JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in JEQ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guzzella, L.
Right arrow Articles by Giuliano, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guzzella, L.
Right arrow Articles by Giuliano, G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Guzzella, L.
Right arrow Articles by Giuliano, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Agricultural Pesticides
Right arrow Preferential Flow
Right arrow Lysimeter/Rhizosphere Studies
Right arrow Pesticides
Right arrow Organic Compounds
Journal of Environmental Quality 32:1089-1098 (2003)
© 2003 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America

TECHNICAL REPORTS
Vadose Zone Processes and Chemical Transport

Studies on Mobility and Degradation Pathways of Terbuthylazine Using Lysimeters on a Field Scale

L. Guzzella*, S. Rullo, F. Pozzoni and G. Giuliano

Water Research Institute-CNR, via Reno 1, Roma, Italy

* Corresponding author (guzzella{at}irsa.rm.cnr.it)

Received for publication April 18, 2002.

    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Terbuthylazine [N2-tert-butyl-6-chloro-N4-ethyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine] degradation pathways in agricultural soils were evaluated by following the appearance and mobility of its main transformation products: dealkylated and hydroxylated derivatives. Three experimental degradation studies in open field were performed in different hydraulic conditions: constant hydraulic head on topsoil, achieved to simulate the highest-risk situation for the aquifer; intermittent artificial precipitation to simulate a medium-risk situation; and natural precipitation to reproduce the lowest-risk condition. Concentrations of terbuthylazine transformation products derived from dealkylation and hydroxylation reactions were measured in leachates and soil samples collected during the three experiments. Desethylterbuthylazine (DET) and deethylterbuthylazine-2-hydroxide [DETH; 4-amino-6-terbutylamino-(1,3,5)-triazine-2-OH] were found to be the highest-leaching compounds and therefore can be considered as potential pollutants for aquifer contamination.

Abbreviations: BTC, breakthrough curve • DDA, desethyl-deisopropylatrazine • DDAH, desethyldeisopropyl-atrazine-2-hydroxide • DEAH, desethyl-atrazine-2-hydroxide • DET, desethylterbuthylazine • DETH, deethylterbuthylazine-2-hydroxide • DIA, deisopropylatrazine • DIAH, deisopropylatrazine-2-hydroxide • TER, terbuthylazine • TH, terbuthylazine-2-hydroxide • TP, transformation product


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
THE s-TRIAZINE chemical family includes a large number of herbicides widely used in agriculture practice for preemergence and postemergence weed control. Atrazine (6-chloro-N2-ethyl-N4-isopropyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine), the most commonly used triazine, was sold worldwide since the 1960s, but in the early 1990s European regulators banned its application in agricultural practices because of its persistence in the environment. Subsequently, terbuthylazine was introduced as an atrazine substitute. In recent years there has been a growing concern about persistence, mobility, and toxicity of triazine metabolites, due to their residual concentrations measured in aquifers and to their scarcely known behavior (Adams and Thurman, 1991; Thurman et al., 1992; Squillace et al., 1993). Metabolite formation is mainly due to biochemical processes such as dealkylation, dechlorination, and hydroxylation; deamination; and ring cleavage of the parent compounds. Herbicide degradation does not always produce a lower phytotoxicity; for example, deethylatrazine [6-chloro-N-isopropyl-(1,3,5)-triazine-2,4-diamine] has the same toxicity as atrazine.

In recent experiments (Dousset et al., 1997), degradation of [14C]terbuthylazine was investigated in laboratory studies with different topsoil to evaluate which soil characteristics would favor metabolite formation. After a 45-d incubation period, terbuthylazine concentration quickly decreased by 30%, whereas desethylterbuthylazine was simultaneously formed. The extrapolated terbuthylazine half-life varied between 88 and 116 d in different soils. The author proposed, according to other studies (Hance, 1970), that terbuthylazine is more readily adsorbed by soil than atrazine, and that this might protect the molecule from microbial attack. According to studies by Dousset et al. (1997), the prominent dealkylation product of terbuthylazine is DET. In comparison with DET, the deterbuthylated compound, deisopropylatrazine [DIA; 6-chloro-N-ethyl-(1,3,5)-triazine-2,4-diamine], is less concentrated. Thurman et al. (1994) hypothesized that the rate of deethylation is two to three times faster than the deisopropylation rate. Deethyldeisopropylatrazine [DDA; 6-chloro-(1,3,5)-triazine-2,4-diamine], produced by DIA deethylation or by DET deterbuthylation, was rarely detected (Winkelmann and Klaine, 1991a; Di Corcia et al., 1999). This compound has the highest capacity of binding to soil and the highest mineralization rate compared with the other metabolites (Winkelmann and Klaine, 1991a).

Dealkylated products can be considered hazardous contaminants for ground water pollution as they are generally more persistent and water soluble than the parent compound. On the contrary, hydroxylated compounds have lower solubility, preferentially accumulate in the first 10 cm of the soil layer, and therefore may be considered less potentially polluting for ground water. Hydroxylation is considered to be one of the major atrazine degradation pathways (Winkelmann and Klaine, 1991b; Jones et al., 1982).

In our study, terbuthylazine degradation pathways and its main metabolite formation were evaluated in different pluviometric situations, using suction cup lysimeters under open field conditions, to assess the influence of pluviometric condition in metabolite formation and mobilization.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Experimental Field
The studied area was located in the Eastern Lombardy plane (Italy) between the Oglio and Adda rivers, at 120 m of altitude on an 80-m-thick Würm fluvial–glacial deposit consisting of gravel, sand, and conglomerates. The experimental site, part of the fundamental level of the Po plane, was located southeast of Treviglio (Bergamo) and had growing grass during the study. The water table was superficial and flowed between depths of 5 and 9 m in the northeast–southwest direction, with a 0.19% hydraulic gradient. Soil was Typic Hapludalf (USDA Soil Taxonomy) (Ente Regionale di Sviluppo Agricolo della Lombardia, 1996). The texture was loamy from topsoil to 120 cm, silty clay loamy from 120 to 150 cm, and sandy loamy from 150 to 480 cm, with 50% gravel (Table 1) (Pozzoni, 1997). The soil was carbonated and the organic carbon content decreased from 2.7% in the topsoil to 0.02% in the >200-cm layer. The maximum clay content was 26 to 27% and was measured in the 70- to 106-cm layer. The site was classified as highly vulnerable to ground water pollution.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Pedological characteristics of the Treviglio soil profile.

 
The plot, a 20-m2 circular area, was confined by a HDPE panel fitted in the soil up to a 20-cm depth, sealed along the perimeter with sodium bentonite and emerging 45 cm above the soil to guarantee a hydraulic head during the experiments. Suction cup (0.5 L) lysimeters (Timco, Prairie Du Sac, WI) were installed to collect water samples from soil pores at 30- and 90-cm depths (three replicates at each depth). Two 4-cm bentonite rings were installed at different depths to avoid water passage through the walls of the suction cup lysimeters.

A vacuum pump (Millipore, Bedford, MA) was used to establish a 15-kPa pressure in the lysimeter cups for collection of pore water samples. Manometer-type tensiometers were installed at the same depth as the lysimeter cups to control water saturation conditions of the different soil horizons. A 15-m-deep piezometer, bored between 3 and 15 m, was installed 2 m downstream from the plot. Ground water samples were collected with a submergible electric pump (7.6-cm-o.d. JS4/08; GEO Impianti, Bergamo, Italy). A manual pluviometer was also installed to measure precipitation events during the experiments. The rainfall events were recorded every day.

The bacterial concentration (cell number/g soil) was evaluated by collecting four soil samples (10 kg soil collected from the 5- to 15-cm soil layer) in March, June, and November 1999 and February 2000 near the experimental plot. Soil organic carbon content and temperature at 5 and 15 cm (mean values are shown in Table 2) were also recorded in the same samples. Organic carbon content was determined by back titration after oxidation with potassium dichromate in the presence of sulfuric acid (Walkley and Black, 1934).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Bacterial enumeration, organic carbon (OC) content, and temperature of Treviglio soil samples at the 5- to 15-cm depth.

 
Microbial count was performed accordingly to method developed by Barra Caracciolo et al. (1998) and Di Corcia et al. (1999). The bacterial concentrations reported in Table 2 as means of the triplicate samples showed a good correlation with the soil temperature, in that the highest temperature corresponded with the highest microbial enumeration. The greatest concentration of bacteria was measured in the June sample but, generally, the microbial population could be considered abundant for the entire year.

Experimental Conditions and Herbicide Application
Three experimental trials were performed in different hydraulic conditions to assess soil humidity and permeability influence on terbuthylazine degradation pathways. Herbicide and transformation product (TP) concentrations in water leachates and in soil were analyzed before every new experiment to avoid cross contamination between experiments.

The experimental field was decorticated and irrigated with 300 L of water (corresponding to a 40% topsoil humidity) before the herbicide application, to reduce the presence of clay crack in topsoil. Water preferential flow transport is typical of arid topsoil conditions and particularly critical for herbicide leaching and ground water contamination.

In all the experiments, herbicide application was performed by dissolving 112 g of PRIMAGRAM TZ in 600 L of water, making 28 mg/L terbuthylazine concentration. The commercial formulate PRIMAGRAM TZ (Ciba Specialty Chemicals, Basel, Switzerland) contains 15% terbuthylazine. The herbicide solution was applied with a water reservoir with a tube irrigation system to obtain a good uniformity in herbicide distribution on the plot. The different pluviometric simulations were performed one hour after the herbicide application, allowing the herbicide solution to penetrate in topsoil. Potassium chloride salt (1.5 g/L solution) was used in the first and second experiment as a tracer to study the mobility of nonreactive compounds transported downward by water flow.

The first experiment, with a constant 3-cm water head throughout the experiment, started on 9 July 1996 and was concluded at the end of August 1996. Topsoil water saturation was checked with the 30-cm tensiometer. The added water amount varied between 600 and 1200 L/d. The second experiment started on 16 June 1998 and was concluded at the end of July 1998 and simulated intermittent pluviometric conditions (30 mm/d of rain for 21 d) with a water drop raining system. Two 300-L rain events were simulated each day (with a flow of about 15 mm/h), one in the morning and the other in the afternoon.

The third experiment was performed from 10 May to 18 Nov. 1999, without an artificial water supply, except for the 600-L solution used for terbuthylazine application.

Considering the first 20 d since the herbicide application, the total amount of water added was 900 mm for the first experiment, 600 mm for the second, and 50 mm for the third. Natural precipitation events were recorded by the installed pluviometer.

Sample Collection, Extraction, and Analysis
Analytical reference standards of terbuthylazine (TER), DET, terbuthylazine-2-hydroxide [TH; 4-terbutylamino-6-ethylamino-(1,3,5)-triazine-2-OH], DIA, DDA, DETH, deethyl-atrazine-2-hydroxide [DEAH; 4-amino-6-isopropylamino-(1,3,5)-triazine-2-OH], deisopropylatrazine-2-hydroxide [DIAH; 4-amino-6-ethylamino-(1,3,5)-triazine-2-OH], and deethyldeisopropyl-atrazine-2-hydroxide [DDAH; 4,6-diamino-(1,3,5)-triazine-2-OH] were purchased from Dr. Ehrenstorfer GmbH (Augsburg, Germany) with a certified purity greater than 95%. Standard solutions (0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1, and 5 mg/L) were prepared for high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) calibration in 25 mM KH2PO4. Methyl alcohol for pesticide residue analysis and HPLC, acetonitrile for HPLC, and ethyl acetate ACS for analysis were obtained from Carlo Erba (Milan, Italy). Chloride concentrations were determined by portable cuvette kits (Dr. Bruno Lange GmbH, Düsseldorf, Germany) with a 5 mg/L detection limit.

Leachate samples were collected by suction cup lysimeters in dark glass bottles (500 mL), while ground water samples were collected in 1-L dark glass bottles after 15 min of piezometer purging. All samples were kept at 4°C after their collection until laboratory analysis. Terbuthylazine and deethylterbuthylazine extraction from water was performed by eluting the water through Lichrolut EN 200-mg solid-phase extraction (SPE) cartridges (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) (Pozzoni and Guzzella, 2000). The extract was concentrated to <1 mL by a gentle N2 flux and recovered to 1 mL or 0.25 mL in ethyl acetate, depending on the expected concentrations, for gas chromatography–nitrogen and phosphorous detector (GC–NPD) analysis. The extraction of the other TPs was performed on 0.5-g Carbograph SPE cartridges (Alltech Associates, Deerfield, IL) (Di Corcia and Marchetti, 1991; Bonfanti et al., 1998). The extract was concentrated to 10 mL by a N2 gentle flux and recovered to 1 mL with a 25 mM KH2PO4 solution.

Soil was sampled by pushing a 120-cm iron tube (5-cm i.d.) into the ground. Six soil sample cores were collected at different times after the herbicide application and divided into seven subsamples; only the inner part of the sample was kept to avoid contamination. All soil samples were frozen in sealed dark glass bottles and stored at -20°C. For the pesticide determination, the soil sample was defrosted and dehydrated under air conditions and ambient temperature (20–22°C) for 96 h. The water content of the air-dried soil sample was determined by drying 10 g of soil in a stove at 105°C for 24 h. The dry sample was sieved with a 2-mm sieve. The extraction procedure was performed according to the method developed by Guzzella et al. (1996), briefly described here: 10 to 50 g of air-dried sifted soil sample was extracted with pesticide free–grade methanol in a Soxhlet extraction apparatus for 8 h, and the extract was cleaned by passing it through a diatom power-filled column.

Terbuthylazine and desethylterbuthylazine determination was performed on a HRGC 5160 Mega Series (Carlo Erba) with an NPD 80-FL phosphorus–nitrogen detector, TS-2 ionic source, and Sil13-Chrompack capillary column (50-m length x 0.25-mm i.d., 0.2- to 0.25-µm film thickness; Varian, Palo Alto, CA) (Guzzella et al., 1996). Quantification employed an external standard method. Limit of detection was 0.005 µg/L for each compound when concentrating 1 L of the water sample to 0.25 mL.

The hydroxylated derivatives, DIA and DDA were identified with a DAD 1050 high-performance liquid chromatograph (HP, Palo Alto, CA) with an autosampler (HP), a Hicarbosphere 5 ODS-H column (250-mm length x 4.6-mm i.d.) (Mallinckrodt Baker, Phillipsburg, NJ), and a Lichrosorb RP8 (Merck) pre-column. Desethyl-deisopropylatrazine, DEAH, DIAH, DETH, and DDAH were quantified by the UV detector at 205 nm, DIA at 210 nm, and TH at 240 nm. Limits of detection of 1 L of the water sample concentrated to 1 mL were: 0.01 µg/L for DIAH, DDA, DIA, and TH; 0.03 µg/L for DEAH and DETH; and 0.05 µg/L for DDAH. All the analyses were conducted in duplicate and a standard deviation lower than 10% was accepted.


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Terbuthylazine Breakthrough Curves
Terbuthylazine breakthrough curves (BTCs) in water samples from the three experiments are shown in Fig. 1 (values are the average of the three leachate samples). At the 30-cm depth, the highest concentrations were measured in the first and third experiment, whereas at the 90-cm depth, the greatest concentrations were measured in the natural experimental conditions. The observed trends can be explained on the basis of the different dilution effect of the applied herbicide solution in the three experimental conditions. The constant hydraulic head forced the herbicide to move quickly through the root zone, but also diluted the herbicide-applied solution. In the second experiment, in which intermittent precipitations were simulated, the terbuthylazine trend had an intermediate behavior, with concentrations more similar to the first one. The whole process seemed to be driven by the water dilution in both cases. In the third experiment, the absence of rain during the first 15 d promoted TER degradation and metabolites accumulation in topsoil.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Comparison between terbuthylazine (TER) concentrations in water at 30- and 90-cm soil depths in the three experiments.

 
The maximum concentration peaks were reached, both at 30- and 90-cm depths, more quickly in the first experiment than in the second and third, as shown in Fig. 1. The greater water volume supplied during the first experiment compared with the third caused a quick disappearance of TER from topsoil and its leaching toward the lower soil horizons. Terbuthylazine persistence in topsoil was substantially higher during the third experiment, in which natural conditions were applied.

In all the three experiments (Fig. 1), after the first few days, herbicide concentrations were lower at the 30- than the 90-cm depth. This can be explained on the basis of a rich clay content in the soil horizon between depths of 70 and 110 cm, which could have acted as a trap, capturing herbicide residuals leaching from the topsoil to the ground water.

In the first experiment, at both the 30- and 90-cm depths, BTCs showed only one main concentration peak with some relatively minor peaks. The very sharp peaks, which increased and decreased within a few hours, showed that preferential transport prevailed over matrix flow, that is, the herbicide moved mainly via macropore transport with low interaction with the topsoil horizon. On the contrary, in the other two experiments TER transport seemed to be driven mainly by matrix flow interactions and precipitation events. In the second experiment, BTCs showed many relatively high concentration peaks, indicating that herbicide transport had an impulsive behavior tightly bound to water transport in the unsaturated zone. At the 30-cm depth, the breakthrough curve had a similar trend to that in the first experiment and the terbuthylazine peak also was delimited in a short period of time. In the third experiment, BTCs showed many secondary peaks with similar concentrations at both 30- and 90-cm depths. The observed trend can be related to the natural precipitation events, that is, rainfall that happened mostly after the 80th day (as shown in Fig. 2) .



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Natural rainfall in the third experiment.

 
Terbuthylazine behavior was compared with that of a nonreactive tracer (chlorine) and with the matrix potential measured with tensiometers (Fig. 3) . In the first and second experiments, the herbicide and the chlorine tracer showed a similar trend. Terbuthylazine interaction with soil did not seem to retard its transport to ground water and a chromatographic separation of the applied chemicals was not observed. In fact, the water saturation conditions adopted in the first two experiments influenced only the maximum concentration reached by the herbicide and not the time necessary to reach the peak concentration, providing further evidence of a preferential flow situation.



View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Comparison between terbuthylazine (µg/L) and chlorine (mg/L) trends and the matrix potential values (mm Hg). Terbuthylazine (TER) and Cl- concentrations are on the left, while tensiometer values are on the right.

 
In the third experiment, high temperatures and the scarcity of natural precipitation (Fig. 2) caused an increasing dryness of soil measured at the 30-cm depth, and a water desaturation condition of the topsoil horizon was reached. In this condition, the BTC showed a longer time to reach the maximum concentration peaks at both depths. In addition, a prevailing matrix-flow transport might have existed. Results are in agreement with published data on field-scale variability of the herbicide transport (Lennartz et al., 2001), which demonstrated that under unsaturated steady state flow conditions, a prevalent matrix-flow transport of TER occurs in 90% of the lysimeters.

With regard to ground water trend, in the first experiment one main terbuthylazine peak was determined just hours after herbicide application, reaching a concentration four times greater than the background value, while DET concentration seemed to increase during the first study, reaching 0.1 µg/L at the end of the experiment. In the other two experiments, no variation compared with the background value (0.05 µg/L) was observed.

Leaching of Transformation Products
In all the experiments, the presence of terbuthylazine TPs in water samples collected from lysimeters was monitored.

In the first experiment DET was detected at both depths (Fig. 4A) , whereas the other TPs were measured only at the 90-cm depth. At the 30-cm depth, DET was determined since the 10th day (Fig. 4A) and its maximum concentration was reached on the 22nd day. The DET concentration curve at the 90-cm depth (Fig. 5A) had the same trend as shown at 30 cm but the highest concentration was twice as large, indicating that this compound has a faster leaching behavior, compared with its parental compound. The presence of DET at 90 cm was mainly dominated by its leaching from topsoil rather than an in situ biodegradation. In this experiment, TH was the second-most abundant metabolite, showing the maximum concentration on the 43rd day (Fig. 5B) and then decreasing progressively. Terbuthylazine-2-hydroxide is a lypophilic compound that is rarely detectable in water samples and is generally absorbed by organic-rich soil. Deethylterbuthylazine-2-hydroxide, formed by DET hydroxylation or TH deethylation, behaved like TH, suggesting that DETH is mainly derived from TH degradation. Deisopropylatrazine, the deterbuthylated metabolite, was scarcely found in this experiment. Its formation is generally limited by steric hindrance of the ter-buthyl substituent and, furthermore, it degrades rapidly to DIAH and DDA. Deisopropylatrazine-2-hydroxide was measured in concentrations greater than those of DIA, demonstrating that DIA was generally underestimated because of its low persistence. Desethyl-deisopropylatrazine, formed by degradation of both DIA and DETH, showed an accumulative behavior: its concentration was still increasing at the end of the experiment.



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Transformation product (TP) concentrations in water at the 30-cm soil depth. DDA, deethyl-deisopropylatrazine; DDAH, desethyldeisopropyl-atrazine-2-hydroxide; DEAH, desethyl-atrazine-2-hydroxide; DET, deethylterbuthylazine; DETH, deethylterbuthylazine-2-hydroxide; DIA, deisopropylatrazine; DIAH, deiso-propylatrazine-2-hydroxide; TH, terbuthylazine-2-hydroxide.

 


View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Transformation product (TP) concentrations in water at the 90-cm soil depth. DDA, deethyl-deisopropylatrazine; DET, deethylterbuthylazine; DETH, deethylterbuthylazine-2-hydroxide; DIA, deisopropylatrazine; DIAH, deiso-propylatrazine-2-hydroxide; TH, terbuthylazine-2-hydroxide.

 
In this experiment, at the 90-cm depth, DET concentrations were twice as high as the sum of all the other TP concentrations and the maximum concentration peak was measured on the 22nd day, whereas other TP maximum values were on the 43rd day. Therefore, DET can be considered a priority pollutant during the first month after the herbicide application, while other metabolites, particularly DETH and DDA, are mobilized mainly later.

In the second experiment, the breakthrough curves at 30 and 90 cm (Fig. 4B and 5C) showed an early appearance of DET just after a few days after herbicide application; concentrations 10 times greater compared with the first experiment were measured and the maximum concentration peaks occurred later at both depths. The other TPs (Fig. 4C, 4D, and 5B) also reached their maximum concentration peaks later than in the first experiment. Deethylterbuthylazine-2-hydroxide and DDA were the main metabolites observed after DET. At the 30-cm depth, the highest concentration was measured between the 72nd and 79th days both for DET and other TPs, while at the 90-cm depth metabolite maximum cumulative concentration was reached on the 101st day. The phenomenon might be related to natural precipitation events that occurred after the simulated rain. At the 90-cm depth, TP concentrations were 2.5 times higher than in the first experiment, due to the lower dilution of the metabolites compared with the first experiment.

The TP concentrations in water samples from the third experiment were higher than in the other two experiments, since the dilution effect was less relevant and degradation processes were favored (Fig. 4E, 4F, 4G, 5E, and 5F). The DET maximum concentration at the 30-cm depth occurred on the 37th day, corresponding to a natural precipitation event (30 mm of rain; Fig. 5E). At the 90-cm depth, DET showed a breakthrough curve with many peaks: the first one was in agreement with the one measured at 30 cm. In this experiment, DET concentrations were 70 and 10 times greater than in the first experiment at 30- and 90-cm depths, respectively. Terbuthylazine-2-hydroxide, at the 30-cm depth, was detected irregularly (as shown in Fig. 4G), only when rain events allowed its solubilization. In contrast, DETH was detected throughout the whole experiment with relatively high peaks, reaching the maximum concentration on the 190th day. The DETH peak measured on the 37th day could be related to DET degradation, while TH degradation could have played an important role in the DETH formation later on (Fig. 4G). Desethyl-deisopropylatrazine, together with DIA and DIAH, showed the maximum cumulative concentration on the 46th day and other two peaks on the 175th and 202nd, which could be related to DETH. At the 90-cm depth (Fig. 5E and 5F) TH was irregularly detected, while DETH showed a trend similar to the one showed at 30 cm, but with an accumulative behavior, reaching its maximum concentration at the end of the third experiment.

This research showed that TP concentrations in water samples increased from the first to the third experiment. This was not only due to a lower dilution of the chemicals, but also to the important role played by the degradation processes: the greater pesticide residence time increased the opportunity for pesticide degradation. The main degradation pathways showed in these experiments were: TER > DET > DETH > DDAH and TER > TH > DETH > DDAH.

Desethylterbuthylazine to Terbuthylazine Ratio
In this study the role played by the water flow regime conditions in influencing DET mobility was also evaluated. Because of increasing DET concentrations with time, due to TER degradation, and decreasing TER concentrations, due to both degradation and adsorption by organic matter in the topsoil, the DET to TER ratio increased with time at both depths (Fig. 6) . The simulated hydraulic condition in the second experiment facilitated both degradation and leaching of DET, as showed by the DET to TER ratio in Fig. 6, which was greater than in the other two situations at both depths.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Desethylterbuthylazine (DET) to terbuthylazine (TER) ratios at 30- and 90-cm soil depths.

 
The high-leaching conditions established in the first experiment caused a very low DET to TER ratio at the 30-cm depth, because DET formation was inhibited by TER fast transport to the deeper soil horizons. The natural precipitation condition in the third experiment favored DET formation at 30 cm but also its degradation to DETH. The DET to TER high ratio at the 90-cm depth occurred only during rain events: the rainfall event of the 154th day (150 mm of rain in one day) accelerated DET leaching, which is a more mobile compound than TER.

With regard to the comparison between DET to TER ratios in the water leachates (Fig. 6) and in the soil samples collected at the 30-cm depth (Fig. 7) , the values measured in the middle of the experiments (60–80 d after the herbicide application) are reported in Table 3.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Terbuthylazine (TER) and desethylterbuthylazine (DET) concentrations in the soil samples.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Desethylterbuthylazine (DET) to terbuthylazine (TER) ratios in water and soil.

 
The DET to TER ratio was greater in water than in soil, demonstrating the higher mobility of DET than terbuthylazine. In the first experiment, the constant water flow promoted both terbuthylazine and DET leaching, determining the lowest DET to TER ratio in both water and soil samples. In the third experiment, high temperature and dryness of soil facilitated the degradation of both TER and DET with respect to the first experiment. In the second experiment the DET to TER ratio in water was three times higher than in soil and the risk for ground water contamination was highest. A DET to TER ratio of about 2 was also determined in the leachates from lysimeter experiments by Dorfler et al. (1997), using C14–marked terbuthylazine.

Adams and Thurman (1991) suggested that the desethylatrazine to atrazine ratio, also called the DAR ratio, can be used, for atrazine, as a measure of the age of the herbicide residue and the amount of interaction between atrazine and the soil. Goolsby et al. (1997) stated that a DAR ratio less than 0.1 in the pore water indicates a residue that has not interacted significantly with the surrounding soil, whereas higher values (median about 0.4) are detected after considerable degradation of the herbicide in the soil.

Extrapolating these consideration to terbuthylazine showed a similar degradation pathway, and it is possible to conclude that the obtained DER ratios (DET to TER) suggest that TER degradation occurred in the second and the third experiments, while it was scarce in the first. This conclusion is also in agreement with the results regarding the other TPs. At the 90-cm depth (Fig. 5), the amount of the TPs was five times greater in the third experiment compared with the first, and two times higher in the second compared with the first. Treviglio topsoil was used to calculate the Koc value for DET, which was found to be higher compared with terbuthylazine (42 versus 99) (Bottoni et al., 1996). All these considerations lead to the conclusion that DET can be considered a high-risk pollutant for ground water contamination.

Herbicide Content in Soil Samples
Terbuthylazine and DET concentrations in soil samples collected at the 30-cm depth are reported in Fig. 7. Although soil samples were taken from different depths, this section will concentrate on the analysis at 30 cm, so that comparison can be made to the lysimeter samples. In the first experiment one core was sampled 60 d after herbicide application, whereas in the other two experiments, six cores were collected at different times. In the first experiment, TER and DET concentrations reached values of 70 and 8 µg/kg, respectively, 60 d after the application. The great limitation of the data on herbicide concentration in the first experiment makes impossible any remarks.

The second and third experiments showed similar starting TER concentrations but terbuthylazine and DET seemed to be retained in soil for a longer time in the second experiment than in the third one. An opposite trend was shown in water samples, where higher TER and DET concentrations occurred in the third experiment. In conclusion, in the third experiment, terbuthylazine demonstrated a lower persistence.


    CONCLUSIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Herbicide leaching in the terrestrial environment depends mainly on transport in water solution or as soil-bound residue. The variation of water flux, especially in the case of field studies, is dominated by multiple nonequilibrium effects. To what extent and in which way the chemicals are leached below a certain soil layer greatly depends on the water flux regime.

In this study, BTCs showed significant differences in the three experimental conditions and, inside each one, at different depths (Fig. 1). The constant water saturation and the natural precipitation enhanced infiltration rates, while the herbicide concentrations in water reached the maximum values. Furthermore, the natural precipitation condition generated the highest risk condition for ground water contamination, because TER passed through the clay soil horizon at 70 to 90 cm and its highest concentrations were recorded at the 90-cm depth. In these conditions the herbicide might quickly reach the first aquifer.

With regard to the TP formation, results showed that DET is the prominent dealkylated terbuthylazine metabolite, whereas DIA was found only at trace concentrations, in agreement with the results of Dousset et al. (1997). The high levels of DET and the low levels of DIA observed in the experiments might be a consequence of the different rates between deethylation and deterbuthylation. Similar to atrazine (Mills and Thurman, 1994), DIA can be regarded as a minor-importance metabolite in TER degradation reactions. However, C14 studies have shown that DIA has shorter dissipation rate than DET, indicating that its limited concentrations might be due to a rapid turnover in the unsaturated zone rather than to its absence (Winkelmann and Klaine, 1991b). The presence of a detectable DIAH concentration in the present experiments (Fig. 4 and 5) agrees with this hypothesis.

In this research significant concentrations of hydroxylated derivatives were measured in the pore water samples. The analysis of the 90-cm samples (Fig. 5) showed a mobilization of TH in water flow saturation conditions and of DETH in unsaturated steady-state flow condition. There is, therefore, a real possibility that these chemicals can move through the topsoil horizon toward the ground water, as Schiavon (1988) also suggested.

In conclusion, the present experiments demonstrated that soil dryness (Fig. 3) facilitates the formation of dealkylated and hydroxylated derivatives of terbuthylazine, while rainfall events promote DET leaching, the most mobile among TPs. The DER ratio, as was demonstrated for DAR, can give useful information on the age of the herbicide residue and the amount of interaction between parental compound and topsoil.

The main degradation pathways evidenced were: TER > DET > DETH > DDAH and TER > TH > DETH > DDAH; among TPs, DET and DETH showed a high mobility from agricultural topsoil to ground water and can be considered potential leaching compounds.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The present study was conducted with financial support from the Strategic Project "Environment and Territory" (1995–1998), promoted by CNR (Italy), and from the Ministry of the Environmental project "The Presence of Pesticide Transformation Products in Ground Water" (1998–2001). The authors thank Adolfo De Paolis and Luciano Previtali for their technical help and Anna Barra Caracciolo for microbial analysis.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 


Related articles in JEQ:

This Issue in Journal of Environmental Quality

JEQ 2003 32: 745-750. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
C. Dolaptsoglou, D. G. Karpouzas, U. Menkissoglu-Spiroudi, I. Eleftherohorinos, and E. A. Voudrias
Influence of Different Organic Amendments on the Degradation, Metabolism, and Adsorption of Terbuthylazine
J. Environ. Qual., October 24, 2007; 36(6): 1793 - 1802.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in JEQ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guzzella, L.
Right arrow Articles by Giuliano, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guzzella, L.
Right arrow Articles by Giuliano, G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Guzzella, L.
Right arrow Articles by Giuliano, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Agricultural Pesticides
Right arrow Preferential Flow
Right arrow Lysimeter/Rhizosphere Studies
Right arrow Pesticides
Right arrow Organic Compounds


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome