JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 6 July 2006
Published in J Environ Qual 35:1584-1598 (2006)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2005.0232
© 2006 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mosier, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, X. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mosier, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, X. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mosier, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, X. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Nitrogen
Right arrow Global Change
Right arrow Nutrient Cycling
Right arrow Tillage

Net Global Warming Potential and Greenhouse Gas Intensity in Irrigated Cropping Systems in Northeastern Colorado

Arvin R. Mosiera, Ardell D. Halvorsonb,*, Curtis A. Reuleb and Xuejun J. Liuc

a Agricultural and Biological Engineering Department, University of Florida, 281 Frazier Rogers Building, Museum Road, P.O. Box 110570, Gainesville, FL 32611
b USDA-ARS, 2150 Centre Avenue, Building D, Suite 100, Fort Collins, CO 80526-8119
c College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China


Figure 1
View larger version (37K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. (A) Daily minimum and maximum air temperature at the field site, April 2002–October 2004; and (B) soil temperature at a 5-cm depth, measured at the time of each gas flux measurement. Note the different temperature scales.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. (A) Precipitation and (B) irrigation at the field site, and (C) volumetric soil water content measured at the time of each gas flux measurement.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (34K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Soil–atmosphere CH4 exchange observations from 28 Apr. 2002 until 28 Oct. 2004 in (A) plots to which no fertilizer N was applied, (B) plots to which 134 kg N ha–1 fertilizer N was applied, and (C) plots fertilized with 202 kg N ha–1 in 2002 and 224 kg N ha–1 in 2003 and 2004. Note the different scales for CH4 flux.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (40K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Average soil–atmosphere exchange rates of CH4 during (A) the 2002, 2003, and 2004 growing seasons; and (B) during the fallow seasons, November–April of 2002–2004. Note the different scales for CH4 flux.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (38K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Soil–atmosphere exchange of CO2 from (A) unfertilized conventional-till continuous corn (CT-CC), no-till continuous corn (NT-CC), and no-till corn–soybean rotation (NT-CB) plots; (B) CT-CC and NT-CC plots fertilized with 134 kg N ha–1; and (C) CT-CC and NT-CC plots fertilized with 202 kg N ha–1 in 2002 and 224 kg N ha–1 in 2003 and 2004, and NT-CB plots fertilized with 202, 56, and 224 kg N ha–1 in 2002 (corn year), 2003 (soybean year), and 2004 (corn year), respectively.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (55K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Soil–atmosphere exchange of CO2 during (A) the 2002, 2003, and 2004 growing seasons (May–October); and (B) during the fallow seasons (November–April) 2002–2003 and 2003–2004. Note the different scales for seasonal CO2 flux.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (35K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Nitrous oxide flux rate observations made during 28 Apr. 2002 through 28 Oct. 2004 from (A) unfertilized conventional-till continuous corn (CT-CC), no-till continuous corn (NT-CC), and no-till corn–soybean rotation (NT-CB) plots; (B) CT-CC and NT-CC plots fertilized with 134 kg N ha–1 yr–1; and (C) CT-CC and NT-CC plots fertilized with 202, 224, and 224 kg N ha–1 in 2002, 2003, and 2004, respectively, and NT-CB plots fertilized with 202, 56, and 224 kg N ha–1 in 2002 (corn year), 2003 (soybean year), and 2004 (corn year), respectively. Note the different scales.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (42K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Seasonal averaged N2O fluxes during (A) the 2002, 2003, and 2004 growing seasons from plots fertilized at the rates of 0, 134, and 202 or 224 kg N ha–1 in conventional-till continuous corn (CT-CC) and no-till continuous corn (NT-CC) plots and 0 and 202, 0 and 56, and 0 and 224 kg N ha–1 in no-till corn–soybean rotation (NT-CB) plots in 2002 (corn year), 2003 (soybean year), and 2004 (corn year), respectively; and (B) the November through April 2002–2003 and 2003–2004 fallow seasons. Note the different scales.

 

Figure 9
View larger version (40K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Effect of N fertilizer rate on growing season N2O emissions in (A) 2002, (B) 2003, (C) 2004, (D) three-year average, and (E) all three years of data. Note the different scales.

 

Figure 10
View larger version (40K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10. Net global warming potential calculated (A) from changes in soil organic carbon (SOC) from 1999 to 2004; and (B) from soil respiration and crop residue input data for the conventional-till continuous corn (CT-CC) and no-till continuous corn (NT-CC) 0, 134, and high N (HN) kg N ha–1 N rate treatments. Note the different scales.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.