JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 4 January 2008
Published in J Environ Qual 37:16-21 (2008)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2006.0556
© 2008 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Altenburger, R.
Right arrow Articles by Riedl, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Altenburger, R.
Right arrow Articles by Riedl, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Altenburger, R.
Right arrow Articles by Riedl, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ecological Risk Assessment
Right arrow Cell Biology & Molecular Genetics
Right arrow Crop Models

Bioassays with Unicellular Algae: Deviations from Exponential Growth and Its Implications for Toxicity Test Results

Rolf Altenburger*, Mechthild Schmitt-Jansen and Janet Riedl

UFZ- Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Dep. Bioanalytical Ecotoxicology, Permoserstr.15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany


Figure 1
View larger version (5K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Growth of liquid cultures of Desmodesmus subspicatus over 72 h, as detected using the in vivo red chlorophyll autofluorecence signal of suspensions after blue light excitation. The line represents an exponential regression fit for the 8 independent values each derived as a mean value from a 24 well plate.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Cell population growth of Desmodesmus subspicatus between 24 and 50 h of the 72 h growth experiment at a time resolution of 2 h. Figure 2a displays the values for in vivo chlorophyll autofluorescence and the fit of the growth model provided in Eq. 1. The inset shows the values within the 72 h full experiment. Figure 2b depicts the values for cell counts for the same experiment.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Cell size distributions of Desmodesmus subspicatus suspension samples between 24 and 50 h of the 72 h growth experiment at a time resolution of 2 h. The modal value was used to uniformly scale the distributions. The inset shows the derived mean cell volumes for each distribution at a given time point plus the fit of the growth model provided in Eq. 1.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Contour plot of an algal sample at 42 h of a 72 h growth experiment with Desmodesmus subspicatus. Plotted are the 2000 particle specific signals for sideward light scatter against the red autofluorescence signal emitted after blue light excitation. The scale is provided in relative units.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.