JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (40)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hutchinson, S.L.
Right arrow Articles by Schwab, A.P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hutchinson, S.L.
Right arrow Articles by Schwab, A.P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hutchinson, S.L.
Right arrow Articles by Schwab, A.P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Bioremediation and Biodegradation
Right arrow Other Environmental Contamination
Right arrow Nutrient Management
Right arrow Plant and Environment Interactions
Right arrow Soil Pollution
Journal of Environmental Quality 30:395-403 (2001)
© 2001 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America

TECHNICAL REPORT
BIOREMEDIATION AND BIODEGRADATION

Phytoremediation of Aged Petroleum Sludge

Effect of Inorganic Fertilizer

S.L. Hutchinsona, M.K. Banksb and A.P. Schwabc

a Assistant Professor of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Kansas State Univ., 147 Seaton Hall, Manhattan, KS 66507
b Associate Professor of Civil Engineering, Purdue Univ., 1284 Civil Engineering Building, West Lafayette, IN 47907
c Associate Professor of Agronomy, Purdue Univ., 1150 Lily Hall of Life Sciences, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1150

Corresponding author (sllhutch{at}ksu.edu)

Received for publication July 2, 1999.

    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Phytoremediation is a promising new technology that uses higher plants to enhance biodegradation. Nutrient availability is an important factor governing the success of phytoremediation and can be regulated through the addition of fertilizer. A greenhouse study was conducted to assess the importance of nitrogen and phosphorus for the phytoremediation of petroleum sludge. Degradation of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) was quantified for six fertilization rates and three vegetation treatments: bermuda grass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.], tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.), and an unvegetated control. During the first 6 mo of the experiment, TPH declined by an average of 49% with no significant differences between treatments. After 1 yr, TPH degradation was significantly greater in both vegetated treatments with a mean TPH reduction of 68% for bermuda, 62% for fescue, and 57% for the unvegetated control. Degradation of TPH in the fescue and bermuda treatments was significantly lower in the treatments in which no fertilizer was added or N and P were added simply to maintain plant growth compared with the higher rates of fertilization. For this short-term, greenhouse experiment, optimal remediation was obtained by fertilization that produced a C to N to P ratio of 100:2:0.2.

Abbreviations: EC, electrolytic conductivity • GC, gas chromatography • TPH, total petroleum hydrocarbons


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
LARGE quantities of soil have been contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons at oil refineries and spill sites. Scientists and engineers are charged with the task of finding inexpensive, in situ processes that can be used to remediate these soils. Phytoremediation may be a feasible and practical remediation technique for soils contaminated with organic contaminants (Banks et al., 2000; Cunningham et al., 1996; Watkins et al., 1994; Schwab and Banks, 1994; Qui et al., 1994). However, phytoremediation of organic contaminants is a phenomenon for which the basic mechanisms are not well understood. To fully exploit this technology, an understanding of the complex rhizosphere dynamics that result in the reduction of organic compounds is necessary. Research on the effects of various irrigation and fertilization schedules and the use of alternative plants may allow us to significantly improve the rates of degradation of soil contaminants.

Phytoremediation can use several different mechanisms for remediating contaminants including phytoaccumulation, phytostabilization, phytodegradation, phytovolatilization, and rhizosphere degradation (McCutcheon, 1998). The primary phyto-mechanism used is dependent on the compound being degraded. Because of the chemical characteristics of petroleum hydrocarbons, it is not likely that petroleum hydrocarbons will be taken up into the plant, thus the primary phytoremediation mechanism is rhizosphere degradation or plant-assisted bioremediation (Briggs et al., 1982). Therefore, one of the key components of petroleum sludge phytoremediation is microbial activity in the soil because of its effect on carbon mineralization rates. The size and function of the microbial community are influenced by soil moisture content, aeration, and substrate and nutrient availability. The interaction of these factors creates specialized environments that select for specific microorganisms capable of degrading petroleum hydrocarbons.

The activities of the heterotrophic microbial community in soils are driven primarily by the oxidation of organic carbon that enters the soil ecosystem as root exudates, plant litter, manure, compost, or industrially produced waste materials (e.g., petroleum by-products and industrial wastes) (Tate, 1997, p. 93–121 and 171–228). In addition to an energy source, cellular growth requires a variety of macronutrients including nitrogen, phosphorus, and sulfur (Tate, 1997, p. 93–121 and 171–228).

The inorganic nutrients that are most often limiting in the bioremediation of hazardous organic compounds are nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P). Although not all bioremediation systems respond to nutrient additions, the addition of N fertilizer has been observed to enhanced bioremediation of oil contamination in aquatic systems and soils (Lin and Mendelssohn, 1998; Churchill et al., 1995; Glaser, 1991; Rasiah et al., 1992). Carbon mineralization rates increased in response to the addition of fertilizer, indicating the importance of sufficient nutrients in enhancing oily waste decomposition in soil (Rasiah et al., 1992). Graham et al. (1995) conducted a laboratory experiment on the application of various nutrients to soil to optimize biodegradation of xylenes, anthracene, phenanthrene, and n-hexadecane. Biodegradation was enhanced by nutrient addition, and each type of hydrocarbon reacted differently to various levels of fertilization.

In all vegetated systems, plants compete with microorganisms for required nutrients including carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, potassium, calcium, magnesium, nitrogen, phosphorus, sulfur, iron, zinc, copper, magnesium, chlorine, boron, and molybdenum (Gardner et al., 1985, p. 98–131). Plants are capable of using light as their energy source to transform CO2 and H2O into organic compounds and use inorganic nutrients drawn from the environment to synthesize required amino acids and vitamins (Raven et al., 1986, p. 515–540).

Degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons appears to be enhanced in the rhizosphere, and plants with a healthy and extensive root system are speculated to be beneficial to bioremediation. Root biomass generally increases as the aboveground biomass increases. Large healthy plants often support extensive root systems that are capable of pumping more water through the rhizosphere, transporting more nutrients through the soil system, and providing increased surface area for microbial activity.

There is also evidence to suggest that (i) the availability of organic chemicals to soil microorganisms declines with time; (ii) freshly added chemicals are available to soil microorganisms whereas identical, aged compounds are not metabolized; (iii) organic compounds incubated in sterile soils become increasingly less available to subsequently added microorganisms; (iv) aged compounds often are resistant to extraction; and (v) sorption and desorption of hydrophobic compounds often require long time periods to reach equilibrium (Alexander, 1995). Studies conducted on organic pesticides demonstrated that the compounds sequestered into the soil's organic fraction and molecules that diffuse into internal micropores and other remote sites are effectively unavailable to microorganisms and the biological food chain (Atlas and Bartha, 1993, p. 383–412). Despite the presence of presumably toxic concentrations of organic contaminants as determined through rigorous chemical extractions, aged compounds may not be bioavailable (Alexander, 1995; Loehr and Webster, 1996). Thus, biodegradation of contaminants may slow to imperceptible rates. However, the presence of vegetation may enhance remediation due to soil disturbance by roots and increased microbial activity.

The objective of this study was to determine the effect of vegetation and rates of N and P fertilization on contaminant degradation in aged petroleum sludge. A greenhouse phytoremediation experiment was conducted using petroleum sludge from an oil refinery in California. Plant shoot and root biomass, microbial counts, and dissipation of contaminants were measured.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
A container (pot) fertilization experiment was conducted in a greenhouse at the Kansas State University Plant Sciences Center, Manhattan, KS. One petroleum-contaminated sludge was used with six fertilization rates, three vegetation treatments, and two dates for destructive sampling, with four replicates. To minimize environmental effects, treatments were randomly assigned along drip irrigation lines resulting in a split plot statistical design.

Soil Characterization and Preparation
The medium ("soil") used in this experiment was a petroleum sludge generated during the refining process at a California oil refinery. The sludge initially contained 48800 mg TPH kg-1 (Table 1) with carbon chains ranging from C10 to C35. The petroleum sludge had been held in clay-lined oxidation ponds for more than 40 yr.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Chemical and physical properties of the petroleum sludge used in this study

 
The sludge was analyzed for various chemical and physical properties by the Kansas State University Soil Testing Laboratory (Table 1) (Brown, 1997): pH was measured by glass electrode in a 1:1 water suspension; available P by the Bray method; exchangeable cations (Ca, K, Mg, Na) following ammonium acetate extraction; organic matter by the Walkley–Black method; Cu, Mn, Fe, and Zn following DTPA extraction; Al following KCl extraction; cation exchange capacity (CEC) by NH+4 saturation; texture by hydrometer; NH+4 and NO-3 following KCl extraction; total P by peroxide digest; and total N by dry combustion. The initial TPH concentration was quantified as described below. After phytoremediation, mineralizable N was estimated by the autoclave method of Keeney (1982).

Prior to packing the sludge into greenhouse pots, the petroleum sludge was ground to pass a 6-mm sieve to obtain a homogenous mixture that was subsequently air-dried and thoroughly mixed using a large volume mixer for each replicate.

Greenhouse pots (7.5 L) were filled with 5 kg of petroleum sludge with a moisture content of 10% at a bulk density of 1 g cm-3. The bottom of the pot was lined with 5 mm of glass wool and a 4-cm layer of gravel to allow for improved drainage and to minimize loss of petroleum sludge from the pot. Vinyl pans were placed under each pot to catch leachate. A sample was taken from each pot to determine initial total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) concentration and variance among pots.

Plant Species and Fertilization
Grass plugs of tall fescue and bermuda grass from the Kansas State University horticultural turf farm were planted in each vegetated treatment. Prior to planting, the petroleum sludge was saturated and allowed to settle. A 7.5-cm-diam., 4-cm-thick turf plug, obtained using a soil sampler, was placed in each pot after the clean soil was washed from the roots.

Fertilization rates were chosen based on a C to N to P ratio of 100:10:1 (Cookson, 1995) used to calculate the total fertilizer N and P for bioremediation of soils contaminated with organic compounds. Using this ratio, the maximum fertilization rate was calculated assuming that the entire mass of C in TPH was labile, but the maximum amount of N or P to be applied was reduced by 50% to account for the short duration of the experiment. Thus, the highest fertilization application rate (F6, Table 2) was 2500 mg N kg-1 and 250 mg P kg-1. One treatment was no fertilizer added (F1), and F2 was the maintenance addition of N and P as recommended for maintaining turf grasses. Rates F3, F4, and F5 were various combinations of N and P at rates below the maximum.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Fertilization rates for the greenhouse study with units of mg N or P per kg sludge. Maintenance level, F2, was added to all fertilized pots quarterly. F3–F6 were added twice monthly between quarterly applications with 50 mL of water added to the control and maintenance pots to maintain the water balance

 
The fertilizer was added as a solution to the pots twice monthly. Urea was used as the nitrogen source and diammonium phosphate as the phosphorus source. Fifty milliliters of solution was added to each pot per application.

Plant Maintenance
The pots were irrigated using a drip irrigation system. Evapotranspiration was estimated using a modified pan evaporation technique (Soil Conservation Service, 1993) where the weight of evaporated water from a clear plastic pan was measured and recorded three times weekly. The flow rate from the irrigation system was calibrated four times throughout the experiment to ensure consistent water application along the drip irrigation lateral. Each plant treatment received water applications scheduled to match water use. Immediately prior to the addition of fertilizer, the unvegetated control pots received 1 L of water while vegetated treatments required 1.5 L of water to produce a leachate and remove excess salts. The leachate was analyzed for available N and TPH, as described below. Due to controlled irrigation, there was no leaching between samplings.

Aboveground biomass was cut every 7 to 8 wk to a height of 5 cm. Biomass was collected, dried, and reported as total dry weight at each of the two sampling dates (6 and 12 mo). Roots were collected when the pot was sacrificed at the end of each time period. At that time, the petroleum sludge was homogenized by hand mixing for chemical and microbial analysis. A subsample of the petroleum sludge was air-dried and ground to pass a 0.25-mm sieve for TPH analysis as described below. A moist sample was retained and stored at 4°C for subsequent microbial analysis.

Extraction and Analysis
Petroleum Sludge Extraction
Total petroleum hydrocarbons was extracted from the petroleum sludge using a sequential shaking extraction (Schwab et al., 1999). The petroleum sludge was air-dried and mechanically ground to pass through a 0.25-mm mesh sieve. One gram of air-dried petroleum sludge was spiked with 100 µL of 100 mg L-1 tetracosane and shaken on a reciprocal shaker with 10 mL Optima grade dichloromethane (Fisher Scientific, St. Louis, MO) for 30 min then centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 10 min to settle the petroleum sludge. The supernatant was collected in 60 mL glass jars. This procedure was repeated two more times, and the mass of the final extractant was recorded. A 1.5-mL sample was transferred into a 2-mL gas chromatography (GC) vial, spiked with 10 µL of 1000 mg L-1 {alpha}-androstane, capped with a Teflon-lined septa, and stored at 4°C until analysis by GC.

Leachate Extraction
Leachate was collected from one replicate of each treatment prior to fertilizer application and analyzed for electrolytic conductivity (EC), TPH, and nitrate. The EC was measured using a Model 31 Conductivity Bridge (Yellow Springs Instruments, Yellow Springs, OH). Before nitrate analysis, TPH was extracted using solid phase C18 cartridges (J&W Scientific, Folsom, CA). The cartridge was conditioned with 5 mL dichloromethane (DCM), 5 mL methanol, and 5 mL deionized water distilled in the presence of potassium permanganate. Then 10 mL of leachate was loaded onto the cartridge. The effluent was collected for NH+4 and NO-3 analysis. The TPH was eluted from the C18 cartridges with 3 mL DCM. The sample was dried with anhydrous sodium sulfate. A 1-mL aliquot of the eluent was transferred to GC vials, spiked with androstane, capped with a Teflon-lined septum, and stored at 4°C until analysis.

Gas Chromatographic Analysis
All extracted samples were analyzed on a Hewlett–Packard (Palo Alto, CA) 5890A Gas Chromatograph (GC) equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID), HP Chemstation Integration Software, and an HP7673A autosampler utilizing a DB-TPH column. The DB-TPH column, designed specifically for analysis of TPH, had an inside diameter of 0.32 mm, a length of 30 m, and a 0.25-µm film thickness. The fuel and carrier gas for the FID was H2. The carrier gas was delivered at 67 µL s-1 and the fuel gas at 670 µL s-1. Nitrogen was used as the make-up gas at a flow rate of 530 µL s-1. Air was supplied as the oxidant at a rate of 7.0 µL s-1. The initial oven temperature was maintained at 40°C for 2 min, then increased at 0.2°C s-1 to 320°C and maintained at 320°C for 1 min for leachate samples and 10 min for petroleum sludge samples. The temperature of the injection port was 250°C and the detector temperature was 350°C. The splitless injection volume was 2 µl. The TPH concentrations were measured using integrated GC areas and then converted to concentrations using external standard calibration curves.

Microbial Activity
Microbes were enumerated using viable heterotrophic plate counts by the spread plate method (Pepper et al., 1995). Ten grams (dry weight) of petroleum sludge were diluted in 95 mL of 0.2% tetrasodium pyrophosphate for soil dispersal (Alef and Nannipieri, 1995, p. 503–505), shaken on a rotary shaker at 150 rpm for 30 min, and allowed to settle for 10 min. The solute was diluted serially in 0.85% sodium chloride (NaCl), transferring 1 mL of solution into 9 mL of NaCl using a sterile 1-mL syringe. Two dilutions were selected for the plating procedure to obtain a concentration of microorganisms that had from 30 to 300 colony forming units per plate. Each sample was diluted in triplicate, and the average value of the three replicates was used for calculations. Petri plates of tryptic soy agar were inoculated with an aliquot of 0.1 mL. The plates were surface spread using an alcohol flame sterilized spreader (Wollum, 1982). Once inoculated, the plates were inverted to prevent water from settling on the plate surface, and incubated at 25°C for 96 h. Plates were counted for colonies at 24-h intervals for 72 h.

Statistical Analysis
The greenhouse experiment was arranged in a split plot design. Analysis of variance was performed by SAS (SAS, Cary, NC). Unless stated otherwise, all main effects or interactions discussed below are statistically significant (P < 0.05).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Leachate
Leachates were collected and analyzed from one replicate of each treatment to monitor for soluble salts, ammonium, nitrate, and TPH. The purpose was to determine if phytoremediation of sludge increases the risk of ground water contamination. Because leachate was collected from only one replicate from each treatment, rigorous statistical analysis was not possible. Nevertheless, trends were readily apparent, and the desired information was obtained.

Prior to each fertilizer application, the pots were leached with excess irrigation to reduce salt buildup. The amount of leachate generated varied with vegetation treatment from an average of 500 mL in the unvegetated control to less than 100 mL in the higher fertilization treatments for both bermuda and fescue. In all treatments, most samples contained no detectable NH+4 or NO-3, with the remaining samples containing up to a maximum of 5 mg L-1 NH4–N and 4 mg L-1 NO3–N. The small quantities of nitrogen found in the leachate indicate that the applied fertilizer was being used by the plants and microorganisms. Measured EC varied during the experiment and with treatment (Fig. 1) . The EC of the unvegetated treatment was consistently higher throughout the experiment, indicating that more salt was accumulated and leached from this treatment.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Electrical conductivity of leachate measured monthly from one replicate of each vegetation treatment averaged over fertilization rate

 
Small concentrations of TPH were found in leachate samples (Fig. 2) . Because there was no apparent effect of fertilization, TPH concentrations associated with a given vegetation treatment were averaged over fertilizer treatment. As illustrated in Fig. 2, the presence or absence of plants had no apparent effect on the concentrations of TPH. When TPH concentrations are converted to a mass sludge basis, TPH losses due to leaching range from <1 to 5 mg TPH kg-1 sludge, based on the volume of leachate produced. Over the 1-yr period, this would result in a maximum of 60 mg TPH kg-1 sludge. Considering the average overall reduction of 30000 mg TPH kg-1 sludge observed in the experiment (discussed below), losses due to leachate represent a maximum of 0.2% of the TPH reduction with most leachate TPH values accounting for less than 0.05% of the overall TPH reduction.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Leachate total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) concentrations measured monthly from one replicate of each vegetation treatment averaged over fertilization rate

 
Most states do not have set allowable limits for TPH in ground water, rather limits are set for target compounds. For those states listing ground water TPH limits, the concentrations in the leachates would be reportable, but would not require action (Simmons et al., 1999).

Plant Biomass
Over the course of the experiment, bermuda generated almost twice as much biomass as fescue in all fertilizer treatments (Fig. 3) . Growth in both plant species was significantly less at the lower fertilization rates, indicating that N and perhaps P were limiting for plant growth under these circumstances. Although neither N nor P was added in the absence of the other, the high initial Bray P concentration (191 mg P kg-1) suggests that P was not limiting.



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Aboveground biomass (g) at 6 mo (A) and 12 mo (B). Error bars represent the standard deviation associated with each treatment. Least significant differences (P < 0.05) refer to comparisons of fertilizer treatments within a plant species [LSD0.05(fert)] and plant species within a fertilizer treatment [LSD0.05(veg)]

 
Bermuda produced increasing amounts of shoots with increased fertilization. Growth of fescue tended to plateau at the upper fertilization rates suggesting that these nutrients were no longer limiting growth. Both species were relatively slow to establish with low biomass production during the first 6 mo. Aboveground biomass increased 300% for both species during the second 6 mo.

Bermuda had more root biomass than fescue for all treatments (Fig. 4) , which is consistent with the shoot biomass. During the first 6 mo, root biomass was highly variable and neither plant species showed any trend related to fertilization. After 1 yr, the root biomass of bermuda was almost constant with no effect from the fertilization rates. Fescue, on the other hand, produced the greatest biomass with intermediate fertilization (F3 and F4) and biomass was significantly less at low and high fertilization rates.



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Root biomass determined after (A) 6 mo and (B) 12 mo growth. Error bars represent one standard deviation. At 6 mo, the species x fertilization least significant difference (LSD0.05) was 15.3 g. At 12 mo, LSD0.05 = 8.1 g

 
Microbial Characterization
The microbial plate counts for both harvest dates are shown in Fig. 5 . During the first 6 mo of the study, the number of colonies in both vegetated treatments was significantly greater than in the unvegetated control. Differences were not significant between fertilization rates for either plant species. After 1 yr, the number of viable microbial colonies was significantly greater in most fescue treatments as compared with the bermuda grass and unvegetated treatments. Again, the number was not greatly affected by fertilization. Nitrogen and phosphorus did not limit microbial activity, and microorganisms were able to obtain adequate N for cell production, even with no additions of fertilizer. The soil microbes were able to mineralize the indigenous organic N to meet their needs.



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Bacterial colony forming units for 6 mo (A) and 12 mo (B) with statistical significance at 6 mo and 12 mo comparing vegetation treatments

 
To estimate the quantity of readily mineralizable organic N, an N availability test (Keeney, 1982) was conducted on selected soil samples. In this method, soil samples are autoclaved, and the resulting mineralized N (NH+4 and NO-3) is extracted with KCl and quantified. Concentrations of mineralizable N were similar for all vegetation and fertilizer treatments (Table 3) despite the changes in total N in response to fertilization (Table 4). This may at least partially explain the lack of variation in microbial numbers among different fertilization treatments.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Nitrogen available for mineralization as determined by the method of Keeney (1982)

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Chemical properties of the soil at the end of the greenhouse experiment

 
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon Concentrations
The TPH concentration averaged over all treatments was reduced by an average of 49% at 6 mo (Table 5), and there were no significant differences between vegetation or fertilization treatments. Because of the age of the sludge, loss of contaminants from volatilization would be minimal, and the rapid dissipation was probably due to enhanced bioremediation in response to soil processing (drying, grinding, rewetting) that exposed new surfaces and fully aerated the sludge. These high rates of bioremediation in the first 6 mo overwhelmed the contributions of phytoremediation when the plants were still small.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Average total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) concentrations (mg kg-1) and changes for all treatments

 
After 1 yr, fertilization had no effect on the reduction of TPH in the unvegetated treatments. Only treatments F3 and F6 in the fescue had significantly greater degradation than either the unfertilized (F1) or "maintenance" (F2). However, TPH concentrations decreased significantly in response to F3 through F6 in the bermuda. Compared with the unvegetated control, decreases were significantly greater for treatments F2 through F6 in the pots with bermuda and F3, F5, and F6 for fescue.

Fertilization had a significant effect on changes in TPH from 6 to 12 mo. Within the unvegetated control treatment, the effect of fertilization on percent degradation was not significant at P < 0.05, but degradation was greater for F5 and F6 compared with F1 and F2 at P < 0.10. For fescue, degradation was greater in treatments F3, F5, and F6 compared with F1 and F2 (P < 0.05); only F5 had greater degradation than F1 and F2 for bermuda. Relative to the unvegetated controls, percent degradation was greater with bermuda for all treatments except F6 (which was significantly greater at P < 0.10). Degradation in the fescue pots was significantly greater than in the unvegetated controls for F2, F3, F5, and F6. After initially equivalent degradation in all treatments during the first 6 mo, TPH reduction was slower in the unvegetated control than both vegetated treatments during the second 6 mo.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
The rapid TPH degradation observed in all treatments during the first 6 mo of the study can be attributed in part to the preparation of the petroleum sludge. In its original state, the sludge resembled an unconsolidated lacustrine deposit with layers of petroleum products intermixed with sediments. To homogenize the material for the study, it was dried and ground to pass a 6-mm sieve. This action exposed a much larger surface area to favorable bioremediation conditions: microorganisms, aeration, and nutrients. Thus, biodegradation was very rapid in all pots early in the experiment and masked any effects due to vegetation or fertilization. The decline in the degradation rate for the unvegetated treatment in the second 6 mo suggests that effects of processing had diminished sometime during the first 6 mo, and reduction of TPH was being governed by other factors. The mean percent change in the fertilized vegetated treatments (27%) was 1.7 times that of the unvegetated treatments (16%) during the second half of the study. With additional time, a much greater difference in TPH concentrations between vegetated and unvegetated treatments might be realized.

The time required for shoot and root development also contributed to the lack of significant differences between vegetated treatments during the first 6 mo. Neither plant species showed signs of distress due to toxicity, but both were slow to establish with bermuda producing an average accumulated dry biomass of 74 g shoots and 30 g roots, while fescue produced only 35 g of shoots and 20 g of roots. During the second 6 mo of the experiment, above- and belowground biomass increased by an average of 300% for both plant species, which increased transpiration rates, and the enhanced removal of water from the soil profile resulted in greater aeration.

During the second 6 mo of the experiment, microbial counts increased by an order of magnitude in all treatments, perhaps a result of decreased soil toxicity. Significantly higher bacterial counts in fescue may account for the increased degradation rate observed in fescue during the latter half of the study. However, bacterial plate counts may not represent petroleum-degrading microbes, which makes these data difficult to interpret in terms of phytoremediation.

The control and maintenance fertilization treatments (F1 and F2) were associated with significantly smaller percent TPH degradation at 6 and 12 mo, but only for the fescue and bermuda treatments. The lack of an effect of fertilizer on TPH degradation in the unvegetated treatment would suggest that these materials were not N and P deficient for bioremediation. The presence of plants appears to stimulate microbial TPH degradation and requires more N and P than when plants are absent. This is further illustrated by the residual, total N in the different treatments at the end of the experiment (Table 4). For F6, increases in total N were the greatest in the unvegetated pots and the least in bermuda. Responses were similar for total P. This is most likely the result of the very high use of N for biomass production in the bermuda, intermediate use by fescue, and the absence of fertilizer demand by plants in the unvegetated pots. Nearly 50% of the N and P applied in F6 could be found in this tissue of bermuda and 25% in fescue (data not shown).

Because previous studies have demonstrated successful bioremediation with a wide range of nutrient application in freshly contaminated soils (Churchill et al., 1995; Glaser, 1991; Graham et al., 1995; Rasiah et al., 1992), an aged contaminated system may be carbon limiting, not N and P limiting. If the organic contaminant was sequestered in microsites and not bioavailable, the reduction rate would be dependent upon contaminant release, not the addition of N and P. This would account for the lack of differences in degradation in response to fertilization and the slower degradation in the second half of the study for the unvegetated pots. Mineralization of organic N and P have supplied adequate nutrients for biodegradation in the absence of plants.

Another explanation for the observed differences in TPH reduction between vegetated and unvegetated treatments is lack of O2 in the unvegetated soil profile. Roots create macropores and preferential channels that facilitate the transport of gases and liquids through the soil column. As the belowground biomass increased, the soil column was more likely to maintain soil, air, and water conditions that support active aerobic microbial activity.


    CONCLUSIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Phytoremediation is a viable choice for aged, petroleum hydrocarbon remediation if sufficient time is allowed for plant establishment and contaminant degradation. After 6 mo of phytoremediation in the greenhouse, an average of 49% TPH degradation was observed in all treatments with no significant differences between the treatments. This is typical for bioremediation sites and can be attributed to processing the sludge, which enhanced degradation. After 1 yr of growth, the effect of processing had been overcome, and overall TPH reduction in the vegetated treatments was significantly greater than the unvegetated control, with an average reduction of 65% in the bermuda and 62% in fescue, compared with 57% in the unvegetated control. The maximum TPH degradation was 68% in the F5 rate in bermuda and 65% in treatment F3 of the fescue. Fertilization did not affect degradation in the unvegetated control.

The decline in contaminant degradation observed in the unvegetated control was typical of unplanted bioremediation, where carbon mineralization is enhanced through tillage and nutrient addition. The initial sludge processing was similar to tillage in the field. Because tillage is unable to continue reducing aggregate size to expose all contaminated surfaces, TPH degradation slows considerably with time. Plant roots are able to penetrate the soil and break up large aggregates, and contaminated surfaces are continually being exposed and higher degradation rates maintained. This was apparent in the latter stages of the experiment where the average degradation rate in the vegetated treatments (27%) was 1.7 times the rate in the unvegetated control (16%).

Microbial activity was assessed at each harvest date using viable heterotrophic plate counts. Increased microbial numbers were observed in the planted treatments, but fertilization rates did not significantly affect microbial populations. Because the sludge had a high level of organic N and total P, microorganisms may have been able to obtain the nutrients required for growth from the sludge.

The highest rate of fertilization (F6) ultimately applied 2500 mg kg-1 N and 250 mg kg-1 P, or a ratio of 100:5:0.5, which was half of the target ratio of 100:10:1 for C to N to P suggested by Cookson (1995). This rate of fertilization produced excessive N and P fertilization when one considers overall TPH degradation, plant biomass production, and residual N in the soil. Nitrate and total N accumulated in the soil except in the bermuda pots, which produced very high quantities of shoot biomass. For this petroleum sludge, rate F3 resulted in remediation equivalent to F6 with no nitrate accumulation in the soil. The relatively low demand for fertilizer was probably the result of the presence of significant concentrations of total N and P, incomplete bioremediation of the contaminant, and efficient use of nutrients. Thus, for this material, we would recommend a C to N to P ratio of 100:2:0.2 for phytoremediation. For other petroleum-contaminated sites, initial assessment of the soil and contaminant will be useful in determining the ideal fertilization rate.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
P. E. Olson, A. Castro, M. Joern, N. M. DuTeau, E. A. H. Pilon-Smits, and K. F. Reardon
Comparison of Plant Families in a Greenhouse Phytoremediation Study on an Aged Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Contaminated Soil
J. Environ. Qual., August 31, 2007; 36(5): 1461 - 1469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
Z. D. Parrish, M. K. Banks, and A. P. Schwab
Effect of Root Death and Decay on Dissipation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in the Rhizosphere of Yellow Sweet Clover and Tall Fescue
J. Environ. Qual., January 1, 2005; 34(1): 207 - 216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
T. T. Koivula, M. Salkinoja-Salonen, R. Peltola, and M. Romantschuk
Pyrene Degradation in Forest Humus Microcosms with or without Pine and its Mycorrhizal Fungus
J. Environ. Qual., January 1, 2004; 33(1): 45 - 53.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
S. L. Hutchinson, A. P. Schwab, and M. K. Banks
Phytoremediation of Aged Petroleum Sludge: Effect of Irrigation Techniques and Scheduling
J. Environ. Qual., September 1, 2001; 30(5): 1516 - 1522.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (40)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hutchinson, S.L.
Right arrow Articles by Schwab, A.P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hutchinson, S.L.
Right arrow Articles by Schwab, A.P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hutchinson, S.L.
Right arrow Articles by Schwab, A.P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Bioremediation and Biodegradation
Right arrow Other Environmental Contamination
Right arrow Nutrient Management
Right arrow Plant and Environment Interactions
Right arrow Soil Pollution


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal