JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Published online 1 March 2008
Published in J Environ Qual 37:333-343 (2008)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2007.0183
© 2008 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chomycia, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Bergamaschi, B. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Chomycia, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Bergamaschi, B. A.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Chomycia, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Bergamaschi, B. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Biogeochemical Processes
Right arrow Geochemical Processes
Right arrow Organic Compounds
Right arrow Animal Waste
Right arrow Ground Water Quality

Land Management Impacts on Dairy-Derived Dissolved Organic Carbon in Ground Water

Jill C. Chomyciaa, Peter J. Hernesa,*, Thomas Hartera and Brian A. Bergamaschib

a Department of Land, Air, and Water Resources, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616
b U.S. Geological Survey, 6000 J Street, Placer Hall, Sacramento, CA 95819


Figure 1
View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 1. Schematic map of the primary dairy facilities and sampling sites. Sampling site numbers correspond to those shown in Tables 1 and 3. Secondary dairy sampling sites not shown, including wells 19 and 20.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 2. Distribution of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) by management unit (defined in text) over five sample dates. Bars give the maximum and minimum of the data set; the box defines the first and third quartiles; the median is given as a point. Complete data set shown in Table 1.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 3. Dissolved oxygen (DO) (mg L–1) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) (mg L–1) as sampled on 4 Sept. 2005 and 26 Mar. 2006 are inversely correlated. Lines of best fit for each sampling date are shown with corresponding equations.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 4. Mean specific trihalomethane formation potential (STHMFP) and mean dissolved organic carbon (DOC) grouped by management unit for samples collected on 7 and 8 Mar. 2005.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 5. Mean dissolved organic carbon (DOC) (mg L–1) and bioavailability (percent) grouped by management unit for samples collected on 26 Mar. 2006.

 




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education		 Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.