JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 May 2008
Published in J Environ Qual 37:871-879 (2008)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2007.0203
© 2008 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bilodeau Gauthier, S.
Right arrow Articles by Messier, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bilodeau Gauthier, S.
Right arrow Articles by Messier, C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bilodeau Gauthier, S.
Right arrow Articles by Messier, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Plant and Soil Interactions
Right arrow Nutrients
Right arrow Soil pH
Right arrow Plant Analysis
Right arrow Soil Pollution

Extractability of Elements in Sugar Maple Xylem along a Gradient of Soil Acidity

Simon Bilodeau Gauthiera,b,*, Daniel Houlea,c, Christian Gagnona, Benoît Côtéd and Christian Messierb

a Environment Canada, 105 McGill St., Montreal, QC, H2Y 2E7, Canada
b Dép. des Sciences Biologiques, Faculté des sciences, Université du Québec à Montréal, C.P. 8888, Succursale Centre-Ville, Montreal, QC, H3C 3P8, Canada
c Direction de la Recherche Forestière, Forêt Québec, Ministère des Ressources Naturelles et de la Faune du Québec, 2700 rue Einstein, Sainte-Foy, QC, G1P 3W8, Canada
d Dep. of Natural Resource Sciences, Macdonald Campus of McGill Univ., 21,111 Lakeshore Rd., Ste.-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC, H9X 3V9, Canada


Figure 1
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Reaction kinetics from H2O and HCl extractions for a few key elements. Values are means, and error bars are ranges (max minus min) from three replicates.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Radial (temporal) trends of element concentrations in tree wood and distribution among fractions. Values are means, and error bars are SE (n = 9 trees for residual; n = 8 for water-soluble and acid-soluble from all three sites combined). The "total fraction" refers to the sum of the three distinct fractions. The vertical broken line is the heartwood–sapwood boundary.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Comparison of average sapwood concentrations between sites (n = 3 for Clair and Duchesnay; n = 2 for Laurent) and for each fraction (H2O = water-soluble, HCl = acid-soluble, HNO3 = residual, TOTAL = sum of all fractions). Sites are ranked (left to right) from least to most acid. Bars with different letters indicate that means were significantly different (p < 0.05) according to Tukey-Kramer's honest significant difference.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.