JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Published online 2 February 2006
Published in J Environ Qual 35:450-458 (2006)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2005.0316
© 2006 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Furman, O.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Furman, O.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Furman, O.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Remediation
Right arrow Ecological Risk Assessment
Right arrow Heavy Metals
Right arrow Soil Pollution

Risk Assessment Test for Lead Bioaccessibility to Waterfowl in Mine-Impacted Soils

Olha Furmana, Daniel G. Strawna,*, Gary H. Heinzb and Barbara Williamsa

a University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-2339
b Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, MD 20708


Figure 1
View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1. The pH effect on Pb extractability in the waterfowl physiologically based extraction test gizzard phase. Error bars are standard deviations of triplicates (R2 = 0.97).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2. Extraction time effect on Pb solubility in the waterfowl physiologically based extraction test gizzard phase. Error bars are standard deviations of triplicates.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3. Effect of grinding on Pb extractability in the waterfowl physiologically based extraction test gizzard phase. Error bars are standard deviations of triplicates.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 4. Relationship between Pb concentrations in the waterfowl physiologically based extraction test gizzard phase and soil/fluid ratio in the simulated gizzard solution (R2 = 0.96).

 

Figure 5
View larger version (10K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 5. Correlations between (a) gizzard Pb concentrations and (b) log gizzard Pb concentrations in the waterfowl physiologically based extraction test and Pb concentrations in the blood (blood Pb data from Heinz et al., 2004).

 

Figure 6
View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 6. Bioaccessible Pb from P-amended and unamended soils from the Lower Coeur d'Alene River Basin. The W-PBET Pb concentrations were logarithmically transformed to allow a better relative comparison with respect to waterfowl bioavailability. Error bars are standard deviations (n = 4).

 




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education		 Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.