JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Published online 27 June 2007
Published in J Environ Qual 36:1224-1230 (2007)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2006.0266
© 2007 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dolliver, H.
Right arrow Articles by Gupta, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dolliver, H.
Right arrow Articles by Gupta, S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Dolliver, H.
Right arrow Articles by Gupta, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Sustainable Agriculture
Right arrow Pharmaceuticals
Right arrow Animal Waste

Sulfamethazine Uptake by Plants from Manure-Amended Soil

Holly Dollivera, Kuldip Kumarb and Satish Guptaa,*

a Dep. of Soil, Water, and Climate, Univ. of Minnesota, 1991 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, MN 55108
b Res. and Dev., Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago, 6001 West Pershing Rd., Cicero, IL 60804-4112


Figure 1
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 1. Chemical structure and characteristics of sulfamethazine (O'Neil et al., 2001).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 2. Sulfamethazine concentration in plant tissue by crop and antibiotic treatment. Error bars indicate SD of the mean. Within crop type, different letters designate statistical significance at the 0.05 probability level.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 3. Sulfamethazine uptake by crop and antibiotic treatment. Error bars indicate SD of the mean. Within crop type, different letters designate statistical significance at the 0.05 probability level.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 4. Sulfamethazine concentration in the potato seed tuber.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 5. High-performance liquid chromatography chromatogram (A) plant sample, (B) spiked plant sample, and (C) sulfamethazine standard. Asterisk (*) indicates sulfamethazine peak.

 




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education		 Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.