JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 9 January 2007
Published in J Environ Qual 36:70-79 (2007)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2006.0254
© 2007 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Biasioli, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ajmone-Marsan, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Biasioli, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ajmone-Marsan, F.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Biasioli, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ajmone-Marsan, F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Toxic Trace Metals
Right arrow Urban Soils
Right arrow Heavy Metals
Right arrow Soil Pollution

Potentially Toxic Elements Contamination in Urban Soils

A Comparison of Three European Cities

M. Biasiolia,*, H. Grcmanb, T. Kraljb, F. Madridc, E. Díaz-Barrientosc and F. Ajmone-Marsana

a DI.VA.P.R.A., Chimica Agraria, Università di Torino, Via Leonardo da Vinci, 44, 10095 Grugliasco, Torino, Italy
b Univerza v Ljubljani, Biotehniska fakulteta, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
c Instituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiología de Sevilla (CSIC), Apartado 1052, 41080, Sevilla, Spain


Figure 1
View larger version (95K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Sampling locations in the three cities.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Particle size distribution (PSD) for all the samples.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Boxplots of the potentially toxic elements (PTE) contents (mg kg–1) in the three cities. Boxes represent interquartile ranges (IQR) and stars are outliers, calculated as the values below Q1–1.5·IQR and above Q3+1.5·IQR. Whiskers are range excluding outliers. Medians are marked in each box with a line, means with a dot.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Dendrogram for potentially toxic elements (PTE), pH, cation exchange capacity (CEC), organic carbon (OC), clay, and sand in all samples.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Boxplots of the potentially toxic elements (PTE) contents (mg kg–1) in the three cities according to land uses. Boxes represent interquartile ranges (IQR) and stars are outliers, calculated as the values below Q1–1.5·IQR and above Q3+1.5·IQR. Whiskers are range excluding outliers. Medians are marked in each box with a line, means with a dot. Numbers are median values.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Scatter of the sampling points on the plane of the first two principal components of the principal component analysis (PCA) after Varimax rotation. LJU, Ljubljana; SEV, Sevilla; TOR, Torino.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.