JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in JEQ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ryu, H. W.
Right arrow Articles by Choi, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ryu, H. W.
Right arrow Articles by Choi, H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ryu, H. W.
Right arrow Articles by Choi, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Remediation
Right arrow Bioremediation and Biodegradation
Right arrow Heavy Metals
Right arrow Soil Pollution
Right arrow Other Waste Management
Journal of Environmental Quality 32:751-759 (2003)
© 2003 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America

TECHNICAL REPORTS
Bioremediation and Biodegradation

Leaching Characteristics of Heavy Metals from Sewage Sludge by Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans MET

H. W. Ryua, H. S. Moonb, E. Y. Leeb, K. S. Cho*,b and H. Choia

a School of Textiles, Soongsil Univ., 1-1 Sangdo-dong, Dongjak-gu, Seoul 156-743, Korea
b Dep. of Environmental Science and Engineering, Ewha Womans Univ., 11-1 Daehyun-dong, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 120-750, Korea

* Corresponding author (kscho{at}ewha.ac.kr)

Received for publication December 25, 2001.

    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
An acidophilic, sulfur-oxidizing Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans MET bacterium was isolated from anaerobically digested, dewatered sewage sludge. This bacterium showed sulfur-oxidizing ability at both acidic and neutral conditions, and allowed metal leaching even at a high (130 g L-1) sludge solids concentration. We found that low metal leaching efficiency at high solids concentration was mainly due to an increase in buffering capacity resulting in retardation of pH reduction. Therefore, metal leaching was mainly influenced not by sludge solids concentration, but by the pH (or sulfate concentration per unit sludge mass) of the sludge solutions. The relationship between the pH of the sludge solution and the efficiency of metal leaching was obtained by quantitatively investigating the effect of pH reduction or the amount of sulfate produced per unit sludge mass on leaching of each metal. Furthermore, the relationship between total metal content in the sludge and metal leached to the solution was obtained for each metal. Such a relationship allowed estimation of leachable metal at various amounts of total metal content in sludge.

Abbreviations: MW, modified Waksman medium


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
THE TREATMENT and final disposal cost of sewage sludge represents 50% of the overall cost of the wastewater treatment process (Tyagi et al., 1991). Most of the sludge produced is discharged in landfills or the ocean, but alternative methods such as incineration, solidification, composting, and pyrolysis have been recently examined (Tyagi et al., 1993). One of the most economical sludge disposal methods is composting followed by land application. However, heavy metals present in the sludge often hinder agricultural land application of the composted sludge. Total heavy metal content in the sludge is generally about 0.5 to 2.0% of total dry weight, but in some cases it reaches up to 4% (Tyagi et al., 1991; Jain and Tyagi, 1992; Sreekrishnan et al., 1993; Blais et al., 1993). Specifically, the toxic metal content in dewatered sludge obtained from sewage treatment facilities located in municipal and industrial districts often exceeds the maximum limit by several 10-folds. The heavy metals, therefore, must be removed before final land application to prevent environmental contamination and health hazards due to the presence of heavy metals in the sludge (Tyagi et al., 1991).

Numerous methods have been proposed to remove heavy metals from sewage sludge, including chlorination, use of chelating agents, and acid treatment at high temperatures. However, these methods are generally ineffective in practical applications due to high cost, operational difficulties, and low metal leaching efficiency (Oliver and Carey, 1976; Wonzinak and Huang, 1982; Lo and Chen, 1990; Tyagi et al., 1988; Sreekrishnan and Tyagi, 1996).

An alternative way to replace chemical methods in removing heavy metals is microbial leaching with Acidithiobacillus species (Tyagi and Couillard, 1989; Tyagi et al., 1992, 1997; Jain and Tyagi, 1992; Sreekrishnan et al., 1993; Blais et al., 1993; Couillard and Mercier, 1993; Sreekrishnan et al., 1996). This method shows several advantages over chemical methods in terms of its simplicity, high yield of metal extraction, lower acid and alkali consumption, and minimum reduction in sludge nutrients such as N and P (Tyagi et al., 1988; Couillard and Mercier, 1993). In addition, microbial leaching has been shown to be 80% less expensive than acid leaching (Couillard and Mercier, 1993).

The most widely used microorganisms in metal leaching are Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans (Tyagi et al., 1988, 1991; Lo and Chen, 1990; Cho et al., 1999; Sreekrishnan and Tyagi, 1996; Sreekrishnan et al., 1996; Ryu et al., 1998). Metal leaching from the sludge occurs directly with the microorganism or indirectly with sulfuric acid formed in the presence of FeSO4 and S0. However, in microbial leaching with A. ferrooxidans and A. thiooxidans, the reaction time to leach heavy metals from the sludge to a recommended level was found to be very long (8–32 d) and the initial pH should be maintained to 2.5 to 4 (Tyagi et al., 1991, 1992; Blais et al., 1992; Jain and Tyagi, 1992; Sreekrishnan et al., 1996; Cho et al., 1999). To minimize such a problem, Tyagi et al. (1992) established mixed cultures by adding elemental sulfur during digestion; these cultures allowed heavy metal leaching without controlling the initial pH. These microorganisms were found to be the mixed cultures of neutral sulfur-oxidizing bacterium (A. thioparus) and acidophilic bacterium (A. thiooxidans).

To develop a microbial metal leaching process of sludge, a steady supply of efficient microorganisms must be ensured. Greater process efficiency can be achieved by co-inoculation of highly active isolated pure cultures to the leaching system containing indigenous microorganisms from the sludge and the mixed culture obtained by the enrichment. Once the pure culture is isolated, the leaching ability of the microorganism can be enhanced by recombination of the strain. Moreover, its application in the microbial leaching process can be optimized by understanding characteristics of the pure culture.

The objective of the present study is therefore to isolate sulfur-oxidizing pure culture A. thiooxidans, which is active in a wide range of pH values, by enrichment from the anaerobically digested sludge in the presence of elemental sulfur. We also evaluated metal leaching efficiency of the isolated culture at various sludge solids concentrations to investigate the feasibility of using this culture at high sludge solids contents. Furthermore, a relationship between the pH of the sludge solution and metal leaching efficiency was investigated.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Sludge
Anaerobically digested, dewatered sewage sludge obtained from a sewage treatment plant located in a suburb of Seoul, Korea, was used throughout the study. The sludge used was solar-dried to prevent its decomposition, followed by grinding to a powder (average particle size = 1 mm). Average concentrations of heavy metals in the sludge samples were as follows: 2340 ± 40 µg Cu per g dry sludge, 31870 ± 461 µg Al per g dry sludge, 1152 ± 31 µg Cr per g dry sludge, 4529 ± 105 µg Zn per g dry sludge, 829 ± 19 µg Ni per g dry sludge, 222 ± 10 µg Pb per g dry sludge, and 33020 ± 1320 µg Fe per g dry sludge.

Isolation and Identification of a Sulfur-Oxidizing Bacterium
For enrichment of sulfur-oxidizing microorganisms, a modified Waksman (MW) medium (Cho et al., 1991) of the following composition was used: 3.0 g L-1 K2HPO4, 0.1 g L-1 MgSO4·7H2O, 0.3 g L-1 CaCl2·2H2O, 0.01 g L-1 FeSO4·7H2O, and 10 g L-1 S0 as an energy source. The initial pH of the MW medium was 4.0. The dewatered sludge (5 g dry weight) was placed in a 250-mL Erlenmeyer flask containing 100 mL MW medium followed by incubation for three weeks at 30°C and 180 rpm. The pH change of the medium was monitored during the incubation. The mixed culture obtained by the enrichment was inoculated in MW medium at 10% (v/v) and the culture was again incubated at the same conditions. When the medium pH dropped to less than 2, the culture was further transferred to fresh MW medium. After 20 successive transfer cultures, the culture was finally plated in MW agar medium and the enrichment culture was isolated. This isolated culture was named MET. Identification of the isolated microorganism was performed at the Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Korean Collection for Type Cultures.

Effect of Initial pH on Sulfur Oxidation Rate of the Isolate
The pure culture of the isolated bacterium preincubated in MW medium for 3 d was inoculated at 10% (v/v) concentration in a large container containing 4 L of MW medium. The container was continuously aerated by compressed air during 8 to 10 d of incubation. The culture was then centrifuged for 3 min at 4500 x g to remove residual sulfur. The supernatant was again centrifuged for 20 min at 7600 x g and the cells were harvested. After washing the harvested cells with inorganic salt medium, the cells were further suspended within the same salt medium to obtain the concentrated cell suspension, which was used as an inoculum. The composition of the salt medium was the same as MW medium but in the absence of S0.

To investigate effects of initial pH on the sulfur oxidation rate of the isolate, the pH values of the MW medium were adjusted to 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 by adding 0.2 to 2 M NaOH and HCl solutions. The concentrated cell suspension previously inoculated into the pH-adjusted MW medium was incubated at 30°C and 180 rpm. Initial optical density (OD) after inoculation was 0.05 at 660 nm. The culture broth (10 mL) was sampled every 1 or 2 d during incubation to determine pH, OD, and sulfate concentrations. When OD of the cell suspension of the isolated bacterium reached 1 at 660 nm, the actual concentration of the microorganisms corresponded to 0.47 g dry cell weight (DCW) L-1. Experiments were conducted in duplicate and the average value determined.

Effect of the Isolate Inoculation
To investigate the effect of the isolated bacterium on metal leaching, four incubation systems were prepared in 250-mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing 20 g L-1 sewage sludge, 100 mL MW medium, and 10 g S0 L-1, as follows:

System I: sterilized for 20 min at 121°C and 0.1515 MPa

System II: nonsterilized

System III: nonsterilized, inoculated with the mixed sulfur-oxidizing culture (10%, v/v)

System IV: nonsterilized, inoculated with the isolated bacterium culture (10%, v/v)

The pH of the incubation bath was measured every day to indirectly monitor growth of the microorganisms.

Effect of Sludge Concentration in Microbial Leaching of Heavy Metals by the Isolate
The isolated bacterium was cultivated in 500-mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing 200 mL MW medium and sewage sludge (50 g L-1) at 30°C and 180 rpm for 3 d. The resulting culture broth, which had been previously adapted in the sludge, was used as an inoculum to elucidate the effect of various sludge concentrations on microbial leaching of heavy metals. This culture (10%, v/v) was inoculated in 500-mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing the sewage sludge at various concentrations (20, 50, 90, and 130 g L-1 in dry weight) in 180 mL inorganic salt medium and 10 g S0 L-1. No adjustment was made for initial pH. Experiments were performed in duplicate at 30°C and 180 rpm in a shaking incubator.

Analyses of Metal and Sulfate Concentrations
Ten milliliters of sample from the flask was centrifuged for 15 min followed by filtration of the supernatant to measure concentrations of sulfate and metal in the filtrate. A finely ground dewatered sludge (0.1 g) was suspended in a Teflon vessel containing 5 mL of mixed acid solution, such as hydrofluoric acid, nitric acid, and perchloric acid (4:4:1, v/v), to determine initial concentrations of heavy metals in the sludge. The vessel was heated at 150 to 200°C to ensure a complete digestion of the sludge. Concentrations of heavy metal were measured by inductively coupled plasma spectroscopy (Plasma 40; PerkinElmer, Wellesley, MA). Sulfate concentrations in the medium were determined by ion chromatography (Waters 510 pump; Waters 432 conductivity detector; IC-Pak anion column [4.6-mm diameter x 50-mm length]; Waters, Milford, MA) at 1.2 mL min-1 and 35°C along with sodium borate–gluconate solution as a mobile phase.


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Identification of the Isolate
The strain MET, isolated in this study, was a short rod type (0.5–1 µm) and gram negative. The colony grown on the MW agar medium was a small, round shape with a light yellow color. With successive incubation at 30°C for 8 to 9 d, the color of the colony changed to dark yellow. This bacterium contains ubquinone-8 as a coenzyme, and nonhydroxyhexadecanoic acid and 3-hydroxyetetradecanoic acid as the main cellular fatty acids. The isolated bacterium uses CO2 as a carbon source and is a chemoautotropic bacterium obtaining energy by oxidation of reduced sulfur complexes such as thiosulfate and elemental sulfur. The bacterium cannot utilize ferrous iron as an energy source. Based on such information, the isolated bacterium was identified as A. thiooxidans (Katayama et al., 1982; Holt et al., 1994). This bacterium was registered as A. thiooxidans KCTC 8928P at the Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology.

Effect of Initial pH on Sulfur Oxidation Rate of Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans MET
To clarify the effect of initial pH on sulfur oxidation rate of A. thiooxidans MET, the pH values of the culture broth, dry cell weights, and sulfate concentrations were measured at all the initial pH conditions (pH 2–8). The results from pH values 2, 4, and 8 are shown in Fig. 1 .



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Values for pH, dry cell weight, and sulfate concentration during growth of Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans MET at different initial pH values: (a) pH 2, (b) pH 4, (c) pH 8. Symbols: •, pH; {blacksquare}, dry cell weight; {blacktriangledown}, sulfate.

 
At pH 2 and 4, the isolated MET showed no lag phase in its bacterial growth as revealed by a continuous increase in dry cell weights (Fig. 1a,b). Maximum bacterial growth was shown in 8 to 10 d of incubation. Furthermore, sulfate concentrations increased continuously and the pH of the culture broth decreased to less than 1 with successive incubations. At an initial pH of 8, the pH of the medium continuously decreased due to proton formation during oxidation of sulfur to sulfate , although the reaction rate was slow in the early phase of the incubation. The pH of the medium decreased continuously and in 8 d of incubation it dropped to less than 5, thus indicating significant bacterial growth. Maximum bacterial growth was decreased after 14 d of incubation.

At all other pH conditions, initial dry cell weights leveled off as the pH of the medium decreased to around 1.0 to 0.8 due to sulfur oxidation, as evidenced by increasing sulfate concentrations with incubation time. This suggested that the sulfur-oxidizing ability of MET bacterium was not adversely affected by highly acidic conditions (e.g., pH 1).

The initial sulfur oxidation rate (ISOR) of MET bacterium with time is illustrated in Fig. 2a . The ISOR for all pH treatments (pH 2–8) was determined from a ratio between concentrations of consumed energy source (S0) and incubation time during the initial 1 to 2 d of incubation. Consumed sulfur concentration was based on measurements of sulfate concentrations. Results indicated that up to pH 4, the ISOR of the MET bacterium tended to increase with increases in the initial pH of the medium. The maximum ISOR (6.1 g S L-1 d-1) was observed at pH 4. Although the ISOR decreased with increases in the pH at initial pH values greater than 4, the rates were still 3.2 and 2.2 g S L-1 d-1 at pH 6 and 7, respectively. This revealed that the MET bacterium continued to oxidize sulfur even in neutral conditions.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Effect of initial pH on sulfur oxidation rate of Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans MET. (a) Initial sulfur oxidation rate. (b) Average sulfur oxidation rate.

 
The average sulfur oxidation rate (ASOR) for all pH treatments was calculated by dividing consumed sulfur concentration by incubation time during 20 d of incubation (Fig. 2b). Maximum ASOR was also shown at pH 4 (0.61 g S L-1 d-1), but was relatively unaffected by higher initial pH conditions (pH > 4). Although the rate of reaction was slow, the strain MET was still able to oxidize sulfur to sulfate, resulting in pH reduction in neutral conditions (e.g., pH 8), as previously shown in Fig. 1c. Once the pH of the medium became favorable for bacterial growth, the MET bacterium grew rapidly and efficiently to maintain sulfur-oxidizing ability.

Unlike most ecotypes of A. thiooxidans that are acidophilic bacteria (Tyagi et al., 1991; Jain and Tyagi, 1992), A. thiooxidans MET isolated in this study was able to oxidize sulfur not only in acidic conditions, but also in neutral conditions. Since the pH of the sewage sludge is mainly neutral, the initial pH must be adjusted to pH 2 to 4 to employ conventional A. thiooxidans in microbial leaching (Tyagi et al., 1988, 1991; Lo and Chen, 1990; Cho et al., 1999; Sreekrishnan and Tyagi, 1996; Sreekrishnan et al., 1996; Ryu et al., 1998). By contrast, A. thiooxidans MET can be directly used in a microbial leaching process without adjustment of initial sludge pH.

Effect of Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans MET Inoculation
In general, a rapid rate of acidification and low final pH of the sewage sludge are indicative of effective microbial sulfur oxidation and hence ability to leach heavy metals. Four systems comparing sterilization and inoculation treatments were analyzed for their ability to acidify sludge solutions (Fig. 3) .



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Effect of inoculation of Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans MET on pH reduction of sludge solution. Symbols: •, sterilized sludge; {circ}, nonsterilized sludge; {blacktriangledown}, nonsterilized sludge with the inoculation of mixed sulfur-oxidizing bacteria; {triangledown}, nonsterilized sludge with the inoculation of A. thiooxidans MET.

 
No pH change was observed in sterilized sludge solutions, indicating the absence of sulfur oxidation (System I). On the other hand, in nonsterilized sludge (System II) an initial lag phase was observed for the first 5 d of incubation followed by a subsequent decrease in pH, probably due to the presence of sulfur-oxidizing bacteria indigenous to the sludge. Inoculation with the mixed sulfur-oxidizing bacteria obtained from this study (System III) resulted in rapid acidification with a short lag phase (1 d). Final pH in System III was 1.4 after 14 d of incubation. However, in the system inoculated with A. thiooxidans MET (System IV), no initial lag phase was observed and the rate of acidification was much faster than that of System III. The pH decreased to 1.2 within 4 d of incubation. These results indicated that the leaching efficiency of A. thiooxidans MET isolated in this study was much greater than those of the mixed sulfur-oxidizing cultures and indigenous sulfur-oxidizing bacteria in the sludge.

Effect of Sludge Solids Concentration
Results for effects of sludge solid concentrations on pH, redox potential, and sulfate concentration are illustrated in Fig. 4 .



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Values for (a) pH, (b) redox potential (ORP), and (c) sulfate concentration at different sludge solids concentrations during microbial leaching with Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans MET. Symbols: •, 20 g L-1; {triangledown}, 50 g L-1; {blacksquare}, 90 g L-1; {diamond}, 130 g L-1.

 
With the exception of a few studies (Tyagi et al., 1997; Ryu et al., 1998), most of the previous studies in microbial metal leaching employed low sludge solids concentration (13–38 g L-1). Leaching of heavy metals from the sludge solution at high sludge solids concentration is a less expensive process since large amounts of heavy metals can be extracted from a small volume of the sludge.

The initial pH of the sludge solution inoculated with the strain MET increased with an increase in sludge solids concentration. At high sludge concentrations, such as 90 and 130 g L-1, an increase in sludge pH was observed during the first half day. However, after the initial increase, the sludge pH decreased considerably across all treatments, due to oxidation of elemental sulfur to sulfuric acid by the strain MET. The rate of acidification was much faster at lower sludge solids concentration and became slower at pH values less than 2.0. The slow acidification at high solids concentration was due to an increase in buffering capacity as described in previous studies (Sreekrishnan et al., 1993; Tyagi et al., 1997; Cho et al., 1999). The buffering effects were mainly due to the presence of basic components such as carbonate in the sludge (Brombacher et al., 1998), which hindered microbial leaching efficiency (Sreekrishnan et al., 1993; Tyagi et al., 1997; Cho et al., 1999). After 5 to 8 d of leaching, the final pH of the sludge solution decreased to 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, and 1.6 for 20, 50, 90, and 130 g L-1 sludge solids concentrations, respectively.

The sludge redox potential continuously increased with increasing reaction time and the increase in the rate of redox potential was rapid at low solids concentrations (Fig. 4b). The final redox potentials obtained for 20, 50, 90, and 130 g L-1 were 420, 42, 390, and 370 mV, respectively, suggesting a high rate of sulfur oxidation and an easy transfer of air into the sludge solution at low sludge solids concentrations. As shown in Fig. 4c, the concentration of sulfate produced by the strain MET increased with time and, regardless of sludge solids concentration, was approximately the same across treatments at any given time up to 5 d of incubation. The rate of S oxidation decreased after 5 d. Despite sulfur oxidation being similar across solids concentration treatments, pH reduction differed due to buffering by the sludge. Since the concentration of elemental sulfur in the sludge solution was 10 g L-1, the stoichiometric sulfate concentration should be 30 g L-1. Approximately 50 to 60% of sulfur was oxidized during 6 to 8 d of incubation (Fig. 4c).

Figure 5 shows concentrations of various heavy metals (Zn, Cu, Cr, Pb, Ni, and Al) solubilized by microbial leaching with A. thiooxidans MET. Regardless of type of heavy metal, the rate of leaching was faster at low sludge solids concentration than that at high solids concentration, due to a faster reduction of pH at low solids concentrations (Fig. 4a).



View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Concentration of heavy metals (g kg-1 dry sludge) solubilized at different sludge solids concentrations: (a) Zn, (b) Cu, (c) Cr, (d) Pb, (e) Ni, (f) Al. Symbols: •, 20 g L-1; {triangledown}, 50 g L-1; {blacksquare}, 90 g L-1; {diamond}, 130 g L-1.

 
Based on the data in Fig. 5, the removal efficiency of heavy metals at different solids concentrations was calculated in 6 d of leaching (Table 1). With the exception of Pb, removal efficiencies of heavy metals decreased with increases in sludge solids concentration. Longer reaction times were generally needed (Fig. 4a) to produce a sufficient acidification of the leaching solution at high sludge solids concentrations (90 and 130 g L-1) for metal solubility. In addition, even with longer leaching times the removal efficiency of Pb was substantially lower at high solids concentrations. Nevertheless, these results confirmed the high efficiency of the strain MET in microbial leaching of heavy metals from the dewatered sludge or the highly concentrated sludge solution.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Removal efficiency of heavy metals at different solids concentration after 6 d of incubation.

 
Figure 6 shows removal efficiency of the heavy metal at various pH values for all the sludge solids concentrations. The results showed that removal efficiency of metal and solution pH were highly correlated (with the exception of Pb). Low correlation of Pb removal with solution pH was mainly due to the precipitation of PbSO4 generated by complex formation of sulfate and Pb ions (Mercier et al., 1996). It should be also noted that the leaching efficiency of Zn and Ni at pH 4 was greater than 20%, whereas that of other metals at the same pH was almost zero. These results suggested leaching of Zn and Ni may be easily effected even at high pHs. Nevertheless, the pH of leaching solution should be decreased to 1 to 1.5 for a sufficient removal of all the types of heavy metals at various sludge solids concentrations.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Relationship between pH and removal efficiency of heavy metals at different sludge solids concentrations: (a) Zn, (b) Cu, (c) Cr, (d) Pb, (e) Ni, (f) Al. Symbols: •, 20 g L-1; {triangledown}, 50 g L-1; {blacksquare}, 90 g L-1; {diamond}, 130 g L-1.

 
As described previously in Fig. 4 and Table 1, the high buffering capacity at high sludge solids concentrations retarded acidification, resulting in low leaching efficiencies of metals. Data points illustrated in Fig. 7 were obtained by dividing sulfate concentration and amount of leached metal by the amount of sludge solids at all the solids concentration (from Fig. 4 and 5). By eliminating the effect of buffering capacity on metal leaching caused by disparity in solids concentration, a direct interaction between sulfate concentration and metal leaching can be found by this normalization.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Relationship between sulfate concentration and concentration of heavy metals solubilized. Symbols: {circ}, Al; •, Zn; {square}, Cu; {blacksquare}, Ni; {triangleup}, Cr; {blacktriangleup}, Pb.

 
Results shown in Fig. 7 clearly indicate that, regardless of sludge solids concentration, the amount of metal leached per unit sludge mass was practically identical at the same sulfate concentration per unit sludge mass. Initially, there was a linear correlation between sulfate concentration per unit sludge mass and amount of leached metal per sludge. For all the metals, however, amount of leached metal per unit sludge mass reached equilibrium at a certain sulfate concentration per unit sludge mass. Minimum sulfate concentrations for maximum metal leaching (i.e., sulfate concentrations produced per unit sludge at maximum metal removal) for various metals were in the order of Zn 1.15, Ni 1.22, Al 1.25, Cu 1.29, Cr 1.41, and Pb 2.21 g SO42- per kg sludge.

The slopes (g metal per g sulfate) of the initial first-order line (before equilibrium) from the relationship between sulfate concentration and amount of leached metal shown in Fig. 7 are as follows: 2.63 for Zn, 2.43 for Cu, 3.42 for Cr, 0.85 for Pb, 1.93 for Ni, and 4.42 for Al. The greater the slope, the greater the influence of sulfate concentration on metal leaching. The influence decreased in the order of Al >> Cr > Zn > Cu > Ni >> Pb. With knowledge of such a relationship, the sole measurement of sulfate concentration in the sludge solution could permit estimation of amounts of leached metal.

Figure 8 shows the relationship between total metal content (solid metal) in the sludge and the amount of metal leached in the solution (solubilized). The latter values were selected from Fig. 6, where the amount of leached metal reached equilibrium at below pH 2. Some data points (open circles) were derived from the values cited in the reference (Sreekrishnan et al., 1993). Results revealed that the amounts of solubilized metal were proportional to solid metal content in the sludge, regardless of metal types. The slopes shown in Fig. 8 correspond to the amount of potentially leachable metal per total metal content (solid metal) within the unit volume of sludge.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Relationship between the concentration of leached metal in the solution and total metal content (solid) in the sludge: (a) Zn, (b) Cu, (c) Cr, (d) Pb, (e) Ni, (f) Al. Data sources: •, this study; {circ}, Sreekrishnan et al. (1993).

 
For instance, with Zn the slope value 0.91 indicates that approximately 90% of total Zn in the sludge can be leached. The slope values increased in the order Al < Cu < Cr < Ni < Pb < Zn. These results are, within 10% error, in accordance with the experimental data obtained by A. thiooxidans MET microbial leaching (Table 1). At below pH 2, the removal efficiency of Cr was 65 to 69% (Fig. 6), whereas the estimated leachable Cr was 69% (Fig. 8). Other metals, except Pb, showed similar trends to Cr. Estimation of leachable Pb was only feasible at low total metal content such as 0.06 mmol L-1, due to low solubility of PbSO4. The results in Fig. 8 therefore allow estimation of leachable metal with the MET strain at various amounts of total metal in the sludge.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This research has been supported by the National Research Laboratory Program of the Korean Ministry of Science and Engineering, and the Korea Research Foundation.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 


Related articles in JEQ:

This Issue in Journal of Environmental Quality

JEQ 2003 32: 745-750. [Full Text]  




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in JEQ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ryu, H. W.
Right arrow Articles by Choi, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ryu, H. W.
Right arrow Articles by Choi, H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ryu, H. W.
Right arrow Articles by Choi, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Remediation
Right arrow Bioremediation and Biodegradation
Right arrow Heavy Metals
Right arrow Soil Pollution
Right arrow Other Waste Management


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome