JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 7 November 2005
Published in J Environ Qual 34:2263-2277 (2005)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2004.0398
© 2005 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Page, T.
Right arrow Articles by Wood, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Page, T.
Right arrow Articles by Wood, G. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Page, T.
Right arrow Articles by Wood, G. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Water Quality
Right arrow Watershed and Landscape Processes
Right arrow Surface Hydrology
Right arrow Spatial Distribution

Spatial Variability of Soil Phosphorus in Relation to the Topographic Index and Critical Source Areas

Sampling for Assessing Risk to Water Quality

Trevor Pagea, Philip M. Haygarthb,*, Keith J. Bevena, Adrian Joynesb, Trisha Butlerb, Chris Keelera, Jim Freera, Philip N. Owensc and Gavin A. Woodd

a Environmental Science Department, University of Lancaster, Lancaster, LA1 4YQ, UK
b Soil Science and Environmental Quality Team, Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, North Wyke Research Station, Okehampton, Devon, EX20 2SB, UK
c National Soil Resources Institute, Cranfield University, North Wyke Research Station, Okehampton, Devon, EX20 2SB, UK
d National Soil Resources Institute, Cranfield University, Silsoe, Bedfordshire, MK45 4DT, UK



View larger version (61K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Plan view of the Den Brook catchment showing (a) a schematic layout of main catchment features including subclassified areas (see sector key in Table 1) and (b) soil sampling transects and locations overlaying a topographic index map of the catchment. Codes refer to transect identification (see Table 3). The term ln({alpha}/tan ß) denotes the topographic index, where {alpha} is the upslope contributing area to a given point in the catchment and ß is the local surface slope angle.

 


View larger version (56K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Plan view of the Drewston catchment showing (a) a schematic layout of main catchment features including subclassified areas (see sector key in Table 1) and (b) soil sampling transects and locations overlaying a topographic index map of the catchment. Codes refer to transect identification (see Table 4). The term ln({alpha}/tan ß) denotes the topographic index, where {alpha} is the upslope contributing area to a given point in the catchment and ß is the local surface slope angle. The wetland is located downstream of the arrow identifying transect MFG1–MFG8.

 


View larger version (8K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Box and whisker plots for Den Brook and Drewston showing distributions of Olsen P (0- to 7.5-cm depth) for all spatial samples. The boxes show the lower quartile, median, and upper quartile and the whiskers show the minimum and maximum concentrations measured.

 


View larger version (53K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Spatial plot of Olsen P (0- to 7.5-cm depth) results for Den Brook. Note that the size of the circles indicates relative magnitude of P concentration (see legend for minima and maxima, Table 1 for sector descriptions, and Table 3 for full results).

 


View larger version (56K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Spatial plot of Olsen P (0- to 7.5-cm depth) results for Drewston. Note that the size of the circles indicates relative magnitude of P concentration (see legend for minima and maxima, Table 1 for sector descriptions, and Table 4 for full results).

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. The variation of concentration with depth for Olsen P, water-soluble total phosphorus (WSTP), and water-soluble reactive phosphorus (WSRP) for (a) Den Brook and (b) Drewston. See Tables 5 and 6 for standard deviations.

 


View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Scatter plots showing topographic index [ln({alpha}/tan ß)] vs. Olsen P (0- to 7.5-cm depth) concentration for (a) Den Brook and (b) Drewston.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. A comparison of distributions of Olsen P (0- to 7.5-cm depth) concentrations measured in the present study (black columns) and concentrations from the National Soil Inventory (NSI) database for similar land use and soil type for (a) Den Brook and (b) Drewston.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.