorption and with space (S), partial ({rho}) correlations with P sorption after controlling for autocorrelation, and pure-partial correlations with P sorption after controlling for autocorrelation and all other soil properties.{dagger}

 


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Path diagrams depicting the relationships among space, individual soil properties, and P sorption as estimated with Mantel tests for (a) Rowel Branch and (b) Grindle Creek. Dashed arrows show significant simple and partial Mantel correlations, while solid arrows show significant pure-partial correlations. The thickness of the arrows is proportional to the magnitude of the correlation. Alox and Feox, oxalate-extractable aluminum and iron, respectively; SOM, soil organic matter.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Site Means
The lack of difference in mean soil moisture between RoBr and GrCr suggested that during the summer of 2002, both sites may have experienced similar hydrologic conditions. The similarities in mean bulk density for RoBr and GrCr allowed us to express our data on a mass rather than a volumetric basis. We believe mass basis to be desirable for two reasons: (i) it allowed us to avoid having to multiply our precise concentration values by more uncertain bulk density values and (ii) because the dependent variable (PSI) is expressed in units of mass, we also wanted to express the independent variables, or soil properties, in units of mass. Our mean bulk density values for RoBr and GrCr were also similar to those reported for forested riparian wetlands in the Coastal Plain of Virginia (Axt and Walbridge, 1999).

Our mean SOM values of 21.8% at RoBr and 12.0% at GrCr were also similar to mean SOM values of 23.4 and 9.8% reported for two forested riparian wetlands in the Virginia Coastal Plain (Axt and Walbridge, 1999). These results suggested that there is considerable variability in mean SOM content among natural forested riparian wetlands in the southeastern Coastal Plain. The higher SOM content in RoBr may have contributed to its higher PSI values, as another study of Coastal Plain riparian wetlands reported a positive relationship between SOM and P sorption (Axt and Walbridge, 1999). Unlike SOM values, mean soil pH values at RoBr and GrCr were very similar. In addition, mean pH values for RoBr and GrCr were comparable with mean pH values of 4.1, 4.8, and 5.0 reported in other studies of forested riparian wetlands in the Coastal Plain (Axt and Walbridge, 1999; Darke and Walbridge, 2000).

The major difference in the texture of the soils from RoBr and GrCr was that mean percent silt at RoBr was more than double that of GrCr. Consequently, the soil of RoBr would be classified as a silt loam while the soil of GrCr would be classified as a sandy loam (Brady and Weil, 1999). Our results supported the generally accepted idea that soils dominated by fine-textured clays and silts will have a higher P sorption capacity than soils dominated by coarse-textured sands (Sample et al., 1980; Poach and Faulkner, 1998). Our data for mean percent clay, percent silt, and percent sand values of 11.4, 18.4, and 70.2% for GrCr were similar to values of 17.4, 15.1, and 67.5% reported for a floodplain forest in the Georgia Coastal Plain (Darke and Walbridge, 2000).

Oxalate-extractable Al concentrations of RoBr were almost double those of GrCr. Similarly, Feox concentrations of RoBr were much higher than GrCr. Our mean Alox values in RoBr and GrCr were similar both to mean values (1.97, 2.19, and 5.16 mg g–1) reported for a drainage catena spanning a forested riparian wetland in Rhode Island (Lyons et al., 1998), and to the mid-range values (4.50–6.00 mg g–1) reported for 11 swamp forests in Maryland (Richardson, 1985). Our Feox values were similar to mean values (2.16, 1.63, and 3.51 mg g–1) reported for the forested riparian wetland catena in Rhode Island (Lyons et al., 1998).

As previous studies have shown that Alox and Feox are highly correlated with the PSI (Richardson, 1985; Axt and Walbridge, 1999), it was not surprising that RoBr, which had almost twice as much Alox and Feox than GrCr, had mean PSI values that were almost double those of GrCr. Furthermore, the PSI has been shown to be positively correlated to SOM and silt (Axt and Walbridge, 1999), for which RoBr had significantly higher amounts than GrCr. Our mean PSI values for RoBr and GrCr (166.4 and 85.8) were similar to the range of PSI values for swamps in Maryland (approximately 20–160) (Richardson, 1985). These results illustrated that forested riparian wetlands in the southeastern Coastal Plain with similar vegetative communities and similar hydrogeomorphic settings may have very different P sorption capacities.

Geostatistical Analyses of Soil Properties and Phosphorus Sorption
Semivariance analysis indicated that at RoBr, pH, percent Alox, and Feox exhibited strong spatial dependencies, while at GrCr, Alox, Feox, and PSI exhibited strong spatial dependencies. At both sites, percent clay exhibited moderate spatial structuring. As nugget values, which can be viewed as indicators of spatial continuity at close distances, were lower at RoBr than at GrCr for percent clay, Alox, and Feox, it appeared that RoBr exhibited greater fine-scale heterogeneity in soil properties than GrCr. In other words, variance among soil cores taken at short distances from each other was greater at RoBr than at GrCr for the majority of soil properties. A number of the measured soil properties at both sites exhibited high relative spatial structure values, indicating that the spherical model explained the spatial structure of these soil properties quite effectively. For example, sample variances for Alox and Feox at both sites were 90 to 100% spatially structured. Ranges of autocorrelation for soil properties commonly related to P sorption tended to be smaller at RoBr than at GrCr.

The high degree of spatial variability of Alox and Feox observed in this study corroborated with previous studies that reported substantial spatial variability of these soil properties in riparian zones (Lyons et al., 1998; Darke and Walbridge, 2000; Johnston et al., 2001). For example, the study in Rhode Island found that Alox exhibited a range of autocorrelation of 8.8 m and Feox a range of 4.3 m (Lyons et al., 1998). These were similar to the values we reported in this study for Alox at RoBr (13.2 m) and for Feox at RoBr (7.6 m). Unlike the study in Rhode Island, in which P sorption did not exhibit spatial autocorrelation (Lyons et al., 1998), our semivariance data for both RoBr and GrCr suggested that P sorption was spatially autocorrelated.

The tendency of soil properties at RoBr to vary at smaller scales than soil properties at GrCr was further illustrated by the kriged maps. These maps presented a striking illustration of the spatial distributions of percent clay, Alox, and PSI across the study plots. For example, percent clay in the RoBr plot was particularly heterogeneous with patches of high and low clay content. Patch size for percent clay in the GrCr plot, on the other hand, was much larger, as the sample plot captured only part of a larger patch of high clay soil. The spatial distribution of Alox across the two study plots followed a similar pattern to percent clay, with greater heterogeneity in the RoBr plot. High PSI areas in both plots typically were located in areas that had high percent clay and high Alox content. The differences in spatial distributions of soil properties between the two sites may be due to the fact that RoBr was adjacent to a second-order stream while GrCr was adjacent to a third-order stream. Differential frequencies, durations, and intensities of flooding may cause soil properties of headwater streams to be more heterogeneous than those of larger-order streams. In addition, areas within the plots that were further downstream or at slightly lower elevations may have been subject to greater deposition of fine-textured materials that have an affinity for P sorption.

If the spatial heterogeneity of soil properties and P sorption observed in this study is representative of natural forested riparian wetlands in the southeastern Coastal Plain, there are a number of important implications. First, it appears that due to the inherent variability of soil properties in riparian zones, attempts to characterize soil properties in these zones by taking a single soil sample or even by random sampling may be inappropriate. For example, if we had randomly taken three cores from each plot, we might not have found a significant difference between PSI values at RoBr and GL, let alone have any idea about the spatial distribution of P sorption across the two study plots. As noted in other recent studies of wetland soils (Johnston et al., 2001), we recommend that sampling schemes in riparian zones be designed to capture spatial variability of soil properties to extrapolate soil properties across sites with greater accuracy. Second, water quality models may also inaccurately extrapolate homogeneous P sorption values across riparian zones, when in fact P sorption in these zones is highly heterogeneous. Third, our results indicate that assessment of wetland functions with geographic information systems (GIS) analyses that rely on vegetative cover data may be unreliable, as we have shown that two forested riparian wetlands with similar vegetation and hydrogeomorphic settings had very different P sorption capacities and associated patterns of spatial variability. Lastly, relationships of soil properties to P sorption may continue to be oversimplified, if we continue to ignore the fact that these properties are spatially autocorrelated and should be measured with spatial sampling designs. Therefore, despite the additional sampling and labwork required for spatially explicit research, we not only believe it to be worthwhile, but also necessary to further our understanding of P sorption dynamics. Improving our understanding of the spatial variability of soil properties in forested riparian wetlands may also provide insights on how to better reproduce patterns of natural variation in restored or created wetlands (Mummey et al., 2002).

Nonparametric Statistical Analyses: Simple and Partial Mantel Tests
There are some important caveats that should be made before discussing the results of the Mantel tests. First, while "space," in and of itself, does not control the distribution of soil properties at these sites, a significant Mantel correlation with space indicates that soil properties at RoBr and GrCr were influenced by biotic or abiotic processes having spatial components (Leduc et al., 1992). Second, although these Mantel analyses do not establish causation (Petraitis et al., 1996), they do offer strong evidence as to which soil properties are most likely to influence P sorption in natural forested riparian wetlands and suggest the best variables for use in future studies. Third, differences in P sorption at RoBr and GrCr may partially be the result of soil properties that were not measured in this study, such as redox potential or exchangeable calcium. Finally, the measured values for the soil properties may have been noisier than the precise distance measurements, causing statistical relationships to be degraded (King et al., 2004).

Despite these caveats, the strong spatial dependencies of soil properties at RoBr and GrCr as well as the strong Pearson correlations for almost all measured soil properties with PSI, made it necessary to employ a spatially explicit approach to determine which soil properties best explained P sorption. At both RoBr and GrCr, a number of soil properties exhibited significant simple Mantel correlations with PSI. The partial Mantel tests allowed us to examine the relationship of soil properties to P sorption after removing the effects of spatial autocorrelation. At both RoBr and GrCr, none of the soil properties that exhibited significant simple Mantel correlations with PSI ceased to be significantly related to PSI, after partialling out the effects of space. However, at RoBr, after removing the effects of all the other soil properties and space, only Alox and percent silt continued to have significant correlations with P sorption, and percent clay actually emerged with a significant correlation to PSI. Had we not employed the Mantel tests, we would have concluded that, at RoBr, SOM and pH were significant predictors of P sorption. In actuality, once we accounted for collinearities with other soil properties and spatial autocorrelation, SOM and pH were no longer significantly related to P sorption. Furthermore, we might have concluded that at RoBr, percent clay was not a useful predictor of PSI. However, according to the pure-partial Mantel test, percent clay accounted for a unique part of the variability in P sorption that was not accounted for by any other soil property. While previous studies have shown Feox to be an excellent predictor of P sorption (Darke and Walbridge, 2000; Bridgham et al., 2001), at RoBr, Feox did not exhibit a significant Mantel correlation with P sorption. One explanation for this may be that acid ammonium oxalate extracts appreciable amounts of magnetite Fe, which does not bind with phosphate (Walbridge and Struthers, 1993). The RoBr site may have had higher pools of magnetite Fe than did the GrCr site. At GrCr, after removing the effects of all other soil properties and space, SOM, pH, percent clay, Alox, and Feox all remained significant predictors of P sorption.

We determined the soil property with the strongest pure-partial Mantel correlation with PSI at both RoBr and GrCr to be Alox. While Alox was the best predictor of PSI at both sites, the different suites of soil properties that had significant pure-partial Mantel correlations with PSI at RoBr and GrCr suggested that P sorption dynamics may vary from site to site, depending not only upon the amounts but also upon the spatial distributions of soil properties across the sites. However, if Alox is the master variable controlling PSI in natural forested riparian wetlands with acid soils, as suggested by previous studies (Richardson, 1985), we recommend that future research of P sorption dynamics in riparian wetlands should focus on Alox, as well as factors that control development and spatial distribution of amorphous aluminum pools including parent material, weathering, and organic matter accumulation. In future studies, if financial or logistical constraints limit the number of soil properties to be analyzed, it appears that the measurement of Alox alone will give a strong indication of the P sorption capacity. Further research is also needed to determine whether the quantity and spatial distribution of Alox found in natural wetlands can be found in similar degrees in mitigation wetlands.


    CONCLUSIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Two forested riparian wetlands with similar vegetation and hydrology had substantially different mean P sorption capacities due to differences in percent clay, Alox, and Feox. Our spatially explicit sampling design allowed us to use semivariance analysis to determine that pH, Alox, and Feox exhibited strong spatial dependencies at RoBr, while Alox, Feox, and PSI exhibited strong spatial dependencies at GrCr. Nugget values, ranges of autocorrelation, and kriged maps also helped to illustrate that soil properties at RoBr appeared to vary at smaller scales than soil properties at GrCr. Had we used a uniform or random sampling design and taken fewer cores per plot, as is commonly done in this type of study, we would have not captured the rich spatial structure of the soil properties in the RoBr and GrCr plots. We determined that at both sites, the soil property that best explained the variability in PSI after accounting for the effects of spatial autocorrelation was Alox. While a strong correlation has been shown to exist between Alox and PSI in previous studies, none of these studies explicitly accounted for the effects of spatial autocorrelation. Thus we were able to illustrate the robust nature of the relationship between Alox and PSI in a way that has not been shown before. While Alox was the best predictor of PSI at each site, the fact each site had a different suite of soil properties that were significantly related to P sorption suggested that P sorption dynamics may vary from site to site, depending on the spatial distributions of soil properties at the site. Our results indicated that future research of P sorption in riparian wetlands should be performed with an appropriate spatial sampling design, because related soil properties exhibited strong spatial structure. Improving our understanding of the spatial variability of soil properties in forested riparian wetlands may help us to develop more accurate models of P sorption and provide insights on how to better reproduce patterns of natural variation in restored or created wetlands. We believe this spatially explicit Mantel approach is robust and could serve as a model for future research of spatial and edaphic controls on other important biogeochemical processes in wetlands such as decomposition, denitrification, and nitrogen fixation.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Dr. Dean Urban for guidance in developing the spatial sampling design, Dave Schiller and Leilani Paugh of the NCDOT for assistance with site identification and access, Rob Moul and Kim Williams of Land Management Inc., for supplying us with background information about the Rowel Branch site, Wes Willis and Paul Heine for assistance with the laboratory analysis at the Duke Wetland Center, Holly Bruland, and two anonymous reviewers for critical reviews of earlier drafts of the manuscript. Funding was provided by a Graduate Research Fellowship to the first author from the Center for Transportation and the Environment in Raleigh, North Carolina, and from the Duke University Wetland Center Case Studies Program.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 


Related articles in JEQ:

This Issue in Journal of Environmental Quality

JEQ 2004 33: 413-418. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
R. E. Vaughan, B. A. Needelman, P. J. A. Kleinman, and A. L. Allen
Spatial Variation of Soil Phosphorus within a Drainage Ditch Network
J. Environ. Qual., May 25, 2007; 36(4): 1096 - 1104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
G. L. Bruland, S. Grunwald, T. Z. Osborne, K. R. Reddy, and S. Newman
Spatial Distribution of Soil Properties in Water Conservation Area 3 of the Everglades
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., August 3, 2006; 70(5): 1662 - 1676.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
C. J. Anderson, W. J. Mitsch, and R. W. Nairn
Temporal and Spatial Development of Surface Soil Conditions at Two Created Riverine Marshes
J. Environ. Qual., October 12, 2005; 34(6): 2072 - 2081.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
M. J. Cohen, J. P. Prenger, and W. F. DeBusk
Visible-Near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy for Rapid, Nondestructive Assessment of Wetland Soil Quality
J. Environ. Qual., July 5, 2005; 34(4): 1422 - 1434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
G. L. Bruland and C. J. Richardson
Spatial Variability of Soil Properties in Created, Restored, and Paired Natural Wetlands
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2005; 69(1): 273 - 284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in JEQ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bruland, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bruland, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, C. J.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation