JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 3 April 2006
Published in J Environ Qual 35:726-733 (2006)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2005.0119
© 2006 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lindblom, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Pilon-Smits, E. A. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lindblom, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Pilon-Smits, E. A. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lindblom, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Pilon-Smits, E. A. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Toxic Trace Metals
Right arrow Sulfur
Right arrow Bioremediation and Biodegradation
Right arrow Cell Biology & Molecular Genetics

Constitutive Expression of a High-Affinity Sulfate Transporter in Indian Mustard Affects Metal Tolerance and Accumulation

Stormy Dawn Lindbloma, Salah Abdel-Ghanya, Brady R. Hansona, Seongbin Hwangb, Norman Terryc and Elizabeth A. H. Pilon-Smitsa,*

a Biology Department, Colorado State University, Anatomy/Zoology Building, Fort Collins, CO 80523
b Department of Molecular Biology, Sejong University, Kwangjin-Gu Kunja-Dong 98, Seoul 143-747, Korea
c Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California at Berkeley, 111 Koshland Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720


Figure 1
View larger version (80K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Transcript levels of S. hamata SHST1 in transgenic Indian mustard lines. Total RNA was isolated from 3-wk-old wild-type (WT) and SHST1 overexpressing (SHST1-4C and SHST1-12C) Indian mustard plants. (A) Ethidium bromide-stained gel showing total RNA loading. (B) Autoradiogram of RNA blot after hybridization with 33P-labeled SHST1 cDNA.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (44K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Seedling metal tolerance for wild-type (WT) and SHST1 overexpressing (SHST1-4C and SHST1-12C) Indian mustard plants. Shown is the ratio of seedling root length grown on medium containing metal(loid) relative to root length on control medium. The form and concentration used for each metal(loid) is described in Materials and Methods. Shown are means ± SE (n = 36). The letters above the bars indicate statistically significant differences between groups (ANOVA with pairwise post-hoc analyses, {alpha} = 0.05).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (47K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Seedling metal accumulation for wild-type (WT) and SHST1 overexpressing (SHST1-4C and SHST1-12C) Indian mustard plants. Shown is the shoot metal concentration after 7 d of growth on agar medium supplied with a metal(loid) to a concentration as indicated in Materials and Methods. Shown are means ± SE (n = 5 samples pooled from 14 plants each). The letters above the bars indicate statistically significant differences between groups (ANOVA with pairwise post-hoc analyses, {alpha} = 0.05).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (40K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Mature plant metal tolerance for wild-type (WT) and SHST1 overexpressing (SHST1-4C and SHST1-12C) Indian mustard plants. Shown is the ratio of plant fresh weight when grown on medium containing metal(loid) relative to its fresh weight on control medium. The form and concentration used for each metal(loid) is described in Materials and Methods. Shown are means ± SE (n = 10). The letters above the bars indicate statistically significant differences between groups (ANOVA with pairwise post-hoc analyses, {alpha} = 0.05).

 

Figure 5
View larger version (39K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Mature plant shoot metal accumulation for wild-type (WT) and SHST1 overexpressing (SHST1-4C and SHST1-12C) Indian mustard plants. Shown is the shoot metal concentration after hydroponically grown plants were treated for 14 d with a metal(loid) concentration as indicated in Materials and Methods. Shown are means ± SE (n = 10). The letters above the bars indicate statistically significant differences between groups (ANOVA with pairwise post-hoc analyses, {alpha} = 0.05).

 

Figure 6
View larger version (60K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Mature plant root metal accumulation for wild-type (WT) and SHST1 overexpressing (SHST1-4C and SHST1-12C) Indian mustard plants. Shown is the root metal concentration after hydroponically grown plants were treated for 14 d with a metal(loid) concentration as indicated in Materials and Methods. Shown are means ± SE (n = 5 samples pooled from two plants each). The letters above the bars indicate statistically significant differences between groups (ANOVA with pairwise post-hoc analyses, {alpha} = 0.05)

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.