JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 May 2008
Published in J Environ Qual 37:1190-1200 (2008)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2007.0326
© 2008 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Voegelin, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kretzschmar, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Voegelin, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kretzschmar, R.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Voegelin, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kretzschmar, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Batch Studies
Right arrow Toxic Trace Metals
Right arrow Sorption/Exchange
Right arrow Heavy Metals
Right arrow Soil Pollution

Zinc Fractionation in Contaminated Soils by Sequential and Single Extractions: Influence of Soil Properties and Zinc Content

Andreas Voegelin*, Gerome Tokpa, Olivier Jacquat, Kurt Barmettler and Ruben Kretzschmar

Soil Chemistry Group, Institute of Biogeochemistry and Pollutant Dynamics, ETH Zurich, ETH Zentrum CHN, CH-8092 Zürich, Switzerland


Figure 1
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Total Zn contents versus soil pH for acidic (pH <6; Table 2) and neutral (pH ≥6; Table 3) soils (separated by vertical dashed line). Soils with total Zn contents of <23 mmol kg–1, 23 to 78 mmol kg–1, and >78 mmol kg–1 are separated by horizontal dashed lines.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Results from the sequential extraction of acidic soils (A, C) and neutral soils (B, D). Absolute amounts are shown in the upper panels (A, B) and relative amounts (normalized by the sum of extracted Zn) in the lower panels (C, D). Soils are arranged by increasing total Zn content (X-ray fluorescence analyses) from left to right. The hypothetical interpretation of the sequential extraction is provided in Table 1.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Summarizing comparison of the sequentially extracted fractions of Zn in acidic soils (open boxes) and neutral soils (hatched boxes). Boxes cover the 25th to 75th percentile range (including the median [lines dividing boxes] and the arithmetic mean [squares]), bars cover the 5th to 95th percentile range, and crosses indicate the maximum and minimum values. The hypothetical interpretation of the extracted fractions is provided in Table 1.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. (A) Sum of Zn extracted in the fractions F1 and F2 versus total Zn (linear regression Eq. [16] from Table 6). (B) Ratio of Zn in F1 over sum of Zn extracted in F1 and F2 (line: F1/(F1+F2) calculated using linear regression Eq. [17] from Table 6). (C) Ratio of Zn extracted by 0.01 mol L–1 CaCl2 (SSR = 50 L kg–1) over Zn in F1 (1 mol L–1 NH4NO3; SSR = 25 L kg–1). (D) Ratio of Zn extracted by 0.1 mol L–1 BaCl2 (SSR = 30 L kg–1) over Zn in F1 (1 mol L–1 NH4NO3; SSR = 25 L kg–1).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.