JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 5 April 2007
Published in J Environ Qual 36:753-763 (2007)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2006.0081
© 2007 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gjettermann, B.
Right arrow Articles by Hansen, H. C. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gjettermann, B.
Right arrow Articles by Hansen, H. C. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gjettermann, B.
Right arrow Articles by Hansen, H. C. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Phosphorus
Right arrow Soil Chemistry

Sorption and Fractionation of Dissolved Organic Matter and Associated Phosphorus in Agricultural Soil

B. Gjettermanna,b,*, M. Styczena, S. Hansenb, O. K. Borggaardc and H. C. B. Hansenc

a DHI–Water and Environment, Dep. of Hydrology, Soil and Waste, Agern Allé 11, DK-2970 Hørsholm, Denmark
b The Univ. of Copenhagen, Faculty of Life Sciences, Højbakkegård Allé 9, DK-2630 Taastrup, Denmark
c The Univ. of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, DK-1871 Frederiksberg C, Denmark


Figure 1
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Effect of pH on dissolved organic carbon (DOC) sorption showing adsorbed DOC as function of DOC in solution with time for the Ap, EB, and Bt horizons. Left: pH 7, right: pH 5. Dots indicate average of two replicates.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Effect of pH on dissolved organic phosphorus (DOP) sorption showing adsorbed DOP as function of DOP in solution with time for the Ap, EB, and Bt horizons. Left: pH 7, right: pH 5. Dots indicate average of two replicates.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Simulated (Eq. [6], lines) and measured (dots) dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations vs. time of reaction for different initial concentrations of DOC added.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Simulated (Eq. [6], lines) and measured (dots) dissolved organic phosphorus (DOP) concentrations vs. time of reaction for different initial concentrations of DOP added.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Comparison of measured and simulated (Eq. [6]) values of dissolved organic C (DOC) (left) and dissolved organic P (DOP) (right) concentrations for all samples investigated. The line 1:1 indicates where a measured value is equal to a simulated value.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Fractionation of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and dissolved organic phosphorus (DOP) during sorption represented by the DOC/DOP ratios in solution vs. dissolved DOC concentration for Ap, EB, and Bt horizons at pH 7 (left) and pH 5 (right). Dots correspond to averages for all reaction times for each soil sample.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.