JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 25 May 2007
Published in J Environ Qual 36:1050-1060 (2007)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2006.0265
© 2007 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fine, P.
Right arrow Articles by Hass, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fine, P.
Right arrow Articles by Hass, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fine, P.
Right arrow Articles by Hass, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Plant and Environment Interactions
Right arrow Soil Biology
Right arrow Ground Water Quality

Role of Organic Matter in Microbial Transport during Irrigation with Sewage Effluent

Pinchas Fine* and Amir Hass

Inst. of Soil, Water and Environmental Sciences, Volcani Center, ARO, Bet Dagan 50250 Israel. A. Hass, current address, USDA-ARS, Beaver, WV 25813 USA


Figure 1
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Leaching of fecal coliforms (FC) from sand-packed lysimeters irrigated with oxidation pond effluent. (A) Seasonal average FC counts, and (B) recoveries are presented (vertical bars denote standard errors) in the leachate from lysimeters that were either unplanted at LF 1 (NT-1) or planted with a Eucalyptus tree and maintained at LF 0.2 (T-0.2) or intermittent leaching (T-Int.) regimes. The sand was either not amended or amended with biosolids compost (BC) at a rate equivalent to 625 Mg ha–1.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Leaching of fecal coliforms (FC) from lysimeters packed with three soils and irrigated with oxidation pond effluent. (A) Seasonal average FC counts, and (B) recoveries are presented (vertical bars denote standard errors) in the leachate from lysimeters that were either unplanted at LF 1 (NT-1) or planted with a Eucalyptus tree and maintained at LF 0.2 (T-0.2).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Leaching of fecal streptococci (FS) from sand-packed lysimeters irrigated with oxidation pond effluent. (A) Seasonal average FS counts, and (B) recoveries are presented (vertical bars denote standard errors) in the leachate from lysimeters that were either unplanted at LF 1 (NT-1) or planted with a Eucalyptus tree and maintained at LF 0.2 (T-0.2) or intermittent leaching (T-Int.) regimes. The sand was either not amended or amended with biosolids compost (BC) at a rate equivalent to 625 Mg ha–1.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Leaching of fecal streptococci (FS) from lysimeters packed with three soils and irrigated with oxidation pond effluent. (A) Seasonal average FC counts, and (B) recoveries are presented (vertical bars denote standard errors) in the leachate from lysimeters that were either unplanted at LF 1 (NT-1) or planted with a Eucalyptus tree and maintained at LF 0.2 (T-0.2).

 

Figure 5
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Concentration of fecal coliforms in the leachate from sand-packed, oxidation pond effluent (OPE)-irrigated lysimeters in relation to the daily irrigation rate and daily OC loads. Data are presented for (A) unplanted lysimeters and (B) lysimeters planted with a Eucalyptus tree. The two sets of unplanted lysimeters received the same amounts of effluent as their planted counterparts (at LF 0.2 and at intermittent leaching regimes).

 

Figure 6
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Concentration of fecal coliforms (FC) in leachate from the oxidation pond effluent (OPE)-irrigated lysimeters in relation to organic carbon (OC) concentration in the leachate. Data are from all sand- and soil-packed, unplanted (at LF 1), and Eucalyptus planted lysimeters (at LF 0.2 and intermittent leaching), and from all the sampling events where both FC and OC data were available.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 7. Concentrations of fecal coliforms (FC) and fecal streptococci (FS) in leachate from the oxidation pond effluent (OPE)-irrigated lysimeters in relation to the carbonaceous biochemical oxygen demand (CBOD) concentration in the leachate. Data are from all sand- and soil-packed, unplanted (at LF 1), and Eucalyptus planted lysimeters (at LF 0.2 and intermittent leaching), and from all the sampling events where both bacteria (FC and/or FS) and CBOD data were available.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 8. Concentrations of fecal coliforms (FC) in leachate from the oxidation pond effluent (OPE)-irrigated lysimeters in relation to Cl concentration in the leachate. Data are from all sand- and soil-packed, unplanted (at LF 1), and Eucalyptus planted lysimeters (at LF 0.2 and intermittent leaching), and from all the sampling events where both FC and Cl data were available.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.