JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Published online 13 September 2006
Published in J Environ Qual 35:1914-1923 (2006)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2005.0379
© 2006 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sogbedji, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by McIsaac, G. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sogbedji, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by McIsaac, G. F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Sogbedji, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by McIsaac, G. F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Surface Water Quality
Right arrow Watershed and Landscape Processes
Right arrow Nutrients
Right arrow Coupled Flow/Transport Models
Right arrow Nitrogen

Evaluation of the ADAPT Model for Simulating Nitrogen Dynamics in a Tile-Drained Agricultural Watershed in Central Illinois

Jean M. Sogbedji and Gregory F. McIsaac*

Dep. of Natural Resources and Environmental Sci., Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, W503 Turner Hall, 1102 South Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL 61801 (Senior Author now at the School of Agronomy, Université de Lomé, B.P.1515 Lomé, Togo, West Africa)


Figure 1
View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1. Comparison between measured and simulated annual, monthly, weekly, and daily NO3-N load during the calibration period.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2. Residual values of simulated minus measured monthly NO3-N load during the calibration period.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3. Comparison between measured and simulated crop yield (harvest N) during the calibration period.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 4. Comparison between measured and simulated annual, monthly, weekly, and daily NO3-N load during the testing period.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 5. Comparison between measured and simulated crop yield (harvest N) during the testing period.

 




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education		 Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.