JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spalding, R. F.
Right arrow Articles by Monson, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Spalding, R. F.
Right arrow Articles by Monson, S. J.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Spalding, R. F.
Right arrow Articles by Monson, S. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Water Management
Right arrow Water Quality
Right arrow Agricultural Pesticides
Journal of Environmental Quality 32:92-99 (2003)
© 2003 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America

TECHNICAL REPORTS
Ground Water Quality

Herbicides in Ground Water beneath Nebraska's Management Systems Evaluation Area

Roy F. Spalding*,a, Mary E. Exnerb, Daniel D. Snowa, David A. Cassadac, Mark E. Burbachc and Stephen J. Monsonc

a Dep. of Agronomy and Horticulture, Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583-0915
b School of Natural Resource Sciences, Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583-0759
c Water Sciences Laboratory, Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583-0844

* Corresponding author (rspalding1{at}unl.edu)

Received for publication February 20, 2002.

    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Profiles of ground water pesticide concentrations beneath the Nebraska Management Systems Evaluation Area (MSEA) describe the effect of 20 yr of pesticide usage on ground water in the central Platte Valley of Nebraska. During the 6-yr (1991–1996) study, 14 pesticides and their transformation products were detected in 7848 ground water samples from the unconfined water table aquifer. Triazine and acetamide herbicides applied on the site and their transformation products had the highest frequencies of detection. Atrazine [6-chloro-N-ethyl-N'-(1-methylethyl)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4,-diamine] concentrations decreased with depth and ground water age determined with 3H/3He dating techniques. Assuming equivalent atrazine input during the past 20 yr, the measured average changes in concentration with depth (age) suggest an estimated half-life of >10 yr. Hydrolysis of atrazine and deethylatrazine (DEA; 2-chloro-4-amino-6-isopropylamino-s-triazine) to hydroxyatrazine [6-hydroxy-N-ethyl-N'-(1-methylethyl)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine] appeared to be the major degradation route. Aqueous hydroxyatrazine concentrations are governed by sorption on the saturated sediments. Atrazine was detected in the confined Ogallala aquifer in ultra-trace concentrations (0.003 µg L-1); however, the possibility of introduction during reverse circulation drilling of these deep wells cannot be eliminated. In fall 1997 sampling, metolachlor [2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl) acetamide] was detected in 57% of the 230 samples. Metolachlor oxanilic acid [(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)amino]oxo-acetic acid] was detected in most samples. In ground water profiles, concentrations of metolachlor ethane sulfonic acid [2-[(ethyl-6-methylphenyl)(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)amino]-2-oxo-ethanesulfonic acid] exceeded those of deethylatrazine. Alachlor [2-chloro-N-(2,6-diethylphenyl)-N-(methoxymethyl)acetamide] was detected in <1% of the samples; however, alachlor ethane sulfonic acid [2-[(2,6-diethylphenyl)(methoxymethyl)amino]-2-oxoethanesulfonic acid] was present in most samples (63%) and was an indicator of past alachlor use.

Abbreviations: DDA, didealkylatrazine • DEA, deethylatrazine • DIA, deisopropylatrazine • ESA, ethane sulfonic acid • HA, hydroxyatrazine • MLS, multilevel sampler • MSEA, Management Systems Evaluation Area • OA, oxanilic acid


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
SINCE THE DISCOVERY of atrazine in ground water overlain by irrigated row crops in central Nebraska in the late 1970s (Spalding et al., 1980), more than 139 pesticide residues and 23 transformation products have been reported in the ground water of the United States (Barbash and Resek, 1996). Triazine and acetamide herbicides are the most frequently reported pesticides in ground water in corn [Zea mays L.] and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] growing areas (Spalding et al., 1989; Roux et al., 1991; Kolpin et al., 1996; Barbash et al., 1999). The high frequency of detection is due to a combination of their high use on these commodities and physical–chemical characteristics that allow for mobility and moderate persistence. Atrazine, the most widespread pesticide in the nation's ground water, and its transformation products together with cyanazine, simazine, and alachlor and metolachlor and their transformation products are the most commonly detected herbicides in row-cropped regions (Barbash et al., 1999) (see Table 1 for chemical names of pesticides detected in this study).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Pesticide concentrations in the unconfined aquifer, 1991–1996.

 
National or regional assessments of pesticide concentrations in ground water link most detections and frequency of occurrence of specific pesticides to high-use areas and the chemical properties of the compound (Klaseus et al., 1988; Exner and Spalding, 1990; Kross et al., 1990; USEPA, 1990; Roux et al., 1991; Holden et al., 1992; Kolpin, 1997; Ator and Ferrari, 1997; Kolpin et al., 2000). Even in high-use areas most pesticide concentrations in ground water are at sub–part per billion concentrations (µg L-1) with only a handful having concentrations consistently near or exceeding 1 µg L-1. The USEPA has set maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for atrazine, alachlor, and simazine in drinking water (Table 1).

The presence of transformation products was ignored for two decades largely because the focus was pesticides with regulated concentrations in drinking water, and because methods for their analysis needed to be developed and tested. In surveys conducted in agricultural regions during the early and mid-1990s, transformation products, not parent compounds, were the most frequently detected pesticide compounds (Kolpin et al., 1995; Potter and Carpenter, 1995). Especially prevalent in ground water are the two triazine metabolites deethylatrazine (DEA) and deisopropylatrazine (DIA), which frequently are quantified in the same analytical scheme as atrazine and the acetamide herbicides. The recent development of analytical methods for the ethane sulfonic acid (ESA) and oxanilic acid (OA) metabolites of alachlor, metolachlor, acetochlor, and propachlor (Ferrer et al., 1997) have led to the widespread detection of these metabolites in ground water in regional surveys (Kalkhoff et al., 1998). Understanding the fate of herbicides in ground water is intrinsically related to the quantification of their major transformation products.

The 6-yr study at the Nebraska MSEA, one of five USDA-sponsored MSEA projects in five midwestern states in the corn and soybean belt, evaluated the effect of four nutrient and four irrigation practices on nitrate loading in a shallow unconfined aquifer (Spalding et al., 2001). A comparison of the effects of precipitation and irrigation on atrazine, the atrazine metabolites DEA and DIA, and metolachlor loading showed that peak atrazine and metolachlor loading was more dependent on focused recharge from sites where storm water ponded in cropped fields and road ditches than from infiltration from less disturbed parts of the fields (Spalding et al., 2003). The objectives of this paper are to describe the distribution of herbicide and transformation product concentrations in the shallow unconfined water table aquifer and in the deeper confined Ogallala aquifer beneath the Nebraska MSEA. The data for the concentration profiles were obtained from a network of multilevel ground water samplers in an unconfined, predominately sand and gravel aquifer.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Study Site
The Nebraska MSEA site is located in central Nebraska approximately 6 km north of the Platte River (Fig. 1) . Regional ground water quality, site selection, and site layout are discussed in Spalding et al. (2001)( 2003).



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Location of the Nebraska Management Systems Evaluation Area (MSEA) and layout of research–demonstration site and sampling locations.

 
Hydrogeology and Water Quality
The unsaturated zone of the research–demonstration site is a 1.1-m-thick, well-drained, silt loam overlaying 4.3 m of fine to medium-textured sands. The well-drained Hord silt loam (fine-silty, mixed, mesic Cumulic Haplustoll) is the predominant soil and there are small areas of Hall silt loam (fine-silty, mixed, mesic Pachic Argiustoll). Quaternary-age sands and gravels form the 14.3- to 17.3-m-thick shallow water table aquifer that overlies a 9- to 20-m-thick clayey silt aquitard that separates the unconfined water table aquifer and the confined Ogallala aquifer (Diffendal and Smith, 1996). Both aquifers serve as drinking water supplies for area residents.

Annual precipitation, depth to water, hydraulic conductivities, and estimated nonretarded transport times across the Nebraska MSEA are described in Spalding et al. (2001). Ground water in the unconfined water table aquifer was successfully dated in 1993 (Spalding et al., 2001) with atmospherically derived tritium (3H) and stable daughter (3He) procedures.

Baseline water quality data were obtained for both aquifers in 1990. The unconfined aquifer was initially monitored at an 11-multilevel sampler (MLS) network installed within the research–demonstration site and the upgradient buffer. These data were used to optimize the locations of 31 permanent MLSs. Atrazine concentrations averaged 2.1 ± 1.3 µg L-1 in the unconfined aquifer. Deethylatrazine (0.90 ± 0.29 µg L-1), DIA (0.02 ± 0.03 µg L-1), propazine (0.00 ± 0.01 µg L-1), and metolachlor (0.03 ± 0.10 µg L-1) also were detected in the unconfined aquifer.

Three wells in the Ogallala aquifer were sampled to characterize the quality of the confined aquifer. Pesticides were not detected in the confined aquifer with routine analytical procedures. Dissolved organic carbon concentrations averaged 3.3 ± 0.3 mg C L-1 and 0.6 ± 0.1 mg C L-1 in the unconfined and confined aquifers, respectively, and were consistent with values reported 20 yr ago (Spalding et al., 1978). Average pH values in the unconfined and confined aquifers were 6.8 ± 0.3 and 6.7 ± 0.0, respectively.

Study Design
The 54-ha research–demonstration site was subdivided into four 13.4-ha management fields (Fig. 1). Three fields were cropped to corn and the fourth to alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). In keeping with the local practice of banding preemergent herbicides at planting, each corn management field received 46-cm-wide banded applications containing 1.68 kg atrazine ha-1 and 0.75 kg metolachlor ha-1 as Bicep (Sygenta Crop Protection, Greensboro, NC) between April 29 and May 20. Although the site reverted to farmer–landowner management after the 1996 growing season, no changes were made in the herbicide treatment or irrigation practices at the four management fields during 1997 (Spalding et al., 2001).

The unconfined aquifer was sampled with the 31 MLSs shown in Fig. 1. Each MLS was designed so that ground water could be obtained from as many as 16 depths. Most MLSs consisted of 8 stainless steel gas-drive samplers, 16 low-density polyethylene (LDPE) suction sampling tubes, and 4 PVC piezometers. The rationale for the design and the construction details are given in Spalding et al. (2001).

Using specially constructed MLSs at the research–demonstration site, Papiernik et al. (1996) showed the tubing composition (polytetrafluoroethylene, rigid polyvinyl chloride, stainless steel, LDPE, and high-density polyethylene) of the samplers did not significantly affect the aqueous concentrations of atrazine and its transformation products, DEA and DIA, butachlor [2-chloro-2',6'-diethyl-N-(butoxymethyl) acetanilide], metolachlor, alachlor, and cyanazine. Ground water for herbicide analyses was obtained from the LDPE suction sampling tubes and the herbicide concentrations are representative of aquifer concentrations. The effect of tubing composition on the concentrations of the other pesticides addressed in this paper could not be evaluated as the concentrations were at or below the limits of detection.

From 1991 through 1997 samples were collected three times a year: in late March during the preplant period, in late June prior to irrigation season, and in early October after irrigation and harvest. All MLSs were sampled through 1996 with a smaller subset sampled in 1997. Field methods, water table measurements, and sample collection procedures are detailed in Spalding et al. (2003).

Three deep boreholes were drilled into the confined Ogallala aquifer to about 40 m with reverse circulation and were cased with 10.2-cm-diameter polyvinyl chloride (PVC). The annular space at the screens was gravel packed, and bentonite slurry was pumped into the annular space from the water table to the top of the screen to provide a seal.

Analytical Methods
Atrazine, DEA, DIA, alachlor, metolachlor, and 11 additional pesticides (Table 1) were quantified with the stable isotope dilution method described in Cassada et al. (1994). The detection limit for each analyte was determined by the standard deviation method with eight fortified samples (USEPA, 1989). Quality assurance–quality control (QA–QC) protocol included the analysis of one field duplicate, field blank, laboratory fortified blank, laboratory fortified matrix, and laboratory reagent sample for every 20 field samples. The reporting limit (Table 1) for each analyte ranged from two to three times the detection limit, thereby increasing confidence in the results.

Atrazine was quantified in samples from the Ogallala aquifer with 13C3–labeled atrazine as an internal standard and high resolution mass spectrometry (MS) (Cai et al., 1993). The method detection limit was 0.50 ng L-1 and the precision was ±15% for water samples containing 1 ng L-1.

Parts per trillion (ng L-1) residues of hydroxyatrazine (HA) were measured by the method of Cai et al. (1994). Samples were analyzed by fast atom bombardment high resolution MS and quantified with 13C3–labeled HA. The method detection limit was 1.3 ng L-1 and the precision was ±10% as measured in a 10 ng L-1 fortified water sample.

Didealkylatrazine (DDA; 2-chloro-4,6-diamino-s-triazine) in 200 mL of sample was sorbed to graphitized carbon black and quantified with high resolution MS (Cai et al., 1995). The detection limit was 3 ng L-1 and the precision was ±20%. Previously published DDA concentrations in natural waters relied upon C18 solid phase extraction and mass selective detector quantification; however, the recoveries were poor (Mills and Thurman, 1994).

The ethane sulfonic acid (ESA) and oxanilic acid (OA) metabolites of acetochlor, alachlor, and metolachlor were concentrated by solid phase extraction and quantified with liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS) and LC–MS–MS (Ferrer et al., 1997; Vargo, 1998). Since these metabolites are not commercially available, several neat ESA standards were synthesized following the method of Feng (1991) while others were obtained from Monsanto (St. Louis, MO) and Novartis (Greensboro, NC). Known amounts of butachlor ESA [2-[(2,6-diethylphenyl)(1-butoxymethyl)amino]-2-oxo-ethane sulfonic acid] (internal standard) and pretilachlor ESA [2-[(2,6-diethylphenyl)(2-propoxyethyl)amino]-2-oxo-ethane sulfonic acid] and dimethachlor ESA [2-[(2,6-dimethylphenyl)(2-methoxyethyl)amino]-2-oxo-ethane sulfonic acid] (surrogate compounds) were added to each 100-mL sample prior to extraction. The compounds were extracted with a preconditioned 1-g trifunctional C18 solid phase extraction cartridge, eluted with 2 mL of methanol, and concentrated to approximately 200 µL by evaporation. Analytes were separated and quantified with a Finnigan LCQ ion trap mass spectrometer (Finnigan Thermoquest, San Jose, CA) equipped with an electrospray ionization source operated in the negative ion mode. Compound identification was based upon the occurrence of each compound's product ion at the proper retention time, a technique that is especially important for the identification of alachlor and acetochlor ESA metabolites (Vargo, 1998). Quantitation was based on the target compound's response relative to that of the internal standard. Method detection limits determined from 100-mL fortified samples were near 0.05 µg L-1 and reporting limits were 0.1 µg L-1.


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Detected Pesticides
Fourteen pesticide active ingredients and two transformation products (Table 1) were detected in the unconfined aquifer beneath the research–demonstration site from 1991 through 1996. Atrazine and DEA concentrations were detected in 99.9 and 100%, respectively, of the 7848 samples. Deisopropylatrazine was detected in 86.4% of the samples. Average DIA concentrations were 10 times less than those of DEA. Atrazine, DEA, and DIA concentrations were at or above the reporting limit in all samples; however, atrazine concentrations remained below the 3 µg L-1 maximum contaminant level. The incidence of detection of metolachlor (32.2%) was considerably less than that of atrazine and its primary metabolites. Prior to 1992 only a few samples (9.8%) had metolachlor concentrations above the reporting limit. While metolachlor and atrazine were applied to the site annually between 1991 and 1996, metolachlor was not applied prior to 1991. Atrazine, however, had been applied to the site for nearly three decades and reportedly had been used at higher rates during the 1970s and early 1980s.

Propazine (11.8%), simazine (6.3%), alachlor (3%), and prometon (1.6%) were also detected in the unconfined aquifer. There is no history of propazine use at the site; however, atrazine formulations, which should be 92% pure and usually are 95% pure (Health and Safety Guide, 1990), contain the impurities sodium chloride, simazine, and propazine. Atrazine to propazine ratios in the samples indicated that the atrazine formulations contained 1 to 3% propazine. Simazine reportedly was also used for broadleaf weed control in the shelterbelt along the southern border of the site (L. Niemack, personal communication, 1991). Alachlor was applied to the site prior to 1990. Prometon occurrence is very widespread in the hydrologic system and in the ground water at the site may originate from nonagricultural uses, such as applications to driveways and fence lines (Capel et al., 1999).

The detection frequencies of cyanazine (0.1%) and metribuzin (0.1%), pesticides that were applied to cropland in the region but were not applied to the Nebraska MSEA, were very low. Acetochlor, measured only in 1996, was detected in the summer in ML 34. It is not known whether the acetochlor, which was not applied to the site, originated from a spill along the fence row or from runoff from the corn field to the east. Trace concentrations of pendimethalin and trifluralin in a few samples may be false positives. According to Martin (1999), both compounds are likely to be falsely quantified near the method detection limit. Both have very high organic carbon partition coefficients, and transport through the unsaturated zone to the ground water is unlikely.

Ground Water Ages and Concentration Profiles
Ground water collected at three MLSs across the site in spring 1993 (Fig. 1) was dated with 3H/3He (Spalding et al., 2001). The 3H/3He clock starts at or near the water table. Ages ranged from 0.0 ± 0.5 yr at the surface to approximately 20 yr at the bottom of the unconfined aquifer. Ages were consistently older with depth and for equivalent depths were quite consistent across the site. Using ground water ages and nitrate concentrations, Spalding et al. (2001) showed that seasonal changes in nitrate concentrations in the uppermost 1.5 m of the unconfined aquifer could be conservatively attributed to loading during the preceding months. The residence times for water at depths greater than approximately 5 m below the water table were greater than 5 yr and indicate water that is transported horizontally from upgradient of the site.

During the investigation atrazine and DEA concentrations beneath the corn management fields were lower and remained relatively constant in the older, deeper ground water (>7 yr old and >6 m below the water table) (Fig. 2b) compared with those in the uppermost ground water (approximately 1 yr old and <=1.5 m below the water table) (Fig. 2a). Average DEA concentrations of 2.4 µg L-1 were 1.1 µg L-1 higher than those of atrazine. Metolachlor was detected at concentrations above the reporting limit at only two depths greater than 6 m. The results indicate that during the 6-yr study the deeper, older ground water remained isolated and was not affected by annual contaminant loading events.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Atrazine, atrazine transformation products (DEA, deethylatrazine; DIA, deisopropylatrazine), and metolachlor concentrations in the (a) shallow (<=1.5 m) and (b) deep (>6 m) ground water of the unconfined aquifer downgradient of the corn management fields.

 
Prior to the 1993 corn planting there was commonality in the concentration profiles of atrazine, its transformation products DEA, DIA, DDA, and HA, and metolachlor at three locations (Fig. 3) . The atrazine, DEA, DIA, and metolachlor concentration profiles at the other 28 MLSs had patterns similar to those shown in Fig. 3. Analysis of DDA and HA was limited to these three profiles. Generally herbicide and transformation product concentrations decreased with depth and aquifer residence time, as indicated by the ground water age, in the unconfined aquifer. Throughout the unconfined aquifer, DEA concentrations were almost double those of atrazine and DEA was the dominant atrazine species in the ground water. The DIA concentrations were <1.0 µg L-1 and generally followed the DDA profile in the bottom two-thirds of the unconfined aquifer. The DDA concentrations in the upper 2 m of the aquifer were approximately 1 µg L-1 and decreased to approximately 0.20 µg L-1 at depths greater than 10 m. While DDA is a commonly reported transformation product in ground water beneath high simazine use areas in California (Troiano et al., 2001), DDA is rarely reported in Nebraska and Iowa where atrazine is the dominant herbicide (Kolpin et al., 2000). The very low HA concentrations ranged from 0.011 to 0.030 µg L-1 and decreased with depth.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Profiles of atrazine, atrazine transformation products (DEA, deethylatrazine; DIA, deisopropylatrazine; DDA, didealkylatrazine), and metolachlor in the unconfined aquifer and ground water ages, spring 1993. [Ages are from Spalding et al. (2001).]

 
The high correlation (r = 0.73) of DEA and atrazine concentrations in the three profiles (Fig. 3) indicated that approximately 50% of the DEA variability was associated with atrazine. This association and the trend of decreasing atrazine and DEA concentrations with depth from 1991 through spring 1993 suggested two scenarios: (i) there was progressively less loading of atrazine and DEA with increasing distance upgradient of the site or (ii) atrazine and DEA were transformed in the ground water at approximately the same rate. The first scenario is highly unlikely as the upgradient fields have been cropped fence-row-to-fence-row with irrigated corn and treated with atrazine for at least the last quarter-century. Rather, it is more probable that intrinsic remediation by abiotic transformation reduced the concentrations of atrazine and DEA to hydroxytriazines. The half-life of parent and primary transformation product in the aquifer appears to range from 10 to 20 yr.

Low HA concentrations ranging from 10 to 30 ng L-1 in the unconfined aquifer were apparently controlled by HA partitioning to the primarily sandy, silty, and gravelly aquifer materials. The major transformation product of atrazine in sandy loams (Sorenson et al., 1993), HA has been shown to tightly bond to soils (Clay and Koskinen, 1990; Lerch et al., 1996). Sorptive loss of aqueous concentrations of HA was supported by a laboratory experiment in which 80% of the HA spiked into an 80:20 water and Nebraska MSEA aquifer sediment (sand and gravel) mixture was removed from the water phase after 3 min of manual shaking. Highest HA concentrations in the shallowest ground water may suggest that HA production is concentration dependent.

Atrazine was detected in the confined Ogallala aquifer at concentrations of 0.003 µg L-1. Despite lengthy pumping during well development to remove drilling fluids, the introduction of atrazine during well drilling that relied heavily on the use of water cannot be ruled out. No other pesticides or transformation products were measured in samples from the Ogallala aquifer with this degree of sensitivity.

Metolachlor and Alachlor Transformation Products
To better elucidate the fate of metolachlor and alachlor in ground water, metolachlor and alachlor ESA and OA transformation products were quantified in more than 230 fall 1997 samples from selected MLSs. Metolachlor was detected in 57% of the samples and concentrations ranged as high as 6.7 µg L-1. Metolachlor ESA and OA were detected in 99 and 35% of the samples, respectively, with maximum concentrations of 24 and 3.8 µg L-1, respectively. Alachlor, which had not been applied to the site since 1989, was detected in only two samples (<1%) while alachlor ESA was detected in 63% of the samples at concentrations as high as 4.5 µg L-1. Alachlor OA was detected in only one sample (0.3 µg L-1).

Metolachlor ESA concentrations in the unconfined aquifer averaged 5.8 µg L-1 in the shallow water (<=1.5 m), 4.8 µg L-1 at mid-depths, and 2.1 µg L-1 in the bottom third of the aquifer. In comparison, alachlor ESA concentrations were lower and varied less with depth with average concentrations of 0.45 µg L-1 in the shallow ground water, 0.62 µg L-1 at mid-depths, and 0.50 µg L-1 in the bottom third of the aquifer. Representative vertical profiles from three locations across the site (Fig. 4) indicate that in fall 1997 metolachlor ESA contributed more mass than any other pesticide monitored in the underlying ground water. Throughout most of the profile, metolachlor ESA concentrations greatly exceeded those of metolachlor by factors of approximately 10 to approximately 100. Aga et al. (1996) reported that as metolachlor degraded in Kansas soils, concentrations of its ESA metabolite increased for about 100 d and then decreased. The subsequent decrease in ESA soil concentrations was attributed to leaching below the soil horizons sampled in their study. Ethane sulfonic acid compounds are ionized in soil and water and thus are extremely mobile. Field and Thurman (1996) suggested that ESA formation could also occur in shallow ground water. High ESA metabolite to parent ratios at the Nebraska MSEA site concur with those reported by Ferrer et al. (1997) and Kalkhoff et al. (1998) in Iowa ground water surveys and further indicate that metolachlor ESA is much more pervasive and persistent in ground water than its parent herbicide.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Profiles of commonly detected triazine and acetamide herbicides and their metabolites in the unconfined aquifer, fall 1997. DEA, deethylatrazine; DIA, deisopropylatrazine; ESA, ethane sulfonic acid.

 
The uniform alachlor ESA concentrations (approximately 0.1 µg L-1) in the shallow ground water of the profiles suggest relatively continuous low-level leaching from the unsaturated zone. Higher concentrations in the mid-depth ground water appear correlated with past use on upgradient fields during the 1980s. Kolpin et al. (1996) reported that alachlor ESA was the most frequently detected pesticide in ground water of the north-central corn-producing region of the USA; however, metolachlor ESA was not measured in the ground water profile. Rapid transformation of alachlor in soils and slow transformation in saturated conditions (Potter and Carpenter, 1995; Kolpin et al., 1996) suggest that most degradation occurs in the soils. A glutathione conjugation process in terrestrial microorganisms is believed to form the sulfonated metabolite (Laue et al., 1996). The higher alachlor ESA concentrations in the deep ground water indicate that this highly mobile compound is very persistent and in all probability has a half-life in ground water greater than the 10 to 20 yr estimated for atrazine. The absence of detectable concentrations of alachlor OA in all but one sample indicates that it degrades more quickly than metolachlor OA. Acetochlor ESA [2-[(ethyl-6-methylphenyl)(ethoxymethyl)amino]-2-oxo-ethanesulfonic acid] was not detected in any of the samples.


    CONCLUSIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Fourteen pesticides and transformation products were detected in the unconfined aquifer during the 6-yr Nebraska MSEA study. Herbicides applied to the Nebraska MSEA and their transformation products had the highest frequencies of detection. Common pesticide impurities, such as propazine and simazine, were also routinely detected.

Atrazine concentrations were stratified during the first years of the study with highest levels in the shallow ground water and lowest levels at the bottom of the unconfined aquifer. The combination of ground water ages and declines in atrazine concentration with depth allowed estimation of a 10 to 20 yr half-life for atrazine. Atrazine appears to be slowly transformed by hydrolysis to hydroxyatrazine, which is present in trace concentrations because its aqueous concentration is governed by partitioning to the aquifer solids. Atrazine was detected in the confined Ogallala aquifer in ultra-trace concentrations (<0.01 µg L-1); however, its introduction during monitoring well drilling is a distinct possibility. The data vividly demonstrate the difficulty in assigning origins to ultra-trace levels of pesticides in deep wells requiring drilling fluid circulation during construction.

The atrazine transformation products DEA, DIA, and DDA were also detected in the unconfined aquifer. On average, DEA concentrations exceeded those of atrazine by a factor of approximately two. Deisopropylatrazine and DDA are not preferred transformation products in the soil metabolism of atrazine and were detected in the ground water mostly in sub–microgram per liter concentrations.

Acetamide ESAs and OAs were added to the normal suite of pesticides in 1997. Metolachlor ESA was detected in 99% of the 230 samples analyzed at concentrations that exceeded those of the other detected transformation products and parent compounds. Metolachlor OA was detected in considerably fewer samples than its ESA. Presumably, metolachlor ESA is the preferred transformation product or it is more persistent than metolachlor OA. Alachlor ESA, which was detected in 63% of the samples, tended to have peak concentrations at the mid-aquifer depths, suggesting infiltration from upgradient fields during the years of heavy alachlor usage during the 1980s. Only two samples contained alachlor, indicating that almost all the residual alachlor has been transformed. Alachlor OA was detected in only one sample.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors are grateful to Jeff Toavs and Tom Papiernik for assistance in the installation and sampling of the MLSs. The project was funded by USDA-CSRS. The Water Sciences Laboratory received support from the Nebraska Research Initiative. The acetamide transformation product sampling and analysis were funded by the Nebraska Department of Agriculture and the Central Platte Natural Resources District. The authors are deeply indebted to Loran Niemack, the cooperating farmer. This manuscript has been assigned Journal Series no. 13733, Agricultural Research Division, University of Nebraska.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
J. Gaultier, A. Farenhorst, J. Cathcart, and T. Goddard
Regional Assessment of Herbicide Sorption and Degradation in Two Sampling Years
J. Environ. Qual., August 8, 2008; 37(5): 1825 - 1836.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
T. Lee and C. H. Benson
Sorption and Degradation of Alachlor and Metolachlor in Ground Water Using Green Sands
J. Environ. Qual., September 1, 2004; 33(5): 1682 - 1693.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
M. S. Rodriguez-Cruz, M. J. Sanchez-Martin, and M. Sanchez-Camazano
Enhanced Desorption of Herbicides Sorbed on Soils by Addition of Triton X-100
J. Environ. Qual., May 1, 2004; 33(3): 920 - 929.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
G. W. Gee, G. W. Gee, Z. F. Zhang, and A. L. Ward
A Modified Vadose Zone Fluxmeter with Solution Collection Capability
Vadose Zone J., November 1, 2003; 2(4): 627 - 632.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
R. F. Spalding, D. G. Watts, D. D. Snow, D. A. Cassada, M. E. Exner, and J. S. Schepers
Herbicide Loading to Shallow Ground Water beneath Nebraska's Management Systems Evaluation Area
J. Environ. Qual., January 1, 2003; 32(1): 84 - 91.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spalding, R. F.
Right arrow Articles by Monson, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Spalding, R. F.
Right arrow Articles by Monson, S. J.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Spalding, R. F.
Right arrow Articles by Monson, S. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Water Management
Right arrow Water Quality
Right arrow Agricultural Pesticides


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome