JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 4 January 2008
Published in J Environ Qual 37:174-181 (2008)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2007.0148
© 2008 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leader, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Reddy, K. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leader, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Reddy, K. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Leader, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Reddy, K. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Wetlands and Aquatic Processes
Right arrow Phosphorus
Right arrow Biogeochemical Processes

Phosphorus Sorbing Materials: Sorption Dynamics and Physicochemical Characteristics

J. W. Leadera, E. J. Dunneb,* and K. R. Reddyb

a Wor-Wic Community College, 32000 Campus Drive, Salisbury, MD 21804
b Wetland Biogeochemistry Lab., Soil and Water Science Dep., Univ. of Florida/IFAS, 106 Newell Hall, PO BOX 110510, Gainesville, FL 32611


Figure 1
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Multi-point phosphorus sorption isotherms for eight materials showing log trend lines and their associated r2 values. Error bars represent ± one standard deviation. During the multi-point phosphorus sorption isotherm experiments we did not have Fe-DWTR, Ca-DWTR, or SuperMag materials. Dehydrated Fe-sludge was not locally available; therefore, we do not present results.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Kinetic study showing phosphorus remaining in solution after various equilibration periods with seven materials. Error bars represent ± one standard deviation. The sand-masonry was eliminated as a potential candidate material due to low P-sorption capacity, therefore it was not tested further. The organic soil had too high an in situ value in natural wetlands; therefore we did not view it as a readily available by-product. The Al#2 and sandblast grit materials were not tested due to potential toxicity concerns. The dehydrated Fe-sludge was not tested, due to it not being locally available.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Inorganic phosphorus fractions of tested materials. The total mass (mg) of phosphorus per mass (kg) of material are provided above each column. The NaOH-Pi represents the inorganic P in the NaOH extracted solution. The NaOH-Po represents the amount of organic phosphorus in the NaOH extract. The inorganic phosphorus was calculated as the difference between total P and soluble reactive P in the NaOH solution.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.