|
|
||||||||
USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Pasture Systems and Watershed Management Research Unit, Building 3702, Curtin Rd., University Park, PA 16802-3702
* Corresponding author (Peter.Vadas{at}ars.usda.gov).
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Given this low P threshold of water bodies and the fact that P losses can be highly variable within watersheds and among management practices, certain small, defined areas of the landscape can be major sources of P exported from watersheds (Pionke et al., 2000; Sharpley et al., 2002). The subsequent challenge for the agricultural community, from scientists to producers, is to identify agricultural areas with a high potential for P export, accurately quantify that P export, and assess the ability of alternative management practices to minimize P export (Coale et al., 2002; Gburek et al., 2000). Water quality simulation models are seen as one relatively rapid and cost effective way to help achieve these goals (Sharpley et al., 2002).
While significant loss of P from agricultural fields can occur through leaching in sandy soils (Novak et al., 2000), organic soils (Porter and Sanchez, 1992), and soils with artificial drainage (Heckrath et al., 1995), the primary pathway of P loss from the majority of agricultural soils is through surface runoff. The three major sources of P to surface runoff are soil, plant material, and applied fertilizers, manures, or biosolids (Hanson et al., 2002; Heathwaite and Dils, 2000; Withers et al., 2001). Research has clearly shown that even though soil and plant material can be significant sources of P to runoff, their effect is overwhelmed by P release from recently applied manures and fertilizers (Eghball and Gilley, 1999; Kleinman et al., 2002a; Moore et al., 2000). However, most water quality models do not simulate surface application of manures, a common practice in many areas of the USA, and therefore do not consider direct loss of P from manures to runoff. Instead, models incorporate manure P into soil P pools and adjust extraction coefficients of these pools. The result is a poor representation and often underprediction of P loss in runoff (Pierson et al., 2001b; Sharpley et al., 2002). Therefore, such models could be greatly improved by adding routines to simulate P loss directly from surface-applied manures to runoff.
The objective of this research was to develop a method to predict both P release to water from animal manures and dissolved P concentrations in runoff from soils where animal manures have been surface-applied.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
![]() | [1] |
, and ß are empirical constants for a given soil. Equation [1] was developed based on the observations that P release from soil to water increases as both the water to soil ratio and the time of interaction between soil and water increase. Kleinman et al. (2002b) demonstrated similar relationships between time and water to manure ratio for P release from fresh dairy, swine, and poultry manures to water in laboratory experiments. Therefore, we theorized that a model similar to Eq. [1] could accurately describe P release from manure to water. Kleinman et al. (2002b) measured dissolved inorganic P release from fresh manures to water at shaking times ranging from 1 to 1440 min and a constant added deionized water to manure ratio of 200:1 and found that the relationship between P release and shaking time was described by lognormal equations, such that P release approached a maximum within a 24 h extraction. They also observed that more than 70% of this maximum P release occurred within 60 min. Elsewhere, Dou et al. (2002) conducted water extractions on dried and ground poultry and dairy manure with shaking times ranging from 1 to 16 h. Similar to Kleinman et al. (2002b), they found that more than 90% of the P extracted at 16 h had been extracted within 60 min.
In field situations, it is likely that the interaction between surface-applied manures and rain or surface runoff water will last at least 60 min for many rainfall events. Furthermore, the majority of water quality models rarely operate on less than an hourly time step. Given these considerations and the observations by Kleinman et al. (2002b) and Dou et al. (2002) that the majority of P release from manures to water will occur within 60 min, it is reasonable to omit a time parameter in an equation to predict P release from manure to water. Therefore, based on the concepts of Eq. [1] and the observations of Kleinman et al. (2002b), the release of P from manures to water can be described as simply a function of the water-extractable P concentration of manure and the ratio of the quantity of extracting water to the quantity of manure (water to manure ratio). Such relationships between P release from fresh manures and water to manure ratio are shown in Fig. 1a for the experiments conducted by Kleinman et al. (2002b) for dairy, poultry, and swine manures. In this figure, the water to manure ratios take into account the liquid already present in the manures and the deionized water added during extractions.
|
Kleinman et al. (2002b) conducted 20-min water extractions of fresh dairy, poultry, and swine manures at water to manure ratios ranging from 10 to 250 (Fig. 1a). These ratios consider both water already in the fresh manures and deionized water added during extractions. Since the maximum water to manure ratio used was 250, we normalized the data of Kleinman et al. (2002b)(Fig. 1a) by expressing the ordinate axis as the ratio of inorganic P released at a given water to manure ratio to the maximum P released at a 250:1 water to manure ratio (Fig. 1b). For these data, inorganic P release was best described by linear relationships for poultry and swine manures and by a power function equation for dairy manure. We then plotted the data from Dou et al. (2000)(2002) in the figure for comparison, and observed that their data fell relatively well in line with the trends in the Kleinman et al. (2002b) data (Fig. 1b). The combined findings of Dou et al. (2000)( 2002) and Kleinman et al. (2002b) show that the maximum amount of manure P that can be released to water is reasonably estimated by a single extraction with water at a 250:1 water to manure ratio for 60 min. From the data in PFig. 1b, P release from dairy, poultry, or swine manure to water can thus be described by the equations:
![]() | [2] |
![]() | [3] |
![]() | [4] |
Model Testing
Leaching of Dissolved Phosphorus from Manure during Simulated Rainfall
We used data from Sharpley and Moyer (2000), who investigated the forms of P in various animal manures and composts and their release to water when subjected to simulated rainfall. They measured water-extractable inorganic and organic P in fresh manures and composts by shaking manure and deionized water for 60 min at an added water to manure ratio of 200:1. Afterward, they applied fresh manure and compost at a rate of 20 g dry weight basis to filter paper mounted on leaching columns and applied rainfall at a rate of approximately 70 mm h1 for 30 min. All leachate was collected in one bulk sample, filtered through 0.45-µm filter paper, and analyzed for dissolved inorganic and organic P by the method of Murphy and Riley (1962). Manures and composts were then allowed to freely drain by gravity for 24 h at room temperature. The rainfalldraining cycle was repeated four more times for a total of five leaching events. Taking into account the initial moisture content of the manures and composts and the amount of rainfall applied in the experiments, the resulting W values for Eq. [2], [3], and [4] ranged from 31 to 40.
We used Eq. [2], [3], and [4] to predict P release from manures and composts for all five leaching events. For dairy composts, we used Eq. [2]; for poultry litter and composts, we used Eq. [4]. Although Eq. [2], [3], and [4] were determined using data from inorganic P release from manures, we used them to predict both inorganic and organic P release from manures. For organic P release predictions, water-extractable P in Eq. [2], [3], and [4] was organic P instead of inorganic P. For each manure or compost, we subtracted the amount of predicted P released from the first leaching event from the initial amount of manure water-extractable P on the right hand side of Eq. [2], [3], and [4]. We used the resulting differences as new values for manure water-extractable P to predict P release for the second leaching event. We carried this method through to predict both inorganic and organic P release for all five leaching events.
Dissolved Inorganic Phosphorus Loss in Runoff from Soils with Surface-Applied Manures
We used P runoff data from Kleinman et al. (2002a)(2004) and Kleinman and Sharpley (2003). All of these studies used boxes packed with soil and subjected to simulated rainfall that followed the protocol of the National P Research Project (National Phosphorus Research Project, 2003). Soils used were Buchanan (fine-loamy, mixed, semiactive, Aquic Fragiudult), Hagerstown (fine, mixed, semiactive, mesic Typic Hapludalf), Hartleton (loamy-skeletal, mixed, active, mesic Typic Hapludult), Honeoye (fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Glossic Hapludalf), and Lewbeach (coarse-loamy, mixed, semiactive, frigid Typic Fragiudept). Briefly, soils were packed into stainless steel runoff boxes that were 100 cm long by 20 cm wide by either 7.5 or 27.5 cm deep and had nine drainage holes. Soil in boxes was leveled to a depth of either 5 or 25 cm deep, with bulk densities between 1.2 and 1.4 g cm3. Soils were pre-wet 24 to 72 h before runoff experiments started. Boxes were placed at a 5% slope under a rainfall simulator based on the design of Miller (1987). Fresh dairy, poultry, or swine manure was surface-applied to boxes at a rate of 100 kg total manure P ha1. Kleinman and Sharpley (2003) also had manure application rates of 10, 50, 75, and 150 kg total manure P ha1. All manures had been analyzed for water-extractable P by shaking with deionized water for 60 min at an added water to manure ratio of 200:1. Seventy-two hours after manure application to soils, simulated rainfall was applied at an approximate intensity of 75 mm h1 until 30 min of runoff had been collected. The time until runoff initiation was recorded so that the total amount of rain falling on the boxes was known. All runoff was collected in a single container, and subsamples were filtered through 0.45-µm filter paper and analyzed for dissolved reactive P by the method of Murphy and Riley (1962). Kleinman et al. (2002a)(2004) conducted only one set of runoff experiments at 72 h after manure application, whereas Kleinman and Sharpley (2003) conducted three sets of runoff experiments at 3, 10, and 24 d after manure application.
To supplement the data from the above studies, we also conducted a series of runoff experiments whose protocol followed that of the previous experiments described above. Briefly, a Mardin channery silt loam soil (coarse-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Typic Fragiudepts) was packed into runoff boxes that were 100 cm long by 20 cm wide by 7.5 cm deep and had nine drainage holes. Soils in boxes were leveled to a depth of 5 cm and were pre-wet 24 h before runoff experiments started. Boxes were placed at a 5% slope under a rainfall simulator and fresh dairy, poultry, or swine manure was surface-applied to boxes at a rate of 100 kg total manure P ha1. Twenty-four hours later, simulated rainfall was applied at an approximate intensity of 75 mm h1 until 30 min of runoff had been collected. Instead of one bulk sample, runoff was collected in discrete 5-min increments, and subsamples were filtered through 0.45-µm filter paper and analyzed for dissolved reactive P by the method of Murphy and Riley (1962).
Using data from the above studies, we tested Eq. [2], [3], and [4] for their ability to predict dissolved P concentrations in runoff from soils where manures had been surface-applied. None of the experiments estimated dissolved organic P concentrations in runoff, so we tested Eq. [2], [3], and [4] for their ability to predict only dissolved inorganic P in runoff. We calculated values for W in Eq. [2], [3], and [4] as the volume of rainfall (cm3) divided by the dry weight mass (g) of manure applied to the boxes. For the consecutive runoff experiments of Kleinman and Sharpley (2003), we subtracted the amount of predicted P released from manures during the first runoff event from the initial amount of manure water-extractable P on the right hand side of Eq. [2], [3], and [4]. We used the resulting differences as new values for manure water-extractable P to predict P release for the second runoff event. We carried this method through to predict P release for the third runoff event. Values for W were held constant for all three runoff events. Finally, Eq. [2], [3], and [4] predict the amount of P release from manure in mg kg1, and dissolved inorganic P in runoff in all studies was measured as mg L1. Therefore, to convert mg kg1 to mg L1 to predict dissolved inorganic P in runoff, we divided the right sides of Eq. [2], [3], and [4] by their respective values of W.
| RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Effect of the Runoff to Rainfall Ratio on Dissolved Inorganic Phosphorus in Runoff
At the beginning of a rain event when soils are relatively dry and no runoff occurs, P released from manure to rain water will infiltrate into the soil. It is likely that the concentrations of P released from manure are greatest at this point. As soils become wetter and runoff begins, only a small proportion of rainfall is converted to runoff. At this point, P released from manure both enters the soil in infiltrating water and moves over the soil in runoff. Eventually, when soils become saturated, most of the rainfall is converted to runoff, and nearly all the P released from manure moves in runoff. At this point, P concentrations leaving manure will be significantly less than at the initial stages of the rainfall event (Sharpley and Moyer, 2000).
This phenomena of high initial P release from manure followed by decreasing P release is supported by data collected from our newly conducted runoff experiments. In this study, poultry, dairy, and swine manures were surface-applied to soil boxes at a rate of 100 kg total manure P ha1 and subjected to simulated rainfall until 30 min of runoff had been collected. This provided the same conditions as the previous studies of Kleinman et al. (2002a)(2004) and Kleinman and Sharpley (2003), except that runoff was collected in discrete 5-min increments instead of one bulk sample. For all manures, incremental runoff volumes were fairly constant after 10 min, but incremental dissolved inorganic P concentrations in runoff were decreasing (Table 1).
|
Figure 3a shows that Eq. [2], [3], and [4] essentially predict a constant rate of P release from manure for a rain event. Therefore, when all rainfall is converted to runoff, the equations provide a good prediction of dissolved inorganic P concentrations in runoff. However, when little rainfall is converted to runoff, the equations overpredict dissolved inorganic P concentrations in runoff. To account for increasing incremental runoff relative to rainfall and decreasing incremental P release from manure over a runoff event, we multiplied the concentrations of dissolved inorganic P in runoff predicted by Eq. [2], [3], and [4] for the data of our newly conducted runoff experiments and the experiments of Kleinman et al. (2002a)(2004), and the first runoff event of Kleinman and Sharpley (2003) where manure was applied at a rate of 100 kg total manure P ha1 (Fig. 3a) by the ratio of runoff to rainfall. The predictions in Fig. 4a are much improved compared with those in Fig. 3a. However, runoff dissolved inorganic P concentrations for dairy and swine manures are overpredicted, while predictions for poultry manures are good. The disparity of these results leads to the second issue of the effect of manure characteristics on dissolved inorganic P in runoff.
|
Hill and Baier (2000) determined the fraction of P dissolved in the freely draining liquid portion of swine manure that had a water content of 98%. They found that as much as 80% of the water-extractable P in swine manure was in the freely draining liquid phase. In a series of experiments designed to determine how much of a manure slurry's water-extractable P is in its freely draining liquid phase, Vadas (unpublished data, 2003) observed that for dairy slurries, roughly 65% of water-extractable P is in the liquid phase; and for swine slurries, roughly 40% of water-extractable P is in the liquid phase.
In the 72 h between manure application and runoff events in our studies, this infiltrated P should have reacted with the soil and become much less available to loss in runoff compared with the P in the manure solids left on the soil surface. Westerman and Overcash (1980) applied liquid poultry and swine wastes to soils and flushed them with runoff water at different initial times ranging from 1 h to 3 d after application. They found that P concentrations in runoff at 1 h averaged 32 mg L1 and were on average 15 times greater than P concentrations in runoff at 3 d. At 3 d, P concentrations in runoff from treated soils averaged three times those in runoff from control soils. Similarly, Edwards and Daniel (1993a) applied liquid swine manure to pasture plots at a rate of 46 kg total manure P ha1 and collected runoff from simulated rainfall at initial times of 4, 7, and 14 d after application. They found that delaying the time to runoff had no effect on P concentrations in runoff, which averaged 12.9 mg L1, suggesting that any manure P that had infiltrated into the soil upon application had fully reacted within 4 d. Phosphorus concentrations in runoff from treated soils were about seven times those of control soils. Comparatively, Edwards and Daniel (1993b) applied liquid swine manure to pasture plots at a rate of 38 kg total manure P ha1, which is 17% less than Edwards and Daniel (1993a), and measured P concentrations in runoff after 24 h of 29.7 mg L1, which is 2.3 times greater than Edwards and Daniel (1993a).
The findings of Edwards and Daniel (1993a)(1993b) and Westerman and Overcash (1980) suggest that when the dairy and swine manures were surface-applied to soils in our investigated runoff box studies, water-extractable P in the freely draining manure liquid infiltrated into the soil, reacted with soil over the 72 h between manure and rainfall application, and became less available to runoff. This reaction was likely rapid enough that subsequent loss of dissolved inorganic P in runoff was much more from wet manure solids remaining on the soil surface than from the underlying soil. Even though the soil P likely increased from manure additions, it is unlikely that desorption of P from the soils accounted for a large proportion of the observed P loss in runoff. Kleinman et al. (2002a) clearly showed that compared with unamended soils, dissolved inorganic P concentrations in runoff are greater when manures are incorporated into soils. However, these incorporated runoff P concentrations are still much less compared with runoff P concentrations when manures are left unincorporated on soil surfaces. In their study, dissolved P concentrations in runoff after incorporating manures into soils averaged only 5% of dissolved P concentrations in runoff when manures were unincorporated. This discussion is not intended to suggest that soils will not contribute environmentally significant quantities of dissolve inorganic P to surface runoff. To the contrary, a vast amount of literature shows that soils with high concentrations of P are significant sources of dissolved inorganic P loss in runoff (Sharpley et al., 2002). However, the studies referenced above show that when manures are left unincorporated on the soil surface, their release of dissolved inorganic P to runoff is likely to overwhelm the release of dissolved inorganic P by the underlying soil.
For our predictions using the runoff data of newly conducted experiments and experiments of Kleinman et al. (2002a)(2004) and the first runoff event of Kleinman and Sharpley (2003) where manure was applied at a rate of 100 kg total manure P ha1, we multiplied measured values for manure water-extractable P in Eq. [2], [3], and [4] by 0.35 for dairy manures and 0.60 for swine manures. These adjustment factors are based on the results of Hill and Baier (2000) and the observations of Vadas (unpublished data, 2003) and represent the fact that 65% of water-extractable P in the diary slurries and 40% in the swine slurries were dissolved in the freely draining water. This P infiltrated into the soil upon slurry application and was rendered significantly less available to runoff between the time of slurry application and the beginning of simulated rainfall. No adjustment was made for the poultry manure because there was no freely draining water available for infiltration. The results of the 0.35 or 0.60 adjustment factor are shown in Fig. 4b. Compared with the results in Fig. 4a, there is now good prediction of dissolved inorganic P in runoff for all three manure types.
Figure 5 compares dissolved inorganic P concentrations in runoff for three consecutive runoff events using two types of soil and poultry, dairy, and swine manures surface-applied at five different rates as predicted by Eq. [2], [3], and [4] and as measured by Kleinman and Sharpley (2003). The predictions for the first runoff event have been adjusted by factors of 0.35 for dairy manures and 0.60 for swine manures to account for immediate infiltration of P in the freely draining water of the manures. Predictions for all events have been adjusted by the runoff to rainfall ratio. Figure 5 shows that Eq. [2], [3], and [4], with appropriate adjustments, are able to accurately predict dissolved inorganic P concentrations in runoff from different soil types where three different manures have been surface-applied at several different rates and have been subjected to three consecutive runoff events.
|
![]() | [5] |
![]() | [6] |
![]() | [7] |
| CONCLUSIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related articles in JEQ:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. K. Udeigwe, J. J. Wang, and H. Zhang Predicting Runoff of Suspended Solids and Particulate Phosphorus for Selected Louisiana Soils Using Simple Soil Tests J. Environ. Qual., July 17, 2007; 36(5): 1310 - 1317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Vadas, W. J. Gburek, A. N. Sharpley, P. J. A. Kleinman, P. A. Moore Jr., M. L. Cabrera, and R. D. Harmel A Model for Phosphorus Transformation and Runoff Loss for Surface-Applied Manures J. Environ. Qual., January 9, 2007; 36(1): 324 - 332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. K. Guber, D. R. Shelton, Y. A. Pachepsky, A. M. Sadeghi, and L. J. Sikora Rainfall-Induced Release of Fecal Coliforms and Other Manure Constituents: Comparison and Modeling Appl. Envir. Microbiol., December 1, 2006; 72(12): 7531 - 7539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. A. Kleinman, M. S. Srinivasan, C. J. Dell, J. P. Schmidt, A. N. Sharpley, and R. B. Bryant Role of Rainfall Intensity and Hydrology in Nutrient Transport via Surface Runoff. J. Environ. Qual., July 1, 2006; 35(4): 1248 - 1259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Vadas and P. J. A. Kleinman Effect of Methodology in Estimating and Interpreting Water-Extractable Phosphorus in Animal Manures J. Environ. Qual., May 31, 2006; 35(4): 1151 - 1159. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Vadas, T. Krogstad, and A. N. Sharpley Modeling Phosphorus Transfer between Labile and Nonlabile Soil Pools: Updating the EPIC Model Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 29, 2006; 70(3): 736 - 743. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Vadas Distribution of Phosphorus in Manure Slurry and Its Infiltration after Application to Soils J. Environ. Qual., February 2, 2006; 35(2): 542 - 547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. B. Leytem, B. L. Turner, V. Raboy, and K. L. Peterson Linking Manure Properties to Phosphorus Solubility in Calcareous Soils: Importance of the Manure Carbon to Phosphorus Ratio Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., August 4, 2005; 69(5): 1516 - 1524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Penn, G. L. Mullins, and L. W. Zelazny Mineralogy in Relation to Phosphorus Sorption and Dissolved Phosphorus Losses in Runoff Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., August 4, 2005; 69(5): 1532 - 1540. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Vadas, B. E. Haggard, and W. J. Gburek Predicting Dissolved Phosphorus in Runoff from Manured Field Plots J. Environ. Qual., July 5, 2005; 34(4): 1347 - 1353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Gerard-Marchant, M. T. Walter, and T. S. Steenhuis Simple Models for Phosphorus Loss from Manure during Rainfall J. Environ. Qual., April 20, 2005; 34(3): 872 - 876. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. A. Kleinman, A. M. Wolf, A. N. Sharpley, D. B. Beegle, and L. S. Saporito Survey of Water-Extractable Phosphorus in Livestock Manures Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., April 11, 2005; 69(3): 701 - 708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. D. Schroeder, D. E. Radcliffe, and M. L. Cabrera Rainfall Timing and Poultry Litter Application Rate Effects on Phosphorus Loss in Surface Runoff J. Environ. Qual., November 1, 2004; 33(6): 2201 - 2209. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Vadas, J. J. Meisinger, L. J. Sikora, J. P. McMurtry, and A. E. Sefton Effect of Poultry Diet on Phosphorus in Runoff from Soils Amended with Poultry Manure and Compost J. Environ. Qual., September 1, 2004; 33(5): 1845 - 1854. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||