|
|
||||||||
a Dep. of Agronomy and Horticulture, Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583-0915
b School of Natural Resource Sciences, Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583-0759
c Water Sciences Laboratory, Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583-0844
* Corresponding author (rspalding1{at}unl.edu)
Received for publication February 20, 2002.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Abbreviations: DDA, didealkylatrazine DEA, deethylatrazine DIA, deisopropylatrazine ESA, ethane sulfonic acid HA, hydroxyatrazine MLS, multilevel sampler MSEA, Management Systems Evaluation Area OA, oxanilic acid
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The presence of transformation products was ignored for two decades largely because the focus was pesticides with regulated concentrations in drinking water, and because methods for their analysis needed to be developed and tested. In surveys conducted in agricultural regions during the early and mid-1990s, transformation products, not parent compounds, were the most frequently detected pesticide compounds (Kolpin et al., 1995; Potter and Carpenter, 1995). Especially prevalent in ground water are the two triazine metabolites deethylatrazine (DEA) and deisopropylatrazine (DIA), which frequently are quantified in the same analytical scheme as atrazine and the acetamide herbicides. The recent development of analytical methods for the ethane sulfonic acid (ESA) and oxanilic acid (OA) metabolites of alachlor, metolachlor, acetochlor, and propachlor (Ferrer et al., 1997) have led to the widespread detection of these metabolites in ground water in regional surveys (Kalkhoff et al., 1998). Understanding the fate of herbicides in ground water is intrinsically related to the quantification of their major transformation products.
The 6-yr study at the Nebraska MSEA, one of five USDA-sponsored MSEA projects in five midwestern states in the corn and soybean belt, evaluated the effect of four nutrient and four irrigation practices on nitrate loading in a shallow unconfined aquifer (Spalding et al., 2001). A comparison of the effects of precipitation and irrigation on atrazine, the atrazine metabolites DEA and DIA, and metolachlor loading showed that peak atrazine and metolachlor loading was more dependent on focused recharge from sites where storm water ponded in cropped fields and road ditches than from infiltration from less disturbed parts of the fields (Spalding et al., 2003). The objectives of this paper are to describe the distribution of herbicide and transformation product concentrations in the shallow unconfined water table aquifer and in the deeper confined Ogallala aquifer beneath the Nebraska MSEA. The data for the concentration profiles were obtained from a network of multilevel ground water samplers in an unconfined, predominately sand and gravel aquifer.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Annual precipitation, depth to water, hydraulic conductivities, and estimated nonretarded transport times across the Nebraska MSEA are described in Spalding et al. (2001). Ground water in the unconfined water table aquifer was successfully dated in 1993 (Spalding et al., 2001) with atmospherically derived tritium (3H) and stable daughter (3He) procedures.
Baseline water quality data were obtained for both aquifers in 1990. The unconfined aquifer was initially monitored at an 11-multilevel sampler (MLS) network installed within the researchdemonstration site and the upgradient buffer. These data were used to optimize the locations of 31 permanent MLSs. Atrazine concentrations averaged 2.1 ± 1.3 µg L-1 in the unconfined aquifer. Deethylatrazine (0.90 ± 0.29 µg L-1), DIA (0.02 ± 0.03 µg L-1), propazine (0.00 ± 0.01 µg L-1), and metolachlor (0.03 ± 0.10 µg L-1) also were detected in the unconfined aquifer.
Three wells in the Ogallala aquifer were sampled to characterize the quality of the confined aquifer. Pesticides were not detected in the confined aquifer with routine analytical procedures. Dissolved organic carbon concentrations averaged 3.3 ± 0.3 mg C L-1 and 0.6 ± 0.1 mg C L-1 in the unconfined and confined aquifers, respectively, and were consistent with values reported 20 yr ago (Spalding et al., 1978). Average pH values in the unconfined and confined aquifers were 6.8 ± 0.3 and 6.7 ± 0.0, respectively.
Study Design
The 54-ha researchdemonstration site was subdivided into four 13.4-ha management fields (Fig. 1). Three fields were cropped to corn and the fourth to alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). In keeping with the local practice of banding preemergent herbicides at planting, each corn management field received 46-cm-wide banded applications containing 1.68 kg atrazine ha-1 and 0.75 kg metolachlor ha-1 as Bicep (Sygenta Crop Protection, Greensboro, NC) between April 29 and May 20. Although the site reverted to farmerlandowner management after the 1996 growing season, no changes were made in the herbicide treatment or irrigation practices at the four management fields during 1997 (Spalding et al., 2001).
The unconfined aquifer was sampled with the 31 MLSs shown in Fig. 1. Each MLS was designed so that ground water could be obtained from as many as 16 depths. Most MLSs consisted of 8 stainless steel gas-drive samplers, 16 low-density polyethylene (LDPE) suction sampling tubes, and 4 PVC piezometers. The rationale for the design and the construction details are given in Spalding et al. (2001).
Using specially constructed MLSs at the researchdemonstration site, Papiernik et al. (1996) showed the tubing composition (polytetrafluoroethylene, rigid polyvinyl chloride, stainless steel, LDPE, and high-density polyethylene) of the samplers did not significantly affect the aqueous concentrations of atrazine and its transformation products, DEA and DIA, butachlor [2-chloro-2',6'-diethyl-N-(butoxymethyl) acetanilide], metolachlor, alachlor, and cyanazine. Ground water for herbicide analyses was obtained from the LDPE suction sampling tubes and the herbicide concentrations are representative of aquifer concentrations. The effect of tubing composition on the concentrations of the other pesticides addressed in this paper could not be evaluated as the concentrations were at or below the limits of detection.
From 1991 through 1997 samples were collected three times a year: in late March during the preplant period, in late June prior to irrigation season, and in early October after irrigation and harvest. All MLSs were sampled through 1996 with a smaller subset sampled in 1997. Field methods, water table measurements, and sample collection procedures are detailed in Spalding et al. (2003).
Three deep boreholes were drilled into the confined Ogallala aquifer to about 40 m with reverse circulation and were cased with 10.2-cm-diameter polyvinyl chloride (PVC). The annular space at the screens was gravel packed, and bentonite slurry was pumped into the annular space from the water table to the top of the screen to provide a seal.
Analytical Methods
Atrazine, DEA, DIA, alachlor, metolachlor, and 11 additional pesticides (Table 1) were quantified with the stable isotope dilution method described in Cassada et al. (1994). The detection limit for each analyte was determined by the standard deviation method with eight fortified samples (USEPA, 1989). Quality assurancequality control (QAQC) protocol included the analysis of one field duplicate, field blank, laboratory fortified blank, laboratory fortified matrix, and laboratory reagent sample for every 20 field samples. The reporting limit (Table 1) for each analyte ranged from two to three times the detection limit, thereby increasing confidence in the results.
Atrazine was quantified in samples from the Ogallala aquifer with 13C3labeled atrazine as an internal standard and high resolution mass spectrometry (MS) (Cai et al., 1993). The method detection limit was 0.50 ng L-1 and the precision was ±15% for water samples containing 1 ng L-1.
Parts per trillion (ng L-1) residues of hydroxyatrazine (HA) were measured by the method of Cai et al. (1994). Samples were analyzed by fast atom bombardment high resolution MS and quantified with 13C3labeled HA. The method detection limit was 1.3 ng L-1 and the precision was ±10% as measured in a 10 ng L-1 fortified water sample.
Didealkylatrazine (DDA; 2-chloro-4,6-diamino-s-triazine) in 200 mL of sample was sorbed to graphitized carbon black and quantified with high resolution MS (Cai et al., 1995). The detection limit was 3 ng L-1 and the precision was ±20%. Previously published DDA concentrations in natural waters relied upon C18 solid phase extraction and mass selective detector quantification; however, the recoveries were poor (Mills and Thurman, 1994).
The ethane sulfonic acid (ESA) and oxanilic acid (OA) metabolites of acetochlor, alachlor, and metolachlor were concentrated by solid phase extraction and quantified with liquid chromatographymass spectrometry (LCMS) and LCMSMS (Ferrer et al., 1997; Vargo, 1998). Since these metabolites are not commercially available, several neat ESA standards were synthesized following the method of Feng (1991) while others were obtained from Monsanto (St. Louis, MO) and Novartis (Greensboro, NC). Known amounts of butachlor ESA [2-[(2,6-diethylphenyl)(1-butoxymethyl)amino]-2-oxo-ethane sulfonic acid] (internal standard) and pretilachlor ESA [2-[(2,6-diethylphenyl)(2-propoxyethyl)amino]-2-oxo-ethane sulfonic acid] and dimethachlor ESA [2-[(2,6-dimethylphenyl)(2-methoxyethyl)amino]-2-oxo-ethane sulfonic acid] (surrogate compounds) were added to each 100-mL sample prior to extraction. The compounds were extracted with a preconditioned 1-g trifunctional C18 solid phase extraction cartridge, eluted with 2 mL of methanol, and concentrated to approximately 200 µL by evaporation. Analytes were separated and quantified with a Finnigan LCQ ion trap mass spectrometer (Finnigan Thermoquest, San Jose, CA) equipped with an electrospray ionization source operated in the negative ion mode. Compound identification was based upon the occurrence of each compound's product ion at the proper retention time, a technique that is especially important for the identification of alachlor and acetochlor ESA metabolites (Vargo, 1998). Quantitation was based on the target compound's response relative to that of the internal standard. Method detection limits determined from 100-mL fortified samples were near 0.05 µg L-1 and reporting limits were 0.1 µg L-1.
| RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Propazine (11.8%), simazine (6.3%), alachlor (3%), and prometon (1.6%) were also detected in the unconfined aquifer. There is no history of propazine use at the site; however, atrazine formulations, which should be 92% pure and usually are 95% pure (Health and Safety Guide, 1990), contain the impurities sodium chloride, simazine, and propazine. Atrazine to propazine ratios in the samples indicated that the atrazine formulations contained 1 to 3% propazine. Simazine reportedly was also used for broadleaf weed control in the shelterbelt along the southern border of the site (L. Niemack, personal communication, 1991). Alachlor was applied to the site prior to 1990. Prometon occurrence is very widespread in the hydrologic system and in the ground water at the site may originate from nonagricultural uses, such as applications to driveways and fence lines (Capel et al., 1999).
The detection frequencies of cyanazine (0.1%) and metribuzin (0.1%), pesticides that were applied to cropland in the region but were not applied to the Nebraska MSEA, were very low. Acetochlor, measured only in 1996, was detected in the summer in ML 34. It is not known whether the acetochlor, which was not applied to the site, originated from a spill along the fence row or from runoff from the corn field to the east. Trace concentrations of pendimethalin and trifluralin in a few samples may be false positives. According to Martin (1999), both compounds are likely to be falsely quantified near the method detection limit. Both have very high organic carbon partition coefficients, and transport through the unsaturated zone to the ground water is unlikely.
Ground Water Ages and Concentration Profiles
Ground water collected at three MLSs across the site in spring 1993 (Fig. 1) was dated with 3H/3He (Spalding et al., 2001). The 3H/3He clock starts at or near the water table. Ages ranged from 0.0 ± 0.5 yr at the surface to approximately 20 yr at the bottom of the unconfined aquifer. Ages were consistently older with depth and for equivalent depths were quite consistent across the site. Using ground water ages and nitrate concentrations, Spalding et al. (2001) showed that seasonal changes in nitrate concentrations in the uppermost 1.5 m of the unconfined aquifer could be conservatively attributed to loading during the preceding months. The residence times for water at depths greater than approximately 5 m below the water table were greater than 5 yr and indicate water that is transported horizontally from upgradient of the site.
During the investigation atrazine and DEA concentrations beneath the corn management fields were lower and remained relatively constant in the older, deeper ground water (>7 yr old and >6 m below the water table) (Fig. 2b)
compared with those in the uppermost ground water (approximately 1 yr old and
1.5 m below the water table) (Fig. 2a). Average DEA concentrations of 2.4 µg L-1 were 1.1 µg L-1 higher than those of atrazine. Metolachlor was detected at concentrations above the reporting limit at only two depths greater than 6 m. The results indicate that during the 6-yr study the deeper, older ground water remained isolated and was not affected by annual contaminant loading events.
|
|
Low HA concentrations ranging from 10 to 30 ng L-1 in the unconfined aquifer were apparently controlled by HA partitioning to the primarily sandy, silty, and gravelly aquifer materials. The major transformation product of atrazine in sandy loams (Sorenson et al., 1993), HA has been shown to tightly bond to soils (Clay and Koskinen, 1990; Lerch et al., 1996). Sorptive loss of aqueous concentrations of HA was supported by a laboratory experiment in which 80% of the HA spiked into an 80:20 water and Nebraska MSEA aquifer sediment (sand and gravel) mixture was removed from the water phase after 3 min of manual shaking. Highest HA concentrations in the shallowest ground water may suggest that HA production is concentration dependent.
Atrazine was detected in the confined Ogallala aquifer at concentrations of 0.003 µg L-1. Despite lengthy pumping during well development to remove drilling fluids, the introduction of atrazine during well drilling that relied heavily on the use of water cannot be ruled out. No other pesticides or transformation products were measured in samples from the Ogallala aquifer with this degree of sensitivity.
Metolachlor and Alachlor Transformation Products
To better elucidate the fate of metolachlor and alachlor in ground water, metolachlor and alachlor ESA and OA transformation products were quantified in more than 230 fall 1997 samples from selected MLSs. Metolachlor was detected in 57% of the samples and concentrations ranged as high as 6.7 µg L-1. Metolachlor ESA and OA were detected in 99 and 35% of the samples, respectively, with maximum concentrations of 24 and 3.8 µg L-1, respectively. Alachlor, which had not been applied to the site since 1989, was detected in only two samples (<1%) while alachlor ESA was detected in 63% of the samples at concentrations as high as 4.5 µg L-1. Alachlor OA was detected in only one sample (0.3 µg L-1).
Metolachlor ESA concentrations in the unconfined aquifer averaged 5.8 µg L-1 in the shallow water (
1.5 m), 4.8 µg L-1 at mid-depths, and 2.1 µg L-1 in the bottom third of the aquifer. In comparison, alachlor ESA concentrations were lower and varied less with depth with average concentrations of 0.45 µg L-1 in the shallow ground water, 0.62 µg L-1 at mid-depths, and 0.50 µg L-1 in the bottom third of the aquifer. Representative vertical profiles from three locations across the site (Fig. 4)
indicate that in fall 1997 metolachlor ESA contributed more mass than any other pesticide monitored in the underlying ground water. Throughout most of the profile, metolachlor ESA concentrations greatly exceeded those of metolachlor by factors of approximately 10 to approximately 100. Aga et al. (1996) reported that as metolachlor degraded in Kansas soils, concentrations of its ESA metabolite increased for about 100 d and then decreased. The subsequent decrease in ESA soil concentrations was attributed to leaching below the soil horizons sampled in their study. Ethane sulfonic acid compounds are ionized in soil and water and thus are extremely mobile. Field and Thurman (1996) suggested that ESA formation could also occur in shallow ground water. High ESA metabolite to parent ratios at the Nebraska MSEA site concur with those reported by Ferrer et al. (1997) and Kalkhoff et al. (1998) in Iowa ground water surveys and further indicate that metolachlor ESA is much more pervasive and persistent in ground water than its parent herbicide.
|
| CONCLUSIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Atrazine concentrations were stratified during the first years of the study with highest levels in the shallow ground water and lowest levels at the bottom of the unconfined aquifer. The combination of ground water ages and declines in atrazine concentration with depth allowed estimation of a 10 to 20 yr half-life for atrazine. Atrazine appears to be slowly transformed by hydrolysis to hydroxyatrazine, which is present in trace concentrations because its aqueous concentration is governed by partitioning to the aquifer solids. Atrazine was detected in the confined Ogallala aquifer in ultra-trace concentrations (<0.01 µg L-1); however, its introduction during monitoring well drilling is a distinct possibility. The data vividly demonstrate the difficulty in assigning origins to ultra-trace levels of pesticides in deep wells requiring drilling fluid circulation during construction.
The atrazine transformation products DEA, DIA, and DDA were also detected in the unconfined aquifer. On average, DEA concentrations exceeded those of atrazine by a factor of approximately two. Deisopropylatrazine and DDA are not preferred transformation products in the soil metabolism of atrazine and were detected in the ground water mostly in submicrogram per liter concentrations.
Acetamide ESAs and OAs were added to the normal suite of pesticides in 1997. Metolachlor ESA was detected in 99% of the 230 samples analyzed at concentrations that exceeded those of the other detected transformation products and parent compounds. Metolachlor OA was detected in considerably fewer samples than its ESA. Presumably, metolachlor ESA is the preferred transformation product or it is more persistent than metolachlor OA. Alachlor ESA, which was detected in 63% of the samples, tended to have peak concentrations at the mid-aquifer depths, suggesting infiltration from upgradient fields during the years of heavy alachlor usage during the 1980s. Only two samples contained alachlor, indicating that almost all the residual alachlor has been transformed. Alachlor OA was detected in only one sample.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Gaultier, A. Farenhorst, J. Cathcart, and T. Goddard Regional Assessment of Herbicide Sorption and Degradation in Two Sampling Years J. Environ. Qual., August 8, 2008; 37(5): 1825 - 1836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Lee and C. H. Benson Sorption and Degradation of Alachlor and Metolachlor in Ground Water Using Green Sands J. Environ. Qual., September 1, 2004; 33(5): 1682 - 1693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Rodriguez-Cruz, M. J. Sanchez-Martin, and M. Sanchez-Camazano Enhanced Desorption of Herbicides Sorbed on Soils by Addition of Triton X-100 J. Environ. Qual., May 1, 2004; 33(3): 920 - 929. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. W. Gee, G. W. Gee, Z. F. Zhang, and A. L. Ward A Modified Vadose Zone Fluxmeter with Solution Collection Capability Vadose Zone J., November 1, 2003; 2(4): 627 - 632. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. F. Spalding, D. G. Watts, D. D. Snow, D. A. Cassada, M. E. Exner, and J. S. Schepers Herbicide Loading to Shallow Ground Water beneath Nebraska's Management Systems Evaluation Area J. Environ. Qual., January 1, 2003; 32(1): 84 - 91. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Crop Science | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Vadose Zone Journal | ||||
| Soil Science Society of America Journal | Journal of Plant Registrations | The Plant Genome | |||