JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 31 August 2007
Published in J Environ Qual 36:1452-1460 (2007)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2006.0207
© 2007 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Watson, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Matthews, D. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Watson, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Matthews, D. I.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Watson, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Matthews, D. I.
Related Collections
Right arrow Surface Water Quality
Right arrow Phosphorus
Right arrow Field-Scale Studies

Increase in Phosphorus Losses from Grassland in Response to Olsen-P Accumulation

C. J. Watsona,*, R. V. Smitha and D. I. Matthewsb

a Agriculture, Food and Environmental Science Division
b Biometrics Branch, Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX, United Kingdom


Figure 1
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Olsen-P (mg kg–1) status in February each year for plots receiving 0, 10, 20, 40, or 80 kg P ha–1 yr–1.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Change in weekly Olsen-P (mg kg–1) status in the plots receiving zero P and 80 kg P ha–1 yr–1.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Weekly dissolved reactive phosphorus (DRP) concentrations in land drainage water for each calendar month for the plots receiving (a) zero P and (b) 80 kg P ha–1 yr–1 for 5 yr (March 2000 to February 2005). The line is drawn through the mean values.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Histograms showing the mean weekly differences in DRP concentrations for the period March 2002 to February 2005 compared with the period March 2000 to February 2002 in land drainage water from plots receiving 0, 10, 20, 40, or 80 kg P ha–1 yr–1.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Average annual total phosphorus (TP) load (kg P ha–1) in overland flow and land drainage water (March 2001 to February 2005) for plots receiving 0, 10, 20, 40, or 80 kg P ha–1 yr–1. P loads in overland flow from the plot receiving 40 kg P ha–1 yr–1 were anomalously low due to instrumentation failure during the summer of 2002. The average weekly Olsen-P concentration (mg P kg–1), from March 2001 to February 2005, is shown above each plot.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.