JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 March 2008
Published in J Environ Qual 37:362-368 (2008)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2007.0366
© 2008 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sharpley, A. N.
Right arrow Articles by Schmidt, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sharpley, A. N.
Right arrow Articles by Schmidt, J. P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Sharpley, A. N.
Right arrow Articles by Schmidt, J. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Watershed and Landscape Processes
Right arrow Surface Water Quality
Right arrow Phosphorus
Right arrow Nutrients

Phosphorus Loss from an Agricultural Watershed as a Function of Storm Size

Andrew N. Sharpleya,*, Peter J. A. Kleinmanb, A. Louise Heathwaitec, William J. Gburekd, Gordon J. Folmarb and John P. Schmidtb

a Dep. of Crop, Soil and Environmental Sciences, 115 Plant Sciences Building, Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
b USDA-ARS, Pasture Systems and Watershed Management Research Unit, Building 3702, Curtin Road, University Park, PA 16802-3702
c Centre for Sustainable Water Management, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster Univ., Lancaster, LA1 4YQ, UK
d USDA-ARS, Pasture Systems and Watershed Management Research Unit, Building 3702, Curtin Road, University Park, PA 16802-3702. Mention of trade names does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government


Figure 1
View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. The FD-36 watershed, field boundaries, and field identification numbers.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Relationship between storm-flow return period and mean dissolved phosphorus (DP), particulate phosphorus (PP), and total phosphorus P (TP) concentration for FD-36 during 1997 to 2006 (all regressions were significant at P > 0.05). For each form, concentration points assigned different letters were significantly different (P < 0.05) as determined by Tukey's studentized range test.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.