JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in JEQ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (23)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abu-Zreig, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kaushik, N. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Abu-Zreig, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kaushik, N. K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Abu-Zreig, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kaushik, N. K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Surface Water Quality
Right arrow Soil Erosion
Right arrow Phosphorus
Right arrow Agricultural Systems
Journal of Environmental Quality 32:613-619 (2003)
© 2003 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America

TECHNICAL REPORTS
Surface Water Quality

Phosphorus Removal in Vegetated Filter Strips

Majed Abu-Zreig*,a, Ramesh P. Rudrab, Hugh R. Whiteleyb, Manon N. Lalondec and Narinder K. Kaushikd

a Dep. of Biosystems Engineering, Jordan Univ. of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 3030, Irbid, Jordan
b School of Engineering, Univ. of Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1
c J.F. Sabourin and Associates, Inc., Ottawa, ON, Canada
d Dep. of Environmental Biology, Univ. of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1

* Corresponding author (majed{at}just.edu.jo)

Received for publication February 3, 2002.

    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Vegetated filter strips (VFS) are used recently for removal, at or near the source, of sediment and sediment-bound chemicals from cropland runoff. Vegetation within the flowpath increases water infiltration and decreases water turbulence, thus enhancing pollutant removal by sedimentation within filter media and infiltration through the filter surface. Field experiments have been conducted to examine the efficiency of vegetated filter strips for phosphorus removal from cropland runoff with 20 filters with varying length (2 to 15 m), slope (2.3 and 5%), and vegetated cover, including bare-soil plots as control. Artificial runoff used in this study had an average phosphorus concentration of 2.37 mg L-1 and a sediment concentration of 2700 mg L-1. The average phosphorus trapping efficiency of all vegetated filters was 61% and ranged from 31% in a 2-m filter to 89% in a 15-m filter. Filter length has been found to be the predominant factor affecting P trapping in VFS. The rate of inflow, type of vegetation, and density of vegetation coverage had secondary influences on P removal. Short filters (2 and 5 m), which are somewhat effective in sediment removal, are much less effective in P removal. Increasing the filter length beyond 15 m is ineffective in enhancing sediment removal but is expected to further enhance P removal. Sediment deposition, infiltration, and plant adsorption are the primary mechanisms for phosphorus trapping in VFS.

Abbreviations: PTE, phosphorus-trapping efficiency • VFS, vegetated filter strip


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
DURING THE LAST 20 YEARS, the effects of nonpoint-source (NPS) pollution have received increasing attention globally. Efforts to reduce NPS pollution from cropland were first aimed at reducing surface runoff and erosion within fields. Improvements in land management practices such as no-till practices, contouring, crop rotation, and timely application of fertilizers and herbicides were investigated. Later on, means of treating cropland runoff at field edges were considered (Becker and Mills, 1972). Sediment-control structures and vegetative filter strips (VFS) were among the techniques that have been used to reduce NPS at or near its source (USEPA, 1976).

Vegetated filter strips can be defined as bands of cropland adjacent to streams or drainage ditches that are set aside from crop production to be planted with permanent vegetation. When cropland runoff flows across the VFS, it undergoes a decrease in pollutant concentration and volume. These changes reduce the loading of pollutants in the receiving watercourse. In Canada, the use of VFS has been included in the Ontario Environmental Farm Plan and the Best Management Practices for Water Management and for Soil Management. In the United States, since 1988, filter strips are an approved USDA cost-share practice under the Conservation Reserve Program of the Food Security Act of 1985.

Phosphorus (P) exists in many forms in soil, water, and sediments. In runoff, P is generally divided into particulate and dissolved fractions by filtration through a 0.45-µm filter. Particulate forms (i.e., sediment-bound P) include sorbed P, organic P, and mineral P phases. Dissolved forms are normally considered to be orthophosphate, inorganic polyphosphates, and organic P compounds (McDowell and Sharpley, 2001a; Nelson and Logan, 1983). These P compounds exist in dynamic equilibrium between their dissolved and particulate forms. The desorption of soil P for individual runoff events has been related to the P content of surface soil, duration and volume of runoff event, and sediment load (McDowell and Sharpley, 2001b; Sharpley, 1985). Once in surface runoff, phosphorus can deposit along with sediments, adsorb to suspended solids, adsorp to surface soil and vegetation, be assimilated by microorganisms and plants, infiltrate down into soil profile, or move downslope with the runoff (Lee et al., 1989).

While sediment-removal studies are abundant, research studies that have dealt with P removal in VFS are very limited and the sparse results are somewhat contradictory. In a VFS field experiment, Dillaha et al. (1987) found that total P removal was closely related to sediment removal when runoff had high particulate P concentration. They found that P removal efficiency in 4.6-m-long filters varied from 49 to 73%, while corresponding sediment removal was slightly higher at 53 to 86%. Longer filters of 9.1 m were more efficient, with P removal ranging from 65 to 93% and sediment removal ranging from 70 to 98%. In this study more than 90% of the total phosphorus content was sediment bound. Another study (Magette et al., 1989) reported that VFS were less efficient in P removal compared with that of sediment removal. They found that the average total P removal for the 4.6- and 9.1-m-long filters was only 27 and 46%, respectively. The corresponding sediment removal efficiencies for the same study were 66 and 82%, respectively.

In a two-year VFS study under natural rainfall conditions, Daniels and Gilliam (1993) found that 6-m-long filters retained, on average, 60% of the total P load, and retained about 50% of the soluble P load. A similar study was conducted by Patty et al. (1997), who investigated the removal of soluble P load in VFS with 12 filters with lengths of 6, 12, and 18 m under natural rainfall conditions. They found that the average soluble P removal was 40, 52, and 87% for lengths of 6, 12, and 18 m, respectively. Corresponding average sediment load removal was 92, 98, and 99%, respectively. Infiltration was suggested as the main removal mechanism for P removal, especially in the case of longer filter strips.

Many other studies have suggested that infiltration is the primary mechanism of P removal, especially for runoff with high soluble P content such as runoff from land area receiving manure applications (Overcash et al., 1981; Chaubey et al., 1994; Srivastava et al., 1996). In Ontario, VFS for treatment of beef feedlot and dairy yard runoff are designed to allow for total infiltration of the design storm, as infiltration is more easily quantified than other VFS treatment effects (Toombs, 1997).

The first objective of the study reported here was to examine the efficiency of P removal under Ontario, Canada conditions for VFS that varied in length, slope, type of vegetation, and density of vegetative cover. A second objective was to identify P removal mechanisms in vegetated strips and record their relative importance.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
A total of 20 field experiments were conducted on filters with varying length, slope, and vegetation cover with simulated or artificial runoff with various flow conditions. The filters were constructed on a field near Elora, Ontario, Canada. The soil type of the field is characterized as silt loam with sand, silt, and clay percentage of 38, 54, and 8%, respectively. The organic content of the soil was 4%. Four filter lengths (2, 5, 10, and 15 m) with two slope values (2.3 and 5%) and three types of vegetation cover were used in the experiments. Three 5-m-long plots with bare soil were used as control filters. The width of all filters was 1.20 m. The vegetation covers were denoted as A for perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.), B for legume and creeping red fescue (Festuca rubra L.) mix, C for bare filters, and D for native grass species. Experiments were performed in triplicates except for the Type A filters. Soil bulk densities varied in average from 1133 kg m-3 for the A, B, and C filter strips to 1417 kg m-3 for the native vegetation Type D filters.

A fully replicated range of strip lengths was tested for red fescue mix (Type B), but only 5-m strips of the control (Type C), native (Type D), and perennial rye grass (Type A) treatments were studied. The perennial rye grass strip was unreplicated and the strips of native vegetation were twice as steep as the other strips. The A and B types were recently established and had lower density of coverage than the well-established Type D. The vegetation density, reported as percentage of vegetation cover, was measured for each filter by visual estimation of vegetation cover and by counting and measuring the diameter of grass punches within a 25-cm square frame. Table 1 summarizes the physical characteristics of each filter tested in this study.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Characteristics of the experimental vegetated filter strips used in this study.

 
For a standardized comparison of test results between different strips, the tests were conducted with a runoff of consistent rates and constituents. An experimental system capable of producing artificial runoff was designed. As in previous studies involving the use of artificial runoff (Choi, 1992; Mickelson and Baker, 1993; van Dijk et al., 1996), the pollutant load in runoff is created by mixing soil with water. Soil used in the artificial runoff was collected from the surface of the experimental field and characterized as silt loam.

The experimental pollutant load was selected to represent an expected edge-of-field water quality. A difficulty arose in defining typical cropland runoff because this type of runoff has highly variable characteristics. The literature shows that there is a wide range of sediment and phosphorus concentrations found in cropland runoff. Total suspended solids of farm runoff ranged from 90 mg L-1 (Shaeffer, 1982) to as high as 7000 mg L-1 (Hayes and Hairston, 1983). Sharpley and Smith (1989) found an average phosphorus concentration of 0.24 mg L-1 with values ranging from 0.03 to 2.67 mg L-1. For highly disturbed areas, however, runoff sediment concentrations up to 50 000 mg L-1 have been reported (Robinson et al., 1996). In their VFS experiments, Mickelson and Baker (1993) used an artificial runoff with 10 000 mg L-1 of sediment. A concentration of 4000 mg L-1 was arbitrarily selected for this study that, in turn, governed the P content of the artificial runoff. The resultant average concentration of total P in the artificial runoff was 2.37 mg L-1. Soluble P, estimated by measuring dissolved orthophosphate that had filtrated through a 0.45-µm opening filter, varied between 0.10 and 0.30 mg L-1.

A typical test run was divided into five different phases: a wetting phase, an unsaturated phase (Q1A), and three consecutive saturated phases (Q1B, Q.65, and Q.3) with flow rates of 1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 0.65, and 0.3 L s-1, respectively. During the wetting phase, clear water was applied at a rate of 1.0 L s-1 onto the filter strip. Most of this water infiltrated into the soil, as the strip was initially dry. As soon as runoff started at the filter's outlet, the inflow was switched from clear water to artificial runoff at 1.0 L s-1, thus starting Phase Q1A. Soil water conditions in the surface layer during this phase moved from unsaturated to near saturation by the end. The unsaturated phase lasted until the flow rate at the outlet became steady, which indicated that near-saturated soil conditions were obtained. Following this soil saturation, application of artificial runoff continued in three consecutive phases of 15-min duration: Q1B, Q.65, and Q.3 with flow rates of 1.0, 0.65, and 0.3 L s-1, respectively.

Sediment and phosphorus load was introduced into the influent water from a separate premixed sediment tank, which was made of a 1.2-m-high PVC pipe with a 0.15-m diameter. The soil and water mixture was kept homogenized by an air jet placed at the bottom of the tank operating at 400 kPa. The sediment–water mixture was supplied to the filter influent by a peristaltic pump and mixed with clear water before it entered the filter inlet as artificial runoff. The average inlet sediment and P concentrations were kept constant at 2700 and 2.37 mg L-1, respectively. A schematic diagram of the experimental setup is shown in Fig. 1 .



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of the experimental supply and monitoring system for artificial runoff.

 
The influent and effluent water flow and P concentrations were monitored, and the infiltrated volume, outflow volume, and phosphorus-trapping efficiencies (PTEs) were calculated. Trapping efficiency is defined as the percentage P mass trapped within the filter. Outflow rate was continuously measured with an HS flume equipped with a pressure transducer. The outflow P concentrations were estimated from grab samples obtained at the discharge point of the outlet flume at 4-min intervals. Total P concentrations were determined by digestion with sulfuric and nitric acid, whereas dissolved P was measured in the filtrate that passed through a 0.45-µm filter in accordance with American Public Health Association standard methods (Greenberg et al., 1992, p. 2-53 to 2-59 and 4-108 to 4-114). The conditions of the VFS experiments are summarized in Table 1. Lalonde (1998) reported detailed experimental procedures and methods of analyses.


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Phosphorus content in runoff was mainly in particulate form, accounting for about 94% of the total P content. Others also reported high concentrations of particulate P in cropland runoff, ranging from 70 to 90% (Dillaha et al., 1987; Sharpley and Smith, 1989). In this study, the average orthophosphate concentration (P passing through a 0.45-mm filter) in 48 runoff samples was 0.15 mg L-1, which accounted for only 6% of the total P mean concentration.

Performance in Phosphorus Removal
Performance of VFS for phosphorus removal was assessed from total P load calculated from influent concentrations and outflow rate compared with influent runoff and P concentration. Excluding results from filter strips B2-2 and B10-1, for which flow-rate measurements were inaccurate, the phosphorus-trapping efficiency (PTE) varied widely from 31% (for Filter B2-1) to 89% (for Filter B15-2) with an average of 61% for all filters. This PTE is 28% lower and had higher variation (coefficient of variation [CV] = 26.6% and ranged from 31 to 89%) than that of the mean sediment-trapping efficiency (CV = 9.5% and ranged from 68 to 98%) reported by Abu-Zreig et al. (2002) for the same plots. Higher CV and range in P removal was also observed in previous studies with similar experimental conditions (Dillaha et al., 1987; Magette et al., 1989; Daniels and Gilliam, 1993). Phosphorus trapping efficiencies reported here are comparable with those found in the literature. In a two-year study under natural rainfall conditions, Daniels and Gilliam (1993) found that the average PTE for 3- and 6-m-long filter strips vegetated with fescue was 55 and 70%, respectively. Their results are within the range obtained in the present study for the D-type filters with well-established natural vegetation but higher than that obtained with B-type filters with recently established legumes and fescue. In another study, Dillaha et al. (1989) reported trapping efficiencies of 73 and 93% for 4.6- and 9.1-m-long strips with a slope of 11%. With a 16% slope, the corresponding trapping efficiencies were 49 and 65% for the 4.6- and 9.1-m-long strips. Despite differences on the experimental conditions of the work presented here, such as the use of artificial runoff and the absence of rainfall, phosphorous trapping efficiencies with vegetative filters were quite comparable with other studies.

Effect of Filter Length
The effect of flowpath length on PTE was determined by comparing trapping efficiencies for the Type B strips, excluding filter strips B2-2 and B10-1. The results are shown in Fig. 2 . Phosphorus-trapping efficiency increased steadily with length of filter strip and the increase is highly significant (p = 0.003) using multiple range variance analysis at a 95% probability level. However, the increase in performance with length decreased rapidly as filter length increased beyond 10 m. A power regression line seemed to fit the PTE data versus filter length very well (PTE = 24.78 [length]0.437; R2 = 0.88), and the results are shown in Fig. 2. The average phosphorus trapping efficiencies of the 2-, 5-, 10-, and 15-m-long strips were 32, 54, 67, and 79%, respectively. These are lower than the sediment-trapping efficiencies reported by Abu-Zreig et al. (2002). The difference between sediment and phosphorus trapping appears to be large for short strips and small for longer strips. Hence, while shorter strips offer good sediment control, they offer much less control over phosphorus. Increasing the filter length from 10 to 15 m increased the PTE by 12% (Table 2), but had negligible influence on sediment trapping as reported by Abu-Zreig et al. (2002). This is probably due to the dilution of phosphorus in filter strips being higher in long filters compared with short ones. Other researchers have also observed a uniform decrease in P concentration in overland flow with flowpath length without vegetation (McDowell and Sharpley, 2002). Dilution was hypothesized as the major factor for this decrease. In the presence of vegetation and enhanced sediment deposition the decrease in P concentration will be even more profound.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. The influence of length on phosphorus-trapping efficiency (PTE) of Type B filter strips in replicates.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Water retention and phosphorus trapping efficiency of various filters.

 
Effect of Incoming Runoff Flow Rate
The results of average PTE calculated for each phase for all filters irrespective of their length or vegetation type are shown in Table 3 and Fig. 3 . Generally, the highest trapping efficiencies were observed during the phase with the lowest incoming flow rates, Phase Q.3. The average PTE values increased from 53%, to 54%, and then to 78% as inflow rate decreased from 1.0, to 0.65, and then to 0.3 L s-1. But this increase is only significant in the case of the last phase, Q.3. The PTE of the first phase, Q1A, showed a higher efficiency, though not significant at a 0.05 probability level, than that of Phase Q1B for all filters (Fig. 3, Table 3). This result shows the effect of the initial water content of Phase Q1A being much smaller than that of Phase Q1B, resulting in higher infiltration volume and subsequently higher PTE in Phase Q1A.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Average trapping efficiency of phosphorus for various filters in relation to inflow phase.{dagger}

 


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. The effect of flow rate on the average and range of phosphorus-trapping efficiency (PTE) for all vegetated filters.

 
The accumulation of sediments and phosphorus in filter strip media may result in a performance decrease with continuing flow events, especially for short filters as they become saturated with sediments. Thus, running different flow rates consecutively might be expected to produce lower trapping efficiencies for subsequent phases. This would probably explain why the trapping efficiencies of the Phase Q.65 of the B2 and B5 filters gave lower trapping efficiencies compared with that of Phase Q1B (Table 3). The selective erosion of fine particles, which have a higher P content compared with coarse particles, by initial overland flow events might also contribute to the decrease of PTE of initial phases (Q1A and Q1B) compared with later ones (Q.3) (McDowell and Sharpley, 2002). Nevertheless, visual observations revealed that no sediment washoff has been observed during the experimental phases. Therefore, the effect of accumulating sediment is assumed negligible compared with that of reducing flow rate, and PTE is expected to increase with a decrease in the overland flow rate of VFS.

Effect of Vegetation Type
The influence of vegetation type is shown in Fig. 4 , where the average and range of PTE values of the 5-m-long filters were plotted against vegetation type. As shown in Fig. 4, the PTE of Type D filters showed a higher PTE, 68% on average and ranging from 65 to 72%, compared with that of Type A (65% on average) and B (54% on average) filters, which ranged from 47 to 60%. The Tukey HSD multiple comparisons test was performed between filters of similar length assuming that the single PTE value of the A filter is an average of 3 with a standard deviation similar to that of D5 filters. The test has shown that PTE values of D5 filters were significantly higher than those of B5 filters (P = 0.04) and also higher than those of A5 filters, with no significant difference. The PTEs of A5 filters were somewhat higher than those of B5 filters (p = 0.12). The advantages of native vegetation (Type D strips) under low-flow conditions, Phases Q.65 and Q.3, were even more profound. As shown in Table 3, the PTEs of D5 filters in phases Q.65 and Q.3 were 72 and 92%, respectively, which were equal or even higher than PTEs of the 10- and 15-m-long B filters. Considering that the slope of Type D filters was double that of other filters and a decrease in PTE would be expected, as reported by Dillaha et al. (1989), the actual PTE of native vegetation filters (Type D) could be greater than reported.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Influence of vegetation type on the average and range of phosphorus-trapping efficiency (PTE) for the 5-m-long filters.

 
The higher PTE values of D filters were probably caused by the higher percentage of vegetation cover (77% on average and ranging between 70 and 83%) compared with A filters (70%) and B filters (52%) (range 40–65%). A plot of PTE with vegetation cover for all filters, shown in Fig. 5 , reveals that PTE steadily increased with an increase in vegetation cover irrespective of filter length. A linear regression was performed on filters having similar lengths of 5 m and the results are shown in Fig. 5. The linear equation was significant at the 0.05 probability level with R2 = 0.88 (PTE = 0.42 vegetation cover % + 34.38). It should be noted that experimental evaluation of vegetation type on filter performance is very difficult because constructing filters that are identical in all properties except vegetation type is virtually impossible.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Variation of phosphorus-trapping efficiency (PTE) with vegetation cover.

 
Careful inspection of the results in Table 3 suggests that P removal mechanisms are affected by the type of vegetation and not just by the amount of infiltration, as reported in the literature (Overcash et al., 1981; Chaubey et al., 1994; Srivastava et al., 1996). For example, PTE values for the B5 and A5 filters were 54% (range 47–60%) and 65% on average, respectively, even though the amount of average water retention in these filters was practically similar at 42%.

Mechanisms other than sedimentation and infiltration can enhance P removal in VFS. Possible additional mechanisms include adsorption to plant and soil surfaces and absorption of soluble P by plants. Improved P performance in Type D filter strips can be linked to these mechanisms since Type D vegetation had higher vegetation coverage, a rougher flow surface, and the presence of a decaying thatch near the ground surface. Generally, Type D filter strips had higher water retention (39–58%) than Type B strips (37–44%), and also had average flow velocities of 0.04 m s-1, which were half of the Type B strips, with water velocities of 0.09 m s-1. Lower flow velocities and greater water retention resulted in more contact time with the vegetation and soil, less erosive power, and less transport capacity, especially for fine particles with high P content (McDowell and Sharpley, 2002).

Phosphorus Removal in Relation to Sediment Removal
Experimental results presented here have shown that the relative importance of mechanisms for P removal is different from that of suspended solids. The average P removal in VFS (61%) was less than that of suspended solids (84%) (Abu-Zreig et al., 2002). Furthermore, the removal of P was seen to increase more steadily with filter length compared with the removal of suspended solids. Sediment trapping efficiencies for the 2-, 5-, 10-, and 15-m-long Type B filters were 65, 81, 92, and 91%, respectively (Abu-Zreig et al., 2002). The corresponding phosphorus trapping efficiencies of B filters were 32, 54, 67, and 79%, respectively. Increasing the length of filter strips from 2 to 15 m would increase the PTE by 47% compared with only 25% in the case of sediment trapping.

The main reason for this difference is the change in relative importance of the removal mechanisms in relation to the uneven distribution of P in different size classes of aggregates or soil particles. In this study more than 90% of P concentration in the runoff was sediment bound. Phosphorus tends to be more present in the particles smaller than 100 microns, that is, silt and clay fractions (He et al., 1995). It is also known that sediment settling in VFS is directly related to particle size. In a simulation study, Abu-Zreig (2001) found that the sediment trapping efficiency in a 3-m-long filter for sand (d = 0.2 mm), silt (d = 0.01 mm), and clay (d = 0.002 mm) particles was about 90, 60, and 2%, respectively.

Hence, while filter strips 2 m long were efficient in trapping sand and similar-sized large aggregates (Abu-Zreig et al., 2002), they were not efficient in removing clay particles, which contain most of the P. The PTE of the 15-m-long filters (79%) was higher than that of short filters because longer filters retain smaller particles better than short filters via deposition and provide more infiltration opportunity of overland flow.


    CONCLUSIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Vegetated filter strips have been found to be effective in removing phosphorus from cropland runoff. Filter length had the highest and most significant effect on P removal while inflow rate, vegetation type, and density of vegetative coverage had secondary influences. The phosphorus trapping efficiencies of the 2-, 5-, 10-, and 15-m-long Type B filters were 32, 54, 67, and 79%, respectively. While short filters (5 m) are quite effective for removal of sediment, they are not very effective for P removal. For sediment trapping, increasing filter length beyond 15 m is not at all effective in increasing sediment removal but it is expected to further increase P removal.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 


Related articles in JEQ:

This Issue in Journal of Environmental Quality

JEQ 2003 32: 377-382. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
K. E. Smith, R. A. Putnam, C. Phaneuf, G. R. Lanza, O. P. Dhankher, and J. M. Clark
Selection of Plants for Optimization of Vegetative Filter Strips Treating Runoff from Turfgrass
J. Environ. Qual., August 8, 2008; 37(5): 1855 - 1861.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Soil and Water ConservationHome page
S. Kumar, S.H. Anderson, L.G. Bricknell, R.P. Udawatta, and C.J. Gantzer
Soil hydraulic properties influenced by agroforestry and grass buffers for grazed pasture systems
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, July 1, 2008; 63(4): 224 - 232.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
D. J. Wagner, H. A. Elliott, R. C. Brandt, and D. Jaiswal
Managing Biosolids Runoff Phosphorus Using Buffer Strips Enhanced with Drinking Water Treatment Residuals
J. Environ. Qual., June 23, 2008; 37(4): 1567 - 1574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
K. R. Sistani, G. E. Brink, and J. L. Oldham
Managing broiler litter application rate and grazing to decrease watershed runoff losses.
J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2008; 37(2): 718 - 724.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
R. P. Udawatta, C. J. Gantzer, S. H. Anderson, and H. E. Garrett
Agroforestry and Grass Buffer Effects on Pore Characteristics Measured by High-Resolution X-ray Computed Tomography
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 25, 2008; 72(2): 295 - 304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
K. Steinke, J. C. Stier, W. R. Kussow, and A. Thompson
Prairie and Turf Buffer Strips for Controlling Runoff from Paved Surfaces
J. Environ. Qual., January 25, 2007; 36(2): 426 - 439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
R. P. Udawatta, S. H. Anderson, C. J. Gantzer, and H. E. Garrett
Agroforestry and Grass Buffer Influence on Macropore Characteristics: A Computed Tomography Analysis
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., August 22, 2006; 70(5): 1763 - 1773.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
H. Blanco-Canqui, C. J. Gantzer, S. H. Anderson, and E. E. Alberts
Grass Barriers for Reduced Concentrated Flow Induced Soil and Nutrient Loss
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 2004; 68(6): 1963 - 1972.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
R. P. Udawatta, P. P. Motavalli, and H. E. Garrett
Phosphorus Loss and Runoff Characteristics in Three Adjacent Agricultural Watersheds with Claypan Soils
J. Environ. Qual., September 1, 2004; 33(5): 1709 - 1719.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in JEQ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (23)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abu-Zreig, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kaushik, N. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Abu-Zreig, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kaushik, N. K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Abu-Zreig, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kaushik, N. K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Surface Water Quality
Right arrow Soil Erosion
Right arrow Phosphorus
Right arrow Agricultural Systems


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome