JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 27 June 2007
Published in J Environ Qual 36:1163-1171 (2007)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2006.0354
© 2007 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koschorreck, M.
Right arrow Articles by Tittel, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Koschorreck, M.
Right arrow Articles by Tittel, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Koschorreck, M.
Right arrow Articles by Tittel, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Wetlands and Aquatic Processes
Right arrow Surface Water Quality

Natural Alkalinity Generation in Neutral Lakes Affected by Acid Mine Drainage

Matthias Koschorreck* and Jörg Tittel

Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Dep. of Lake Research, Brückstr. 3a, D-39114 Magdeburg, Germany


Figure 2
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure S1. Frequency distribution of alkalinity generating processes in the dataset used for the present study. (A) log2 nitrogen burial, (B) log2 denitrification, (C) log10 net sulfate reduction and (D) log10 potential net sulfate reduction when methanogenesis is inhibited (PSR). Process rates were converted to alkalinity generation according to Eq. [2]. Labels of x axes denote class minima.

 

Figure 1
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Gross (squares) and net (dots) sulfate reduction rates plotted against sulfate concentrations in different lakes. Data from Tables S2 and S3 (in online supplemental information). Slopes of regressions (not shown) were not significant (p = 0.50, t = 0.68 and p = 0.32, t = 1.03 for net and gross rates, respectively).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.