JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Published online 7 November 2005
Published in J Environ Qual 34:2112-2117 (2005)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2005.0083
© 2005 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dayton, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Basta, N. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dayton, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Basta, N. T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Dayton, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Basta, N. T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Surface Water Quality
Right arrow Best Management Practices
Right arrow Phosphorus
Right arrow Nutrients
Right arrow Runoff

Use of Drinking Water Treatment Residuals as a Potential Best Management Practice to Reduce Phosphorus Risk Index Scores

E. A. Dayton* and N. T. Basta

School of Natural Resources, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210



View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1. Relationship between reduction in runoff P and drinking water treatment residual (WTR) Langmuir phosphorus adsorption maxima (Pmax) normalized across WTR application of 5, 10, and 20 Mg ha–1 (Pmax x WTR application).

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2. Relationship between (A) percent reduction in 0.01 M calcium chloride–extractable phosphorus (CaCl2–P) and drinking water treatment residual (WTR) Langmuir phosphorus adsorption maxima (Pmax) normalized across WTR application (Pmax x WTR application) for incorporation of WTR at 25, 50, and 100 g kg–1 and (B) percent reduction in Mehlich 3–extractable P and Pmax normalized across WTR application (Pmax x WTR application) for incorporation of WTR at 25, 50, and 100 g kg–1.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3. Relationship between reduction 0.01 M calcium chloride–extractable phosphorus (CaCl2–P) and drinking water treatment residual (WTR) Langmuir phosphorus adsorption maxima (Pmax) normalized across WTR application (Pmax x WTR application) for WTR co-blended with poultry litter at 100, 250, and 500 g WTR kg–1.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 4. Relationship between reduction 0.01 M calcium chloride–extractable phosphorus (CaCl2–P) and drinking water treatment residual (WTR) Langmuir phosphorus adsorption maxima (Pmax) normalized across WTR application (Pmax x WTR application) for WTR co-blended with biosolids at 125, 250, and 375 g WTR kg–1.

 




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education		 Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.