JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stuczynski, T. I.
Right arrow Articles by Siebielec, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stuczynski, T. I.
Right arrow Articles by Siebielec, G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Stuczynski, T. I.
Right arrow Articles by Siebielec, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Heavy Metals
Right arrow Soil Pollution
Right arrow Soil Biochemistry
Journal of Environmental Quality 32:1346-1355 (2003)
© 2003 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America

TECHNICAL REPORTS
Heavy Metals in the Environment

Response of Soil Microbiological Activities to Cadmium, Lead, and Zinc Salt Amendments

T. I. Stuczynskia, G. W. McCarty*,b and G. Siebieleca

a Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation, Pulawy, Poland
b Environmental Quality Laboratory, Building 007, Room 202, BARC-West, Beltsville, MD 20705

* Corresponding author (mccartyg{at}ba.ars.usda.gov)

Received for publication April 22, 2002.

    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Heavy metal pollution of soil has been recognized as a major factor impeding soil microbial processes. From this perspective, we studied responses of the soil biological activities to metal stress simulated by soil amendment with Zn, Pb, and Cd chlorides. The amounts of heavy metal salts added to five metal-polluted soils and four nonpolluted soils were selected to match the total metal concentrations typically found in polluted soils of the Silesia region of Poland. From the perspective of soil quality, metal mobility in amended soils could not be described by simple functions of pH or organic matter. Reaction of Pb with the soil caused strong immobilization with less than 1% of the Pb amendment recovered by 0.01 M CaCl2 extractions. Immobilization of Cd was also significant, whereas immobilization of the Zn amendment was much weaker than that of Cd or Pb. The Zn amendment had substantial inhibitory effect on soil dehydrogenase, acid and alkaline phosphatase, arylsulfatase, urease, and nitrification potential. Generally, Cd and Pb had limited or stimulatory effect on most of these biological activities, with an exception of Pb strongly inhibiting soil urease. The effect of the metal amendments on biological activities could not be satisfactorily accounted for by metal toxicity because no strong relationship was observed between extractable metal content and the degree of inhibition. The Zn amendment had a significant effect on soil pH, resulting in confounding effects of pH and Zn toxicity on activities. Metal amendment experiments seem to be of limited utility for meaningful assessment of metal contamination effects on soil quality.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
THE CONCEPT OF DEFINING CRITERIA for assessing changes in soil quality is a well-accepted approach that has been widely addressed in the literature (Blum, 1993; Brookes, 1995; Pankhurst et al., 1997; Leirós et al., 1999). Whereas physical and chemical soil properties help define soil fertility and productivity, soil biological functions are of equal importance. The existing regulatory values regarding soil pollution with heavy metals are mainly designed to protect the food chain and to control the risk of excessive accumulation of metals in plants. Recently, there has been a growing interest in protecting soil habitat function, which requires a quantitative assessment of toxicity factors influencing soil processes mediated by microorganisms. In the Netherlands, regulatory values were proposed for heavy metals thresholds, which should be indicative for potential deleterious effects on biological processes, such as nitrification, or on soil fauna population, represented by earthworms (Eisenia fetida) (Van Hesteren et al., 1999). This concept is based on ecotoxicology criteria that have been designed to provide protection for the soil biological processes important for sustaining soil fertility and quality in the ecosystem.

There is a substantial amount of published data assessing the behavior of microorganisms under metal stress as measured by enzyme activities, bacterial counts, soil respiration, and biomass carbon and nitrogen determinations, which has been extensively reviewed (Duxbury, 1985; Bååth, 1989; Brookes, 1995). Mechanisms for apparent metal tolerance of metals by microorganisms after long-term exposure have been also addressed (Tyler et al., 1974; Duxbury and Bicknell, 1983; Diaz-Ravina and Bååth, 1996). The use of biological activities as indicators of metal stress seems to be an attractive approach due to its simplicity. There is a concern, however, that the variability in biological activities driven by other soil parameters may be greater than effects attributed to metal pollution (Duxbury, 1985; Brookes, 1995).

The classical approach to investigating metal effect on biological activities involves laboratory experiments in which clean or polluted soils are amended with single or multiple metal salts, often resulting in soil metal contents much higher than in natural soil ecosystems (Chander et al., 1995; Marzadori et al., 1996; Hemida et al., 1997; Ping and Tieheng, 1996; Leirós et al., 1999; Welp, 1999; Kandeler et al., 2000). It is well established that metals entering soil environments undergo different transformations, usually leading to reduction of their mobility through different binding mechanisms such as precipitation or sorption by organic matter, clay minerals, hydrous oxides, and complexation (Chaney et al., 1988; Arnfalk et al., 1996; Asami et al., 1995; Wilkens and Loch, 1994; Ma and Rao, 1997; Martinez and McBride, 2001). A combination of these processes can occur simultaneously, and their overall influence is thought to be principally driven by organic mater, pH, soil texture, and mineralogy. Soil heterogeneity makes it difficult to establish universal toxicity levels and the toxicity sequence among metals for a microbial process (Welp, 1999). Additionally, large instantaneous loadings of soluble metal to soil usually do not occur in natural ecosystems.

Another aspect of the complexity of metal-polluted soil ecosystems occurs when different anthropogenic sources of metal loading interact with the preexisting pedogenic sources of metals that originate from metal-rich parent material. Such conditions are frequently found in areas with metal mining operations. The Zn, Pb, and Cd pollution of soil has been a major environmental concern in some parts of Silesia, a region of Poland with intensive Zn and Pb mining and smelting activity (Dudka et al., 1995; Chlopecka et al., 1996; Terelak et al., 1997). Soil pollution with these three metals has considerable effect on quality of crops that tend to accumulate excessive amounts of metals (Gzyl, 1990; Kabata-Pendias et al., 2000; Terelak et al., 2000), even though the vegetative productivity of soils in the region does not seem to be affected (Witek et al., 1992).

Sustainable ecosystems require robust microbial processing of nutrients in soil. Clearly, the long-term stability and function of metal-polluted ecosystems is affected by the extent to which soil microbial processes are inhibited by the pollution. The objective of our work was to assess utility of measuring biological activities involved in C, N, P, and S cycles as a means for assessing metal influence on quality of metal-polluted soils.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Properties of Unamended Soils
In terms of soil taxonomy, soils from both Silesia and Pulawy regions were formed on glacial till; however, the parent materials of Silesian soils were affected by Zn and Pb mineral outcroppings and mine spoils (Witek et al., 1992). Soils from Silesia contained a similar amount of clay, and on average, a significantly higher amount of organic matter than soils from the Pulawy region. Notably, others have observed that the accumulation of organic matter in metal-contaminated soils may be related to heavy metals impeding the mineralization cycle (Chander and Brookes, 1991; Valesecchi et al., 1995), but without full knowledge about site-specific soil development factors, it is difficult to speculate about influence of metal pollution on organic matter content of soils in the Silesian region. One of the Silesian soils (S5) was much higher in organic matter (Table 1) , as it was developed under the influence of shallow ground water, whereas all other soils were typical examples of rain-fed systems.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Texture, pH, organic matter, and total N for the A horizon of soils from Silesa (S1–S5) and Pulawy (P1–P4).

 
The total content of metals in soils from Silesia was related both to the character of the soil parent material that naturally contains elevated amounts of metals and to emissions from smelting and mining operations (Gzyl, 1990; Dudka et al., 1995; Chlopecka et al., 1996; Terelak et al., 1997). However, it is difficult to distinguish between pedogenic sources and pollution resulting from long-term exposure of these soils to industrial emissions. Metal speciation studies (Chlopecka et al., 1996) conducted on soils in the Tarnowskie Gory area (the same area sampled in this study) provide additional information on transformations, distribution, and mobility of metal from industrial inputs. As shown by data in Table 2 , Silesian soils selected for this experiment contained much higher concentrations of Cd, Pb, and Zn than the average content in this region. According to the evaluation criteria proposed by Kabata-Pendias and Pendias (2001), the Silesian soils used in this study would be classified as contaminated with all three metals, whereas soils from Pulawy represented metal concentrations typically found in the unpolluted soils common for other areas of Poland.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Total and CaCl2–extractable Cd, Pb, and Zn in unamended soils.

 
Metal Amendment Experiment
The soils used in this study were obtained from the A horizons of a heavily polluted cultivated land in Tarnowskie Gory located in Silesia and a nonpolluted reference area near Pulawy, Poland. Pulawy is located 250 km northeast of Katowice, which is the central city within the Sielsian region. The area of Tarnowskie Gory was chosen for this experiment because there were previous extensive studies conducted in this area regarding metal pollution and mobility, as well as crop contamination and yields (Gzyl, 1990; Witek et al., 1992; Dudka et al., 1995; Chlopecka et al., 1996). The nine soils were selected to provide a range of pH values and organic matter and clay contents, as well as varying degrees of pollution and metal mobility. The soils represent Haplorthods and Haplumbrepts (podzols and brown soils according to the Polish classification). Batches of 3 kg of moist soils were sampled from A horizons to a depth of 20 cm in the spring at the beginning of vegetation season. Soils were brought to the laboratory and mixed thoroughly to achieve homogeneous material. Subsamples of 500 g were air-dried and sieved through a 1-mm sieve for analysis of chemical properties. Remaining portions of moist soil were kept in a cold (4°C) room before setup of further experiments. To study the influence of heavy metals on the activity of soil microbial communities, portions of the collected samples from Silesia and Pulawy were treated with Cd, Pb, and Zn as chloride salts at rates of 10, 500, and 700 mg kg-1 for each metal, respectively.

Application rates were chosen to reflect moderately high levels of pollution in Silesian soils, which on average (geometric mean) contain only 1.06, 50.9, and 166 mg kg-1 of Cd, Pb, and Zn, respectively (Terelak et al., 1997), although much higher extreme total concentrations can occur near smelter and mining operations (Gzyl, 1990; Chlopecka et al., 1996; Terelak et al., 1997). Metal additions to the clean soils were thought to reflect the responses of microbial processes occurring in soils that were not previously under metal stress and, therefore, were less likely to develop metal tolerances as widely reported for soils with long-term metal exposure (Doelman and Haanstra, 1979; Angle et al., 1993; Duxbury and Bicknell, 1983; Diaz-Ravina and Bååth, 1996). Even before metal addition, the Silesian soils used in this study contained much greater concentrations of metals than the regional average and fall into the category of polluted soils with substantial risk for excessive metal uptake by plants.

To simulate realistic conditions, ratios between metal additions matched very closely their average ratios found in soils from the Silesian industrial region. Metals were added individually to separate soil samples (about 0.6 kg of moist soil) in 50-mL aliquots of aqueous solutions of Zn, Pb, and Cd chlorides. The concentrations of applied solutions were 107, 24, and 0.89 mM for Zn, Pb, and Cd, respectively. Those solutions were sprayed over a thin layer of soil. Soils were then mixed thoroughly to obtain an even distribution of added elements. Homogeneous soil material of each metal treatment and control was subdivided into three portions for replication. Soil moisture content was adjusted to 33 kPa water tension by the addition of water. Before assay for enzyme activities, the metal-treated soils were incubated for 14 d in a growth chamber supplied with fresh air with the temperature maintained at 25°C. Untreated soils were incubated in the same manner as a reference. The soil containers were weighed periodically to monitor soil water losses during incubation, and such losses were replaced by water.

Soil Analyses: Chemical and Physical Properties
Total metal concentrations were analyzed after sample digestion in aqua regia (a mixture in 3:1 ratio of 12 M HCl and 16 M HNO3) as described by McGrath and Cunliffe (1985). The mobility of metals in unamended and amended soils extracted with 0.01 M CaCl2 was assessed using the procedure described by Houba et al. (1990). The CaCl2 extraction was performed after termination of the incubation by the procedure described above. Total C and N levels were measured using a CNS combustion analyzer (LECO Corporation, St. Joseph, MI). Soil analyses for particle size distribution were performed by the hydrometer method as described by Gee and Bauder (1986). Soil pH was measured in water and in 1 M KCl using a 1:2.5 soil to liquid ratio. At the end of the 14-d incubation, pH measurement in water was repeated to check for the pH change resulting from the metal amendments.

Enzyme Measurements
Activity measurements followed procedures described by Tabatabai (1994) and included a range of enzymes: alkaline phosphatase, acid phosphatase, and arylsulfatase. Determination of dehydrogenase was conducted as described by Casida et al. (1964). For the urease, this procedure was slightly modified: the activity was measured as the amount of ammonia produced and not by measurement of the urea remaining. Nitrification potential was determined as described by Hart et al. (1994), using soil slurries incubated with ammonium sulfate as a substrate for 48 h with sampling for NO-3 at 0, 24, and 48 h. The percentage inhibition of a biological activity was calculated from (C - T)/C x 100, where T is the activity in the metal-treated soil and C is the activity in the control soil. Means for each treatment were evaluated using the Duncan range test at P < 0.05. The statistical significance of regression models was tested with F tests.


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
The results of studies conducted in Silesia (Gzyl, 1990; Dudka et al., 1995) provide evidence that crops grown on soils containing comparable metal contents to those used in this study can accumulate excessive amount of metals from a food safety perspective. This sets an important context for our further discussion regarding metal pollution effects on biological processes and using these processes as indicators of soil quality. As demonstrated in Table 2, much larger amounts and proportions of total metal content were extractable by 0.01 M CaCl2 from Silesian soils as compared with the soils from the Pulawy region. This is indicative of higher metal bioavailability in Silesian soils, assuming that the CaCl2–extractable fraction represents mainly the water-soluble and exchangeable metal pools, which are considered the forms of metal available for uptake by both microorganisms and plants. There is evidence from speciation studies conducted with Tarnowskie Gory soils that most of the Cd and Pb industrial inputs appeared to be immobilized in oxide forms, whereas Zn industrial inputs are found in both oxide and residual (tightly bound) forms (Chlopecka et al., 1996).

Properties of Soil Amended with Cadmium, Lead, and Zinc
An important finding of this study was the substantial change in pH that can occur for soils amended with metal salts. The pH decreased nearly one unit in soils amended with ZnCl2 (Table 3) . The mechanism of lowering pH by salt additions such as ZnCl2 is through hydrolysis, yielding well-dissociated HCl and weakly dissociated Zn(OH)2. Organic matter appeared to ameliorate change in pH caused by Zn addition, as evident from a strong correlation between these two parameters (Fig. 1) . The weaker relationship between changes in extractable Zn content and organic matter relative to that for changes in pH indicates that the primary influence of organic matter was pH buffering and not metal binding.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Calcium chloride–extractable metals, amendment recoveries, and change in pH (metal-amended soils).

 


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Relationships between (A) organic matter and increases in CaCl2–extractable Zn, (B) organic matter and change in soil pH, and (C) soil pH and increases in CaCl2–extractable Zn for soils amended with Zn.

 
Addition of Cd and Zn salts to soils caused an increase in CaCl2–extractable forms of these metals (Table 3). By contrast, Pb was almost entirely immobilized in all soils with extraction recoveries less than 1% of the Pb amendment. Cadmium was also effectively adsorbed and extraction recoveries were usually lower than 5% with the exception of the one low-pH Silesian soil (S1) and two soils from Pulawy (P2 and P3) in which recoveries were 37, 23, and 11%, respectively. Recoveries of Zn by CaCl2 extraction were substantially higher than those of Cd. The soils from Silesia tended to immobilize Zn more effectively than the reference soils from Pulawy (Table 3), despite the fact that the initial content of Zn in Silesian soils was high (Table 2). Two soils from Pulawy (P2 and P3) demonstrated a fundamentally different reaction to Zn amendment and their binding capacity toward this metal was negligible with 106 and 94% of the Zn amendment recovered by 0.01 M CaCl2 extraction from P3 and P2, respectively (Table 3).

Our data indicate that soils can interact differently with soluble forms of metals from external sources. Surprisingly, we did not detect strong relationships between Zn extractability, pH, and organic matter, even though these properties should be indicative of soil potential to immobilize metals either through precipitation driven by pH or by adsorption and complexation mediated by organic matter (Wilkens and Loch, 1994; Soon and Bates, 1982). The differences observed between the two soils from Pulawy (P1 and P2) and other soils in ability to bind Zn were difficult to explain by variation of texture, organic matter, and pH because the variability of these parameters did not account for the fundamental difference observed in Zn adsorption (Table 1). An additional aspect of metal mobility in our experiment is reflected by the relationship between final soil pH, resulting from the addition of Zn, and the change in Zn-extractable form. These two parameters were weakly correlated, which indicates that there are other soil properties playing significant roles in control of Zn mobility (Fig. 1). This inconsistent pattern of metal adsorption is a common phenomenon observed in soils. Chlopecka et al. (1996) did not see any consistent relationship between distribution of metals in different fractions, including exchangeable forms, and texture, organic matter, pH, and soil type in the Tarnowskie Gory area of Silesia.

Biological Activities of Unamended Soils
Notably, the contaminated soils from Silesia, before metal addition, had a similar range of enzyme activities (with the exception of the low-pH soil, S1) to that of noncontaminated soils from Pulawy region (Table 4) . In many cases, the biological activities found in soils from Silesia were substantially higher than in our reference soils, indicating that high metal concentrations do not necessarily imply suppression of biological processes. This also suggests that the measured levels of 0.01 M CaCl2–extractable metals, with the exception of S1, were not detrimental to biological processes in metal contaminated soils from Silesia. Metal mobility in both polluted and clean soils, as characterized by CaCl2 extraction, did not correlate with the enzymes activities measured (Table 5) .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Biological activities in control (unamended) soils and those amended with Cd, Pb, and Zn.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Comparison of regression models for relationships between biological activities and extractable Zn, organic matter, and pH in the control (unamended) soils.

 
Urease, nitrification potential, and alkaline phosphatase exhibited a strong response to pH (Table 5), whereas other activities did not show a similar pattern, which may indicate that pH range of the soils used was wide enough to also cover suboptimal values for the three activities. The relationship between urease and nitrification activities and organic matter did not show a similar trend to that between activity and pH (Table 5). This was also the case for other measured biological activities. This indicates that pH was a major factor influencing some of the biological activities in these soils, independent of pollution status.

Although our soil samples may not be representative of all polluted soils from Silesia, it seems likely that the levels of metal content typically found in regional soils do not generally explain variability of biological activity in soil. This is in agreement with data reported by Marzadori et al. (1996), who found that dehydrogenase and phosphatase activities in mining soils, which had developed from metal-rich parent material, were sometimes higher than that detected in corresponding reference soils with low metal content. However, soils receiving metal inputs from industrial sources can also produce high activities, including processes susceptible to chemical stress such as nitrification. Sauve et al. (1999) showed that in industrial soils containing up to 6000 mg Pb kg-1, nitrification was often several times higher than in much less polluted orchard soils.

Biological Activities of Soils Amended with Zinc, Lead, and Cadmium Salts
Soils amended with Cd, Pb, and Zn chloride salts produced different responses in biological activities, depending on the element added and soil properties. Figure 2 shows the distribution of activity inhibition or stimulation responses with Cd, Pb, and Zn additions to the nine soils studied.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Ranges in response of biological activities (inhibition or stimulation) for Cd-, Pb-, and Zn-amended soils. The whiskers represent the 10th and 90th percentiles, boxes the 25th and 75th percentiles, and solid lines the mean.

 
The Cd treatment in most soils had little or no effect on inhibition of enzyme activities (Fig. 2). Instead, it produced stimulation of different activities, which varied, depending on the specific activity and soil. The stimulatory effect of Cd on biological activities was most pronounced for dehydrogenase, which occurred in all soils, regardless of their initial pollution level and other properties. The Cd amendment also had a major effect on arylsulfatase, which showed a wide range of stimulation, however in two soils from Pulawy (P3 and P4) an inhibition of about 30% was observed (Table 4). The addition of Cd to the low-pH soil from Silesia (S1) caused a small inhibition of arylsulfatase, which was less than 5% of control. The other biological activities showed a similar pattern of response to the Cd treatment, but their maximum stimulatory effect usually did not exceed 20% and was often smaller than 10% (Fig. 2). Even nitrification, which is a process known to be susceptible to chemical stress, was largely unaffected by the Cd addition, with the exception of one soil from Pulawy (P1) and one from Silesia (S3) (Table 4). In the other soils, significant stimulation of nitrification was observed. It is evident from these data that Cd at the level added had a stimulatory, rather than an inhibitory effect, on enzyme activities, including dehydrogenase and nitrification activities, which can only function inside a living cell and do not appear extracellular (Brookes, 1995).

The Pb treatment strongly impeded urease activity in all soils, and the level of this inhibition in most soils was between 30 and 40%. Other activities, which were negatively affected by Pb, included nitrification and acid phosphatase, but their inhibition was usually lower than 10% (Fig. 2). Activity stimulation, or no effect, was the dominating response to Pb addition observed for dehydrogenase, arylsulfatase, and particularly for alkaline phosphatase, whose activity was increased in all soils by 10 to 20%. As previously discussed, the Pb amendment was not recovered by 0.01 M CaCl2 extractions, which suggests that it was rapidly bound to the soil matrix and the amendment had little, if any, effect on its mobile soluble forms. This indicates that the interactions between Pb and enzyme activities may not directly depend on the Pb activity in soil solution, which is the often-suggested mechanism of microbial process exposure to metal pollution. Clearly, further investigation is needed to elucidate microbial interactions with heavy metals.

Kurek et al. (1982) demonstrated that both dead and live bacterial cells pose significant binding capacity for heavy metals. Stimulatory effects of Cd and Pb are not necessarily indicative of a lack of negative effect of these metals on microbial processes. The Pb- and Cd- induced increases in biological activities may be related to their lethal effect on sensitive microbial populations, promoting growth of resistant species, which may feed on cell debris, leading to restructuring of soil microbial populations. Our data characterizing biological activity responses to Cd and Pb are in contrast with most of the existing literature, which reports strong inhibitory effects of these metals (Marzadori et al., 1996; Ping and Tieheng, 1996; Welp, 1999; Kandeler et al., 2000). This may be related, however, to the fact that metal-amendment experiments similar to ours usually involve use of higher levels of metal addition and, in some cases, several metals in combination. These large additions of different metals often do not reflect conditions representative of natural ecosystems.

The relative nature of metal toxicity studies and concerns regarding their validity for the assessment of natural ecosystems was extensively addressed in some reviews (Duxbury, 1985; Brookes, 1995). Sauve et al. (1999) measured nitrification potential in soils from an ecosystem subjected to long-term Pb pollution and found that the variation in biological activity could not be explained by a simple relationship with metal activity, organic matter, or pH. The multiple regression models derived showed that it was primarily sensitive to soil pH and organic matter and, to a much lesser extent, metal levels. They concluded from these findings that nitrification potential is not a straightforward bioindicator of soil metal contamination. Tyler et al. (1974) observed stimulation of nitrification in Cd-amended soil, suggesting that nitrifying bacteria are inherently resistant to metal pollution.

The Zn treatment produced a fundamentally different response of the measured biological activities when compared with that of Cd and Pb. Activities of Zn-amended soils, with the exception of two outliers for alkaline phosphatase and dehydrogenase, reacted with a strong inhibition (Table 4). The degree of these inhibitions greatly varied among activities and soils. Arylsulfatase had the widest range of response from little inhibition in the high organic matter Silesian soil (S4) to a complete suppression in low pH Silesian soil (S1) (Fig. 2, Table 4). Arylsufatase inhibition did not correlate with any of the soil properties measured (Table 6) .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6. Comparison of regression models for relationships between the percentage inhibition of biological activities and extractable Zn, organic matter, and {Delta}pH in soils after amendment with ZnCl2.

 
Nitrification, dehydrogenase, urease, and alkaline phosphatase formed a group of activities with a similar range and distribution of inhibition among soils. In contrast to these activities, the range of acid phosphatase inhibition was narrow, which may explain why there was no relationship between this activity and extractable metals or change in pH. As will be discussed later, these are important parameters controlling biological activities in Zn-amended soils. Based on the median values for inhibition, the degree of inhibition for nitrification appeared to be the most sensitive to Zn addition while alkaline phosphatase was the least sensitive activity (Fig. 2).

The degree of inhibition of biological activities generally did not correspond to Zn availability as measured by 0.01 M CaCl2 extractions. Only the inhibition of nitrification and dehydrogenase were strongly correlated with extractable Zn (Table 6), whereas inhibition of other enzymes did not correspond to Zn availability, even though this availability exhibited changes over a wide range. These weak relationships may indicate that Zn mobility was not the principal parameter influencing the observed inhibitory effects. As previously discussed, Zn amendment at the rate used (700 mg Zn kg-1 soil) had a significant effect on soil pH (Table 3). The protective role of organic matter is demonstrated by the strong reduction of dehydrogenase and nitrification inhibition with the increasing soil organic matter content (Table 6). This relationship is even stronger than the correlation between change in pH and inhibition of these two activities (Table 6). To a certain extent, organic matter also reduced susceptibility of urease. One aspect of the protective role of soil organic matter is probably related to pH buffering. The role of soil organic matter as a buffering agent for soil pH becomes evident from the strong negative relationship between pH change due to metal salt addition and soil organic matter content (Fig. 1).

Our data show that the degrees of inhibition for dehydrogenase, nitrification potential, and urease are correlated with the change in pH (Table 6). For activities such as dehydrogenase and urease, the relationship with change in pH is even stronger than with extractable Zn. The confounding nature of the relationship between pH and mobility of metals makes it difficult to separate the influence of metals on biological activities from that of pH. However, in studies involving Zn salt additions to less buffered soils, Zn toxicity may be overestimated and some of the observed detrimental effects can be accounted for by a simple change in soil pH.

The strong relationship between change in pH and inhibition of nitrification, plotted for all soils amended with the three metals, suggests that there is major contribution of pH to activity inhibition, considering that in amended soils, Pb and Cd amendments have either little negative or stimulatory effect on nitrification inhibition (Fig. 3) . It is obvious from these data that inhibition of nitrification as related to change in pH resulting from all metal additions can be described by a simple linear model. The important role of pH is also reflected in a considerable correlation between pH, urease, and nitrification in control (unamended) soils. As previously discussed, these soils had a wide range of total metal contents and metal extractability, including high values found in soils from Silesia, and these conditions did not seem to suppress activities. Recent work by Smolders et al. (2001) clearly demonstrated that the effect of pH on nitrification can be as great as that caused by the metal additions.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Relationship between change in pH and biological activity response in Cd-, Pb-, and Zn-amended soils.

 
At this point, we cannot totally discount Zn toxicity as a potential cause of the biological activity inhibition observed in metal-amendment experiments. We have found reports in the literature demonstrating decreases of activities in well-buffered systems containing large amounts of carbonate, and, under such conditions, metal addition was not likely to affect pH (Ping and Tieheng, 1996; Kandeler et al., 2000). In the long-term incubation study by Kandeler et al. (2000), however, five different metals were added simultaneously; therefore, it is not possible to distinguish which element caused the inhibition of activities. Ping and Tieheng (1996) studied the effect of salt addition (i.e., salt effect) on nitrifying activity in soil. In their experiment, addition of K2SO4 was used in an amount that matched the molar concentration of the ZnSO4 added and this addition did not affect nitrification. However, this was not surprising as the experimental soil they used contained 12% carbonates, which would clearly prevent changes of soil pH resulting from exchange between solution K+ and sorption complex yielding H+ protons. Moreover, their data showed that Zn and Cd amendments as single metal additions both at rates as high as 500 mg kg-1 did not have any effect on nitrification. More than 98% of the amount added was not recovered by water extraction, which indicated effective immobilization of metals, and, under such conditions, the exposure of nitrifying bacteria was apparently negligible.

Stimulation and Inhibition of Biological Activities in Soil
As previously discussed, Cd and Pb did not always have an inhibitory effect on biological activities. In many cases, stimulatory effects were observed, but the extent of a given activity increase did not correlate well with any of the soil properties measured. To gain a better understanding of how soil properties influence activity stimulation or inhibition to metal additions, a simple correlation analysis was used. The correlation matrix included all measured soil parameters and the number of cases when stimulatory or inhibitory effect was observed in each soil, regardless of the metal type or activity of concern (Table 7) . The strongest correlation between the occurrences of biological activity stimulation was found for organic matter and pH. Positive correlation between stimulatory effects, organic matter, and pH lends some support for the validity of population restructuring in accounting for activity stimulation, as biomass growth strongly depends on substrate availability, reflected by organic matter and optimal pH conditions. The occurrences of biological inhibition in soils were negatively correlated with organic matter and silt content and positively correlated with sand fraction. As the clay content of most of our soils was small, it is likely that the main compartment for microbial populations was associated with the silt fraction. The study by Kandeler et al. (2000) demonstrates significant effect of soil texture on distribution of activities in soils, which are mainly distributed among silt and clay fractions. The increased susceptibility of biological activities to inhibition in soils with higher sand content may be due to their lower metal binding and pH buffering capacities and, as a consequence, larger exposure of microbial population associated with this coarser fraction.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 7. Correlation coefficients for number of stimulatory or inhibitory events and soil properties.

 

    CONCLUSIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
The results of our study indicate that addition of Cd, Pb, and Zn metal salts to either clean or metal-polluted agricultural soils produced a wide range of biological responses from stimulation to inhibition of activities. Additions of Cd and Pb in rates much higher than likely to occur as pollution inputs (10 and 500 mg kg-1 soil, respectively) had very little or no inhibitory effect on most of the biological activities measured. By contrast, Cd and Pb amendments often stimulated soil biological activities to an extent that varied among soils. The Zn treatment at a rate of 700 mg kg-1 soil had a strong inhibitory effect on soil dehydrogenase, acid and alkaline phosphatase, arylsulfatase, urease, and nitrification potential. The effect of the Zn amendment on activities could not be satisfactorily accounted for by metal toxicity because no strong relationship was observed between extractable Zn. The Zn amendment also had a strong effect on soil pH, resulting in confounding effects of pH and Zn toxicity on activities. The strong relationship between the change in pH caused by the metal amendment and the degree of activity stimulation or inhibition indicates that these types of experiment produce significant pH artifacts. Our data characterizing activities of the unamended agricultural soils from Silesia that have been subjected to long-term metal contamination indicate that the extent of pollution has little apparent influence on soil biological processes. In the light of our results, we conclude that the concept of using enzyme activities as indicators of heavy metal pollution for diverse Silesian soils is not useful.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
M. Tejada, M. T. Hernandez, and C. Garcia
Application of Two Organic Wastes in a Soil Polluted by Lead: Effects on the Soil Enzymatic Activities
J. Environ. Qual., January 9, 2007; 36(1): 216 - 225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
A. J. Franzluebbers, S. R. Wilkinson, and J. A. Stuedemann
Bermudagrass Management in the Southern Piedmont, USA: IX. Trace Elements in Soil with Broiler Litter Application
J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2004; 33(2): 778 - 784.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stuczynski, T. I.
Right arrow Articles by Siebielec, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stuczynski, T. I.
Right arrow Articles by Siebielec, G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Stuczynski, T. I.
Right arrow Articles by Siebielec, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Heavy Metals
Right arrow Soil Pollution
Right arrow Soil Biochemistry


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome