JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (25)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chan, A.S.K.
Right arrow Articles by Parkin, T.B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chan, A.S.K.
Right arrow Articles by Parkin, T.B.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Chan, A.S.K.
Right arrow Articles by Parkin, T.B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Microbiology
Right arrow Air Pollution
Journal of Environmental Quality 30:1896-1903 (2001)
© 2001 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America

TECHNICAL REPORT
Atmospheric Pollutants and Trace Gases

Methane Oxidation and Production Activity in Soils from Natural and Agricultural Ecosystems

A.S.K. Chana and T.B. Parkin*,b

a Dep. of Microbiology, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011
b USDA-ARS, National Soil Tilth Lab., 2150 Pammel Drive, Ames, IA 50011

* Corresponding author (parkin{at}nstl.gov)

Received for publication December 8, 2000.

   ABSTRACT
TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Methane (CH4) flux from soil to the atmosphere is the result of two microbial processes, methanogenesis and CH4 oxidation. Land use may have a profound impact on the relative activities of these groups of organisms. In this study, the CH4 production and consumption potentials of soils from agricultural and nonagricultural ecosystems were assessed in laboratory incubations. Methane production potentials of most soils were low and in the range of 0.02 to 0.35 nmol CH4 g soil-1 h-1; however, soils from two of the agricultural sites that experience periodic water saturation had CH4 production potentials from 100 to 300 nmol CH4 g soil-1 h-1. The high methanogenic potential suggests that CH4 consumers may not be wholly dependent on atmospheric CH4 for their survival and maintenance. The prairie soils exhibited the highest CH4 oxidation under ambient atmospheric CH4 concentrations, and CH4 oxidation activity was markedly enhanced in incubations with an atmosphere enriched in CH4. This stimulated CH4 oxidation activity was generally greater in the agricultural soils as compared with the forest and prairie soils. Methane oxidation appeared to be related to soil nitrogen status. Under ambient atmospheric CH4 concentrations, CH4 oxidation was negatively related to soil mineral N concentration. However, a positive relationship between soil mineral N status and CH4 oxidation activity was observed in incubations with atmospheres enriched in CH4. This pattern suggests that the agricultural lands contain different populations of CH4 oxidizers than the natural systems.

Abbreviations: DT50, time required for 50% of the initial headspace CH4 to disappear


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
METHANE is a major atmospheric component contributing to global climate changes. It has a relative global warming potential 21 times that of carbon dioxide over a 100-yr time horizon, and contributes approximately 20% to the radiative force driving global climate change (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 1996). Methane's potency and increasing atmospheric concentration may have a paramount impact on future global warming. This potential impact has led to many terrestrial studies of methods and techniques to quantify CH4 flux at the soil–atmosphere interface (Rolston, 1986; Mosier, 1990; Verma et al., 1992; Hutchinson and Livingston, 1993; Chan et al., 1998). There have also been several studies conducted to identify and assess the sources and sinks of CH4 (Galchenko et al., 1989; Bouwman, 1990; Denmead, 1991; Duxbury et al., 1993; Topp and Pattey, 1997). These studies are generally in agreement, namely, that water-saturated systems like wetlands (swamps, marshes) and paddy soils (rice fields) are net contributors of CH4 to the atmosphere whereas upland soils (with the exception of landfills) are generally sinks for CH4.

Methane flux is the difference between CH4 oxidation and methanogenesis, which may occur simultaneously even in arable terrestrial ecosystems (Conrad, 1995), and the three groups of organisms that may be involved are the methanotrophic bacteria, ammonia oxidizing bacteria, and methanogenic bacteria (Schimel and Gulledge, 1998). Upland soils are recognized as important sinks for atmospheric CH4 (Conrad, 1996); however, atmospheric CH4 concentrations typically are too low to support the growth of common CH4 oxidizers in the laboratory (Bender and Conrad, 1993; King, 1993). Methane oxidation in soil can also be carried out by nitrifying bacteria, which have an affinity for CH4 similar to that of the common methanotrophs (Bedard and Knowles, 1989). Methane production has the potential for influencing CH4 oxidation, in that CH4 oxidizers may not depend completely on atmospheric CH4 for their survival in an ecosystem (Megraw and Knowles, 1987). Conrad (1995) hypothesized that in oxic soils, CH4 production in anaerobic microsites could be an important source of CH4 for CH4 oxidizers.

Anthropogenic influences are generally considered to decrease the CH4 consumption activity of soils (Ojima et al., 1993). Nitrogen fertility has been shown to dramatically decrease CH4 consumption activity of forested and grassland systems (Steudler et al., 1989; Mosier et al., 1991; Castro et al., 1994). Cultivation also appears to decrease net CH4 consumption, as studies have shown that net CH4 consumption in cultivated soils is less than in grasslands (Mosier et al., 1991, 1996; Kessavalou et al., 1998). However, changes in soil nitrogen status due either to N fertilizer additions or to cultivation may differentially affect the CH4 oxidizing community. Schimel and Gulledge (1998) discuss three levels of inhibition of CH4 consumption as influenced by NH+4. These levels were immediate inhibition, delayed inhibition, and no inhibition. These researchers concluded that the response of CH4 oxidation to N inputs, and possibly other changes, will vary from system to system depending on the nature of the CH4 oxidizer population. It is possible that the differential effect of NH+4 fertility on CH4 consumption in agricultural vs. forest systems may be due to differences in the populations of nitrifying bacteria. Regular application of NH+4 to agricultural soils may result in increased populations of nitrifying bacteria, which will coincidently metabolize CH4, and may also stimulate methanotrophic bacterial populations, as both methanotrophs and nitrifying bacteria can oxidize both CH4 and NH+4 (Hanson and Hanson, 1996).

In our recent study describing CH4 flux from a variety of ecosystems (Chan and Parkin, 2001), agricultural systems tended to have reduced CH4 fluxes; however, application of N fertilizer per se did not appear to have an inhibitory effect on CH4 consumption. Clearly, more information is needed on the CH4 production and consumption potential of soils in order to more clearly delineate the impact of land management on CH4 flux. Thus, the objective of this study was to assess methanogenic and CH4 oxidizing activity in a variety soils, and to relate these activities to soil N status.


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Sites
The study sites were located in central Iowa and represented a range of common agricultural systems under a variety of fertilization regimes, including inorganic N fertilization and fertilization with swine (Sus scrofa) manure, and natural systems including a hardwood forest site and native and restored prairies. Many of the sites were included in a recent evaluation of field CH4 flux rates (Chan and Parkin, 2001). Site characteristics are given in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1. Characteristics of study sites.

 
Sample Collection and Processing
Two intact soil cores (4 cm diameter) were collected at each site in August 1995 by driving a metal probe containing a hollow plastic cylinder into the soil. The cylinders containing the cores were capped with butyl rubber stoppers and transported back to the laboratory. The top 5 cm of each core was removed, sieved (0.5-cm mesh), and used in the CH4 activity assays described below. Soil cores were processed within 48 h.

Soil Properties
Nitrate (+nitrite) and ammonium were determined by colorimetric analyses of 2 M KCl soil extracts (4:1 KCl to soil) on a Lachat (Mequon, WI) autoanalyzer following the procedure described by Keeney and Nelson (1982). The pH was determined on 1:1 (H2O to soil) extracts with a standard glass electrode as described in McLean (1982). Soil water content was determined gravimetrically after overnight drying at 105°C (Gardner, 1982). General soil properties are given in Table 2.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 2. General soil properties at the study sites.{dagger}

 
Methane Activity Assays
Field-moist soils (equivalent of 1 g dry soil) were placed into 40-mL screw cap vials. The moisture content of each sample was adjusted to 50% gravimetric water content by additions of sterile distilled water. Different subsamples were used for each of the assays described below. Vials were capped with butyl rubber septa (Laboratory Supply Distributors, Mt. Laurel, NJ) and incubations were done at laboratory temperature (approximately 24°C) in the dark, except during sampling. Vials were sampled approximately every 2 d and monitored for about a 3-wk period. Methane production and consumption potentials were assessed by modifying the headspace gas conditions in the vials.

Methane consumption activity was determined in vials with an aerobic headspace, and was measured by monitoring decreases in CH4 concentration in the headspace of the vials over time. Two types of CH4 oxidation incubations were conducted. In one regime the initial CH4 concentration was near ambient levels (~1.7 to 2.0 µL L-1) and in the other regime a headspace enriched in CH4 (10 mL L-1) was used. The elevated CH4 treatment was prepared by adding CH4 from a tank of ultra–high purity grade CH4 (Air Products and Chemicals, Allentown, PA). Ambient O2 concentrations (~19%) were present for both incubation regimes.

Methane production was also measured in two different incubation regimes. In one regime, methyl fluoride (CH3F) (Matheson Gas Products, Montgomeryville, PA) was used as an inhibitor of CH4 oxidation (Oremland and Culbertson, 1992; Chan and Parkin, 2000), and increases in headspace CH4 with time were measured. These incubations were performed in an aerobic headspace and with a CH3F concentration of 0.5%. In the second regime, CH4 production was measured under anaerobic conditions with a headspace containing 75% H2 and 25% CO2. These conditions were established by alternately evacuating the vial headspace and flushing with helium to remove air. After five cycles of evacuation and flushing, a vacuum was drawn on each vial and H2 and CO2 (Air Products and Chemicals) were added to achieve the proportions stated above. Methane production potential was determined by monitoring increases in headspace CH4 concentration with time.

Gas Sampling and Analysis
Methane, CH3F, and O2 were monitored using a dual detector Tracor (Austin, TX) 540 gas chromatograph. A 0.5-mL sample loop (valve injection) was used to draw a sample from the vials, split, and directed to two gas detectors in the gas chromatograph. Methane and methyl fluoride were measured with a flame ionization detector running at 200°C, oven temperature at 65°C, a Porapak Q 1.8-m glass column (Alltech, Deerfield, IL), and He carrier gas flowing at the rate of 30 mL min-1. Oxygen was measured with a thermal conductivity detector running at 150°C, oven temperature at 65°C, a molecular sieve, 2.4-m stainless steel column, and He carrier gas at a flow rate of 75 mL min-1. Standard curves were constructed for CH4, CH3F, and O2 by injecting a range of concentrations corresponding to the specific gas. Certified standards of CH4 and O2 were obtained from Scott Speciality Gases (Troy, MI). The minimum detectable flux rate was calculated following the procedures described by Chan et al. (1998) using a 3% coefficient of variation for the calculations. The minimum CH4 flux rate detectable in this study was 7.12 pmol CH4 g-1 h-1 (for both consumption and production).

Rate Calculations
The maximum rates of consumption and production were used to compare ecosystem CH4 cycling activity for each incubation regime. Estimation of the maximum rate (Vopt in Bender and Conrad, 1995) was accomplished by least-squares regression of the CH4 concentration vs. time data and calculating the maximum (in cases of CH4 production) or minimum (in cases of CH4 consumption) first derivative of the function. This process was accomplished by employing the Table Curve software package (SPSS, 1996). When rates were less than our minimum detectable rate (7.12 pmol CH4 h-1 per microcosm), we followed the recommendations of Gilbert (1987) and included the values of these "nondetects" in our mean and comparison calculations. All rates are expressed on a dry-weight soil basis. Analysis of the kinetic patterns of CH4 consumption was done by comparing the DT-50 values (time required for 50% of the initial headspace CH4 to disappear) (Parkin et al., 1991; Bender and Conrad, 1995).

Statistical Analyses
The data presented in the bar plots represent means and ranges of duplicate samples. Site and group comparisons on CH4 oxidation and production data were accomplished by using SAS one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (SAS Institute, 1999). Sites were grouped into three different categories based on land use similarities. The three categories are: (i) Natural; (ii) Agricultural—corn and soybean rotation, plow till, no manure; and (iii) Agricultural—corn and soybean rotation, plow till, manure fertility. To satisfy conditions of normality for the CH4 production values, statistical analyses were performed on log-transformed data.


   RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Methane Production Potential
All of the soils possessed the capacity for methanogenesis under anaerobic conditions with added H2 and CO2 (Fig. 1) . Methane production potential from the forest system was lower than the prairie sites (Fig. 1A), and average rates ranged from 0.05 to 0.36 nmol CH4 g-1 h-1, with Roadside Prairie being the highest and McFarland Forest the lowest. Statistically significant differences were detected between the natural and no-manure plow till systems (P < 0.01), and also between the no-manure and manure group (P < 0.01). No differences were detected between the natural and plow till manure group even though manure was applied for three consecutive years to the manure systems. Methanogenic organisms operate best in neutral pH environments (Garcia, 1990; Zinder, 1993). The low pH (<4.5) observed in the manure systems may have had an effect on methanogenic activity.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1. Methane production potential of soils. Samples were incubated anaerobically with a gas mixture of 75% H2 and 25% CO2. Bars indicate the average rate and error bars indicate the range of the rates (n = 2). M Forest = McFarland Forest, DL Prairie = Doolittle Prairie, RS Prairie = Roadside Prairie, KL Control = Kluever Control, KL Nitrogen = Kluever Nitrogen, KL Broadcast = Kluever Broadcast Manure, KL Inject = Kluever Injected Manure, WC Hill Top = Walnut Creek Hilltop, WC Sideslope = Walnut Creek Sideslope, WC Pothole = Walnut Creek Pothole, DL Farm = Doolittle Farm, RS Farm = Roadside Farm.

 
Several agricultural sites exhibited very high CH4 production activity (Fig 1, panel B2). The Walnut Creek Pothole site (WC Pothole) and the Doolittle Farm site (DL Farm) had average rates of 298 and 112 nmol CH4 g-1 h-1, respectively (note scale change on Fig. 1, panel B2). The Walnut Creek Pothole site is a low area of an agricultural field that maintains standing water for extended periods during the year (Cambardella et al., 1994), and the Doolittle Farm site is also a hydric site, supporting a shallow water table. It is thought that these areas maintain anaerobic conditions conducive for the development and maintenance of methanogenic bacterial populations.

The detection of CH4 production indicates that all these ecosystems possess populations of methanogenic bacteria. Given the right conditions these systems have a potential to produce and release CH4 into the atmosphere. In situ methanogenic activity from Walnut Creek Pothole and Doolittle Farm may even fuel CH4 oxidation activity. Yavitt et al. (1995) found methanogenesis occurring in a northern hardwood ecosystem when samples were incubated anaerobically as well as aerobically with methyl fluoride. In both laboratory and field studies, Wang and Bettany (1997) observed methanogenesis in their prairie and forest systems. Methane production began after periods of increased moisture (snowmelt, precipitation, flooding). In a laboratory experiment using a cultivated soil, Megraw and Knowles (1987) observed CH4 production in anaerobic incubations as well as CH4 oxidation under aerobic conditions. These researchers also suggested that the methanotrophs in their cultivated soil were not entirely dependent on atmospheric CH4 for survival and growth. As is the case in many natural ecosystems, release of CH4 has also been observed in cultivated systems after periods following irrigation or rainfall (Delgado and Mosier, 1996; Chan and Parkin, 2001).

Methane Oxidation Potential
Net CH4 flux is the balance between production and consumption processes. In our assay, potential rates of CH4 consumption were determined by changes in headspace CH4 concentration. Thus, CH4 oxidation would be underestimated if methanogenesis was also occurring. In order to assess CH4 production in the absence of CH4 consumption, we performed a separate set of incubations in which CH3F was used. Methyl fluoride, an inhibitor of CH4 consumption, allows for the measurement of production processes in the absence of consumption (Oremland and Culbertson, 1992; Chan and Parkin, 2000). When incubated in an aerobic headspace with CH3F, only soils from three sites exhibited CH4 production activity (Fig. 2) . These CH4 production rates were used to compute the CH4 oxidation rates presented below.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2. Aerobic methane production. Samples were incubated aerobically with 0.5% CH3F to inhibit CH4 oxidation. Only soils exhibiting CH4 production are shown. Bars indicate the average rate and error bars indicate the range of the rates (n = 2). Symbols are the same as in Fig. 1.

 
When soils were incubated in an aerobic headspace containing ambient CH4 concentrations (1.7 to 2.0 µL L-1), the natural systems exhibited the highest CH4 oxidation activity (Fig. 3A) . The two prairie soils had CH4 oxidation rates of 91.1 and 74.6 pmol CH4 g-1 h-1, and these rates were significantly higher (P < 0.01) than the oxidation rate exhibited by the McFarland Forest soil (24.3 pmol CH4 g-1 h-1). The agricultural systems showed much lower CH4 oxidation activity. This was the case for the agricultural systems without liquid swine manure (Fig. 3B) as well as the two systems that received swine manure (Fig. 3C). One of the agricultural sites, the Doolittle Farm, actually exhibited CH4 production in this aerobic incubation regime. It is not known why this production activity was not expressed in the presence of CH3F.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3. Methane oxidation under conditions of ambient headspace CH4 concentration. Positive rates indicate gross methane oxidation and negative rates indicate CH4 release. Bars indicate the average rate and error bars indicate the range of the rates (n = 2). Horizontal dashed lines indicate minimum detection limit of ±7.12 pmol CH4 h-1 g-1 for the assay. Symbols are the same as in Fig. 1.

 
Our observations of CH4 oxidation activity in natural and agricultural ecosystems follow the general pattern of CH4 oxidation activity reported in the literature; namely, natural ecosystems consume CH4 at a higher rate than agricultural ecosystems (Bender and Conrad, 1993; Dobbie and Smith, 1996; Powlson et al., 1997). The CH4 oxidation rates of our natural ecosystem group were significantly greater (P < 0.01) than both the nonmanured and manured agricultural systems. Ambient CH4 oxidation rates extrapolated from studies by Bender and Conrad (1992)(1993) yielded rates of approximately 100 to 200 pmol CH4 g-1 h-1 for a German forest cambisol. These rates are about four to eight times larger than our McFarland Forest ecosystem. However, Heipieper and de Bont (1997) reported average rates of 120 pmol CH4 g-1 h-1 for a Dutch grassland soil incubated with 1 µL L-1 CH4. This value is similar to those of our prairie soils.

Because past reports indicate that CH4 oxidizing bacteria may differ with regard to their affinity for CH4 (Bender and Conrad, 1992; Conrad, 1995), we also measured CH4 oxidation potential under elevated (~1%) headspace CH4 concentrations (Fig. 4) . In all cases, a higher headspace CH4 concentration stimulated CH4 oxidation rates (note scale change from Fig. 3 to Fig. 4). Under this elevated CH4 incubation regime, oxidation activities of the agricultural soils were stimulated to a greater extent than the forest and prairie soils. The Roadside Farm and Walnut Creek Pothole soils had the highest rates of CH4 oxidation. At the Walnut Creek site there appeared to be a landscape effect. Lowest rates were observed in soil collected from the Hilltop location (3.0 nmol CH4 g-1 h-1), and the highest rate was observed in soil from the depressional Pothole location (736 nmol CH4 g-1 h-1). The Sideslope location had an intermediate rate of 483 nmol CH4 g-1 h-1. The two sites that receive liquid swine manure application (Kluever Broadcast and Kluever Injected) had very low CH4 oxidation activity compared with most of the other sites. Manure applications, or some other factor at this site, seemed to have an adverse effect on the population of CH4 consumers, which have affinity to high concentrations of CH4 (Fig. 4). We suspect that the low soil pH (pH < 5.0) may have caused a reduction in the population sizes and/or activity of the CH4–consuming community, although antibiotics (Hanson and Hanson, 1996; Schnell and King, 1995) or other compounds in the swine manure may have played a role.



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 4. Methane oxidation assay at elevated headspace methane concentration (~1% CH4). Positive rates indicate gross methane oxidation. Bars indicate the average rate and error bars indicate the range of the rates (n = 2). Symbols are the same as in Fig. 1.

 
The kinetics of CH4 oxidation are illustrated in Fig. 5 . After a lag time of 2 d, CH4 oxidation was rapid in the Roadside Farm, the Doolittle Farm, and the Walnut Creek Pothole soils. The time for 50% disappearance of the initial CH4 (DT-50) in these incubations ranged from 2.9 to 3.2 d (Fig. 5). Methane oxidation also occurred rapidly in the Kluever Control soil and the soil from the Walnut Creek Sideslope location. However, with these soils the lag time was greater (approximately 6 d), and the resulting DT-50 values were longer (6.8 and 7.7 d). The forest soil and the two prairie soils showed a slightly different pattern of CH4 oxidation. Methane oxidation commenced after a lag period of 4 to 5 d, but oxidation rates did not increase as rapidly as observed in some of the agricultural soils. The other sites showed little CH4 oxidation activity over the 20-d incubation period, although CH4 oxidation in the Kluever Nitrogen soil appeared to be increasing after a lag time of 14 d. The different kinetic patterns may be a reflection of differences in CH4–oxidizing bacterial populations. A short lag time followed by a rapid increase in CH4 oxidation rate could indicate the presence of an active population of CH4 oxidizers relative to soils that exhibited longer lags.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 5. Kinetics of methane oxidation. Curves are the average of two samples. Values in brackets behind the site identification indicate the time (days) for reduction of the initial headspace CH4 concentration by 50% (DT-50). NA indicates no CH4 oxidation activity. Symbols are the same as in Fig. 1.

 
Methane oxidation activity appeared to be related to nitrogen status of the systems (Fig. 6) . Methane oxidation activity under conditions of ambient atmospheric CH4 was negatively related to soil mineral N (NO-2 + NO-3 + NH+4) concentrations (Fig. 6A). The two prairie sites, which had the lowest mineral N concentrations, also showed the highest CH4 oxidation activity. The forest site had a mineral N concentration of 5.5 mg N kg-1 and showed a CH4 oxidation rate intermediate to those of the prairie and agricultural sites. The agricultural sites had the highest mineral N concentrations, and showed the lowest ambient CH4 oxidation activity. Under conditions of elevated CH4 concentrations, a different pattern was observed (Fig. 6B). Methane oxidation activity measured in an atmosphere of 1% CH4 was positively related to soil mineral N levels. The forest and prairie sites had the lowest CH4 oxidation activity, which corresponded to low soil mineral N concentrations. Conversely, soils from the agricultural sites had higher soil mineral N levels, and higher corresponding CH4 oxidation rates. However, a group of the agricultural sites did not fit this pattern. It is thought that the CH4 oxidation activity of these soils was inhibited by low soil pH (<5).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 6. Relationship between soil inorganic N concentrations and methane oxidation rates as determined in incubations with ambient headspace CH4 concentrations (A) and elevated headspace CH4 concentrations (~1% CH4) (B). McF = McFarland Forest; Dp = Doolittle Prairie; Rp = Roadside Prairie; Kc = Kluever Control; Kn = Kluever Nitrogen; Kb = Kluever Broadcast Manure; Ki = Kluever Injected Manure; Wht = Walnut Creek Hilltop; Wss = Walnut Creek Sideslope; Wph = Walnut Creek Pothole; Df = Doolittle Farm; Rf = Roadside Farm.

 
Several studies have shown that CH4 oxidation is lower in agricultural systems than in natural systems (Bender and Conrad, 1993; Dobbie and Smith, 1996; Powlson et al., 1997). This effect, in part, is thought to be due to fertilizer N inhibition of CH4 consumption activity in arable soils (Steudler et al., 1989; Mosier et al., 1991; Bronson and Mosier, 1994). Ammonium has been reported to be a competitive inhibitor of CH4 oxidation (Whittenbury et al., 1970; Hyman and Wood, 1983; Jones and Morita, 1983). Our observations of lower CH4 oxidation in agricultural soils incubated at ambient CH4 concentrations are consistent with these past studies. However, under conditions of elevated atmospheric CH4, our agricultural sites with pH > 5.0 had significantly higher activity (P < 0.01) than the natural systems.

Recent literature indicates there are two populations of CH4 oxidizers present in the environment (Conrad, 1995). One population, having a low affinity to CH4, typically has a Km in the range of 1000 nM CH4, and the other population, having a high affinity for CH4, has a Km in the range of 30 to 60 nM CH4. In contrast, Dunfield et al. (1999) suggest that low- and high-affinity oxidations are carried out by the same methanotrophs, in their case a Type II methanotroph, but that affinity for CH4 changes as a function of growth conditions. It is well documented, however, that ammonia-oxidizing bacteria can also oxidize CH4 as an alternative substrate for ammonia monooxygenase (Suzuki et al., 1976; Hyman and Wood, 1983; Jones and Morita, 1983; Ward, 1987), perhaps making this group of organisms important in the cycling of CH4 in agricultural systems. In both field and spiked (100 µL CH4 L-1) laboratory studies, Goldman et al. (1995) found a positive correlation between CH4 consumption and soil NH+4. These findings are similar to those of our study, which shows that under an elevated CH4 atmosphere, N may actually stimulate CH4 oxidation activity. We suspect that the CH4 oxidation activity carried out under elevated atmospheric CH4 levels may be predominantly due to nitrifying bacteria, especially in the agricultural systems, where regular ammoniacal N fertilizer applications may serve to create and sustain high populations of nitrifying bacteria.

Methane oxidation by nitrifying bacteria may be important in situations where elevated CH4 concentrations are present. Although the maximum rate of CH4 oxidation by nitrifying bacteria has been reported to be several orders of magnitude less than for common CH4–oxidizing bacteria, the contribution of the nitrifying bacteria to total CH4 oxidation could be significant if high numbers of these organisms are present (Conrad, 1995). As shown by our laboratory experiments, soils from all of the sites sampled were capable of producing CH4; however, some sites were much more active than others. Hydric systems, such as our Walnut Creek Pothole site, or the Doolittle Farm site, which showed high CH4 production potential and have been observed to produce CH4 in the field (Chan and Parkin, 2001), may serve to support an active CH4–oxidizing bacterial population.


   CONCLUSIONS
TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES
 
Methane flux dynamics in soil are complex and may be reflected by the activities of three distinct microbial populations: the methanotrophs, the ammonia oxidizing nitrifiers, and the methanogens. This study shows that the prairie and forest soils had the greatest potential to oxidize atmospheric concentrations of CH4; however, soil from many of the agricultural sites exhibited greater CH4 oxidation activity when exposed to elevated CH4 concentrations. All of the soils exhibited CH4 production potential. The high methanogenic potential at two hydric sites (Walnut Creek Pothole and Doolittle Farm) may indicate that CH4 oxidizers may not be wholly dependent on atmospheric CH4 for their survival and maintenance. In soils with pH less than 5.0, CH4 oxidation activity was nearly eliminated. The nitrogen and water status as well as pH of a given system may selectively affect these groups and subsequently influence the net flux of CH4 from a given site.


   NOTES
TOP
 NOTES
ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
A.S.K. Chan, Current Address: Murray State Univ., Dep. of Biological Sciences, 334 Blackburn Science Building, Murray, KY 42071-3346. Trade names are used in this publication to provide specific information, and do not constitute a guarantee or warranty of the product or equipment by the United States Department of Agriculture, nor an endorsement over other similar products.


   REFERENCES
TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Environ. Qual.Home page
A. R. Mosier, A. D. Halvorson, C. A. Reule, and X. J. Liu
Net global warming potential and greenhouse gas intensity in irrigated cropping systems in northeastern colorado.
J. Environ. Qual., July 1, 2006; 35(4): 1584 - 1598.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (25)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chan, A.S.K.
Right arrow Articles by Parkin, T.B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chan, A.S.K.
Right arrow Articles by Parkin, T.B.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Chan, A.S.K.
Right arrow Articles by Parkin, T.B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Microbiology
Right arrow Air Pollution

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education		 Soil Science Society of America Journal