JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 24 October 2007
Published in J Environ Qual 36:1843-1855 (2007)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2007.0064
© 2007 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gill, L. W.
Right arrow Articles by Johnston, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gill, L. W.
Right arrow Articles by Johnston, P. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gill, L. W.
Right arrow Articles by Johnston, P. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Field-Scale Studies
Right arrow Microorganisms
Right arrow Soil Pollution
Right arrow Water Pollution

The Treatment Performance of Different Subsoils in Ireland Receiving On-Site Wastewater Effluent

L. W. Gill*, C. O'Súlleabháin, B. D. R. Misstear and P. J. Johnston

Dep. of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Dublin, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland


Figure 1
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Instrumentation layout: (a) cross-section of trench and (b) plan view of trenches.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Site 1: chloride loading rates at the different sample position depths (0.3, 0.6, 1.0 m) along the percolation trench length (0, 10, 20 m).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Site 1: average chloride loading rates across all depth planes across the percolation area.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Site 2: average chloride concentrations at the 0.3-m depth plane at the three sample positions (0, 10, 20 m) along the trenches.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Site 2: average chloride concentration measured on the three depth planes (0.3, 0.6, 1.0 m) at the 0-m sample position.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Bromide tracer study results for showing time after injection of tracer that bromide levels over 0.2 mg L–1 were first picked up at the different sampling positions on (a) Site 1 and (b) Site 2. [D2 = 2 d after injection, n = not picked up by 8 d, – = no sample]

 

Figure 7
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 7. Site 2: soil moisture tension plotted against effective rainfall for the 20-m sample position.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 8. Site 2: soil moisture tension plotted against effective rainfall for the 0-m sample position.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.