JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Published online 26 April 2006
Published in J Environ Qual 35:928-937 (2006)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2005.0409
© 2006 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zvomuya, F.
Right arrow Articles by Olson, B. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zvomuya, F.
Right arrow Articles by Olson, B. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Zvomuya, F.
Right arrow Articles by Olson, B. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Phosphorus
Right arrow Nutrient Management
Right arrow Soil Chemistry
Right arrow Soil Fertility and Productivity
Right arrow Animal Waste

Predicting Phosphorus Availability from Soil-Applied Composted and Non-Composted Cattle Feedlot Manure

Francis Zvomuyaa, Bobbi L. Helgasonb, Francis J. Larneya,*, H. Henry Janzena, Olalekan O. Akinremic and Barry M. Olsond

a Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research Centre, 5403 1st Avenue South, Lethbridge, AB, Canada T1J 4B1
b Land Resource Unit, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, Canada S7N 5A8
c Department of Soil Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada R3T 2N2
d Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, 5401 1st Avenue South, Lethbridge, AB, Canada T1J 4V6


Figure 1
View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1. Cumulative canola biomass at each of the 10 harvests in the bioassay. Vertical bars represent standard errors.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2. Modified Kelowna-extractable soil P measured at each of the 10 harvests in the bioassay. Vertical bars represent standard errors.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3. Cumulative phosphorus uptake (CPU) by canola plants measured at each of the 10 harvests in the bioassay. Vertical bars represent standard errors.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 4. Predicted amendment-derived cumulative phosphorus uptake (ACPU) values (mg kg–1 amendment) from the one-factor partial least squares (PLS) model versus observed values for composted and non-composted manures used in the bioassay.

 




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education		 Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.