JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 25 January 2007
Published in J Environ Qual 36:453-463 (2007)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2006.0334
© 2007 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leytem, A. B.
Right arrow Articles by Brake, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leytem, A. B.
Right arrow Articles by Brake, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Leytem, A. B.
Right arrow Articles by Brake, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Waste Management
Right arrow Phosphorus

What Aspect of Dietary Modification in Broilers Controls Litter Water-Soluble Phosphorus

Dietary Phosphorus, Phytase, or Calcium?

A. B. Leytema,*, P. W. Plumsteadb, R. O. Maguirec, P. Kwanyuend and J. Brakeb

a USDA-ARS, Northwest Irrigation and Soils Research Lab., 3793 N. 3600 E., Kimberly, ID 83341-5076, USA
b Dep. of Poultry Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Campus Box 7608, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7608
c Crop and Soil Environmental Sciences Dep. (0404), Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061
d USDA-ARS, Soybean and Nitrogen Fixation Research Unit, 3127 Ligon St., Raleigh, NC 27607


Figure 1
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. The comparison of proportion of phytate P to total phosphorus in litters analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and 31P nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Dashed lines represent the 95% confidence intervals.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. The effect of dietary available phosphorus on litter total phosphorus concentrations for both non-phytase and phytase-amended diets.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. The relationship between litter phytate phosphorus concentration and litter total phosphorus concentration for all diets.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. The influence of dietary calcium to available phosphorus ratio on the litter water-soluble phosphorus concentration of both non-phytase and phytase-amended diets.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. The influence of dietary calcium to available phosphorus ratio on the litter water-soluble phosphorus to total phosphorus ratio of both non-phytase and phytase-amended diets.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. The relationship between litter phytate phosphorus to total phosphorus ratio and litter water-soluble phosphorus for both non-phytase and phytase-amended diets.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 7. The relationship between dietary calcium to available phosphorus ratio and the fraction of inorganic phosphorus (IP) in litter (determined by 31P nuclear magnetic resonance [NMR] spectroscopy) that was water-soluble.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.