JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 9 January 2007
Published in J Environ Qual 36:23-30 (2007)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2006.0205
© 2007 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, R. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, R. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Biogeochemical Processes
Right arrow Nutrient Management
Right arrow Soil Biology

Organic Agriculture and Nitrous Oxide Emissions at Sub-Zero Soil Temperatures

Rebecca L. Phillips*

USDA-ARS, Northern Great Plains Research Lab., Box 459, Mandan, ND 58554


Figure 1
View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Overall map of the field site area (47°01' N; 96°36' W), located in Clay County, MN where soil and gas flux sample were collected in the Red River Valley (RRV) agricultural region. Weather station location is also shown, from which continuous soil temperature data were collected. Above the regional map is an aerial photograph (2004) indicating proximity of organic field (T2O), conventional field (T2C), and reference site to each other.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Nitrous oxide flux partitioning for comparison between organically and conventionally managed soils collected in July and at 23% WFPS. Soils were incubated under ambient air, then under 10 Pa C2H2, then under 10 K Pa C2H2 at field moisture and temperature to determine sources of rates of N2O emissions and N produced during denitrification. Mean (n = 10) ± SEM are shown for each treatment and incubation.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Nitrous oxide flux and denitrification for intact core incubations at field moisture (40% WFPS) and temperature (–2.5°C) 17 d following T2O manure amendment. Soil cores were incubated under ambient air, then under 10 K Pa C2H2 to determine rates of N2O emissions and N produced during denitrification. Mean (n = 5) ± SEM are shown for each treatment and incubation.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Nitrous oxide fluxes (mean ± SEM) measured at the soil-atmosphere interface between 4 Aug. 2004 and 8 Apr. 2005 with respect to number of days following manure amendment application for organic (T2O), conventional (T2C), and reference sites. Soybeans were in both fields between days –112 and –55. Fields were fallowed between days –8 and 135.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Mean (± SD) for air and soil temperature collected manually at the field site for each field during flux sampling and soil temperature collected continuously at the weather station located north of the field site (see Fig. 1).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.