JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (19)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haney, R.L.
Right arrow Articles by Hons, F.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haney, R.L.
Right arrow Articles by Hons, F.M.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Haney, R.L.
Right arrow Articles by Hons, F.M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Agricultural Pesticides
Right arrow Bioremediation and Biodegradation
Right arrow Organic Compounds
Right arrow Soil Biochemistry
Journal of Environmental Quality 31:730-735 (2002)
© 2002 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America

TECHNICAL REPORTS
Bioremediation and Biodegradation

Effect of Roundup Ultra on Microbial Activity and Biomass from Selected Soils

R.L. Haney, S.A. Senseman* and F.M. Hons

Department of Soil & Crop Sciences, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843-2474

* Corresponding author (s-senseman{at}tamu.edu)

Received for publication April 2, 2001.

    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Carbon Mineralization
 Nitrogen Mineralization
 Soil Microbial Biomass Carbon...
 Clay Content, Soil Organic...
 Statistical Analysis
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 SUMMARY
 REFERENCES
 
Herbicides applied to soils potentially affect soil microbial activity. The quantity and frequency of Roundup Ultra [RU; N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine; Monsanto, St. Louis, MO] applications have escalated with the advent of Roundup-tolerant crops. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of Roundup Ultra on soil microbial biomass and activity across a range of soils varying in fertility. The isoproplyamine salt of glyphosate was applied in the form of RU at a rate of 234 mg active ingredient kg-1 soil based on an assumed 2-mm glyphosate–soil interaction depth. Roundup Ultra significantly stimulated soil microbial activity as measured by C and N mineralization, as well as soil microbial biomass. Cumulative C mineralization as well as mineralization rate increased above background levels for all soils tested with addition of RU. There were strong linear relationships between C and N mineralized, as well as between soil microbial C and N (r2 = 0.96 and 0.95, respectively). The slopes of the relationships with RU addition approximated three. Since the isopropylamine salt of glyphosate has a C to N ratio of 3:1, the data strongly suggest that RU was the direct cause of the enhanced microbial activity. An increase in the C mineralization rate occurred the first day following RU addition and continued for 14 d. Roundup Ultra appeared to be rapidly degraded by soil microbes regardless of soil type or organic matter content, even at high application rates, without adversely affecting microbial activity.

Abbreviations: RU, Roundup Ultra • SMB, soil microbial biomass


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Carbon Mineralization
 Nitrogen Mineralization
 Soil Microbial Biomass Carbon...
 Clay Content, Soil Organic...
 Statistical Analysis
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 SUMMARY
 REFERENCES
 
THE INCREASING USE OF Roundup-tolerant crops has increased concerns regarding the potential environmental impact of glyphosate. Roundup Ultra (RU) is a nonselective, foliar-applied herbicide used to control weeds preplant or postemergence in tolerant crops or by using shielded sprayers in nontolerant crops. The active ingredient of RU is glyphosate, or more accurately, the isopropylamine salt of glyphosate, and its mode of action is inhibition of 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase, resulting in the depletion of essential aromatic amino acids needed for plant survival (Ahrens, 1994). Glyphosate is readily adsorbed by clay minerals and hydrous oxides (Glass, 1987; McConnell and Hossner, 1985). The Kd values have been reported to range from 33 to 660 L kg-1 (Glass, 1987; USDA, 1990). Glyphosate adsorption correlates with the amount of vacant phosphate sorption sites and may occur through binding of the phosphonic acid moiety (Ahrens, 1994). Glyphosate is microbially degraded in soil and water and has a reported field half-life of 47 d and a laboratory half-life of <25 d (Ahrens, 1994). However, it is not known what effect the product-grade RU (which includes surfactant and other inert products) has on indigenous microbial populations and activities across a range of soils varying in fertility.

Although glyphosate is not intentionally soil applied, a significant concentration of material may reach the soil surface during broadcasted preplant or early-season applications. The amount of herbicide available to soil microorganisms depends on various factors, including available nutrients, pH, temperature, and moisture, though they differ in importance depending on the pesticide involved (Weber et al., 1993). Soil water and temperature directly affect many biological processes, including plant metabolism and microbial degradation, and thereby influence bioactivity and persistence of the chemicals (Weber et al., 1993).

Dick and Quinn (1995) investigated 26 bacterial strains from sites without prior addition of glyphosate and found that all 26 could metabolize glyphosate via the initial cleavage of its carbon–phosphorus bond. Since glyphosate contains carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus, all of which are essential nutrients for soil microorganisms, it should be readily mineralizable.

In our previous work, we found that increasing rates of RU resulted in linear responses of C and N mineralization while no response was observed in soil microbial biomass (SMB) C and N (Haney et al., 2000) when incubated at 25°C. Soil microbial biomass C and N were determined 14 d after addition of RU instead of 3 d, allowing more time for RU-derived C and N to be incorporated into microbial cells. Since heterotrophic soil microorganisms acquire C and N for maintenance and growth by decomposing plant residues and other organic materials in soils, herbicides with low C to N ratios (<15) may potentially be readily mineralized, with N that is in excess of microbial demand being released in the inorganic form (Alexander, 1977). Work done by Forlani et al. (1999) showed evidence of unculturable microorganisms when exposed to glyphosate. We chose C and N mineralization and soil microbial biomass C and N as indicators of microbial activity since these methods are usually sensitive to low C to N ratio substrates and allow for a more realistic study of the effect of RU on field soils since most laboratory studies are conducted using analytical glyphosate, which farmers do not use (Haney et al., 2000).

The objective of this study was to determine whether RU application that reaches the soil has a detrimental or favorable effect on the microbial biomass and activities as measured by C and N mineralization or soil microbial biomass from a range of soils covering a wide array of soil characteristics.

MATERIALS AND METHODSNine soils from Georgia and Texas were used in this study. The soils varied in soil pH (4.7 to 8.2), soil organic C (4.1 to 52.3 g C kg-1 soil), and clay content (6 to 45%) (Table 1). Land management of these soils ranged from row crop production to permanent pasture. The isopropylamine salt of glyphosate as Roundup Ultra (480 g active ingredient L-1) was added to soil at a rate of 234 mg kg-1. This amount was based on the recommended rate of RU being 0.84 kg ha-1 and a shallow 2-mm soil interaction depth due to glyphosate's high adsorptivity and low leachability (McConnell and Hossner, 1985; Sprankle et al., 1975; Haney et al., 2000). A control treatment with no RU was included for each soil; therefore, comparison with RU additions to each soil would measure the positive or negative influences on microbial biomass and activity for each soil.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Characteristics of soils.

 

    Carbon Mineralization
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Carbon Mineralization
 Nitrogen Mineralization
 Soil Microbial Biomass Carbon...
 Clay Content, Soil Organic...
 Statistical Analysis
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 SUMMARY
 REFERENCES
 
Soil samples were initially dried at 40°C for 24 h to ensure homogeneity of soil moisture content. Samples (100 g) were subsequently wetted and preincubated for 7 d and incubated at 30°C prior to RU addition; we incubated at 30°C to allow increased activity from a higher incubation temperature than our previous work at 25°C (Haney et al., 2000). Wetting amounts are calculated using the 90% of clay content technique. For example, if a soil contains 10% clay then 10% x 0.9 = 9 mL water per 100 g soil; if only 50 g are used, then 4.5 mL water is added to the soil sample. The 7-d incubation period before RU addition allowed microbial respiration to reach a baseline level after the initial flush of activity from soil drying and rewetting. Franzluebbers et al. (1996) showed that dried and rewetted soils exhibited similar microbial biomass and activities as continuously moist samples after an incubation period of 5 to 10 d. Roundup Ultra was added in 5 mL of distilled water to soil samples, increasing the final moisture content to 20% w/w (approximately 60% water filled pore space). Soils were placed in gas-tight 1-L glass containers along with a vial containing 10 mL of 1 M KOH to trap evolved CO2 and a vial of water to maintain humidity. Soils were incubated at 30°C with KOH traps replaced daily until 7 d and then at Days 14, 24, 28, and 50. Unreacted alkali in the KOH traps was titrated with 1 M HCl to determine CO2–C (Anderson, 1982).


    Nitrogen Mineralization
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Carbon Mineralization
 Nitrogen Mineralization
 Soil Microbial Biomass Carbon...
 Clay Content, Soil Organic...
 Statistical Analysis
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 SUMMARY
 REFERENCES
 
Nitrogen mineralization was determined by subtracting the initial inorganic N concentration of nonincubated soil samples from soil N extracted after 50 d of incubation. Inorganic N was extracted from 7-g soil subsamples using 28 mL of 2 M KCl. Samples were shaken for 30 min on a reciprocating shaker and filtered, and the extracts were analyzed for NH4–N and NO2– plus NO3–N using an autoanalyzer (Technicon Industrial Systems, 1977a, b). The sum of the above N forms was designated inorganic N.


    Soil Microbial Biomass Carbon and Nitrogen
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Carbon Mineralization
 Nitrogen Mineralization
 Soil Microbial Biomass Carbon...
 Clay Content, Soil Organic...
 Statistical Analysis
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 SUMMARY
 REFERENCES
 
Soil microbial biomass C and N were determined 14 d after RU addition for each soil. Soil microbial biomass C was determined by fumigation–incubation by exposing 40 g of soil to alcohol-free CHCl3 vapor for 24 h (Jenkinson and Powlson, 1976). Following evacuation and removal of vapors, soil was incubated in 1-L gas-tight glass containers for 10 d at 30°C. Carbon dioxide evolved during the 10-d incubation period following fumigation was trapped in 1 M KOH and determined as described previously. The quantity of evolved CO2–C was divided by an efficiency factor of 0.41 to estimate microbial biomass C (Voroney and Paul, 1984).

Soil microbial biomass N was determined by analyzing soil NH4–N concentrations of fumigated samples following the 10-d incubation period minus initial NH4–N prior to fumigation, divided by an efficiency factor of 0.41 (Carter and Rennie, 1982). Extraction and analysis of NH4–N was accomplished as previously described.


    Clay Content, Soil Organic Carbon, and pH
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Carbon Mineralization
 Nitrogen Mineralization
 Soil Microbial Biomass Carbon...
 Clay Content, Soil Organic...
 Statistical Analysis
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 SUMMARY
 REFERENCES
 
Soil pH was estimated with 2:1 water to soil. Clay content was determined by the hydrometer method and soil organic C from the modified Mebius method (Thomas, 1996).


    Statistical Analysis
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Carbon Mineralization
 Nitrogen Mineralization
 Soil Microbial Biomass Carbon...
 Clay Content, Soil Organic...
 Statistical Analysis
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 SUMMARY
 REFERENCES
 
All treatments were replicated three times. Analysis of variance was used for generation of means and for determination of standard error terms. Linear regression was used to assess relationships among variables. Model adequacy was based on residual plot analysis. Treatment means within each incubation interval were separated using Tukey's test at the 5% level of significance (SPSS, 1997).


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Carbon Mineralization
 Nitrogen Mineralization
 Soil Microbial Biomass Carbon...
 Clay Content, Soil Organic...
 Statistical Analysis
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 SUMMARY
 REFERENCES
 
A preliminary study was conducted on the effect of the product-grade glyphosate in the form of RU on CO2 evolution compared with analytical-grade glyphosate. The results indicate an inhibition of CO2 evolution after 24 d of incubation when using RU, although CO2 evolution is still significantly higher from RU than the control but significantly less than analytical-grade glyphosate (Fig. 1) . We therefore concluded that RU increases microbial activity in spite of the slightly inhibitory effects due to the surfactant or other inert products that soil microbes may or may not completely overcome.



View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Carbon dioxide evolution from soil after applications of Roundup Ultra (product; applied at 3 x field rate) and analytical-grade glyphosate, and a control.

 
The first day after RU addition, C mineralization for all soils was significantly different from the control (Fig. 2) . The 30°C incubation temperature appeared to enhance microbial activity and resulted in no apparent lag phase after RU addition when compared with a similar study using Weswood soil (fine-silty, mixed, superactive, thermic Udifluventic Ustrochrept), and conducted at 25°C (Haney et al., 2000). The stimulation of soil microbial activity appeared to be unique to each soil, as soils lower in clay content and soil organic C tended to reach their peak mineralization rate a few days later than the soils with higher clay and organic matter content (Fig. 2). Carbon mineralization rates for the higher organic C soils tended to peak earlier and then dropped significantly in contrast to the lower organic C soils that may have first had to increase their microbial biomass in response to an easily mineralizable substrate. The flush of C mineralization was greater in the higher organic C soils possibly due to a greater population of microbial biomass, which mineralized the added substrate more quickly. Of the nine soils tested, two reached their peak on Day 2, five by Day 3, one on Day 4, and one on Day 5. By Day 7, only the Lakeland soil (thermic, coated Typic Quartzipsamment) had yet to release more C as CO2 than was added as RU. By 14 d of incubation, however, all soils had evolved more C as CO2 than was added as RU.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Effect of Roundup Ultra on daily carbon mineralization between 1 and 7 d from different soils with (A) 0.2 to 0.5% organic C, (B) 0.6 to 0.8% organic C, and (C) 0.9 to 2.6% organic C. Error bars indicate one standard deviation.

 
Two different aspects of soil microbial activity are depicted in Fig. 2 and 3 . Figure 2 shows when the peak mineralization flush occurred for each soil after RU addition, while Fig. 3 identifies the soils that released the most CO2 during the first 7 d of incubation. Soils differed greatly in organic C content (Table 1). Some soils responded similarly (Fig. 2B,C) to RU addition at the end of 7 d while others did not (Fig. 2A). These data showed that generally as soil organic carbon (SOC) increased, C mineralization did also; however, when SOC, soil pH, and clay content are regressed with the flush in CO2 (the difference between RU and no RU after 14 d) the relationships are poor (r2 = 0.02, 0.57, and 0.41 respectively, data not shown). Therefore, SOC, soil pH, and clay content do not necessarily indicate how rapidly RU will be mineralized in a given soil.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Effect of Roundup Ultra on cumulative carbon mineralization between 1 and 7 d from nine soils with (A) 0.2 to 0.5% organic C, (B) 0.6 to 0.8% organic C, and (C) 0.9 to 2.6% organic C. Error bars indicate one standard deviation.

 
Fourteen days after RU addition, all soils returned to background CO2 levels. Soil microbial biomass C and N (SMBC, SMBN) were determined at this time, as the added RU had apparently been completely mineralized. Five of the nine soils showed significant increases in SMBC with RU addition (Fig. 4A) . However, all nine soils exhibited significantly increased SMBN with RU addition (Fig. 4B). Roundup Ultra addition to soil appeared to affect the microbial N content to a greater extent than microbial C, thereby effectively lowering the microbial biomass C to N ratio and releasing N to the soil. The average increase in SMBC due to the addition of RU was 17% compared with 76% for SMBN. This result may indicate an enhanced ability to mineralize N that is in excess of microbial demand from RU degradation.



View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Soil microbial biomass (A) carbon (SMBC) and (B) nitrogen (SMBN) with and without Roundup Ultra addition. Error bars indicate one standard deviation.

 
After 50 d of incubation following RU addition, five of the nine soils tested had significantly greater C mineralization and eight of nine soils showed significantly greater N mineralization (Fig. 5) . The average increase for all soils for C mineralization due to RU addition was 18% compared with 108% for N mineralization. After 50 d of incubation all soils had released more C above the control than was added by RU. Roundup Ultra appeared to be readily mineralized regardless of soil type, clay content, pH, or soil organic C content.



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Mineralization for (A) carbon and (B) nitrogen, after 50 d of incubation for nine soils. Error bars indicate one standard deviation.

 
The literature suggests that the methods for SMBC and SMBN usually do not separate differences between herbicide treatments (Olson and Lindwall, 1991; Hart and Brookes, 1996). In our study, SMBC was highly correlated to SMBN with and without RU addition (Fig. 6A) . Carbon and N mineralized were also highly correlated (Fig. 6B). It is interesting to note that the slopes (C to N ratio) of the regression of both graphs were reduced by roughly three with the addition of RU. Since the C to N ratio of the isopropylamine of glyphosate is 3:1, these data support the hypothesis that the addition of isopropylamine of glyphosate in RU was directly responsible for the increase in SMBC, SMBN, and C and N mineralization. These results support the earlier work done on Weswood soil (Haney et al., 2000).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Regression analysis for (A) soil microbial biomass nitrogen (SMBN) vs. soil microbial biomass carbon (SMBC) with and without Roundup Ultra addition and (B) N mineralized vs. C mineralized in 50 d with and without Roundup Ultra addition.

 
Soil microbial biomass C was estimated on the 14th day after addition of RU and was highly related to the amount of C mineralized at both 7 and 14 d (Fig. 7) . The relationships were not as strong on Day 7 as on Day 14, which may indicate that soil microbial respiration is coupled to the size of the population when substrate is not limiting. In both instances, RU addition increased C mineralized per unit of microbial biomass.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Regression analysis of soil microbial biomass carbon (SMBC) determined at 14 d with (A) SMBC vs. 7-d C mineralization and (B) SMBC vs. 14-d C mineralization.

 

    SUMMARY
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Carbon Mineralization
 Nitrogen Mineralization
 Soil Microbial Biomass Carbon...
 Clay Content, Soil Organic...
 Statistical Analysis
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 SUMMARY
 REFERENCES
 
Roundup Ultra was readily mineralized by indigenous soil microbes and increased their population and activity. Soils with higher organic matter tended to mineralize RU more quickly initially than soils with lower organic C, possibly due to a greater microbial biomass. Soils with less organic C tended to mineralize RU at a slower rate, while their microbial biomass increased in response to the added substrate. Soil organic C, soil pH, and clay content do not necessarily indicate a soil's ability to mineralize RU. Available N may have been more limiting than substrate C in the studied soils as RU application significantly increased SMBN in all soils, but increased SMBC in only five soils. The amount of C mineralized was more highly correlated to SMBC at 14 d after addition of RU than at 7 d. Since the method for SMBC was estimated at 14 d, it appeared that activity was coupled to population when substrate was not limiting. These data suggest that RU actually enhances microbial activity and biomass and does not adversely affect the soil microbial community.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Carbon Mineralization
 Nitrogen Mineralization
 Soil Microbial Biomass Carbon...
 Clay Content, Soil Organic...
 Statistical Analysis
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 SUMMARY
 REFERENCES
 




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
A. Monkiedje, M. Spiteller, D. Fotio, and P. Sukul
The Effect of Land Use on Soil Health Indicators in Peri-Urban Agriculture in the Humid Forest Zone of Southern Cameroon
J. Environ. Qual., October 27, 2006; 35(6): 2402 - 2409.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
P. P. Motavalli, R. J. Kremer, M. Fang, and N. E. Means
Impact of Genetically Modified Crops and Their Management on Soil Microbially Mediated Plant Nutrient Transformations
J. Environ. Qual., May 1, 2004; 33(3): 816 - 824.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (19)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haney, R.L.
Right arrow Articles by Hons, F.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haney, R.L.
Right arrow Articles by Hons, F.M.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Haney, R.L.
Right arrow Articles by Hons, F.M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Agricultural Pesticides
Right arrow Bioremediation and Biodegradation
Right arrow Organic Compounds
Right arrow Soil Biochemistry


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome