JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 9 January 2007
Published in J Environ Qual 36:135-143 (2007)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2006.0133
© 2007 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hunt, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Dail, D. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hunt, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Dail, D. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hunt, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Dail, D. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Sorption/Exchange
Right arrow Plant and Soil Interactions
Right arrow Soil Organic Matter

Influence of Decomposition on Chemical Properties of Plant- and Manure-Derived Dissolved Organic Matter and Sorption to Goethite

James F. Hunta, Tsutomu Ohnoa,*, Zhongqi Heb, C. Wayne Honeycuttb and D. Bryan Daila

a Dep. of Plant, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, Univ. of Maine, 5722 Deering Hall, Orono, ME 04469-5722, U.S.A.
b USDA-ARS, New England Plant, Soil, and Water Lab., Orono, ME 04469


Figure 1
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Water-soluble carbon content of the hydrophilic (HPL) and hydrophobic (HPB) fractions of eight plant and two animal manure residues before incubation (left bar) and after (right bar) a 10-d incubation with microbial inoculation. *, **, and *** designate significant difference between the fresh and decomposed total C content at the p = 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001 levels using the student's t test. NS indicates that the mean difference is not significant.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. The carboxyl and phenolic acid content of the hydrophilic and hydrophobic DOM fractions of the plant biomass- and animal manure-derived DOM before (left bar) and after decomposition (right bar). *, **, and *** designate significant difference between the fresh and decomposed total acidity content at the p = 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001 levels using the student's t test. NS indicates that the mean difference is not significant.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. The sorption onto goethite of 60 mg C L–1 solutions of the hydrophilic and hydrophobic DOM fractions of the plant biomass- and animal manure-derived DOM before and after decomposition. Error bars indicate standard deviation of the mean of three replicates. *, **, and *** designate significant difference at the p = 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001 levels using the student's t test between the fresh and decomposed means. NS indicates that the mean difference is not significant.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.