JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Published online 1 May 2008
Published in J Environ Qual 37:977-982 (2008)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2007.0361
© 2008 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rodgers, M.
Right arrow Articles by Zhan, X.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rodgers, M.
Right arrow Articles by Zhan, X.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Rodgers, M.
Right arrow Articles by Zhan, X.
Related Collections
Right arrow Wetlands and Aquatic Processes
Right arrow Microbial Processes
Right arrow Bioremediation and Biodegradation
Right arrow Water Pollution

Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal from Domestic Strength Synthetic Wastewater Using an Alternating Pumped Flow Sequencing Batch Biofilm Reactor

Michael Rodgersa, Guangxue Wua,* and Xinmin Zhanb

a Dep. of Civil Engineering and National Centre for Biomedical Engineering Science, National Univ. of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
b Dep. of Civil Engineering, National Univ. of Ireland, Galway, Ireland


Figure 1
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of the alternating pumped flow sequencing batch biofilm reactor system.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 2. Dynamics of filtered NH4–N, NO3–N, and PO4–P in a typical cycle during Stage 1.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 3. Dynamics of filtered NH4–N, NO3–N, and PO4–P in a typical cycle during Stage 2.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 4. Nitrification, denitrification, and phosphorus release rates per gram of mixed liquor volatile suspended solids (MLVSS) per hour for the biofilm biomass taken from Reactors 1 and 2 in Stage 2.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 5. Dynamics of the effluent soluble phosphorus concentration (P) against time (t) during Stage 2.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 6. Relationship between the effluent total phosphorus (TP) in the detached biomass and the effluent suspended solid (SS) during Stage 2.

 




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education		 Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.