JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 9 January 2007
Published in J Environ Qual 36:280-290 (2007)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2006.0056
© 2007 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Centofanti, T.
Right arrow Articles by Flühler, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Centofanti, T.
Right arrow Articles by Flühler, H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Centofanti, T.
Right arrow Articles by Flühler, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Radionuclides
Right arrow Ecological Risk Assessment
Right arrow Other Environmental Contamination

Time-Dependent Distribution of Surface-Applied Radionuclides and their Recovery in Maize during the Growing Season

T. Centofantia,*, E. Frossarda and H. Flühlerb

a Plant Nutrition, Institute of Plant Sciences, ETH Zurich, Eschikon 33, CH-8315 Lindau (ZH) Switzerland
b Soil Physics, Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, ETH Zurich, Universitätstrasse 16, CH-8044 Zurich, Switzerland


Figure 1
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Plot design. (A) Overview of the layout in the field experiment. x = plants; gray rectangles = inner areas, traced with radionuclides and dyes; white areas = buffer area to minimize edge effects; black rectangles = instrumented trench close to the maize row (maize soil) and 50 cm from the experimental plots (vegetation-free soil); (B) sampling scheme in the inner areas.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Diagram of the daily rainfall intensity (mm d–1) measured during the plant growing season.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Volumetric water contents and matric potentials measured at different soil depths and at 5 and 40 cm from the maize row (as indicated in Fig. 1). The measurements were performed during the entire growing season.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Growth stage: pollen shed. Activities of 54Mn, 65Zn, 57Co, and 134Cs measured in the unstained soil matrix, in the stained preferential flow paths, and in the 2-cm fringe just outside the stained flow paths. Samples were taken at harvest time when plants reached pollen shed. Means and standard errors are given. The symbols *, **, and *** indicate significance at the 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001 probability levels, respectively; NS is not significant at the 0.05 probability level and ND is not detectable.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Growth stage: maturity. Activities of 54Mn, 65Zn, 57Co, and 134Cs measured in the unstained soil matrix, in the stained preferential flow paths, and in the 2-cm fringe just outside the stained flow paths. Samples were taken at harvest time when plants reached maturity. Means and standard errors are given. The symbols *, **, and *** indicate significance at the 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001 probability levels, respectively; while NS is not significant at the 0.05 probability level and ND is not detectable.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Growth stage: pollen shed. Relation between brilliant blue and the concentration of radionuclides in the three soil compartments: preferential flow paths; 2-cm fringe just outside the stained flow path areas; soil matrix; each point represents the average of the soil samples taken on horizontal profiles at 15-, 18-, 20-, 35-, 38-, and 40-cm depth. Samples were taken at harvest time when plants reached pollen shed. r denotes the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 7. Growth stage: maturity. Relation between brilliant blue FCF and the concentration of radionuclides in the three soil compartments analyzed: preferential flow paths; 2-cm fringe just outside the stained flow path areas; soil matrix; each point represents the average of the soil samples taken on horizontal profiles at 15-, 18-, 20-, 35-, 38-, and 40-cm depth. Samples were taken at harvest time when plant reached maturity. r denotes the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 8. Growth stage: pollen shed. Superimposed maps of root occurrence (black open circles) and fluorescence images of the distribution and concentration of the surface-applied fluorescent tracer (acid yellow 7). Horizontal profiles were cut at soil depths of 15, 18, 20, 35, 38, and 40 cm. Plants were at the pollen shed.

 

Figure 9
View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 9. Growth stage: maturity. Superimposed maps of root occurrence (black open circles) and fluorescence images of the distribution and concentration of the surface-applied fluorescent tracer (acid yellow 7). Horizontal profiles were cut at soil depths of 15, 18, 20, 35, 38, and 40 cm. Plants were at maturity.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.