Published online 7 May 2007
Published in J Environ Qual 36:892-898 (2007)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2006.0235
© 2007 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
Sediment Phosphorus Extractants for Phosphorus-31 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Analysis
A Quantitative Evaluation
Joakim Ahlgrena,
Heidi De Brabanderea,
Kasper Reitzelb,
Emil Rydind,
Adolf Gogollc and
Monica Waldebäcka,*
a Dep. of Physical and Analytical Chemistry, Analytical Chemistry, Uppsala Univ., Box 599, 751 24 Uppsala, Sweden
b Inst. of Biology, Univ. of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark
c Dep. of Biochemistry and Organic Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, Uppsala Univ., Box 599, 751 24 Uppsala, Sweden
d Dep. of Ecology and Evolution, Limnology, Uppsala Univ., Box 573, 751 23 Uppsala, Sweden

View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Interaction plot, with standard deviations, of the main extractants and their dependence on pre-extraction procedures (from the top to the bottom, EDTA, BD, and none) for the total extracted amount of P. BD, bicarbonate buffered dithionite.
|
|

View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. Principal components analysis (PCA) of the individual organic P groups extracted by the various extractants. In the PCA, the triplicate pre-extraction procedures are labeled: A = None, B = BD, C = EDTA, and the triplicates of the main extraction procedures: 1 = NaOH, 2 = NaOH-EDTA. The scoreplot (to the left) indicates how the main extractants vary from each other, and the loading plot (to the right) indicates on which organic P compounds this depends. BD, bicarbonate buffered dithionite.
|
|
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.