JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Published online 1 May 2008
Published in J Environ Qual 37:839-847 (2008)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2007.0306
© 2008 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Potter, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Webster, T. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Potter, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Webster, T. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Potter, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Webster, T. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pesticides
Right arrow Runoff
Right arrow Organic Compounds
Right arrow Tillage
Right arrow Irrigation

Herbicide Incorporation by Irrigation and Tillage Impact on Runoff Loss

Thomas L. Pottera,*, Clint C. Trumana, Timothy C. Stricklanda, David D. Boscha and Theodore M. Websterb

a USDA-ARS, Southeast Watershed Research Lab., Box 748, Tifton, GA 31793
b USDA-ARS, Crop Protection and Management Research Unit, Box 748, Tifton, GA 31793. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this article does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the authors or the USDA


Figure 1
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 1. Rainfall and mean runoff from plots. I, irrigated; NI, non-irrigated; ST, strip tillage; CT, conventional tillage.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 2. Rainfall and mean sediment loss from plots. I, irrigated; NI, non-irrigated; ST, strip tillage; CT, conventional tillage.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 3. Metolachlor and pendimethalin washoff from cover crop mulch expressed as the cumulative percent retained on mulch versus cumulative runoff.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 4. Cumulative metolachlor loss expressed as percent of applied versus cumulative runoff during simulations. I, irrigated; NI, non-irrigated; ST, strip tillage; CT, conventional tillage.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 5. Cumulative pendimethalin loss expressed as percent of applied versus cumulative runoff during simulations. I, irrigated; NI, non-irrigated; ST, strip tillage; CT, conventional tillage.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 6. Average metolachlor concentration in CT soil samples collected before and after rainfall simulations. I, irrigated; NI, non-irrigated; CT, conventional tillage.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 7. Average metolachlor concentration in ST soil samples collected before and after rainfall simulations. I, irrigated; NI, non-irrigated; ST, strip tillage.

 




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education		 Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.