JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scheutz, C.
Right arrow Articles by Kjeldsen, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scheutz, C.
Right arrow Articles by Kjeldsen, P.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Scheutz, C.
Right arrow Articles by Kjeldsen, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Bioremediation and Biodegradation
Published in J. Environ. Qual. 33:61-71 (2004).
© ASA, CSSA, SSSA
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Bioremediation and Biodegradation

Attenuation of Methane and Volatile Organic Compounds in Landfill Soil Covers

Charlotte Scheutz*, Hans Mosbæk and Peter Kjeldsen

Environment & Resources, Bygningstorvet-Building 115, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark

* Corresponding author (chs{at}er.dtu.dk).

Received for publication November 13, 2002.

    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 PERSPECTIVES
 REFERENCES
 
The potential for natural attenuation of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in landfill covers was investigated in soil microcosms incubated with methane and air, simulating the gas composition in landfill soil covers. Soil was sampled at Skellingsted Landfill at a location emitting methane. In total, 26 VOCs were investigated, including chlorinated methanes, ethanes, ethenes, fluorinated hydrocarbons, and aromatic hydrocarbons. The soil showed a high capacity for methane oxidation resulting in very high oxidation rates of between 24 and 112 µg CH4 g–1 h–1. All lower chlorinated compounds were shown degradable, and the degradation occurred in parallel with the oxidation of methane. In general, the degradation rates of the chlorinated aliphatics were inversely related to the chlorine to carbon ratios. For example, in batch experiments with chlorinated ethylenes, the highest rates were observed for vinyl chloride (VC) and lowest rates for trichloroethylene (TCE), while tetrachloroethylene (PCE) was not degraded. Maximal oxidation rates for the halogenated aliphatic compounds varied between 0.03 and 1.7 µg g–1 h–1. Fully halogenated hydrocarbons (PCE, tetrachloromethane [TeCM], chlorofluorocarbon [CFC]-11, CFC-12, and CFC-113) were not degraded in the presence of methane and oxygen. Aromatic hydrocarbons were rapidly degraded giving high maximal oxidation rates (0.17–1.4 µg g–1 h–1). The capacity for methane oxidation was related to the depth of oxygen penetration. The methane oxidizers were very active in oxidizing methane and the selected trace components down to a depth of 50 cm below the surface. Maximal oxidation activity occurred in a zone between 15 and 20 cm below the surface, as this depth allowed sufficient supply of both methane and oxygen. Mass balance calculations using the maximal oxidation rates obtained demonstrated that landfill soil covers have a significant potential for not only methane oxidation but also cometabolic degradation of selected volatile organics, thereby reducing emissions to the atmosphere.

Abbreviations: CFC, chlorofluorocarbon • HCFC, hydrochlorofluorocarbon • HFC, hydrofluorocarbon • LFG, landfill gas • MMO, methane monooxygenase • VOC, volatile organic compound


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 PERSPECTIVES
 REFERENCES
 
WASTE DEPOSITED IN a landfill will undergo anaerobic decomposition resulting in generation of landfill gas (LFG) consisting mainly of methane (55–60% v/v) and carbon dioxide (40–45% v/v). Landfills are estimated to release between 9 and 70 Tg yr–1 of CH4 out of an estimated annual global emission of 600 Tg methane to the atmosphere (Bogner et al., 1997; Lelieveld et al., 1998). It is important to note that these projections are based on estimated rates of methane production applied to national statistics for landfilled refuse and not on field emission measurements.

In several cases LFG has been shown to contain more than 100 different trace gases including halogenated and aromatic hydrocarbons and sulfur- and oxygen-containing compounds (Rettenberger and Stegmann, 1996; Eklund et al., 1998; Allen et al., 1997). Typical trace gas concentrations are in the range of 10 to 250 mg m–3. The trace components originate from hazardous materials deposited in the landfill or from biological or chemical degradation of materials disposed of in the landfill. Due to pressure and concentration gradients, the LFG will migrate through the surrounding soil of landfills, causing emission of LFG into the atmosphere.

Aromatic and chlorinated hydrocarbons are widely used in industry as solvents and degreasing agents. Fluorinated hydrocarbons have been used in a number of industrial processes and products like refrigerating aggregates, foaming agents, solvents, and propellants. Landfills receiving industrial wastes might be expected to have a high content of these compounds. However, an investigation of 23 American landfills receiving household waste showed that in 85% of these landfills benzene and VC were found in the LFG (Brosseau and Heitz, 1994). Emission of trace gases is a potential risk to human health, as compounds like VC and benzene are proven carcinogens (Christensen and Kjeldsen, 1995). Emission of trace components like CFCs is of global environmental concern due to their involvement in the depletion of the ozone layer and global warming (Wallington et al., 1994).

Microbial oxidation of methane in aerobic soils plays a significant role in reducing the emission of methane to the atmosphere (Lelieveld et al., 1998). Aerobic soils serve as biofilters for methane produced in anoxic soils, and some soils even serve as sinks for atmospheric methane (Oremland and Culbertson, 1992). Soils exposed to elevated concentrations of methane can develop a high capacity for methane oxidation by selection of methanotrophic bacteria. In landfill covers methane and oxygen countergradients may appear due to emission of methane from the waste and diffusion of oxygen from ambient air. Oxidation of methane in landfill top cover soil has been shown to reduce the amount of methane emitted to the atmosphere (Czepiel et al., 1996; Liptay et al., 1998; Bogner et al., 1997; Christophersen et al., 2001). A defining characteristic of the methanotrophic bacteria is the enzyme methane monooxygenase (MMO), which catalyzes the oxidation of methane. While all methanotrophs can synthesize a particulate or membrane-bound form (pMMO) of the enzyme, some can also produce a soluble form (sMMO), which has very broad substrate specificity and is known to rapidly cometabolize a variety of aliphatic compounds, including some halogenated hydrocarbons (Hanson and Hanson, 1996). It is therefore reasonable to believe that trace components might be cometabolically degraded during migration in landfill cover soils. Kjeldsen et al. (1997) published results on oxidation of methane and aromatic hydrocarbons (benzene and toluene) and cometabolic degradation of TCE and 1,1,1-trichloroethane (TCA) in soil incubated with LFG. High methane oxidation potentials and high degradation rates for benzene and toluene were found. In addition, slow cometabolic degradation of TCE and 1,1,1-TCA was observed in the presence of methane. The authors concluded that degradation processes might have a significant effect on the emission from landfill covers of the compounds studied. These results provide the potential for further investigation of the topic.

The objective of the current study was to investigate the potential for natural attenuation of methane and VOCs in soil exposed to LFG. Maximal oxidation rates were determined in batch experiments where soil was incubated with methane and selected VOCs. The degradability of 26 trace components was investigated, including chlorinated methanes, ethanes, ethenes, fluorinated hydrocarbons, and aromatic hydrocarbons. The extent of the zone with methanotrophic activity was determined by incubation of soil sampled from different depths at a location emitting methane. Oxidation capacities for landfill soil covers were calculated using the obtained oxidation rates.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 PERSPECTIVES
 REFERENCES
 
Field Site, Soil Sampling, and Soil Analysis
Soil samples were collected at Skellingsted Landfill south of Holbæk, Western Sealand, Denmark. Skellingsted Landfill received a total of approximately 420000 Mg of waste between 1971 and 1990. The composition of the waste was approximately 60% municipal solid waste and 40% bulky waste, industrial waste, and sewage treatment sludge. The landfill is situated in an obsolete gravel pit located in an area of alluvial sand and gravel sediments. The landfill has no liners or gas extraction system. The LFG migration has been intensively studied due to a gas explosion accident in 1991 (Kjeldsen and Fischer, 1995). Landfill gas is mainly migrating horizontally through the sides of the landfill as a result of the stratified compaction of the waste. Soil for laboratory experiments was sampled at a test station on the landfill border where an average methane emission of 25 mmol m–2 h–1 (maximal emission was 189 mmol m–2 h–1) was measured during a one-year field campaign (Christophersen et al., 2001). Soil samples were collected using a hand auger and stored at 4°C in darkness in closed containers to avoid dehydration. Before storage the soil was sieved through an 8-mm mesh to increase homogeneity and remove occasional larger stones, earthworms, and roots.

Soil texture was determined by sieve analyses and classified according to the USDA classification system (Soil Survey Staff, 1975). The field bulk density was determined by weighing soil-filled steel cylinders sampled in the field, subtracting the cylinder weight, and dividing by the cylinder volume. Soil moisture content was determined gravimetrically by oven-drying at 105°C for 24 h and expressed as the mass ratio of water to dry soil. Soil organic content was determined by loss on ignition. The pH was measured in soil water suspensions (10 g soil to 25 mL 0.01 M CaCl2 solution). Ammonium was measured by extracting 50 g soil with 100 mL 0.1 M KCl for 1 h followed by filtration through a 0.45-µm filter. Ammonium concentrations in the filtrates were determined colorimetrically with an autoanalyzer (AutoAnalyzerII, Technicon, Tarrytown, NY). Anion concentrations (NO3 and NO2) were analyzed by extracting 20 g soil with 30 mL Milli Q water (Millipore, Billerica, MA) for 1 h followed by filtration through a 0.45-µm filter. Anion concentrations were analyzed by ion chromatography (Model DX120; Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA). The copper concentration was determined after soil extraction with Titriplex III (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) by atomic adsorption spectrometry. All soil concentrations are expressed as mass of dry soil.

Soil Microcosms
The oxidation process was examined in glass bottles (117 mL in total volume) equipped with Mininert valves made of Teflon (VICI AG, Schenkon, Switzerland). The valves enabled gas to be sampled or injected by a hypodermic needle and a syringe. A fixed amount of soil (20 g moist soil) was added to each batch container. To obtain methane oxidation conditions, air was withdrawn from each container using a syringe and replaced with methane and oxygen, which gave an initial mixture of methane (15% v/v), oxygen (35% v/v), and nitrogen (50% v/v). Gas samples containing the test compound were removed from gaseous stock solutions by a gas-tight glass syringe and injected into the batch containers. The degradation of the VOCs was studied in single compound tests. The initial concentrations used were generally in the range of typical trace gas concentrations in LFG (10–250 mg m–3). However, higher initial concentrations for some of the lower or nonhalogenated compounds were necessary for better analytical sensitivity using chromatographic analysis. Gas samples withdrawn from the headspace were sampled periodically and analyzed by gas chromatography. Between sampling, the bottles were turned to ensure total mixed conditions in the batches. The batch experiments were conducted at room temperature (22°C). All batch experiments were performed in four replicates.

To control for nonmicrobial processes (abiotic degradation, sorption, or volatilization), sodium azide (25 mg kg–1 wet soil) was added to avoid microbial growth in control batches.

In general, the batch experiments were all conducted with soil sampled at 15 to 20 cm below the surface. Furthermore, soil samples from successive depth intervals were collected to determine the distribution of oxidation capacity in the soil profile. The soil was sampled in 5-cm intervals from the surface to a 30-cm depth and in 10-cm intervals from 30 to 90 cm below the surface. Soil samples were incubated with methane and selected trace components including the hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) HCFC-21 and HCFC-22, VC, benzene, and toluene.

Chemicals
PCE, TCE, TeCM, TCM, DCM, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and o-xylene were obtained from Merck. Cis-1,2-DCE, trans-1,2-DCE, and 1,1-DCE were obtained from Fluka (Buchs, Switzerland). The chlorinated ethanes (1,1,2,2-TeCA, 1,1,1-TCA, 1,1,2-TCA, 1,2-DCA, and 1,1-DCA) were purchased from Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany). CFC-11, CFC-12, HCFC-21, and HCFC-22 were purchased from Flourochem Limited (Old Glossop, England). Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) HFC-134a and HFC-245fa were obtained from Interchim (Montluçon, France). HCFC-141b was obtained from Honeywell (Weert, the Netherlands). Vinyl chloride was obtained from Gerling Holz & Co. (Hamburg, Germany). All solvents were obtained in high purity. Full chemical names, together with selected physicochemical parameters of all compounds, are listed in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Physicochemical parameters (Mackey et al., 1993) used for phase distribution calculation and maximal oxidation rates obtained from batch experiments incubated with methane and selected trace components. The batches held soil water content of 25% w/w and were conducted at room temperature.

 
Gas Chromatographic Analysis
For analysis, gas samples (10–500 µL) taken directly from the reaction bottles were injected manually via an on-column inlet to a gas chromatograph. The halogenated compounds were measured on a Carlo Erba (Milan, Italy) HRGC 5300 equipped with a flame ionization detector and an electron capture detector and a wall coated open tubular (WCOT) fused silica capillary column (CP-Sil-19 CB; Chrompack, Middelburg, the Netherlands) with nitrogen as the carrier gas. All compounds were analyzed with an isothermal column temperature of 40°C. Concentrations of the target compounds were calibrated by using a standard curve constructed with no fewer than 12 concentration levels. Calibration standards were made by adding a specific volume of a saturated pure gas at atmospheric pressure to a known volume of air.

The main gas components (CH4, CO2, O2, and N2) were analyzed on a Chrompack Micro GC CP-2002P gas chromatograph (Chrompack) equipped with a thermal conductivity detector and two columns. Oxygen and nitrogen were quantified on a 4-m-long Molsieve 5A column (Chrompack) and methane and carbon dioxide on a 10-m-long Poraplot Q column (Chrompack). The carrier gas was helium and the column temperature was 40°C. Gas standards produced by MicroLab (Aarhus, Denmark) ranging from 0.02 to 50% v/v were used for calibration.

Data Evaluation
From the measured gas concentrations, the total amount (µg) of test compound in each batch was determined by phase distribution calculations. Assuming steady state, the total amount of a chemical compound (MTotal) can be expressed as a function of the measured gas concentration (Cg) using Henry's law and the soil–water distribution coefficient Kd based on the octanol–water distribution coefficient Koc:

[1]
where KH is the dimensionless Henry's law constant, fOC is the fraction of organic carbon, ms is the mass of soil, and V is the volume of gas or water.

The physicochemical parameters used are given in Table 1. For the main components (CH4, O2, CO2, and N2) only distribution between water and air was considered. Control experiments with chemically sterilized soil indicated a rapid adjustment of the equilibrium between phases. A slow decrease in the gas phase could indicate loss due to sorption or dissolution. El-Farhan et al. (2000) investigated the kinetics of TCE cometabolism and toluene consumption in similar soil batch systems and found that the kinetic parameters describing the degradation were not affected by the physical processes like sorption and dissolution taking place in the soil system.

The kinetics of oxidation were examined by plotting the total concentration of the compound versus time. In all cases the methane oxidation followed zero-order kinetics and maximal oxidation rates were calculated by applying zero-order kinetics to the data. However, in some cases the decrease of the VOC concentrations at the end of the experiments limited the reaction and changed it into first order, resulting in a decreasing oxidation rate. To compare the degradation rates between different compounds, maximal rates were calculated applying zero-order kinetics to the data covering the period from the start of the experiment and until the degradation was 90% complete (C/C0 = 10%). The zero-order rate constant was normalized to the dry soil mass. For each compound, an average oxidation rate was calculated based on four replicates. In this paper the term "degradation" is used when a decrease in concentration was observed over time in microbially active experiments.


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 PERSPECTIVES
 REFERENCES
 
Soil Characteristics
The granulometric composition of soil sampled at 15 to 20 cm below the surface was 5.7% silt, 88.1% sand, and 5.3% gravel (loamy sand according to the USDA classification). The bulk density was 1.55 while the porosity was 0.38. The soil organic carbon content was 3.2% w/w and the total nitrogen was 3.5 g N kg–1. The mineral nitrogen content was as follows: 370 mg NO3–N kg–1, 2.3 mg NH+4–N kg–1, and 0.4 NO2–N kg–1. The soil pH (CaCl2) was 6.9 while the copper content was 4.7 mg Cu kg–1. The soil moisture content was 25% w/w.

Methane Oxidation and Degradation of Trace Components in Soil Microcosms
In general, good reproducibility was obtained and results from four replicate batches were almost identical. To examine reproducibility, 10 replicates were incubated with a mixture of methane, HCFC-21, and HCFC-22. The average methane oxidation rate was 82 µg g–1 h–1 with a standard deviation of 2.4. The average oxidation rates for HCFC-21 and HCFC-22 were 0.51 and 0.29 µg g–1 h–1 with standard deviations of 0.02 and 0.01, respectively. Figure 1 shows the degradation of HCFC-21 and HCFC-22 in 5 out of the 10 incubation bottles. Figure 1 also shows the results from two corresponding control experiments.



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. The degradation of hydrochlorofluorocarbons HCFC-21 and HCFC-22 in 5 incubation bottles randomly chosen out of 10. Open symbols represent HCFC-21 and filled symbols represent HCFC-22.

 
In all soil microcosms methane and oxygen concentrations declined over time while carbon dioxide increased, suggesting that methane oxidation was taking place (Fig. 2A) . Lag phases were never observed, which indicates that the bacteria were well adapted to oxidizing methane. Lag phase is here defined as the duration of time between the addition of substrate to the soil and evidence of its detectable loss. The oxidation was microbially mediated as seen from comparison with the sterilized control batch (Fig. 2B). The methane oxidation followed zero-order kinetics (R2 > 0.97), indicating that the oxidation was not methane-limited. Methanotrophs in natural soils exposed to atmospheric methane concentrations (approximately 1.7 x 10–4 % v/v) are often methane-limited, and oxidation of methane then follows first-order kinetics (King and Adamsen, 1992; Boeckx et al., 1997; Bender and Conrad, 1993). In all experiments the oxygen concentrations were never below 10% v/v, and methane oxidation was therefore not limited by low oxygen concentration (as exemplified by Fig. 2A). Czepiel et al. (1996) found that methane oxidation in incubation experiments became sensitive to oxygen mixing ratios below approximately 3% v/v, resulting in lower oxidation rates. Part of the oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production in the soil microcosms is due to the activity of other soil-respiring bacteria, which can compete with the methane oxidizers for oxygen. Soil respiration was measured by analysis of oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide evolution in soil experiments incubated with atmospheric air and using the organic substrate already in the soil. The average rates for oxygen uptake and carbon dioxide formation were 0.38 and 0.29 µmol g–1 h–1, respectively, which accounts for only 7% of the oxygen uptake and 8% of the carbon dioxide formation in the methane oxidation experiments, showing that methane oxidizers dominated the oxygen consumption. Incorporation of carbon into biomass was approximately 48%, calculated as Cassimilated = Csubstrate,methane – Cmineralized,carbon dioxide and subtracting the background soil respiration. Increasing oxidation rates with repeated substrate addition also indicated bacterial growth (results not shown). In comparison, Kightley et al. (1995) found that 69% of oxidized methane was assimilated into biomass in soil cores. Similar findings were obtained by Börjesson et al. (1998), who found CO2 to CH4 ratios between 0.17 and 0.36 indicating that between 64 and 83% was assimilated.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Headspace concentration of methane, oxygen, and carbon dioxide as function of time, showing methane oxidation in a batch experiment containing 20 g soil sampled at 15 to 20 cm below the soil surface. (A) Active batch experiment. (B) Control experiment.

 
The soil showed a high capacity for methane oxidation resulting in very high oxidation rates between 24 and 112 µg CH4 g–1 h–1 (Table 1). The variability in methane oxidation rates between experiments is partly a result of the presence of different trace components. Increasing VOC concentrations seem to cause decreased methane oxidation rates, which most likely is a combination of inhibition due to toxicity of the VOC itself or its metabolites, and increased competition between methane and VOCs for the enzyme methane monooxygenase inducing the oxidation (Alvarez-Cohen and McCarty, 1991b). The methane oxidation rates are very high compared with those reported by Whalen et al. (1990) and Jones and Nedwell (1993), who obtained maximum oxidation rates between 0.65 and 2.7 µg CH4 g–1 h–1. The methane oxidation rates fit well with the results reported by Figueroa (1993) where between 40 and 128 µg CH4 g–1 h–1 was oxidized in different landfill cover soils. Maximal methane oxidation rates reported in the literature show a wide range between 0.0024 and 128 µg CH4 g–1 h–1, even when comparing experiments conducted with landfill cover soils (Christophersen et al., 2000). This variation is probably due to differences in incubation conditions (initial methane concentrations, moisture, and temperature) as well as differences in environmental conditions in the field (soil texture, porosity, and gas migration), which will influence the activity of the soil.

Degradation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons in Soil Microcosms
Both TCM and DCM were degraded in the presence of oxygen and methane and the degradation occurred in parallel with the oxidation of methane (Fig. 3A) . However, degradation of TeCM was not observed. Maximal oxidation rates, initial concentrations, and regression coefficients are listed in Table 1. The degradation of DCM occurred 20 times faster than TCM, which is consistent with the general tendency that degradation of chlorinated aliphatic compounds is inversely related to the chlorine to carbon ratios under aerobic conditions.



View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Relative headspace concentration of chlorinated hydrocarbons as a function of time in a batch experiment containing 20 g soil pre-exposed to landfill gas. (A) Chlorinated methanes. (B) Chlorinated ethylenes. (C) Chlorinated ethanes. (D) Chlorofluorocarbons. (E) Hydrochlorofluorocarbons. (F) Hydrofluorocarbons. (G) Aromatic hydrocarbons.

 
All the chlorinated ethylenes with the exception of PCE were degradable in the presence of oxygen and methane (Fig. 3B). In some of the experiments with high initial concentrations, the degradation declined at the end of the experiment, probably as a result of substrate limitation or toxic effects due to accumulation of degradation products. However, by using the data covering the period from the start of the experiment and until 90% degradation was reached, regression coefficients higher than 0.87 and often even higher (Table 1) were obtained. In general, the degradation rates of the chlorinated ethylenes were inversely related to the chlorine to carbon ratios, with highest rates observed for VC and lowest rates obtained for TCE, while PCE was not degraded. All three DCE isomers are known to undergo cometabolic oxidation, but often with different rates. The oxidation of trans-DCE occurred three times faster than cis-DCE (Table 1). In an experiment with Methylsinus trichosporium OB3b possessing sMMO, cis-DCE was degraded more rapidly than trans-DCE (Oldenhuis et al., 1991). However, the opposite was observed with a pure culture of M. trichosporium OB3b producing pMMO (van Hylckama Vlieg et al., 1996). In general, sMMO is known to catalyze faster cometabolic degradation rates than pMMO (Alvarez-Cohen and Speitel, 2001). However, sMMO is only produced in the wild-type organism at very low copper concentrations (<16 µg L–1) (Tsien et al., 1989). Methanotrophs expressing sMMO were dominating in the Skellingsted landfill soil (at depths of 20–25 cm): 15 isolates of Type II (where 10 carried the genes for sMMO) were identified and only one Type I (Svenning et al., 2003). This is also compatible with the low copper concentration of 4.7 mg g–1 measured in the soil, which corresponds to a copper concentration of 4.7 µg L–1 in soil water (using a soil–water distribution coefficient of 1000 [McLaren et al., 1983]). Literature review shows that the kinetics of 1,1-DCE oxidation by methanotrophs generally is slower than for the other two DCE isomers, which has been suggested to be a result of generation of toxic products during 1,1-DCE oxidation (Alvarez-Cohen and Speitel, 2001). In this study 1,1-DCE was indeed more slowly degraded than the two DCE isomers with a degradation rate comparable with TCE.

Kjeldsen et al. (1997) performed similar experiments with soil from Skellingsted Landfill and found much lower oxidation rates for both methane and TCE (3.75 and 0.00125 µg g–1 h–1, respectively). This can be explained by a combination of several factors. Kjeldsen et al. (1997) collected soil from other sampling sites and had less favorable experimental conditions, including lower temperatures (10°C), deeper sampling depths (50–60 cm below the surface), and soil dehydration during storage.

Transformation yield has been used to describe cometabolic rates, and is defined as the amount of compound transformed per amount of primary substrate utilized (Alvarez-Cohen and McCarty, 1991a). The transformation yields are often quite consistent, ranging from 15 to 50 µg TCE mg–1 methane for a variety of cultures (Alvarez-Cohen and Speitel, 2001). In general the transformation yields in this study were rather low: for example, the transformation yield for TCE was 1.2 µg mg–1 methane. The lower transformation yields may be a result of the fact that not all the methane oxidizers present in the soil are capable of cometabolizing VOCs.

In general, fully chlorinated aliphatics are expected to persist under aerobic conditions since these compounds do not support growth for aerobic microorganisms (Janssen and Koning, 1995). Especially, PCE and TeCM are generally considered to be resistant to aerobic cometabolic degradation by methanotrophs (Oldenhuis et al., 1989).

Both 1,1-DCA and 1,2-DCA were degraded; 1,2-DCA much more rapidly than 1,1-DCA, with maximal oxidation rates comparable with trans-1,2-DCE and VC (Table 1 and Fig. 3C). Also 1,1,2-TCA was degraded with a rate comparable with 1,1-DCE. Neither 1,1,1-TCA nor 1,1,2,2-TeCA were degraded within the time duration of the experiment (Fig. 3C). The results agree well with those obtained by Henson et al. (1989), who observed that 1,2-DCA was more rapidly transformed than 1,1-DCA and 1,1,2-TCA, while 1,1,1-TCA was not removed in a mixed bacterial culture grown on methane. Literature surveys on degradation of 1,1,1-TCA by methanotrophs show some inconsistency. Strand et al. (1990) reported slow degradation of 1,1,1-TCA in batch experiments with mixed cultures of methanotrophs incubated with methane. Likewise, Oldenhuis et al. (1989) observed transformation but not complete degradation of 1,1,1-TCA by M. trichosporium OB3b grown in continuous cultures. Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b PP358, which constitutively expresses soluble MMO, did not degrade 1,1,1-TCA, even though it rapidly degraded a number of other chlorinated solvents (Aziz et al., 1999).

Degradation of Fluorinated Hydrocarbons in Soil Microcosms
Of the HCFCs only HCFC-21 and HCFC-22 were shown to be degradable, while HCFC-141b was not (Fig. 3E). The compound HCFC-21 was more rapidly degraded than HCFC-22, which had a degradation rate closer to TCM (Table 1). The compounds CFC-11, CFC-12, CFC-113, HFC-134a, HCFC-141b, and HFC-245fa did not seem to be degradable within the duration of the experiment (Fig. 3D, 3E, 3F). Information on cometabolic degradation of fluorinated hydrocarbons reported in the open literature is very limited. DeFlaun et al. (1992) studied the oxidation of HCFCs by M. trichosporium OB3b and obtained aerobic degradation of three out of the five HCFCs tested, including HCFC-21 and HCFC-141b. Complete dehalogenation of HCFC-21 was verified by ion chromatographic analysis of the stoichiometric release of chloride and fluoride. However, CFC-11 and HFC-134a were not degraded. Streger et al. (1999) studied the degradation of hydrohalocarbons by three strains of naturally occurring methanotrophs. All three strains completely transformed HCFC-21. Ion chromatography analysis showed a release of stoichiometric amounts of chloride. One of the bacterial strains, M. trichosporium OB3b, also transformed HCFC-141b. None of the tested bacteria were able to degrade HFC-134a. Chang and Criddle (1995) report biodegradation of both HFC-134a and HCFC-22 in a mixed methanotrophic culture; HCFC-22 was more rapidly transformed (15 times) compared with HFC-134a. The mixed methanotrophic culture also contained at least three heterotrophs, and it is therefore possible that they facilitated the degradation of, for example, HFC-134a. The negative impact of CFC and HCFCs on the stratospheric ozone layer has prompted an effort for environmentally acceptable alternatives like the nonchlorinated HFCs. The compound HFC-245fa is a new substitute for HCFCs used as blowing agents in insulation foams and no references in the open literature on cometabolic degradation by methanotrophs are known to the authors. Chlorofluorocarbons are considered inert toward biodegradation under aerobic conditions (Key et al., 1997). The presence of one or more hydrogen atoms in HCFCs and HFCs makes these compounds susceptible to undergo oxidation. The strong chemical carbon–fluoride bond provides greater stability to the HFCs compared with chlorinated hydrocarbons, suggesting that HFCs in general would be more resistant to microbial degradation. Although HFCs are good replacements for HCFCs as a result of their zero ozone depletion potential, their contribution to global warming may be important if they are resistant to microbial transformation.

Degradation of Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Soil Microcosms
The aromatic hydrocarbons were rapidly degraded, giving high maximal oxidation rates between 0.17 and 1.4 µg g–1 h–1 (Table 1 and Fig. 3G). The aerobic biological degradation of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene (BTEX) is rather well understood, and several of the compounds have previously been shown to be degradable under aerobic conditions. A large number of different bacteria are known to degrade benzene and toluene; some are also able to convert chlorinated aliphatics by cometabolism with benzene or toluene as primary substrates (Rivas and Arvin, 2000; Lu et al., 1998; Landa et al., 1994). Aromatic hydrocarbons are often detected in LFG due to their widespread utilization and high persistence under anaerobic conditions. Emission of aromatics from landfills is of special public concern since benzene is a proven carcinogenic. In general, the sterilized control experiments showed no decrease in the VOC concentrations, indicating that microbial oxidation was the only explanation for the decrease in the active experiments.

Depth Distribution of Oxidation Activity
Soil samples were collected at the test station from different depths to determine the vertical distribution of methane oxidation and degradation of selected trace components. The methane oxidizers were very active in oxidizing methane and trace components down to a depth of 50 cm below the surface (Fig. 4A, 4B) . Maximum rates were obtained with soil from 15 to 20 cm. Both Kightley et al. (1995) and De Visscher et al. (1999) observed peak oxidation in soil cores incubated with methane between 10 and 20 cm deep where both oxygen and methane were present. Christophersen and Kjeldsen (2001) performed an extensive field study at Skellingsted landfill, in which vertical soil profiles measured every second week during a one-year period showed that both methane and oxygen often were present between 20 and 40 cm deep. This agrees with the results from this study since the maximum oxidation zone is expected to form in a soil layer of overlapping O2 and CH4 gradients. The oxidation rates decreased dramatically at the 50-cm depth as a result of O2 limitation, which is supported by soil air measurements conducted at the 60-cm depth showing a gas composition of mainly methane and carbon dioxide and very low or no oxygen presence (Fig. 4C). The low methane oxidation rate (3.75 µg g–1 h–1) obtained by Kjeldsen et al. (1997) also with soil from Skellingsted landfill is most likely due to the deeper sampling between 50 to 60 cm below the surface. The distribution of methane oxidizers in a relatively narrow zone makes soil sampling depth a critical parameter when measuring oxidation capacities of landfill soil covers in laboratory incubation experiments.



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. (A, B) Maximal methane oxidation and degradation rates of trace components in batch experiments as a function of soil sampling depth. (C) A representative soil gas depth profile measured at the soil sampling location during a one-year field campaign (Christophersen et al., 2001).

 

    PERSPECTIVES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 PERSPECTIVES
 REFERENCES
 
To evaluate the biodegradation potential of landfill soil covers, the maximal gas concentrations that can be degraded during migration in a landfill soil cover were calculated using the experimental oxidation rates obtained and were then weighed against maximum LFG concentrations reported in literature. The oxidation rates obtained in the batch experiments were calculated as maximal rates applying zero-order kinetics. Even though very good fits were generally obtained (R2 > 0.95), this is of course an approximation, since the oxidation is a function of methane, oxygen, and the presence of trace components. Assuming the zero-order rate constant to be valid for an active zone in a soil profile, the degradation rate integrated over the depth, K0 (g m–2 d–1), can be calculated as:

[2]
where k0 is the degradation rate (µg g–1 d–1), da is the oxidation zone (m), and {rho}b is the soil bulk density (Mg m–3). The flow of LFG is considered intergranular with no macropore flow due to worm holes, cracks, and fissures, which will make the flow conditions very inhomogeneous. The maximum concentration, Cmax (g m–3), of the LFG compound that can be degraded while passing through the oxidative zone is then:

[3]
where JLFG is the total flux of LFG through the soil profile (m3 LFG m–2 d–1). A total LFG flux of 0.25 m3 LFG m–2 d–1 is equivalent to a generation rate of about 5.7 m3 LFG Mg–1 waste yr–1 when assuming a landfill with a 20-m-deep layer of waste and a waste bulk density of 0.8 Mg m–3. A gas production rate of 5.7 m3 LFG Mg–1 waste yr–1 is in the mid to high range from a landfill within the first 10 to 15 yr after disposal (Willumsen and Bach, 1991). Assuming a total LFG flux of 0.25 m3 LFG m–2 d–1 an oxidative zone of 30 cm (based on the conducted batch experiments), and typical values for bulk density and water content of 1.6 Mg m–3 and 25% w/w respectively, the maximal degraded concentrations given in Table 2 are obtained. For comparison, maximum concentrations of VOCs detected in LFG reported in literature and presented in an overview by Rettenberger and Stegmann (1996) are also shown in Table 2.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Maximal oxidation concentrations calculated using zero-order oxidation rates obtained from batch experiments and the equations and constants given in the text. For comparison the last column shows maximal landfill gas concentration reported in the literature (Rettenberger and Stegmann, 1996).

 
Calculations based on the obtained methane oxidation rates show that all the methane in LFG can be totally oxidized under optimal conditions (temperature of 22°C and water content of 25% w/w).

For the lower chlorinated hydrocarbons (DCM, DCEs, DCAs, HCFC-21, and HCFC-22), the maximal degradable concentrations by far exceed the maximal measured concentrations in LFG, which indicates that these compounds may be totally degraded in the top soil cover. The degradation rates are lower for the compounds with higher chlorine substitution, thus resulting in smaller maximal degradable concentrations for these compounds. Nevertheless, for higher chlorinated compounds like TCM and TCE, the maximum degradable concentrations by far exceed the maximum measured concentrations in LFG, which indicates that these compounds also may be totally degraded in the soil cover.

Degradation of fully substituted carbons (TeCM, PCE, CFC-11, CFC-12, and CFC-113) in the oxidative zone is limited, but these compounds have been found degradable under anaerobic conditions. Under methanogenic conditions, which often exist in the lower part of soil covers and within the waste, CFC-11 and CFC-12 may undergo reductive dehalogenation leading to accumulation of lesser chlorinated compounds, like products HCFC-21 and HCFC-22 (Ejlertsson et al., 1996; Deipser and Stegmann, 1997), which then might be degraded in the oxidative zone in the surrounding soil. Likewise, the anaerobic sequential halogen–hydrogen substitution of PCE will generate the far more toxic VC. Vinyl chloride will be rapidly transformed under aerobic conditions in, for example, the soil covers. The same could be valid for other highly halogenated organic compounds, which are more restricted to degradation in the aerobic zone, like trichloroethanes and carbon tetrachloride.

The above evaluation is based on high oxidation rates obtained under optimal conditions and assumes a homogeneous soil layer with an intergranular flow of LFG. However, landfill top covers are highly dynamic systems influenced by atmospheric pressure, temperature, and precipitation. During cold periods with low temperatures the emission might increase due to lower microbial activity. Decreasing barometric pressure also causes higher emissions by enhancing the advective gas flow out of the landfill and thus shrinking the oxic zone. During warm periods with low precipitation the soil may dry out and limit the activity of the methanotrophic bacteria and thereby increase the methane emission.

However, this study demonstrates that LFG-affected soil shows a significant potential for methane oxidation and biodegradation of VOCs. At old landfills with lower gas production, methane oxidation and degradation of VOCs in cover soils may play a very important role in reducing the emission of both methane and trace components into the atmosphere.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 PERSPECTIVES
 REFERENCES
 




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
S. Molins, K. U. Mayer, C. Scheutz, and P. Kjeldsen
Transport and Reaction Processes Affecting the Attenuation of Landfill Gas in Cover Soils
J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2008; 37(2): 459 - 468.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Waste Management ResearchHome page
M. Huber-Humer, J. Gebert, and H. Hilger
Biotic systems to mitigate landfill methane emissions.
Waste Management Research, February 1, 2008; 26(1): 33 - 46.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
C. Scheutz and P. Kjeldsen
Environmental Factors Influencing Attenuation of Methane and Hydrochlorofluorocarbons in Landfill Cover Soils
J. Environ. Qual., January 1, 2004; 33(1): 72 - 79.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scheutz, C.
Right arrow Articles by Kjeldsen, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scheutz, C.
Right arrow Articles by Kjeldsen, P.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Scheutz, C.
Right arrow Articles by Kjeldsen, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Bioremediation and Biodegradation


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal