JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Published online 3 April 2006
Published in J Environ Qual 35:714-725 (2006)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2005.0337
© 2006 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J.
Right arrow Articles by Rolston, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J.
Right arrow Articles by Rolston, D. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J.
Right arrow Articles by Rolston, D. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Global Change
Right arrow Spatial Variability
Right arrow Tillage

Tillage and Field Scale Controls on Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Juhwan Leea,*, Johan Sixa, Amy P. Kingb, Chris van Kessela and Dennis E. Rolstonb

a Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616
b Department of Land, Air, and Water Resources, University of California, Davis, CA 95616


Figure 1
View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1. Location of the study site. The sampling points along the two north–south transects are indicated with crosses.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2. Temporal changes in the cumulative amount of greenhouse gas fluxes at field moisture and 75% water holding capacity (WHC) conditions (n = 20 for each treatment). Arrow indicates when samples were brought up to 75% WHC. Bars indicate the standard error of the mean. ST, standard tillage; NT, no-tillage.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3. Temporal changes in CO2 production rates, net N2O emission rates, and CH4 consumption rates at field moisture and 75% water holding capacity (WHC) conditions (n = 20 for each treatment). Arrow indicates when samples were brought up to 75% WHC. Bars indicate the standard error of the mean. ST, standard tillage; NT, no-tillage.

 




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education		 Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.