JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 March 2008
Published in J Environ Qual 37:369-377 (2008)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2007.0088
© 2008 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gao, S.
Right arrow Articles by Schneider, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gao, S.
Right arrow Articles by Schneider, S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gao, S.
Right arrow Articles by Schneider, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Fumigation
Right arrow Organic Compounds
Right arrow Air Pollution

Evaluation of Fumigation and Surface Seal Methods on Fumigant Emissions in an Orchard Replant Field

Suduan Gaoa,*, Thomas J. Troutb and Sally Schneiderc

a Water Management Research Unit, San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Sciences Center, USDA-ARS, Parlier, CA 93648
b Water Management Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Fort Collins, CO, 80526-8119
c National Program Staff, USDA-ARS, Beltsville, MD 20705-5139


Figure 1
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Effects of application methods and surface seal treatments on emission flux of (a) 1,3-dichloropropene (1,3-D) and (b) chloropicrin (CP) from Telone C35 (shank-injection) and InLine (drip-irrigation) applications. Error bars are SD of duplicate measurements. HDPE, high-density polyethylene; VIF, virtually impermeable film.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Cumulative emission of (a) 1,3-dichloropropene (1,3-D) and (b) chloropicrin (CP) from surface seal treatments. Plotted data are averages of duplicate measurements with cumulative SD listed in Table 2. HDPE, high-density polyethylene; VIF, virtually impermeable film.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Distribution of 1,3-dichloropropene (1,3-D) in the soil-gas phase after fumigation under various surface treatments. Sampling was located (a) adjacent to fumigant injection line or (b) between injection lines. HDPE, high-density polyethylene; VIF, virtually impermeable film.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Residual fumigants (a) 1,3-dichloropropene (1,3-D) and (b) chloropicrin (CP) extracted from soil samples collected 14 d after fumigation. Horizontal bars are the SD of duplicate measurements. HDPE, high-density polyethylene; VIF, virtually impermeable film.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Soil water content measured 2 wk after fumigation under various surface treatments. Horizontal bars are the SD of duplicate measurements. HDPE, high-density polyethylene; VIF, virtually impermeable film.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. One-day soil temperature measurements at 10 cm depth during fumigant emission monitoring period. Horizontal bars are the SD of duplicate measurements. HDPE, high-density polyethylene; VIF, virtually impermeable film.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.