JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 4 January 2008
Published in J Environ Qual 37:196-206 (2008)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2006.0503
© 2008 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lin, C.H.
Right arrow Articles by George, M.F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lin, C.H.
Right arrow Articles by George, M.F.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lin, C.H.
Right arrow Articles by George, M.F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Agroforestry
Right arrow Bioremediation and Biodegradation

Bioremediation of Atrazine-Contaminated Soil by Forage Grasses: Transformation, Uptake, and Detoxification

C.H. Lina,*, R.N. Lerchb, H.E. Garretta and M.F. Georgea

a Center for Agroforestry, School of Natural Resources, Univ. of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211
b USDA Agricultural Research Service, Cropping and Water Quality Research Unit, Columbia, MO 65211


Figure 1
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Degradation pathways of atrazine.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Loss of atrazine (ATR) and its metabolites deisopropylatrazine (DIA), deethylatrazine (DEA), and hydroxyatrazine (HA) to lysimeter leachates during the 25-d experimental period. Means followed by the same letter do not differ significantly at a 90% confidence level using LSD test ({alpha} = 0.1).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Total atrazine uptake and the distribution of the degradation products in forage grasses after 25 d. Means followed by the same letter do not differ significantly at a 90% confidence level using LSD test ({alpha} = 0.1). ATR, atrazine; DEA, deethylatrazine; DEHA, deethylhydroxyatrazine; DIA, deisopropylatrazine; DIHA, deisopropylhydroxyatrazine; HA, hydroxyatrazine.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Plant uptake of atrazine (ATR) and total transpiration rate of forages.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Proportion of total atrazine (ATR) in forage tissue as hydroxylated ATR degradation products (HADPs) and the susceptibility of forages to ATR at 1000 µg L–1. Means followed by the same letter do not differ significantly at a 90% confidence level using LSD test ({alpha} = 0.1).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.