JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 31 May 2006
Published in J Environ Qual 35:1032-1039 (2006)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2005.0371
© 2006 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hita, R.
Right arrow Articles by Bigham, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hita, R.
Right arrow Articles by Bigham, J. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hita, R.
Right arrow Articles by Bigham, J. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Mining Wastes
Right arrow Toxic Trace Metals
Right arrow Soil Pollution

Experimental Oxidative Dissolution of Sphalerite in the Aznalcóllar Sludge and Other Pyritic Matrices

Raúl Hitaa, José Torrenta,* and Jerry M. Bighamb

a Departamento de Ciencias y Recursos Agrícolas y Forestales, Universidad de Córdoba, Edificio C4, Campus de Rabanales, 14071 Córdoba, Spain
b School of Environment and Natural Resources, The Ohio State University, 2021 Coffey Road, 210 Kottman Hall, Columbus, OH 43210-1085


Figure 1
View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Cross-section of the mechanical extractor used in the flow-through experiments (not to scale: syringe and sample tube diameter is ~4 cm).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. The pH of leachates of sludge and sludge–calcite samples as a function of the number of leaching steps in the flow-through experiment. Each value is the mean of two replicates. The standard error bar (two replicates) is not shown when its length is similar to or smaller than the size of the corresponding marker.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Cumulative amounts of (a) Fe, (b) Zn, and (c) S leached from sludge and sludge–calcite samples in the flow-through experiment. Each value is the mean of two replicates. The standard error bar (two replicates) is not shown when its length is similar to or smaller than the size of the corresponding marker. Despite the large standard errors for the sludge samples (solid symbols), the rates of leaching of either Fe, Zn, or S (as measured by the slope of the corresponding y–x regression line) did not differed significantly (P < 0.05) between replicates.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA)-, acetate-, citrate-, and citrate–ascorbate-extractable Fe and Zn before leaching and after four and eight leaching steps (flow-through experiment): (a) Fe in sludge, (b) Fe in sludge–calcite; (c) Zn in sludge, and (d) Zn in sludge–calcite. Error bars are standard errors (two replicates).

 

Figure 5
View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. The pH of leachates of pyrite, sphalerite, and 95% pyrite–5% sphalerite mixtures either with or without calcite as a function of the number of leaching steps in the flow-through experiment. Each value is the mean of two replicates. The standard error bar (two replicates) is not shown when its length is similar to or smaller than the size of the corresponding marker.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Cumulative amounts of (a) Fe, (b) Zn, and (c) S leached from pyrite, sphalerite, and 95% pyrite–5% sphalerite mixtures either with or without calcite as a function of number of leaching steps in the flow-through experiment. Each value is the mean of two replicates. The standard error bar (two replicates) is not shown when its length is similar to or smaller than the size of the corresponding marker.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. DTPA-, acetate-, citrate-, and citrate–ascorbate-extractable Zn before leaching and after four and eight leaching steps (flow-through experiment) in (a) sphalerite, (b) sphalerite–calcite, and (c) pyrite–sphalerite–calcite mixtures. Error bars are standard errors (two replicates).

 

Figure 8
View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. (a) Cumulative amounts of Zn leached from 95%–5% sludge–sphalerite mixtures either with or without calcite, and (b) extractable forms of Zn in 95% sludge–5% sphalerite mixtures mixed with calcite, as a function of number of leaching steps in the flow-through experiment. The standard error bar (two replicates) is not shown when its length is similar to or smaller than the size of the corresponding marker.

 

Figure 9
View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Amounts of Fe and Zn in the solution of suspensions of sludge and 95% sludge–5% sphalerite mixtures as a function of oxidation time. A logarithmic scale is used for the y axis to accommodate data better. According to the standard error values (not shown), differences between sludge and sludge + sphalerite are significant for Zn, but not Fe in solution.

 

Figure 10
View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10. Extractable Zn forms in the solids of suspensions of sludge and 95% sludge–5% sphalerite after 25 d of oxidation in the presence of calcite. Error bars are standard errors (two replicates).

 

Figure 11
View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 11. Amounts of Fe and Zn in the solution of pyrite–sphalerite suspensions (1.8 g of solids in 35 mL of water) after 36 d of oxidation as a function of the percentage of sphalerite in the mixture.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.